PianoSupplies.com (a division of Piano World) Piano & music accessories, music theme decoratons, tuning & repair tools, moving equipment, party goods,music gift items, ... more
Free shipping on Jansen Artist Benches.
|
|
64864 Members
40 Forums
132496 Topics
1893458 Posts
Max Online: 15252 @ 03/21/10 11:39 PM
|
|
|
#1181728 - 04/16/09 05:29 PM
Re: Why isn't Scott Joplin's music "classical"?
[Re: Otis S]
|
Full Member
Registered: 11/23/08
Posts: 275
|
One of the most perfect performances of the Pineapple Rag I have seen. I never liked or understood this piece until I saw this performance: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MoH5eo-XaDgYou can critisize and dislike Ragtime and Joplin all you like, but at the end of the day, what you say is merely your own personal opinion, and not fact. To actually come into this thread and post so much bulloni and state it with the word 'fact' in the same post where you say Joplins music apparantly had something to do with the depression of the 30's, 10+ years after he died, is such laughable ignorance that you only make yourself look daft.
_________________________
Currently working on: Joplin - Maple Leaf Rag (finished) Magnetic Rag (finished :)) The Entertainer Stoptime Rag Pineapple Rag The Chrysanthemum Reflection Rag - Lots of rags to learn  .
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#1181747 - 04/16/09 06:00 PM
Re: Why isn't Scott Joplin's music "classical"?
[Re: Wood-demon]
|
Full Member
Registered: 02/02/09
Posts: 421
Loc: New York City
|
"Also could you wait until next week to dump phantom of the opera in the garbage? It's almost full from all the stuff I wrote last week and all the stage materials and assorted knick knacks, not to mention Michael Crawford and all those other people will take up a lot of room and it taxes the compactor. The last time we threw out a broadway musical we had to spend weeks cleaning all the cat hair out of the machinery."
I'm afraid I put that out years ago, and it wasn't in the recycling bag; I felt that Lord Lloyd-Webber has done quite enough re-cycling of other people's material over the years.
Can we throw away Bolero and Melody in F too? They've been mouldering around for ages.Also Ives. I've only heard one of his pieces but since we're being pretentious twits lets just toss the whole thing out. Edit : I know, Burl or Charles? Better do both to make sure. I mean, ok somebody maybe likes it, but who cares? Our tastes are supreme and we will govern what is good, and what is crap, for all eternity.
Edited by Hrodulf (04/16/09 06:13 PM)
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#1181768 - 04/16/09 07:07 PM
Re: Why isn't Scott Joplin's music "classical"?
[Re: Hrodulf]
|
500 Post Club Member
Registered: 10/25/07
Posts: 607
Loc: UK
|
"Also could you wait until next week to dump phantom of the opera in the garbage? It's almost full from all the stuff I wrote last week and all the stage materials and assorted knick knacks, not to mention Michael Crawford and all those other people will take up a lot of room and it taxes the compactor. The last time we threw out a broadway musical we had to spend weeks cleaning all the cat hair out of the machinery."
I'm afraid I put that out years ago, and it wasn't in the recycling bag; I felt that Lord Lloyd-Webber has done quite enough re-cycling of other people's material over the years.
Can we throw away Bolero and Melody in F too? They've been mouldering around for ages.Also Ives. I've only heard one of his pieces but since we're being pretentious twits lets just toss the whole thing out. Edit : I know, Burl or Charles? Better do both to make sure. I mean, ok somebody maybe likes it, but who cares? Our tastes are supreme and we will govern what is good, and what is crap, for all eternity. If it wasn't for Melody in F, Gershwin might not have taken an interest in music. I'll keep that one. Maybe it's fair enough to style oneself a pretentious twit in seeking to comment on the value of music when one's experience of it is obviously so limited. Some others who post here have opinions that are more informed. Such others also tend to give an indication of why they think this, that or the other is good, bad or indifferent rather than just stating that "It's a matter of opinion" or "I like it, so there!" To go back to the the original purpose of this thread, I think the "Classical world of Music" for want of a better term has passed its judgement on Joplin pretty decisively. Opera houses are not falling over themselves to stage Treemonisha and concert pianists aren't noticeably keen to programme his works in their recitals or even give them as encores. Quite who plays them nowadays I've no idea. There was certainly interest in his music in the early 1970 mainly as a result of the movie "The Sting" but I haven't heard any of his music (apart from the rather boring experience of playing the records of Treemonisha tonight) for years.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#1181792 - 04/16/09 07:36 PM
Re: Why isn't Scott Joplin's music "classical"?
