|
Welcome to the Piano World Piano Forums Over 3 million posts about pianos, digital pianos, and all types of keyboard instruments. Over 100,000 members from around the world.
Join the World's Largest Community of Piano Lovers
(it's free)
It's Fun to Play the Piano ... Please Pass It On!
|
|
70 members (BillS728, aphexdisklavier, bobrunyan, anotherscott, AaronSF, apianostudent, beeboss, brdwyguy, 19 invisible),
2,255
guests, and
372
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 9,230
9000 Post Club Member
|
9000 Post Club Member
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 9,230 |
17mm is the present Hamburg spec which is also available via Renner USA. 15.5 mm is the distance .....
Disclaimer: nontech opinion Sorry, I did not see that - nevermind other authorithies are welcome (gimme your little secrets ya !!! )
Professional of the profession. Foo Foo specialist I wish to add some kind and sensitive phrase but nothing comes to mind.!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 9,230
9000 Post Club Member
|
9000 Post Club Member
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 9,230 |
distance from the screw to the hammer center (modern flange ) : 34.5 mm
Old flange : 33.5 mm
if the original spread was 112.8 Ok it may be playeable (sometime after shimming the whippen flange) but it can be easely seen that the jack does not place well under the roller (and that particularely if the original roller was at 115.5 or 116 mm, then no way it will not work smoothly even if you move the jack the farther possible). That is when you have to order new whippens and have the stack rebuild.
Last edited by Kamin; 11/25/09 02:25 PM.
Professional of the profession. Foo Foo specialist I wish to add some kind and sensitive phrase but nothing comes to mind.!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 109
Full Member
|
OP
Full Member
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 109 |
Thank you Kamin >This is the basis of the problem with old actions the key leverage is often high (big advantage on the key side) and the stack is accelerating more than actually. When you use modern parts compromises are necessary ,like shimming below the whippen flange to get to a better spread, but then the key need a long keydip so the hammer stroke is 45mm (at last) I have thought. It is a difficult problem. Anyway I decided to change a hammer flange rail cross for a new thing.
Last edited by A=443; 11/26/09 08:51 AM.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 9,230
9000 Post Club Member
|
9000 Post Club Member
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 9,230 |
I guess Steinway part dpt have some suiteable parts. Problem with the old whippens is that you cant regulate the jack position, (only with a felt) .
Abel makes flanges with the small dimension, but I never tried them. You need samples to experiment. the ribbon on the rail is somewhat thick (1.1 mm).Some use bushing strips there. The rails are cracked and may be changed if you see the drop screw making waves. On older instruments the screws dont hold very well so better directly have the stack rebuild (specialists are rare) . On the German rails you will also need new thicker screws. A completly new stack cause a lot of problems generally because the spacing of the screws is not the same on old models.
Professional of the profession. Foo Foo specialist I wish to add some kind and sensitive phrase but nothing comes to mind.!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 9,230
9000 Post Club Member
|
9000 Post Club Member
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 9,230 |
Rebuiliding correctly or even only changing the heads and shank on an old Steinway is always somewhat tricky. Experience and a little reflexion helps(in the end !).
Basic setups are availeables that works, but in any case you have to understand hammer and shank weight to be used.
That said I've seen a professional pianist that refuse to feel the 80 g downweight and 11 + key dip of its old model B with a modern hammer and shank installed, and pretend it have a normal touch !
Professional of the profession. Foo Foo specialist I wish to add some kind and sensitive phrase but nothing comes to mind.!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 109
Full Member
|
OP
Full Member
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 109 |
Hi kamin >Rebuiliding correctly or even only changing the heads and shank on an old Steinway is always somewhat tricky. Experience and a little reflexion helps(in the end !).
I think so too,
>That said I've seen a professional pianist that refuse to feel the 80 g downweight and 11 + key dip of its old model B with a modern hammer and shank installed, and pretend it have a normal touch !
I was interested very much and surprised. Thanks
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 9,230
9000 Post Club Member
|
9000 Post Club Member
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 9,230 |
I exagerated a tad, but I recall measuring with the weighs more than 70 gr in the medium range. despite the shimming of the whippen flange)
Seen also a tech that had baught a new Steinway hammer set with shanks/flange for his model D from 1920 +- and was unable even to get the jack under the roller, it slips off the roller always..
experiment to get more spread, it goes in the good direction. What kind of hammers do you want to use ?
