This custom search works much better than the built in one and allows searching older posts.
|
|
69902 Members
40 Forums
143540 Topics
2076828 Posts
Max Online: 15252 @ 03/21/10 11:39 PM
|
|
|
#1960363 - 09/17/12 07:26 PM
Re: New Engineering concepts on Piano Sound production
[Re: Robert Di Santo]
|
Full Member
Registered: 06/04/11
Posts: 490
Loc: England
|
Wouldn't be at all surprised to see the first examples being "test driven" at the Hard Rock Cafes Phil 
_________________________
Concert Tuner & Technician for the past 45 years in the United Kingdom and Member of the Pianoforte Tuners' Association (London) www.jphillipspianoservices.freeindex.co.uk : E-mail jophillips06@aol.com
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#1960365 - 09/17/12 07:30 PM
Re: New Engineering concepts on Piano Sound production
[Re: Robert Di Santo]
|
Full Member
Registered: 11/24/09
Posts: 60
Loc: Chicago!
|
Looking forward to hearing and seeing it in person!
Edit: I didn't read the rest of the thread before posting. I have to say I find the tone taken towards skeptics to be... unfortunate, and more than a bit disappointing.
Edited by adamp88 (09/17/12 09:21 PM)
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#1960413 - 09/17/12 09:18 PM
Re: New Engineering concepts on Piano Sound production
[Re: Robert Di Santo]
|
2000 Post Club Member
Registered: 04/02/08
Posts: 2029
Loc: Niagara Region, On. Canada
|
....Dave B relax this is a good thing for all artists for ALL stringed instruments. i am a journeyman in the stone industry as well as a musician so by having both perspectives I've developed Stonetone.
Thank you. I'm sure the violinists will be fighting to the front of the line to try their bows out on a 60 lb violin. Robert, the idea is interesting enough for me to want to hear a piano with the granite bridge, if I come across one. As others here and elswhere have found with unique tunings (eg.), recorded samples don't often offer full justice for the listener to hear subtle and/or unique differences. If it doesn't catch on in a big way, don't be alarmed...you can always find a market in California...just tell them no condors were used in the testing of it, the granite is fully organic, pesticide free... and throw in a bio feedback system with a free tie dyed toga and you'll be set.
_________________________
Piano Technician George Brown College /85 Niagara Region
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#1960426 - 09/17/12 10:12 PM
Re: New Engineering concepts on Piano Sound production
[Re: Robert Di Santo]
|
1000 Post Club Member
Registered: 05/01/10
Posts: 1217
Loc: Vancouver, Canada
|
this 528 frequency and granite bridge combination has a healing effect that will have a more far-reaching outcome in terms of positive impact on humanity. Don't the strings break when you tune more than a m3 up? Kees
Edited by DoelKees (09/17/12 10:13 PM)
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#1960433 - 09/17/12 10:33 PM
Re: New Engineering concepts on Piano Sound production
[Re: Robert Di Santo]
|
Yikes! 10000 Post Club Member
Registered: 06/07/03
Posts: 18726
Loc: Oakland
|
And has that statement been approved by the Food and Drug Administration?
_________________________
Semipro Tech
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#1960448 - 09/17/12 11:22 PM
Re: New Engineering concepts on Piano Sound production
[Re: Robert Di Santo]
|
1000 Post Club Member
Registered: 08/01/11
Posts: 1420
Loc: Philadelphia area
|
A very interesting treble quality that is in direct contradiction to the 'woody' sound (feel) that Steinway claims is preferred by their surveyed pianist.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#1960480 - 09/18/12 02:17 AM
Re: New Engineering concepts on Piano Sound production
[Re: adamp88]
|
1000 Post Club Member
Registered: 02/09/11
Posts: 1013
Loc: Suffolk, England
|
Looking forward to hearing and seeing it in person!
Edit: I didn't read the rest of the thread before posting. I have to say I find the tone taken towards skeptics to be... unfortunate, and more than a bit disappointing. We are looking forward to your reading your reactions to the piano. How different does it sound from the YouTube videos mentioned earlier in this thread?
_________________________
Ian Russell Schiedmayer & Soehne, 1925 Model 14, 55" upright Ibach, 1922 49" upright (project piano)
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#1960482 - 09/18/12 02:20 AM
Re: New Engineering concepts on Piano Sound production
[Re: Robert Di Santo]
|
3000 Post Club Member
Registered: 09/11/06
Posts: 3463
Loc: Vancouver Island, BC, Canada
|
Take care folks, I am done here and defiantly don't need your rhetoric. Do you mean definitely?