[Re: Wood-demon]
|
Full Member
Registered: 02/02/09
Posts: 421
Loc: New York City
|
"Also could you wait until next week to dump phantom of the opera in the garbage? It's almost full from all the stuff I wrote last week and all the stage materials and assorted knick knacks, not to mention Michael Crawford and all those other people will take up a lot of room and it taxes the compactor. The last time we threw out a broadway musical we had to spend weeks cleaning all the cat hair out of the machinery."
I'm afraid I put that out years ago, and it wasn't in the recycling bag; I felt that Lord Lloyd-Webber has done quite enough re-cycling of other people's material over the years.
Can we throw away Bolero and Melody in F too? They've been mouldering around for ages.Also Ives. I've only heard one of his pieces but since we're being pretentious twits lets just toss the whole thing out. Edit : I know, Burl or Charles? Better do both to make sure. I mean, ok somebody maybe likes it, but who cares? Our tastes are supreme and we will govern what is good, and what is crap, for all eternity. If it wasn't for Melody in F, Gershwin might not have taken an interest in music. I'll keep that one. Maybe it's fair enough to style oneself a pretentious twit in seeking to comment on the value of music when one's experience of it is obviously so limited. Some others who post here have opinions that are more informed. Such others also tend to give an indication of why they think this, that or the other is good, bad or indifferent rather than just stating that "It's a matter of opinion" or "I like it, so there!" To go back to the the original purpose of this thread, I think the "Classical world of Music" for want of a better term has passed its judgement on Joplin pretty decisively. Opera houses are not falling over themselves to stage Treemonisha and concert pianists aren't noticeably keen to programme his works in their recitals or even give them as encores. Quite who plays them nowadays I've no idea. There was certainly interest in his music in the early 1970 mainly as a result of the movie "The Sting" but I haven't heard any of his music (apart from the rather boring experience of playing the records of Treemonisha tonight) for years. You are apparently unaware of the concepts of sarcasm and satire! But in any event, yes, ragtime is not classical music, it is popular music. Oh and if you were trying to prove you aren't pretentious back there, being, um, pretentious was probably not the best way to go about it. Just a tip if any arguments come up in the future, and you try to win by proving the person you're having an argument with right. That usually doesn't work.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#1181794 - 04/16/09 07:39 PM
Re: Why isn't Scott Joplin's music "classical"?
[Re: Hrodulf]
|
Full Member
Registered: 04/24/08
Posts: 164
|
There seems to be a large undercurrent of implying that piano is aristocratic, which was my previous topic. I agree with the notion that classical just refers to a period in the history of piano literature, of which ragtime did not belong to.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#1181803 - 04/16/09 07:47 PM
Re: Why isn't Scott Joplin's music "classical"?
[Re: Wise Idiot]
|
Full Member
Registered: 02/02/09
Posts: 421
Loc: New York City
|
There seems to be a large undercurrent of implying that piano is aristocratic, which was my previous topic. I agree with the notion that classical just refers to a period in the history of piano literature, of which ragtime did not belong to. Hodges' point, which I think got lost here, was what made the difference is that ragtime was created for public consumption, which made it popular, rather than classical.
Edited by Hrodulf (04/16/09 07:47 PM)
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#1181817 - 04/16/09 08:04 PM
Re: Why isn't Scott Joplin's music "classical"?