Professional of the profession. Foo Foo specialist I wish to add some kind and sensitive phrase but nothing comes to mind.!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 32,060
Yikes! 10000 Post Club Member
|
Yikes! 10000 Post Club Member
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 32,060 |
The new shanks should work with a 1920s Steinway, but you need to adjust the jack rest position. Those were made adjustable in the 1890s, so it should not be a problem.
Semipro Tech
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 9,230
9000 Post Club Member
|
9000 Post Club Member
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 9,230 |
Your experience ? may be the D was before 1920 I am unsure but not before 1900 (a German model) no way to have the jack under the roller.
a lot of things differ when the roller is at 15.5 mm, and if you can t get to 112 mm spread at last you have touch problems.
How much is the distance from the whippen center to the jack center on 1920 whippens ?
Last edited by Kamin; 11/28/09 07:26 PM.
Professional of the profession. Foo Foo specialist I wish to add some kind and sensitive phrase but nothing comes to mind.!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 32,060
Yikes! 10000 Post Club Member
|
Yikes! 10000 Post Club Member
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 32,060 |
If there is no fly button, Steinway sells shanks to fit made by Renner. If there is a button, but it does not move far enough, you can bend the spoon.
Semipro Tech
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 9,230
9000 Post Club Member
|
9000 Post Club Member
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 9,230 |
I will ask them, but to my knowledge , no flange with the old dimension, only shanks with the roller at 16 mm are availeable both from Steiway and renner (but Renner makes some parts that are only availeable from Steinway)
Also, to my knowledge, Steinwy NY uses and make sits own flanges and shanks, I'll let you know what they say.
Moving the spoon ,why not but if the spread is not good , no way to have touch. Aint just a question to place the jack under the roller , unfortunately, but one need to be pianist to feel that the action is not acting normally.
Professional of the profession. Foo Foo specialist I wish to add some kind and sensitive phrase but nothing comes to mind.!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 2,685
2000 Post Club Member
|
2000 Post Club Member
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 2,685 |
I am assuming that an action may be in the process of analysis here so pardon me if I am wrong and for thinking out loud for a few minutes. Curious if you think that spread has more impact on leverage in regard to whippen and key ratios - if the hammer flange center position in regard to spread changes slightly because of new shank flanges, I would think that the overall impact is less than moving the whippen rail. I would need to experiment with that. I do not find that a spread of 113mm is anything magical. Increasing the spread gives more leverage but has a price and that is more required key dip - If your action is already at 11mm you cannot go in that direction. Not certain how the verticle dimension of whippen center to string means anything for action placement - I have found that having the whippen centers paralell to the keybed is an advantage but what can be done with the distance to the strings? It is certainly good to have the whippen centers paralell to the hammer shank centers. I have used the 64mm verticle dimension between the two - it also works on other pianos than Steinway. Note that altering this verticle dimension will also change the spread and could be used to help with jack knuckle alignment issues (slightly). It also slightly alters leverage as lowering it will travel the key capstan whippen heal interface toward the whippen rail. I mention this only in the context that if this dimension is not close or varies somewhat, it pays to correct it. Things that have not been mentioned: How many leads in the keys and what is the pattern from bass to treble? How heavy are the original hammers and how heavy are the new ones? 70 grams down was mentioned but what about up? It sounds like the hammers are too heavy for the action and there also may be too few key leads. Great topic - got my curiousity going.
x-rpt retired ptg member
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 32,060
Yikes! 10000 Post Club Member
|
Yikes! 10000 Post Club Member
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 32,060 |
What I find odd about this is that since Steinway action rails are soldered together, the spread is not adjustable. So why worry about what it is? You have to live with it.
Semipro Tech
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 9,230
9000 Post Club Member
|
9000 Post Club Member
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 9,230 |
Hello Gene,
Thanks for your loud think ! I do the same, sometime it helps !
No an action is not yet there in analysis but I am expecting a NY mod M (L ?) from the 1910-20 years, for stack soldering, and I am about to work on a mod O from the same era but German (there analysis will begin shortly).
I am unsure I expressed myself well, to me the corect spread, change leverage a bit, and as you said if you are at 11 mm keydip you have passed the limit. I anyway try not to go as far and to have 10.25 max (it depend to the keyboard as well) .
