This custom search works much better than the built in one and allows searching older posts.
|
|
69893 Members
40 Forums
143498 Topics
2076115 Posts
Max Online: 15252 @ 03/21/10 11:39 PM
|
|
|
#1950445 - 08/28/12 02:58 PM
A432 As a More "Benevolent" Pitch Standard
|
Full Member
Registered: 04/03/05
Posts: 45
Loc: Grand Junction CO
|
I got a call last night from a new customer who wants his piano tuned at A432 Hz. He said there are proponents of A432 as a standard of pitch for its influence on consciousness. I did a quick Internet search on the topic, and indeed there is information about it. A case for A432 being the standard of pitch is made on the following website; the site's "mission is to educate about Concert Pitch A=432 hz and the connection between the vibrant environment and consciousness." http://www.omega432.com/index.htmlI realize that there will me some, perhaps many, who would dismiss the idea as nonsense, but I am inclined to believe there are connections between specific frequencies and effects on our brains—HemiSync and HoloSync being examples. I'm particularly interested whether you have any familiarity with or have had requests to tune to A432. David Bauguess
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#1950526 - 08/28/12 06:06 PM
Re: A432 As a More "Benevolent" Pitch Standard
[Re: Supply]
|
Full Member
Registered: 04/03/05
Posts: 45
Loc: Grand Junction CO
|
Opps. I missed that thread. Thanks for pointing it out, Jurgen. I'll head over there.
-David
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#1950564 - 08/28/12 07:38 PM
Re: A432 As a More "Benevolent" Pitch Standard
[Re: DavidWB]
|
500 Post Club Member
Registered: 10/17/04
Posts: 985
Loc: Nor California Sacramento area
|
As a tenor in a large chorus, I always prefer A432hz. Especially when singing Verdi. Those high As are really high at A440hz.
_________________________
Dale Fox Registered Piano Technician Remanufacturing/Rebuilding
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#1950566 - 08/28/12 07:55 PM
Re: A432 As a More "Benevolent" Pitch Standard
[Re: DavidWB]
|
1000 Post Club Member
Registered: 08/01/11
Posts: 1412
Loc: Philadelphia area
|
Yes there was a thread on this topic and I've found 4-5 web sites dedicated to this theory.
I'm not sure where they came up with this theory. Most pianos (and most instruments) are designed for A440, so there will be a , let's say, less vibrant sound at A432.
It's my understanding that pitches are universally accepted all around the world in all cultures. It's also my understanding that the pitch is recognized within the tolerances of 25 cents sharp to 25 cents flat. That's a large window of 50 cents, of which it is my understanding, that A440 falls pretty much in the middle of this window.
What puzzles me most about A432 is that it is far enough below A440 to not be recognized as an A but not quite close enough to be in that Quarter-tone area.
Who knows. They say time is speeding up. I complained to my dad that the summer seemed to be going by too fast. He told me to, "Put on your seat belt". Maybe sound is speeding up too.
Edited by Dave B (08/28/12 07:57 PM)
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#1950668 - 08/29/12 12:36 AM
Re: A432 As a More "Benevolent" Pitch Standard
[Re: Bob Newbie]
|
1000 Post Club Member
Registered: 02/09/11
Posts: 1005
Loc: Suffolk, England
|
This might catch on..I click on the link and the A432 tuning fork is back ordered!!!  Divine Intonation, no less!!!
_________________________
Ian Russell Schiedmayer & Soehne, 1925 Model 14, 55" upright Ibach, 1922 49" upright (project piano)
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#1950810 - 08/29/12 08:49 AM
Re: A432 As a More "Benevolent" Pitch Standard
[Re: DavidWB]
|
4000 Post Club Member
Registered: 03/14/08
Posts: 4237
Loc: France
|
nothing
Edited by Kamin (08/29/12 08:50 AM)
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|