[Re: Hrodulf]
|
Full Member
Registered: 02/14/09
Posts: 95
|
There seems to be a large undercurrent of implying that piano is aristocratic, which was my previous topic. I agree with the notion that classical just refers to a period in the history of piano literature, of which ragtime did not belong to. Hodges' point, which I think got lost here, was what made the difference is that ragtime was created for public consumption, which made it popular, rather than classical. weren't mozarts opera's also created for public consumption?
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#1181820 - 04/16/09 08:06 PM
Re: Why isn't Scott Joplin's music "classical"?
[Re: Acquiescence]
|
Full Member
Registered: 02/02/09
Posts: 421
Loc: New York City
|
There seems to be a large undercurrent of implying that piano is aristocratic, which was my previous topic. I agree with the notion that classical just refers to a period in the history of piano literature, of which ragtime did not belong to. Hodges' point, which I think got lost here, was what made the difference is that ragtime was created for public consumption, which made it popular, rather than classical. weren't mozarts opera's also created for public consumption? Read this link: http://www.frederickhodges.com/is%20ragtime%20classical%20music.htmlHere I will give you the cliff's notes: In short, the published score in ragtime sheet music is not the same thing as the published score of a work by Chopin or Liszt. Chopin’s sheet music was not published in order to sell copies to the masses. It was designed to represent and preserve the genius of the composer for the benefit of other professional pianists, composers, and serious music students. The cost of publication was frequently underwritten by wealthy aristocratic patrons. Market forces did not determine or constrain classical musical publication.
In stark contrast, ragtime compositions, like all other popular music, were published with the express goal of making money. The composer’s only intention was to sell copies of his piece, thus, he was perfectly willing to see a professional arranger transform his manuscript — or, in most cases, transcribe his live performance — into a manageable and saleable format that would adhere to the strict conventions of popular music publishing. Get it now? There was no mass market for selling scores of operas in Mozart's day and the operas were sponsored by an aristocratic figure and therefore were designed especially for their tastes and delectation. That's the difference.
Edited by Hrodulf (04/16/09 08:11 PM)
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#1181830 - 04/16/09 08:39 PM
Re: Why isn't Scott Joplin's music "classical"?
[Re: Hrodulf]
|
3000 Post Club Member
Registered: 06/08/08
Posts: 3913
Loc: Seattle area, WA
|
There have been many good arguments for and against classifying Joplin's music as classical but one thing I haven't yet seen openly addressed is the likely possibility that racism kept his music from being recognized as "legitimate". Joplin wrote during a time when racial bigotry was rampant.
Jeff Clef wrote "Joplin's works did not make it to the conservatories until the 1970's and thereafter regain the attention of a wider public," no doubt because of the popularity of the film "The Sting".
It is only in the year 2009 that we in the USA are finally crawling out of the shadow of racism.
_________________________
Best regards,
Deborah
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#1181835 - 04/16/09 08:52 PM
Re: Why isn't Scott Joplin's music "classical"?
[Re: gooddog]
|
Full Member
Registered: 02/02/09
Posts: 421
Loc: New York City
|
There have been many good arguments for and against classifying Joplin's music as classical but one thing I haven't yet seen openly addressed is the likely possibility that racism kept his music from being recognized as "legitimate". Joplin wrote during a time when racial bigotry was rampant.
Jeff Clef wrote "Joplin's works did not make it to the conservatories until the 1970's and thereafter regain the attention of a wider public," no doubt because of the popularity of the film "The Sting".
It is only in the year 2009 that we in the USA are finally crawling out of the shadow of racism.
Racism is without a doubt the reason we lost so much of Scott Joplin's longer form work. Treemonisha was preserved only in the form of the piano score, it had to be re-orchestrated by others. There was no publication market for ballet, opera or musicals by a black composer at that time (although Joplin attempted another opera, the score of which is lost; we can presume that Joplin intended to publish it eventually but we will never know what would have happened; it is theorized that the reason he broke with Stark was Stark's refusal to publish his longer form works), and what was not published ended up not being preserved. It is only because Joplin's ragtime was commercially in demand that we have it today. So in short, society in Joplin's time was willing to accept ragtime from a black composer, but was not interested in ballet, opera or musicals. It was not until years later, with "Shuffle Along," that a musical written by blacks broke this race barrier.