It does not change directly the action ratio so much, even if when in the 80's to obtain a heavy touch which was in the trend, some makers where using up to 115 spread on the Renner action (with heavy hammers)
But Steinway rails have to be changed and that is the occasion to get to the normal spread for an action, then the jack align well under the roller, which I find important. (in fact I could even move the old rail if I fell it may be useful, but the jig is not easy to make)
I will answer later, but the elegant solution for old actions is to have new keys made with an higher KR ratio, then new parts will fit and we can place the magic line better.
Now is modern hammer and its weight a must on an old 1920 Steinway, to me, it only depends of the soundboard and level of dynamic availeable. I believe we are obliged to needle so much new heads on old pianos that the advantage is not so high, so I am looking for intermediate solution, may be with 16 mm from shank and 9 mm roller, so lighter hammers are counteracted with highers speed , which in the end lend to better tone than too heavy hammers for the soundboard. DO you know which ratio (measured, or weighted) is considered good for this kind of setup ? and which original Steinway action ratio in the 1920 on "small models" S - B (while B is different I guess).
Thanks for participating, I'll write later.
Isaac
Last edited by Kamin; 11/29/09 06:41 AM.
Professional of the profession. Foo Foo specialist I wish to add some kind and sensitive phrase but nothing comes to mind.!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 9,230
9000 Post Club Member
|
9000 Post Club Member
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 9,230 |
changing the spread will change the whippen leverage mostly, and the shank leverage also a little, but geometry of parts prevails there, for me. I guess only for the whippen centre placement, this measure have been given to me for old German model without explication, then, on a given action sketch the first place to be find is the whippen center because it is the end of the magic line, while from the instrument point of view, the first place to be find is the strike line.
Pure thinking, but the whippen pin height once well placed, you can asess the hammer bore, as then you will know how high will be the hammer center.
That said no practical method to find it out of a sketch.
If Steinway NY action have the same 64 mm spread, they may be use the same wedging than the German ones (I've read somewhere the wedging was different) BTW I regularely find German Steinways from 1910 -1930 who, to my surprize, where shipped to USA or Mexico immediateley.
I have another thinking about the placement of the capstan under the whippen heel (frankly toward the back) as the better compromise to have the sharps passing the magic line.
I'll make anbother thread about that.
Last edited by Kamin; 11/29/09 07:22 AM.
Professional of the profession. Foo Foo specialist I wish to add some kind and sensitive phrase but nothing comes to mind.!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 2,685
2000 Post Club Member
|
2000 Post Club Member
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 2,685 |
Kamin, I think that you should consider contacting Wessell Nickle and Gross http://www.wessellnickelandgross.com/ to get a sample parts kit for experiment. Their whippens have infinitely more options for design modifications and threrfore are highly adaptable. When combined with their shanks that have variable knuckle positioning you would appreciate these new alternatives. Matching hammer mass to soundboard is something that I am only now begining to learn but is more adapted to new soundboards where the design is understood and the scale is part of this. I have not found consistency with Steinway action dimensions. I measure overall action ratio = hammer travel divided by key travel and attempt to alter/lower it so it is closer to 5.0 when practical. For the Steinway, moving key capstans and or altering knuckle spread are the most simple options, and as mentioned they are not the only options. I also like to measure key ratios across the action. As the keys shorten form bass to treble, their ratios should remain the same. If not then this is a clue that the placement of the balance rail is not correct or the key capstan line is skewed or the whippen rail is not positioned correct or all of the above. This is where I have learned to appreciate the position of the whippen rail and the 64mm spread to the hammer rail.
