PianoSupplies.com (a division of Piano World) Piano & music accessories, music theme decoratons, tuning & repair tools, moving equipment, party goods,music gift items, ... more
Free shipping on Jansen Artist Benches.
#1810036 - 12/21/1102:57 PMRe: which chapter in Randy Halberstadt book covers 2+2?
[Re: Jazz+]
knotty
2000 Post Club Member
Registered: 03/01/07
Posts: 2415
Loc: Bethesda, MD (Washington D.C)
Ken,
I still don't really see the problem with that progression though, which is quite standard I should say. If you want to show me the notes, I can take a look and see if I'd do things differently.
I do think that there's a good value in simply playing through half a dozen tunes and applying 2+2. The Levine book has a nice selection of such tunes in chapter 3. Several Coltrane tunes like Giant Steps, Countdown and Moment's notice I think. Tune up, Darn that Dream, Come Sunday, Little B's Poem and a few more. If you apply 2+2 to all those tunes, you'll have all the answers you need. Should take just a couple of week to record all those tunes (have them nice and polished). And then you'll have 2+2 for good.
Hey Knots Do you recommend I buy the Levine book or Randy's Metaphors book to learn and apply these buckets of 2+2, 2+3, drop 2, drop 3 ?
#1810465 - 12/22/1108:13 AMRe: which chapter in Randy Halberstadt book covers 2+2?
[Re: Jazz+]
knotty
2000 Post Club Member
Registered: 03/01/07
Posts: 2415
Loc: Bethesda, MD (Washington D.C)
I love both these books. They are great. For learning 2+2 and 2+3, you really don't need either. Those are quite simple concepts. Drop2 is covered quite a bit in the Jazz piano book.
Both books are not the same, they don't have the same goal. Metaphors is more like talking to a teacher, he gives a lot of great tips. Many are in line with JOI. Levines' is more of an encyclopedia of voicings and scales. More of a theory book. Both are well written, but the jazz Piano book is really superior in terms of writing.
You know when I learnt the 2+3 voicing, it was within the context of the A/B rootless voicing and drop 2.
My teacher basically got me to play the rootless voicing in the right hand, drop the 2nd note to the left hand thumb alla drop 2, and play the bass note with the pinky in the left hand. Its essentially the same 2+3 voicing but allows you to think about it in terms of the basic rootless voicing. Curious if other people do it the same way
Originally Posted By: knotty
I love both these books. They are great. For learning 2+2 and 2+3, you really don't need either. Those are quite simple concepts. Drop2 is covered quite a bit in the Jazz piano book.
Both books are not the same, they don't have the same goal. Metaphors is more like talking to a teacher, he gives a lot of great tips. Many are in line with JOI. Levines' is more of an encyclopedia of voicings and scales. More of a theory book. Both are well written, but the jazz Piano book is really superior in terms of writing.
I still don't really see the problem with that progression though, which is quite standard I should say. If you want to show me the notes, I can take a look and see if I'd do things differently.
Fair enough. I guess I was just looking for a different option that would be more like voice leading rather than jumping up a 5th. I came up with a few options. - Play 2+2 instead of 2+3 - Drop the top note an octave - Drop 2
Originally Posted By: Jazz+
Try 2+2 then 1+3 on every ballad in the Real Book
I learnt about 2+2 and 2+3 from Jazz Keyboard for Pianists and Non-Pianists by Jerry Coker many years ago when I first started using piano so that is the two handed voicing I use.
s_winitsky, I never thought of it like that.
_________________________
Monk - Light Blue Bach - Two Part Invention No.14
#1824377 - 01/13/1207:55 PMRe: which chapter in Randy Halberstadt book covers 2+2?
[Re: Jazz+]
TromboneAl
500 Post Club Member
Registered: 08/12/04
Posts: 557
Loc: Northern, Northern California
I've been using the 2+2 (aka shell voicings) as the base (not bass) for my solo playing. What I've been working on lately is playing this way without look down. The goal is to be able to play any tune from a fakebook solo.
Quote:
But just say the RH melody note is A (over the G7), then this might require me to stretch a 9th in my RH, do you agree ? I can't reach a 9th.
If you play the root and seventh in the left hand, you can play the B and A in the right. Or you can use a rootless or other voicing whenever you come to a problem like this.
Quote:
I was wondering with this approach what do pianists typically do if they are playing with a bass player.
I rarely use this approach when playing with a bass player. That was an epiphany I had: You don't need to use the 2+2 for every chord. Check out this video:
Quote:
playing the same 2+3 voicing sounds too high when you take it up the keyboard
As long as you only play a few chords up high, I think it sounds great. That is, it provides some variety from having the chords in the same area of the keyboard.