Edited by Hrodulf (04/16/09 08:54 PM)
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#1181841 - 04/16/09 08:57 PM
Re: Why isn't Scott Joplin's music "classical"?
[Re: BJones]
|
Full Member
Registered: 02/02/09
Posts: 421
Loc: New York City
|
There seems to be a large undercurrent of implying that piano is aristocratic One has only to watch Chico Marx play the piano in one of the Marx Brother's films to scientifically dispel that idea! Lol, they always played the poor characters trying to pull the wool over the eyes of the rich people. Half of the jokes were at the expense of some dowager who didn't even notice she was getting played. That's why they were so funny!
Edited by Hrodulf (04/16/09 08:59 PM)
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#1182099 - 04/17/09 09:08 AM
Re: Why isn't Scott Joplin's music "classical"?
[Re: Hrodulf]
|
500 Post Club Member
Registered: 12/16/08
Posts: 527
Loc: Dublin, Ireland
|
When you have composers fostered by an educated and wealthy elite the chances are they will produce superior work. The proof is in the pudding re the European great classical composers .
Joplins social milieu was not inspirational. Its a last ditch argument to play the ethnic and poverty card as if this added some cachet to his music. This type of liberal thought impoverishes everybody.
The USA has had a good century of superior living standards yet no real classical composers have emerged on a par with the European Greats. I suspect this is because of the false egalitarianism widespread in that society.
Trying to elevate Joplin to the halls of classicism is merely the whimper of a failed liberal experiment.
_________________________
vcz
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#1182131 - 04/17/09 10:10 AM
Re: Why isn't Scott Joplin's music "classical"?
[Re: gooddog]
|
2000 Post Club Member
Registered: 11/16/06
Posts: 2672
Loc: Western Canada
|
There have been many good arguments for and against classifying Joplin's music as classical but one thing I haven't yet seen openly addressed is the likely possibility that racism kept his music from being recognized as "legitimate". Joplin wrote during a time when racial bigotry was rampant.
Jeff Clef wrote "Joplin's works did not make it to the conservatories until the 1970's and thereafter regain the attention of a wider public," no doubt because of the popularity of the film "The Sting".
It is only in the year 2009 that we in the USA are finally crawling out of the shadow of racism. Oh, such a good point!!! Heard someone say that if you just play the white keys on a piano, it would just not sound as good without playing the black keys too! So one needs to play "the black and white keys" and then we have real harmony! Sometimes I think classical players are racist! Just my take!
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#1182139 - 04/17/09 10:18 AM
Re: Why isn't Scott Joplin's music "classical"?
[Re: Mocheol]
|
3000 Post Club Member
Registered: 06/08/08
Posts: 3913
Loc: Seattle area, WA
|
When you have composers fostered by an educated and wealthy elite the chances are they will produce superior work. The proof is in the pudding re the European great classical composers .
Joplins social milieu was not inspirational. Its a last ditch argument to play the ethnic and poverty card as if this added some cachet to his music. This type of liberal thought impoverishes everybody.
The USA has had a good century of superior living standards yet no real classical composers have emerged on a par with the European Greats. I suspect this is because of the false egalitarianism widespread in that society.
Trying to elevate Joplin to the halls of classicism is merely the whimper of a failed liberal experiment.
This post is so absurd, I won't even comment.
_________________________
Best regards,
Deborah
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#1182143 - 04/17/09 10:24 AM
Re: Why isn't Scott Joplin's music "classical"?
[Re: gooddog]
|
500 Post Club Member
Registered: 12/16/08
Posts: 527
Loc: Dublin, Ireland
|
Deborah, Your viewpoint is not tenable. First you comment and then deny that you have commented. Whos being absurd?
