My understanding is that Beethoven asked someone (cannot recall who) to transcribe the
Grosse Fugue for piano

4[/b] hands. In the event he was dissatisfied with the results and subsequently transcribed it himself. Thus it was his last piano work.
Originally posted by Antonius Hamus:
I would recall reading somewhere that he did so because he feared the work wouldn't be published otherwise, and that it might be lost to posterity.
That wouldn't surprise me. After all he agreed with Clementi's request to convert the D major Violin Concerto to a piano concerto. (A horrid version- moments of piercing eloquence reduced to quasi-music box effect. What was Beethoven smoking?) But Clementi's argument that piano concertos were more marketable than violin concertos did make sense...
Antonius, you're (like me) a fan of Charles Rosen's writings. You recall that Rosen takes no prisoners in his insistence that the
Grosse Fugue be returned to its original place as finale of the great Bb Quartet.
But Beethoven's new finale works well in its own right -a completely different solution to the "finale" problem- and I should not want to second guess the master. At least with CDs, we can program the quartet either way!
Similar case with Mahler 6: Scherzo or Andante first? (For the record, I'm
firmly in the "Scherzo first" camp, dissenting opinions in a recent
Gramophone notwithstanding.)
Amongst recordings, I've always loved the Quartetto Italiano.
(A moderator really needs to move this thread where it belongs...)