|
Welcome to the Piano World Piano Forums Over 3 million posts about pianos, digital pianos, and all types of keyboard instruments. Over 100,000 members from around the world.
Join the World's Largest Community of Piano Lovers
(it's free)
It's Fun to Play the Piano ... Please Pass It On!
|
|
75 members (AaronSF, apianostudent, beeboss, brdwyguy, benkeys, Abdulrohmanoman, 17 invisible),
2,261
guests, and
445
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 168
Full Member
|
Full Member
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 168 |
In theory, it's very simple. Your keyboard triggers a virtual piano on your computer using its midi output and then you record the sound of the virtual piano. Unfortunately the reality is that there are a lot of variables that can make the process a bit more difficult, but it can be done. If you have a relatively new computer and a decent sound card, IMHO, you're halfway there.
That's not the way it's typically done. Most people would choose to record the signal that is the "most un-processed" so as to preserve their options. What you'd do is first capture the performance to a MIDI file. Then later in post production listen to the track as it plays through a software piano and decide on the piano sound that is best for that piece. Then maybe you notice a mistake and you edit that out. Next you work on the audio, maybe adding some EQ or reverb. Listen on monitors and then headphones. Software reverb units have a half dozen "knobs" that you can tweak Then finally you master this onto your output media, be that a CD or MP3. This is very straightforward when you have just one instrument. ChrisA, I did a pretty bad job explaining what I meant because everything you said I agree with. I guess I was a little too concise.
Yamaha U3 SH2 Roland RD-800
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 168
Full Member
|
Full Member
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 168 |
Do you and any other posters have any sound examples of what you've done and what equipment you're using? I think it would be great to hear what post-production editing can do. I've heard this question asked once or twice before so here's a website I'm just finishing up. BlackGrand.comI thought it would be better if, rather than just throw up another personal blog, I make a site that others can actually benefit from. It is an experiment, to a certain degree, since I realize that there are a lot of different ways to share your music already. I just thought it would be helpful to people who are looking into a certain piece of equipment or software to be able to here and see what others are already doing. This is sort of an unofficial announcement since I'm planing on posting a new topic to make it more widely known but I thought it was appropriate to mention here since it goes along with what Morodiene was asking.
Yamaha U3 SH2 Roland RD-800
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 17,391
Yikes! 10000 Post Club Member
|
OP
Yikes! 10000 Post Club Member
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 17,391 |
Certainly, setchman...thanks for posting this!
private piano/voice teacher FT
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 457
Full Member
|
Full Member
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 457 |
Blackgrand is interesting.
Have you considered providing your midis so we could create wave/mp3 files using our sources of sound?
Glenn
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 17,391
Yikes! 10000 Post Club Member
|
OP
Yikes! 10000 Post Club Member
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 17,391 |
That's a cool idea Glenn! And setchman, I love the song Breaking Out...it's gorgeous! I also love the sound of the piano there.
private piano/voice teacher FT
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 168
Full Member
|
Full Member
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 168 |
Thanks for the feedback. I didn't intend on hijacking this thread so I just posted a new one.
Glenn,
I hadn't thought of that but I don't have a problem sharing my midis. I'll get them posted when I have a chance.
Yamaha U3 SH2 Roland RD-800
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 3,842
3000 Post Club Member
|
3000 Post Club Member
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 3,842 |
...My goal is to make it sound as acoustic as possible . I've heard it done, so I'm looking to figure out how. I've listened to the recording quality on a stereo with good speakers and headphones too. I'm not sure what you mean by cloning the track. Can you pleas explain? You copy a section of the music. If you've got a midi capture then you can select (with a mouse) just one voice. and copy it to a parallel track. Then the trick is to make it slightly different and mix to the final stereo mix Some drastic things you can do might be to transpose the pitch and assign the track to (say) a string section and mix that sound under the piano. Once I made a string bass line from the roots of the left hand chords and then moved it down an octave. A more subtle trick is to copy a track, delay it by a few milliseconds (3 to 12) and add it back. this adds "space" to the sound and such a small delay does not sound like an echo. You can also do both. Once for fun I recorded a four hands piano plus bass guitar, woodwind and drum version of a theme from Greig's "morning mood" It was grossly over produced but fun to try. Back then I could only play "one finger piano" so it took hours to "play" all the parts. To make the DP sound "acoustic" you really do have to put it in a mix. But mix it with what Well an altered copy of itself Last night I think I decided that DPs sound and play different than acoustics because the DPs are near perfect while the acoustics not. (I had signed out a practice room at the college and inside was a 20+ year old Kawai piano that is literally played 12 hours a day, 6 days a week and gets tuning about every second year.) To get that sound, you are going to have to "adjust" some pitches to make them "off" slightly. I'm serious, de-tune the DP using the software. Perfection is a dead give away that the piano is digital. I actually got this idea from the service manual for a Hammond organ I have, I cautions NOT to attempt "perfect" tune because the slight key to key "error" is what gives the Hammond it's characteristic sound. So maybe flatten and sharpen a few keys by one or two "cents"
Last edited by ChrisA; 12/02/09 08:19 PM.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 2,462
2000 Post Club Member
|
2000 Post Club Member
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 2,462 |
Morodiene, There are some walk throughs on Mahlzeit's site. www.pianoclues.comLook under MIDI and Recording in the categories and you will find plenty of information. Rich
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 17,391
Yikes! 10000 Post Club Member
|
OP
Yikes! 10000 Post Club Member
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 17,391 |
Interesting idea, Chris, but it sounds right, acoustics aren't perfect and so these imperfections make it work. It sounds a bit sophisticated for me, but I'll have to give it a try. I can't wait to be well again so I can go into my studio and play with this stuff. Of course, I'll have to teach then .