_________________________
vcz
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#1182144 - 04/17/09 10:28 AM
Re: Why isn't Scott Joplin's music "classical"?
[Re: Mocheol]
|
500 Post Club Member
Registered: 04/10/07
Posts: 634
|
Aren't you late for a drunken brawl, Mocs?
Oh, what's that? I shouldn't erroneously stereotype an entire nation? What about a whole hemisphere?
I never understood that line from "Blazing Saddles"...until now...
Edited by JDelmore (04/17/09 10:28 AM)
_________________________
PTG Associate Member
"There is always room above; there is only the ground below."....F.E. Morton (with props to Del F.)
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#1182155 - 04/17/09 10:43 AM
Re: Why isn't Scott Joplin's music "classical"?
[Re: Mocheol]
|
Full Member
Registered: 02/02/09
Posts: 421
Loc: New York City
|
When you have composers fostered by an educated and wealthy elite the chances are they will produce superior work. The proof is in the pudding re the European great classical composers .
Joplins social milieu was not inspirational. Its a last ditch argument to play the ethnic and poverty card as if this added some cachet to his music. This type of liberal thought impoverishes everybody.
The USA has had a good century of superior living standards yet no real classical composers have emerged on a par with the European Greats. I suspect this is because of the false egalitarianism widespread in that society.
Trying to elevate Joplin to the halls of classicism is merely the whimper of a failed liberal experiment.
Yes, Scott Joplin's surviving output is not classical music, it is popular music. But you go beyond the distinction and say that classical music is categorically better from an artistic perspective. You are entitled to your opinion. I think you're wrong. I'm entitled to my opinion just as you are yours. I find Euphonic Sounds, Magnetic Rag, Solace and Scott Joplin's New Rag to be sublime compositions and a sad indication of what we lost through his early death. If you don't like Scott Joplin's music then don't listen to it. There. Problem solved. Edit: technically speaking the opera may count as classical as it is unlikely Joplin wrote it to sell scores or recordings. So the rags are popular music, the opera probably not. But the distinction gets murkier because we don't know the full circumstances and once again we are discussing a point which really isn't relevant to the music or its intrinsic value.
Edited by Hrodulf (04/17/09 10:49 AM)
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#1182157 - 04/17/09 10:45 AM
Re: Why isn't Scott Joplin's music "classical"?
[Re: Diane...]
|
Full Member
Registered: 02/02/09
Posts: 421
Loc: New York City
|
Oh, such a good point!!!
Heard someone say that if you just play the white keys on a piano, it would just not sound as good without playing the black keys too! So one needs to play "the black and white keys" and then we have real harmony!
Sometimes I think classical players are racist!
Just my take!
You are apparently blissfully unaware of the virulent racism that was rampant during Scott Joplin's time.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#1182164 - 04/17/09 11:04 AM
Re: Why isn't Scott Joplin's music "classical"?
[Re: Hrodulf]
|
2000 Post Club Member
Registered: 11/16/06
Posts: 2672
Loc: Western Canada
|
Oh, such a good point!!!
Heard someone say that if you just play the white keys on a piano, it would just not sound as good without playing the black keys too! So one needs to play "the black and white keys" and then we have real harmony!
Sometimes I think classical players are racist!
Just my take! You are apparently blissfully unaware of the virulent racism that was rampant during Scott Joplin's time. Now why would you judge me like that? Why are you telling me what I know and what I don't know? I'm blonde! and am always having to justify my intelligence! (Now where can I get myself some "going brunette" hair dye!!! Then maybe I won't be stereotyped!)  EDIT: changed i to I
Edited by Diane... (04/17/09 11:05 AM)
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#1182173 - 04/17/09 11:19 AM
Re: Why isn't Scott Joplin's music "classical"?
[Re: Diane...]
|
Full Member
Registered: 02/02/09
Posts: 421
Loc: New York City
|
Oh, such a good point!!!