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#1960496 - 09/18/12 03:54 AM
Re: New Engineering concepts on Piano Sound production
[Re: Robert Di Santo]
|
1000 Post Club Member
Registered: 07/31/09
Posts: 1634
Loc: Pretoria, South Africa
|
[irony on] Quickly popping in from the garden, where I had some great fun making mudcakes with Johnkie. [irony off]
Just for the record:
I am absolutely fascinated by the concept of alternative materials for piano components, and how they influence touch and tone. I am even more interested in a scientific exploration of these things. After all, this thread was titled "new engineering concepts on piano sound production". I was immediately drawn to it.
But chakras, healing frequencies, cellular experiences and the likes have nothing to do with scientific and engineering concepts. So I called them out! That's not rhetoric, it's making a much-needed distinction between science and non-science. I might not be a trained piano technician, but I'm a trained scientist.
Robert, if you claim to be talking in scientific and engineering terms, but post all sorts of non-science, then you must be prepared to be called out! Amongst scientists, such robust discussion is absolutely normal, because we are passionate about cutting through the chase and getting to the real science.
Back to the garden...
_________________________
Autodidact interested in piano technology.
1922 49" Zimmermann, project piano. 1970 44" Ibach, daily music maker.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#1960534 - 09/18/12 07:44 AM
Re: New Engineering concepts on Piano Sound production
[Re: Supply]
|
1000 Post Club Member
Registered: 10/22/06
Posts: 1535
Loc: Maine
|
Take care folks, I am done here and defiantly don't need your rhetoric. Do you mean definitely? Yea, I noticed that too, and was puzzled until I recalled some butchering my spell-checker has suggested in the past. Still ... there has been a little on the order of defiance in the OPs posts, so the mistake may have some tangential merit. What I found curious was the lack of pictures of the stone bridge.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#1960536 - 09/18/12 07:47 AM
Re: New Engineering concepts on Piano Sound production
[Re: Robert Di Santo]
|
4000 Post Club Member
Registered: 03/14/08
Posts: 4263
Loc: France
|
The playability ... locates more there in the beginning of the tone, for a piano anyway. How the pianists plays with the attack quality is big part of the nuances. A long sustain is indeed a plus, but the name that strikes me in piano tone is articulation.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#1960547 - 09/18/12 08:35 AM
Re: New Engineering concepts on Piano Sound production
[Re: Robert Di Santo]
|
6000 Post Club Member
Registered: 11/07/07
Posts: 6828
Loc: Grand Rapids Michigan
|
Granite weighs a lot too but, as John mentioned which was one of my first thoughts, all we see are two pictures of pianos but no pictures of granite bridges...
_________________________
Jerry Groot RPT Piano Technicians Guild Grand Rapids, Michigan www.grootpiano.comWe love to play BF2.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#1960551 - 09/18/12 08:44 AM
Re: New Engineering concepts on Piano Sound production
[Re: Olek]
|
1000 Post Club Member
Registered: 02/09/11
Posts: 1013
Loc: Suffolk, England
|
Kamin, are the two plots from the pianos in Robert Clair de Lune YouTube movie?
_________________________
Ian Russell Schiedmayer & Soehne, 1925 Model 14, 55" upright Ibach, 1922 49" upright (project piano)
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#1960554 - 09/18/12 08:53 AM
Re: New Engineering concepts on Piano Sound production
[Re: Robert Di Santo]
|
4000 Post Club Member
Registered: 03/14/08
Posts: 4263
Loc: France
|
no sorry those are only one note, but we see the 2 canals of the stereo, I should have said what is it...
one need an isolated note (without sustain pedal) to plot it, not easy in a musical record
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#1960557 - 09/18/12 08:58 AM
Re: New Engineering concepts on Piano Sound production
[Re: David Jenson]
|
2000 Post Club Member
Registered: 04/02/08
Posts: 2029
Loc: Niagara Region, On. Canada
|
...What I found curious was the lack of pictures of the stone bridge.
Most likely because it isn't patent(pending) protected, or the masonry tool kits for the techs have not been compiled yet. Even so, I suspect some pseudo engineer with a last name similar to the sound a dropped fork makes already has visions of the new and improved Mark 2 Glanite Bridge system in the works.
