PianoSupplies.com (a division of Piano World) Piano & music accessories, music theme decoratons, tuning & repair tools, moving equipment, party goods,music gift items, ... more
Free shipping on Jansen Artist Benches.
|
|
64892 Members
40 Forums
132555 Topics
1894529 Posts
Max Online: 15252 @ 03/21/10 11:39 PM
|
|
|
#1706214 - 07/02/11 01:46 PM
Score-Reading: A "sanity check"
|
1000 Post Club Member
Registered: 11/08/09
Posts: 1095
|
Hey Folks, The rule is: a sharp is a sharp until it becomes "natural" again, right? Here's my dilemma below - is the F in "measure 3" still sharp or is it back to natural?  It doesn't sound correct if left as a sharp. PS-Ah yes, I know...the trial and tribulations of the self-directed. Well, that's where you guys come in to help me. 
Edited by CebuKid (07/02/11 01:51 PM)
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#1706218 - 07/02/11 01:56 PM
Re: Score-Reading: A "sanity check"
[Re: CebuKid]
|
Junior Member
Registered: 04/27/08
Posts: 6
Loc: Denmark
|
The f is only sharp in the first measure. Accidentals only apply in the same measure.
Edited by PeterDK (07/02/11 01:58 PM)
_________________________
Kawai K-5 Yamaha CLP 280
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#1706232 - 07/02/11 02:24 PM
Re: Score-Reading: A "sanity check"
[Re: Rostosky]
|
1000 Post Club Member
Registered: 11/08/09
Posts: 1095
|
Yes, treble and bass, and it is in C-minor. The flats are A,B, and E through this whole section; hence, why the B gets naturalized. I have 2 different scores telling me 2 different things. What is an "accidental"? I'll need to look this up. Anyway, F-natural sounds...well... natural in that 3rd measure. Thanks for your help.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#1706234 - 07/02/11 02:26 PM
Re: Score-Reading: A "sanity check"
[Re: PeterDK]
|
4000 Post Club Member
Registered: 09/16/06
Posts: 4217
Loc: Santa Fe, NM
|
The f is only sharp in the first measure. Accidentals only apply in the same measure. This is right. "Accidentals" are the sharp/flat marks that change a pitch to something different from the key signature. They only affect the measure they're in. Cathy
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#1706238 - 07/02/11 02:29 PM
Re: Score-Reading: A "sanity check"
[Re: CebuKid]
|
2000 Post Club Member
Registered: 11/11/09
Posts: 2881
|
Accidental: Definition 1: An accidental is a sharp, flat, or natural note that goes against the key signature. Example: In C minor, an F sharp is an accidental, but a B flat is not an accidental (since B flat is already in the key signature).
Definition 2: An accidental is the sharp, flat, or natural sign, used in the score to indicate one of the notes described in definition 1.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#1706273 - 07/02/11 03:59 PM
Re: Score-Reading: A "sanity check"
[Re: CebuKid]
|
1000 Post Club Member
Registered: 09/18/09
Posts: 1565
|
If the F's in the treble clef were sharpened in measure three, they'd possibly sound a bit harsh against the F naturals in the bass clef.
But there seems to be some odd editing going on, with both F's sharpened in the first measure. I would imagine that editorial errors can't be ruled out.
Edited by kevinb (07/02/11 04:00 PM)
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#1706281 - 07/02/11 04:23 PM
Re: Score-Reading: A "sanity check"
[Re: CebuKid]
|
1000 Post Club Member
Registered: 04/28/10
Posts: 1408
Loc: Virginia, USA
|
Strange why they repeat it. At best it should have had a (#). Another thing to remember is that they only affect that specific octave for the same measure. So if there had been an F an octave below that would have needed another accidental. The Debussy arabesque is the first piece I'm learning that has a double sharp in it (key signature is E major, Debussy wants a natural G so writes it as Fx (double sharp). Trips be up each time 
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#1707198 - 07/04/11 01:01 PM
Re: Score-Reading: A "sanity check"
[Re: CebuKid]
|
Full Member
Registered: 12/07/10
Posts: 93
Loc: England - via Scotland
|
The rule is: a sharp is a sharp until it becomes "natural" again, right? Accidentals have been explained so I'm sure you're au fait with them now. Just to clarify - the rule you quoted only applies if the sharp or flat is indicated in the key signature. If it's an accidental - as has been pointed out - it only lasts for the bar it's in. A new bar cancels all previous accidentals but should continue to be played in the key signature. (For those not sure, the key signature is found right at the beginning of a piece, beside the initial treble and bass clefs. For example if, at the start of the piece, there were sharp signs on the B line and E space, then you'd know that piece was in the Key of B Flat Major.) Here's a useful link for anyone who wants a concise explanation with graphics. Also, key signatures can change anywhere in a piece of music...just to complicate the issue! But any changes are shown in just the same way - sharps and flats marked on the lines and spaces beside the treble and bass clef.
Edited by Sly Cat (07/04/11 01:06 PM)
_________________________
Rap is to music what Etch-a-Sketch is to art.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#1707216 - 07/04/11 01:29 PM
Re: Score-Reading: A "sanity check"
[Re: CebuKid]
|
Full Member
Registered: 03/28/10
Posts: 176
Loc: San Diego, CA
|
As has been stated, the second accidental in measure one is unnecessary. But I have found this sort of thing in many places in beginner music. My teacher explains it away as the editor just trying to be helpful. But I find it very confusing because it makes me start to second guess what I thought the rules for music notation are. Maybe this is an aid for a sight reader, but it is a great frustration for a decoder like me. Am I the only one bothered by this?
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#1707226 - 07/04/11 01:38 PM
Re: Score-Reading: A "sanity check"
[Re: SoundThumb]
|

Registered: 03/01/10
Posts: 2650
Loc: Italy
|
As has been stated, the second accidental in measure one is unnecessary. But I have found this sort of thing in many places in beginner music. My teacher explains it away as the editor just trying to be helpful. But I find it very confusing because it makes me start to second guess what I thought the rules for music notation are. Maybe this is an aid for a sight reader, but it is a great frustration for a decoder like me. Am I the only one bothered by this? No, you are not alone. It bugs me a bit too. I have found it in several of my books - and yes, I agree, the editor is probably trying to be helpful. However, the result is that I have inevitably asked "What the heck???" and have had to double check with my teacher that it really isn't necesary. mini grrrrr
_________________________
  XVIII-XXV Think like a kid, practice like an adult and you'll be happy!-A. Platt
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#1707232 - 07/04/11 01:42 PM
Re: Score-Reading: A "sanity check"
[Re: CebuKid]
|
Full Member
Registered: 03/28/10
Posts: 176
Loc: San Diego, CA
|
Thanks, I feel better knowing it's not just me. Back to practice.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#1707318 - 07/04/11 04:10 PM
Re: Score-Reading: A "sanity check"
[Re: casinitaly]
|
1000 Post Club Member
Registered: 09/18/09
Posts: 1565
|
I have found it in several of my books - and yes, I agree, the editor is probably trying to be helpful. However, the result is that I have inevitably asked "What the heck???" and have had to double check with my teacher that it really isn't necesary.
Yeah. If I want 'reminder' accidentals, I can pencil them in myself. But I have to say that I've never seen accidentals repeated in the same bar, except occasionally in brackets where there really is a possibility of confusion. The example posted looks to me more like an error than an attempt to be helpful. I could be wrong, of course.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|