Heard someone say that if you just play the white keys on a piano, it would just not sound as good without playing the black keys too! So one needs to play "the black and white keys" and then we have real harmony!
Sometimes I think classical players are racist!
Just my take! You are apparently blissfully unaware of the virulent racism that was rampant during Scott Joplin's time. Now why would you judge me like that? Why are you telling me what I know and what I don't know? I'm blonde! and am always having to justify my intelligence! (Now where can I get myself some "going brunette" hair dye!!! Then maybe I won't be stereotyped!)  EDIT: changed i to I If you don't want your flippant comments about a serious topic to be judged, then you shouldn't post them.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#1182178 - 04/17/09 11:32 AM
Re: Why isn't Scott Joplin's music "classical"?
[Re: Hrodulf]
|
2000 Post Club Member
Registered: 11/16/06
Posts: 2672
Loc: Western Canada
|
Oh, such a good point!!!
Heard someone say that if you just play the white keys on a piano, it would just not sound as good without playing the black keys too! So one needs to play "the black and white keys" and then we have real harmony!
Sometimes I think classical players are racist!
Just my take! You are apparently blissfully unaware of the virulent racism that was rampant during Scott Joplin's time. Now why would you judge me like that? Why are you telling me what I know and what I don't know? I'm blonde! and am always having to justify my intelligence! (Now where can I get myself some "going brunette" hair dye!!! Then maybe I won't be stereotyped!)  EDIT: changed i to I If you don't want your flippant comments about a serious topic to be judged, then you shouldn't post them. You leave me speechless!!! I'll just leave you with this quote! "Don't take life too seriously, you'll never get out of it alive anyway!" 
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#1182182 - 04/17/09 11:38 AM
Re: Why isn't Scott Joplin's music "classical"?
[Re: Diane...]
|
Full Member
Registered: 02/02/09
Posts: 421
Loc: New York City
|
Oh, such a good point!!!
Heard someone say that if you just play the white keys on a piano, it would just not sound as good without playing the black keys too! So one needs to play "the black and white keys" and then we have real harmony!
Sometimes I think classical players are racist!
Just my take! You are apparently blissfully unaware of the virulent racism that was rampant during Scott Joplin's time. Now why would you judge me like that? Why are you telling me what I know and what I don't know? I'm blonde! and am always having to justify my intelligence! (Now where can I get myself some "going brunette" hair dye!!! Then maybe I won't be stereotyped!)  EDIT: changed i to I If you don't want your flippant comments about a serious topic to be judged, then you shouldn't post them. You leave me speechless!!! I'll just leave you with this quote! "Don't take life too seriously, you'll never get out of it alive anyway!"  Yes apparently I was wrong in taking the life and work of an important American composer seriously. How humiliating. Hope you weren't kidding in your last post.
Edited by Hrodulf (04/17/09 11:38 AM)
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#1182197 - 04/17/09 11:54 AM
Re: Why isn't Scott Joplin's music "classical"?
[Re: Hrodulf]
|
2000 Post Club Member
Registered: 11/16/06
Posts: 2672
Loc: Western Canada
|
Oh, such a good point!!!
Heard someone say that if you just play the white keys on a piano, it would just not sound as good without playing the black keys too! So one needs to play "the black and white keys" and then we have real harmony!
Sometimes I think classical players are racist!
Just my take! You are apparently blissfully unaware of the virulent racism that was rampant during Scott Joplin's time. Now why would you judge me like that? Why are you telling me what I know and what I don't know? I'm blonde! and am always having to justify my intelligence! (Now where can I get myself some "going brunette" hair dye!!! Then maybe I won't be stereotyped!)  EDIT: changed i to I If you don't want your flippant comments about a serious topic to be judged, then you shouldn't post them. You leave me speechless!!! I'll just leave you with this quote! "Don't take life too seriously, you'll never get out of it alive anyway!"  Yes apparently I was wrong in taking the life and work of an important American composer seriously. How humiliating. Hope you weren't kidding in your last post. I strangely believe we are arguing for the same cause. But I can't quite convince you of that. Because you obviously already know what I know and what I don`t know! You are probably a mind reader too! Guess what I`m thinking now!!!!