x-rpt retired ptg member
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 9,230
9000 Post Club Member
|
9000 Post Club Member
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 9,230 |
Hi Gene ! what I say about the hammer weight relate more to the tone ability of the soundboard. Old boards are saturating sooner than new ones, but give also a longer sustain that compensates somehow. That is one of the correct way of thinking, I guess that then it may be better in the end to use not to hard hammers, not too heavy hammers, and using a higher ratio if possible then the hammer acceleration may be higher. (what was intended in first place, generally, BTW) This last provide also some compensation for the pianist, and the piano is not to be used in concertos, only chamber music, so to say. Trading weight for speed in the intention of providing enough key resistance in the end, seem appropriate for old Steiwnays, then one have to use the special heads made by Renner for older Steiwnays, even if this is not well accepted when an estimation of the value is made by Steinwnay. Even in the 60's the original heads where lighter in some regions of the instrument. Some prefer that kind of tone, also. But I did not rebuild so many Steinway actions , customers dont have always enough budget to get there. Thanks for the Wessel&Gross parts, even just for experimentation they may be interesting, I'll consider buying a sample kit. Their presentation and documents are well done (but I like the feel of wooden parts because it vibrates more than synthetics so it "tones" a bit). SHortening of key ratio is generally intended to provide faster acceleration in the treble, the ratio may change it is not a problem, what is is if sharps get too far from magic line (or the whole setup) often you'll see the capstan line moving as well. We may think twice before saying that this or this is a mistake from the maker, it may be based on an idea that does not provide the expected result, or the setup is fine with original parts in good condition, and the slights differences provided by adapteable parts (like the very slightly taller Renner whippens) bring us just slightly off the best place. Yes on Steinway's every mm may count, some are really on the edge... but they also are very tolerant, one can generally have them playable even if the feel is not perfect. problem is with professional pianists that knows what they want ! (or with some techs which are too much nit picky or play piano themselves !)
Last edited by Kamin; 11/29/09 06:25 PM.
Professional of the profession. Foo Foo specialist I wish to add some kind and sensitive phrase but nothing comes to mind.!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 2,685
2000 Post Club Member
|
2000 Post Club Member
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 2,685 |
I respect the connection to wood action parts. Is it not true that designers try to minimize the string energy that bleeds back into the action? I believe that WNG parts offer so many solutions to geometry issues that any sympathetic sound they produce or do not produce is not an issue of any consequence. In fact, the stiffness of the shank may allow in increase in energy transfer to the string and minimize action saturation. Just my opinion. There is a completed restoration in a shop where I sometimes visit, with WNG shanks. Not one person that played it had a comment about them. Some were accomplished pianists. As the parts are so new, my opinion is evolving but I like what I see so far.
x-rpt retired ptg member
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 9,230
9000 Post Club Member
|
9000 Post Club Member
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 9,230 |
Well I really don't know. just that makers take care of the sound and vibes radiating from the keys and keybed, and that I fell something missing with the actions id carbon fiber. (like Shigeru). What misses I can't say. String energy may effectively remain on the string side, but I guess it is mostly adbsorbed by the hammer "suspension zone", I guess that impact coming from the hammer center, and vibes from the shank only transfers partially towards the action to the keys.
"resonnances" of the hammer shank seem important part of the percussion tone, in the treble anyway.
I can feel the difference between the strong original Steinway shanks and the replacement parts which are one mm less in diameter. I can even perceive the difference between a hammer glued with hide glue and one glued with Vynil glue.
We don't really know what happens that makes the tone, it may be an addition of events happening within the action, the sound body, case and even the plate.
Nowadays,a s you say WNG parts allow for so much setups that I would like to have some. I hope the set contains more than one whippen of each sort, as it is easier to test more than 1 note each time (bass/medium/treble, sharps/whites). I'll have a assortiment, then I'll have an idea of their quality as well, pinning, cloths, gluing, rigidity etc.
Indeed I can't get it why Renner did not do something like Tokiwa, I guess they like to sell their complete solution eventually computing it for you, more than having their parts incorrectly used. At last that is what they seem to say, and I know I can always ask for a replacement part if I give data for the problem they will send me a whippen with the correct size and leverage.
Nowadays I like to understand what may be possible and what is not, so I can choose among solutions.
Last edited by Kamin; 11/30/09 06:26 PM.
Professional of the profession. Foo Foo specialist I wish to add some kind and sensitive phrase but nothing comes to mind.!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 9,230
9000 Post Club Member
|
9000 Post Club Member
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 9,230 |
litle update while exchanging with some head tech from a factory.
Whippen is level at half stroke, tendancy to leave the hammer without overcentering when new, (it will be overcentering after a few shapings) and the best respect of roller/jack alignment at rest (action placed so it is optimum).
other thoughts but too difficult to explain in english at that time ..
Professional of the profession. Foo Foo specialist I wish to add some kind and sensitive phrase but nothing comes to mind.!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Piano
by Gino2 - 04/17/24 02:34 PM
|
Piano
by Gino2 - 04/17/24 02:23 PM
|
|
Forums43
Topics223,408
Posts3,349,457
Members111,637
|
Most Online15,252 Mar 21st, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|