_________________________
Piano Technician George Brown College /85 Niagara Region
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#1960574 - 09/18/12 09:35 AM
Re: New Engineering concepts on Piano Sound production
[Re: Olek]
|
1000 Post Club Member
Registered: 02/09/11
Posts: 1013
Loc: Suffolk, England
|
... one need an isolated note (without sustain pedal) to plot it, not easy in a musical record Yes, of course. Your two plots make the point very well. BDB said something similar. Sound's like the ring of hammer and chisel to me!
_________________________
Ian Russell Schiedmayer & Soehne, 1925 Model 14, 55" upright Ibach, 1922 49" upright (project piano)
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#1960630 - 09/18/12 11:46 AM
Re: New Engineering concepts on Piano Sound production
[Re: Robert Di Santo]
|
2000 Post Club Member
Registered: 02/14/10
Posts: 2589
|
>You tube really isn't the proper place to have a true judgement and has no comparison rather than in person but for now this is all we have at the moment.
Robert,
Maybe, then your announcement and posting of the videos was a bit premature. These videos may pop up for the coming years if you search on your technology, and thus people may reject the actual sound of your invention based on these videos for years to come.
I recommend getting a really good audio engineer that uses dead flat response mics with the piano in a good acoustic environment. And reports very careful which mics and which environment was used so that people can put the recording in the right perspective.
Without a good recording, I guess you're not going to convince people even to come to hear the real thing.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#1961196 - 09/19/12 04:22 PM
Re: New Engineering concepts on Piano Sound production
[Re: David Jenson]
|
2000 Post Club Member
Registered: 01/20/09
Posts: 2770
|
My guess is that the original poster has a real product, but the lack of pictures of the granite bridge, bits of new-age pseudo-science, and the ease with which sound files can be modified has produced some very legitimate questioning and the slight hint of a spoof. It is real. I first saw this piano a few weeks ago, and again last night at the Chicago PTG meeting. In terms of what it sounds like, one could describe it as Phoenix bridge agraffes on steroids. The sustain is long, and the tone is clear. In my opinion, it improved the sound of the piano. That being said, I have concerns: Serviceability: the bridge pins are epoxied into the granite, so how does one replace the bridge pins when they inevitably deteriorate? Workmanship quality: I thought the bridge pinning looked sloppy, partly due to the fact that the bridge pins are inserted vertically and then bent. Additionally, the added dampers looked sloppily done. These are things that would need improvement before they're put in a high-end piano. The bridge notching looked good, though. Practicality: I don't see how the work required to do this is worth the effort (more on this later). Longevity: Others at the meeting expressed concerns about how the granite and soundboard will interact as the soundboard changes over time. As I see it, there are two reasons why the bridge changes the sound of the piano: it's a more efficient termination than wood is, and it has a lot more mass than wood. As many on here know, there are some small-scale rebuilders/builders of pianos who use hardened termination points and/or ebony capped bridges. This makes the piano sound more clear. There is also the mass issue. Granite has a lot more mass than wood. By using granite as a bridge, they are essentially mass-loading the soundboard, which raises its mechanical impedance, slows the transfer of energy from strings to soundboard, and thus lengthens sustain. The bass bridge, unlike the treble, is not solid granite; it is a wood bridge with a granite cap. Why? A full granite bass bridge would raise the impedance too much in that area of the soundboard and kill the tone. This is why some incorporate floating bridges or thin the board in the bass area. With this in mind, I'm confident that one could produce the same effects with a traditional bridge (without all the fuss of granite) by mass loading the soundboard with brass weights or using auxiliary riblets, and using more efficient terminations (i.e. bridge agraffes, etc.). There is nothing magical about granite.
_________________________
B.Mus. Piano Performance 2009 M.Mus. Piano Performance & Literature 2011 PTG Associate Member
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#1961225 - 09/19/12 05:37 PM
Re: New Engineering concepts on Piano Sound production
[Re: David Jenson]
|
1000 Post Club Member
Registered: 04/13/06
Posts: 1481
Loc: Sandy Eggo, California
|
Take care folks, I am done here and defiantly don't need your rhetoric. Do you mean definitely? Yea, I noticed that too, and was puzzled until I recalled some butchering my spell-checker has suggested in the past. Still ... there has been a little on the order of defiance in the OPs posts, so the mistake may have some tangential merit. What I found curious was the lack of pictures of the stone bridge. Mr. Di Santo is obviously ESL, hence the difficulty in communicating. Yeah, no photos because someone might steal his revolutionary idea. Please... Crummy-quality YouTube recordings, poorly set up, using Story & Clarks as test beds, citing mysticism for science, and then the insulting and petulance. yeah, this guy's going far...