Edited by Diane... (04/17/09 11:55 AM)
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#1182205 - 04/17/09 12:04 PM
Re: Why isn't Scott Joplin's music "classical"?
[Re: Diane...]
|
Full Member
Registered: 02/02/09
Posts: 421
Loc: New York City
|
I strangely believe we are arguing for the same cause. But I can't quite convince you of that. Because you obviously already know what I know and what I don`t know!
You are probably a mind reader too! Guess what I`m thinking now!!!!
Judging from your posts I don't believe you've been thinking at all this entire time. So it's really a trick question.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#1182238 - 04/17/09 01:05 PM
Re: Why isn't Scott Joplin's music "classical"?
[Re: Hrodulf]
|
500 Post Club Member
Registered: 12/16/08
Posts: 527
Loc: Dublin, Ireland
|
Hrodulf, You have agreed that Joplins music is not classical.
Most educated musicians regard classical music as the most superior art form.
I would hope this thread would categorize Joplin and it believe it has:
Scott Joplin ; non-classical minor composer {USA}.Enjoyed brief popularity in the 1970s due to The Sting[movie] but interest currently relegated to a small coterie of Ragtime piano aficionados. Joplin lovers are anxious to have their hero canonized in the halls of classical music fame.This task is proving very difficult since no major opera house or professional classical piano player seem to show much interest in Joplins music
_________________________
vcz
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#1182254 - 04/17/09 01:30 PM
Re: Why isn't Scott Joplin's music "classical"?
[Re: Mocheol]
|
1000 Post Club Member
Registered: 07/08/08
Posts: 1367
Loc: Miami, Florida, USA
|
For what it's worth, I attended a recital last night; Gershwin was programmed in between Haydn and Liszt.
I personally don't consider Gershwin's music "Classical", but it held its own last night (as it always does in my opinion) and I very much enjoyed it.
Saying something is not "Classical" says nothing about the quality of the music.
Daniel
_________________________
Currently working on: -Dane Rudhyar's Stars from Pentagrams No 3
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#1182258 - 04/17/09 01:33 PM
Re: Why isn't Scott Joplin's music "classical"?
[Re: Mocheol]
|
Full Member
Registered: 02/02/09
Posts: 421
Loc: New York City
|
Hrodulf, You have agreed that Joplins music is not classical.
Most educated musicians regard classical music as the most superior art form.
I would hope this thread would categorize Joplin and it believe it has:
Scott Joplin ; non-classical minor composer {USA}.Enjoyed brief popularity in the 1970s due to The Sting[movie] but interest currently relegated to a small coterie of Ragtime piano aficionados. Joplin lovers are anxious to have their hero canonized in the halls of classical music fame.This task is proving very difficult since no major opera house or professional classical piano player seem to show much interest in Joplins music Different, yes we are in agreement. Superior is a matter of subjective judgment. I don't judge music, as you do, by who likes it, and where it is played. Your prejudices are betrayed by your reasoning. And as Einstein said, "It is harder to crack a prejudice than an atom." Please take my advice and don't listen to ragtime. That will solve your ragtime problem. Your apparent insecurity problem, however, will have to await the attentions of a therapist.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#1182265 - 04/17/09 01:44 PM
Re: Why isn't Scott Joplin's music "classical"?
[Re: Mocheol]
|
6000 Post Club Member
Registered: 08/15/06
Posts: 6163
Loc: Briarcliff Manor, NY, USA
|
Most educated musicians regard classical music as the most superior art form. Your assertion is not not tenable. Superior is an absolute term; something cannot be "more superior" or "the most superior." You are being absurd. Steven
_________________________
 "There are two means of refuge from the miseries of life: music and cats." —Albert Schweitzer
Chopin: Allegro de Concert Op. 46 Schumann: Toccata Op. 7 Fauré: Ballade Op. 19
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|