private piano/voice teacher FT
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 17,391
Yikes! 10000 Post Club Member
|
OP
Yikes! 10000 Post Club Member
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 17,391 |
Morodiene, There are some walk throughs on Mahlzeit's site. www.pianoclues.comLook under MIDI and Recording in the categories and you will find plenty of information. Rich That looks like a great resource, Rich. thanks!
private piano/voice teacher FT
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 17,391
Yikes! 10000 Post Club Member
|
OP
Yikes! 10000 Post Club Member
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 17,391 |
OK, so here's what I've been able to figure out so far. Below are two samples of the same music, one a recording directly from my FP-7 as a wav file via an Edirol UA-1ex usb interface, then converted to mp3. The second is as a midi file into Pianoteq and exported as mp3 file using their C3 Recording sound. FP-7 recording: http://www.box.net/shared/a3by9ycnd2Pianoteq C3: http://www.box.net/shared/xp9uy3sj5kWhat do you think? I really like the Pianoteq version much better, of course. Any suggestions as to what else I could do to make it sound more realistic/acoustic?
private piano/voice teacher FT
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,625
1000 Post Club Member
|
1000 Post Club Member
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,625 |
Both are good recordings, but I agree, the Pianoteq version is much better to my ears.
I would play around with all the various settings in PT, mic placement, and all the other settings, EQ, reverb, etc.
Damn! I just posted elsewhere, that while I love PT, it it not quite 'there' for me, but your recording is starting to change my mind again!!! :-)
Rob
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 17,391
Yikes! 10000 Post Club Member
|
OP
Yikes! 10000 Post Club Member
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 17,391 |
I just have the trial version of PT. How do I change the mic settings? Or is that just the different "voice" selection?
edited to add: I think perhaps because I was playing Bach, which doesn't rely on a lot of low notes that it sounded pretty good. I was also going to play something Romantic to see how it held up.
Last edited by Morodiene; 12/08/09 11:12 AM.
private piano/voice teacher FT
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,625
1000 Post Club Member
|
1000 Post Club Member
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,625 |
Just click on the microphone icon ( near the centre of the screen) It will open up a screen with a graphic of the piano, and choices for placing microphones. Just click and drag.
Rob
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 17,391
Yikes! 10000 Post Club Member
|
OP
Yikes! 10000 Post Club Member
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 17,391 |
Oh! Cool!! OK, now time to fiddle some more
private piano/voice teacher FT
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 168
Full Member
|
Full Member
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 168 |
The Pianoteq version is noticeably better sounding to me, as well. I've only played with the demo myself so I can't offer any suggestions as to improving on what you've done but it sure sounds like you're on the right track.
Yamaha U3 SH2 Roland RD-800
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 17,391
Yikes! 10000 Post Club Member
|
OP
Yikes! 10000 Post Club Member
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 17,391 |
So what piano brand does PT use for these? Steinways? Yamahas? I couldn't find it on their site anywhere.
private piano/voice teacher FT
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 448
Full Member
|
Full Member
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 448 |
So what piano brand does PT use for these? Steinways? Yamahas? I couldn't find it on their site anywhere. I always thought the C3 and M3 were supposed to be Steinways, while the YC5 is meant to be a Yamaha. But I don't think the modeling is good enough that you can really distinguish the brand based on sound alone, it's more a mellow vs bright thing...
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 17,391
Yikes! 10000 Post Club Member
|
OP
Yikes! 10000 Post Club Member
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 17,391 |
So how exactly is modeling different than sampling?
private piano/voice teacher FT
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 448
Full Member
|
Full Member
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 448 |
Sampling means recording a real, physical, acoustic piano.
Modeling instead simulates the whole physical system (hammers, strings, soundboard, case, air around the piano, microphones) to create the sound, which is very complicated to do in real-time, so the Pianoteq developers are supposedly using all kinds of mathematical tricks to make it feasible.
The advantage of modeling is that things like resonance between strings or a hammer striking a string that is still vibrating can be accurately taken into account, in a way that wouldn't even be possible with thousands of samples using the "normal", sample-based approach. The drawback is that modeled pianos still sound a little fake sometimes.
Last edited by Martin C. Doege; 12/08/09 01:33 PM.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Piano
by Gino2 - 04/17/24 02:34 PM
|
Piano
by Gino2 - 04/17/24 02:23 PM
|
|
Forums43
Topics223,405
Posts3,349,434
Members111,637
|
Most Online15,252 Mar 21st, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|