Edited by OperaTenor (09/19/12 05:43 PM)
_________________________
Happiness is a freshly tuned piano. Jim Boydston, proprietor, No Piano Left Behind - technician
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#1961226 - 09/19/12 05:40 PM
Re: New Engineering concepts on Piano Sound production
[Re: Emmery]
|
1000 Post Club Member
Registered: 04/13/06
Posts: 1481
Loc: Sandy Eggo, California
|
...What I found curious was the lack of pictures of the stone bridge.
Most likely because it isn't patent(pending) protected, or the masonry tool kits for the techs have not been compiled yet. Even so, I suspect some pseudo engineer with a last name similar to the sound a dropped fork makes already has visions of the new and improved Mark 2 Glanite Bridge system in the works. I didn't know a fork made a "Fandrich" sound when dropped! 
_________________________
Happiness is a freshly tuned piano. Jim Boydston, proprietor, No Piano Left Behind - technician
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#1961394 - 09/20/12 03:19 AM
Re: New Engineering concepts on Piano Sound production
[Re: Robert Di Santo]
|
1000 Post Club Member
Registered: 07/31/09
Posts: 1634
Loc: Pretoria, South Africa
|
B986,
Many thanks for your perspective. It made for interesting reading.
_________________________
Autodidact interested in piano technology.
1922 49" Zimmermann, project piano. 1970 44" Ibach, daily music maker.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#1961410 - 09/20/12 05:19 AM
Re: New Engineering concepts on Piano Sound production
[Re: Mark R.]
|
1000 Post Club Member
Registered: 02/09/11
Posts: 1013
Loc: Suffolk, England
|
B986,
Many thanks for your perspective. It made for interesting reading. +1
_________________________
Ian Russell Schiedmayer & Soehne, 1925 Model 14, 55" upright Ibach, 1922 49" upright (project piano)
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#1961498 - 09/20/12 10:50 AM
Re: New Engineering concepts on Piano Sound production
[Re: OperaTenor]
|
4000 Post Club Member
Registered: 09/04/03
Posts: 4652
Loc: Olympia, Washington
|
...What I found curious was the lack of pictures of the stone bridge.
Most likely because it isn't patent(pending) protected, or the masonry tool kits for the techs have not been compiled yet. Even so, I suspect some pseudo engineer with a last name similar to the sound a dropped fork makes already has visions of the new and improved Mark 2 Glanite Bridge system in the works. I didn't know a fork made a "Fandrich" sound when dropped! I think I've just been insulted--but I'm not sure why...? ddf
_________________________
Delwin D Fandrich Piano Research, Design & Manufacturing Consultant del@fandrichpiano.com or ddfandrich@gmail.com To contact me privately please use one of these e-mail addresses.
Stupidity is a rare condition, ignorance is a common choice --Anon
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#1961508 - 09/20/12 11:26 AM
Re: New Engineering concepts on Piano Sound production
[Re: Robert Di Santo]
|
1000 Post Club Member
Registered: 01/19/05
Posts: 1098
Loc: SouthWest Michigan
|
To the folks who are pros,technicians, masters in there own right etc.. have critical views on incorporating granite and other types a stone into the design of a piano is unorthodox but until you hear one in person as the PTG did and Thomas Zoells owner of the Pianoforte Chicago and Dr. Richard Bosworth who are all credible with a very articulate views agree this is a revolutionary concept that gives the artist a chance to explore new and interpretive vistas you will realize this as fact as well. During our presentation on September 18th Richard Bosworth will compare to a high end in comparison while hands on with the folks who attend. Science doesn't lie and we have the facts. When our prototype was tuned to 444, 4.7Hz higher than 440. After playing @ the 528 healing frequency this is what Richard Bosworth had to say:
My Impressions of The 528 Frequency
Initial reactions:
The sound and timbre were intoxicatingly alluring. There was a feeling of well-being. Serenity and calmness pervaded. I felt very relaxed and restful. There was less stress; a state of repose came over me. My body and mind were more open to stimuli. The experience put me in a trance. There was also a mesmerizing effect. The resulting effect was like having a power nap. My whole being resonated a relaxed state of mind, both mentally and physically. The endorphins were flowing throughout my body. I was attracted to listening to the sound as well as producing it. This instrument had an undeniably compelling quality. After playing it, the little annoyances of life disappeared. The feeling became ineffable and could not be put into words. There was a lingering effect for at least a half hour afterwards. My First Impressions On Playing These Intriguing Granite-Enhanced Pianos By Richard Bosworth General observations:
My first impressions were very subtle, yet powerful. It simply had a hypnotic effect. In this instance, the statement "music soothes the beast" fit exactly how I felt. After I played this instrument, my spirit was calm almost to the point of being reflective. It was as if I had been meditating and my soul was refreshed. A sense of universal, collective consciousness became a palpable moment for me.
I am beginning to realize that tuning to the 528 frequency is not only wonderful, but NECESSARY. Implementing this technique complemented by the granite bridges of a piano, has allowed me to experience a new realm of awareness. In fact, I earnestly seek out this quality and will not settle for anything less. The regular standard tunings along with the traditional wooden bridges are no longer satisfying; it is a rather irritating and frustrating scenario.
Anybody reading these thoughts here will probably think that I am a bit exaggerated in my perceptions. If so, I would encourage you to find out for yourself. Come, play this piano and see if what I am saying is true. Suspend your judgment for just a second and get ready for an extraordinary sonic adventure.
Allow me to leave you with this? Nothing can be more noble and worthwhile than to bring good will to one's fellow-man. I believe this 528 frequency and granite bridge combination has a healing effect that will have a more far-reaching outcome in terms of positive impact on humanity. To leave a legacy of this nature to posterity can only help to better the world in which we live. And the saga continues... Now, this is indeed Gobbledegook! Give me a break!
_________________________
Laugh More Yamaha G7 - Roland FP7   
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#1961547 - 09/20/12 12:38 PM
Re: New Engineering concepts on Piano Sound production
[Re: Robert Di Santo]
|
2000 Post Club Member
Registered: 04/02/08
Posts: 2029
Loc: Niagara Region, On. Canada
|
No worries Del, the comment had nothing to do with you and I'm not sure why Opera Tenor made that connection. Dropped forks typically make a "png, ting,ding,tang,kang,pung" type of sound.
_________________________
Piano Technician George Brown College /85 Niagara Region
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#1961552 - 09/20/12 12:46 PM
Re: New Engineering concepts on Piano Sound production
[Re: Roger Ransom]
|
1000 Post Club Member
Registered: 09/20/04
Posts: 1646
Loc: Massachusetts
|
All the junk science, pseudoscience, and new age mysticism in support of the granite bridge bring my BS detectors to full alert. What's next in the world of pianos--pyramid power??? As it turns out, granite is not a very good conductor of sound--it is very lossy, which is one of the reasons it is used in high-precision machinery, where vibrations are a problem, and a material that damps them out is very desirable.
Hold a bar of steel or aluminum so they can vibrate freely, and when given a rap, they will ring nicely--think of a tuning fork. If you do the same with granite, it will simply produce a thunk. Actually, the density and modulus of granite are very close to that of aluminum. Granite is harder, but the only place in which hardness is of particular importance is at the string contact, and various bridge agraffes that use steel at the string interface have addressed this issue. Will the granite bridge sound different? Sure, it is heavier and stiffer than wood--so are lots of other materials. Yawn...
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#1961556 - 09/20/12 12:52 PM
Re: New Engineering concepts on Piano Sound production
[Re: Robert Di Santo]
|
Yikes! 10000 Post Club Member
Registered: 06/07/03
Posts: 18726
Loc: Oakland
|
My first thought is that if this is desirable, which I doubt, concrete should work just as well, and it could be molded, rather than carved, which would be cheaper.
_________________________
Semipro Tech
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#1961568 - 09/20/12 01:03 PM
Re: New Engineering concepts on Piano Sound production
[Re: Roy123]
|
1000 Post Club Member
Registered: 02/09/11
Posts: 1013
Loc: Suffolk, England
|
... granite is not a very good conductor of sound ... Do bridges conduct sound or simply cause soundboards to move with the strings?
_________________________
Ian Russell Schiedmayer & Soehne, 1925 Model 14, 55" upright Ibach, 1922 49" upright (project piano)
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#1961570 - 09/20/12 01:07 PM
Re: New Engineering concepts on Piano Sound production
[Re: Withindale]
|
1000 Post Club Member
Registered: 09/20/04
Posts: 1646
Loc: Massachusetts
|
... granite is not a very good conductor of sound ... Do bridges conduct sound or simply cause soundboards to move with the strings? Good point--one might argue that bridges are short enough (distance from string to soundboard) that all one really needs is a material with adequate stiffness and low enough loss. My comment about granite being not such a good conductor of sound was made only because of the claims that were made by the inventor.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|