This custom search works much better than the built in one and allows searching older posts.
Piano Acc. & Gift Items in Piano World's Online Store
In PianoSupplies.com ,(a division of Piano World) our online store for piano and music gifts and accessories, party goods, tuning equipment, piano moving equipment and more.
I posted this work a few pages ago, but it has since become my favourite of the Funeral Odes and is becoming one of my favourite Liszt solo piano works overall, despite being almost completely unknown, so i'll put it here again. In its original version it's an orchestral postlude to one of his finest tone poems: Tasso, Lamento e Trionfo, and this is the piano transcription (which I prefer).
#1988050 - 11/18/1207:48 AMRe: Franz Liszt appreciation thread.
[Re: pianojosh23]
Jolteon
500 Post Club Member
Registered: 04/11/11
Posts: 521
Loc: Perth, Australia
It's not often I say this, but I believe this performance is almost genius. He brings out all these lines which just aren't there in other recordings!
_________________________ Algernon: I hope, Cecily, I shall not offend you if I state quite frankly and openly that you seem to me to be in every way the visible personification of absolute perfection. www.youtube.com/jolteon206
The third (and last) piece from one of Liszt's neglected little cycles, Glanes de Woronince (1847-48). It's my favourite of the three...Very simple, but very beautiful.
I don't like the other two pieces as much as some others seem to, but they are still nice; especially the Ballade Ukraine which is probably equal in quality with the contemporaneous 1st Ballade, but even more neglected.
Am I the only one that thinks his oft-criticized Totentanz is one of his greatest works? A masterful tone poem about the inevitability and relentlessness of death, a work that ought to be taken very seriously indeed. Pianistic writing that is as ingenious as any in the entire 19th century, masterful counterpoint in both the most traditional 'canonic' style as well as the most forward-looking (the fugue), wonderfully vivid, novel orchestration, and overall one of his most original and forward-looking works.
#2011668 - 01/09/1311:25 AMRe: Franz Liszt appreciation thread.
[Re: pianojosh23]
Plowboy
1000 Post Club Member
Registered: 06/26/08
Posts: 1849
Loc: Huntington Beach, CA
I just finished reading Amy Fay's book. She had nothing but positive things to say about Liszt as a pianist, composer and teacher. She felt he was far above any other pianist of the day. His teaching style was affirming and positive as opposed to Tausig and Kullak who belittled their students.
#2011678 - 01/09/1311:55 AMRe: Franz Liszt appreciation thread.
[Re: pianojosh23]
Jolteon
500 Post Club Member
Registered: 04/11/11
Posts: 521
Loc: Perth, Australia
Originally Posted By: pianojosh23
Am I the only one that thinks his oft-criticized Totentanz is one of his greatest works? A masterful tone poem about the inevitability and relentlessness of death, a work that ought to be taken very seriously indeed. Pianistic writing that is as ingenious as any in the entire 19th century, masterful counterpoint in both the most traditional 'canonic' style as well as the most forward-looking (the fugue), wonderfully vivid, novel orchestration, and overall one of his most original and forward-looking works.
You're not the only one. It is one of my favourite works of all... The piano writing is transcendental in every sense of the word, it is genius! And what he does with the Dies Irae is very imaginative.
My favourite recording which I've come across, with respect to both the piano and orchestra, is Joseph Banowetz with the Slovak Radio Symphony Orchestra under Oliver Dohnanyi (on Naxos label). Many of the recordings I've heard of it are really rather meek in comparison.
______________
While I'm here, I thought I'd share this. I recently stumbled upon a beautifully presented box-set CD of Berman's recording of the complete Annees de pelerinage. I've listened through it all several times now and am in awe. He makes a lot of these works, especially in the third book, really come alive like nobody else.
Edited by Jolteon (01/09/1312:19 PM)
_________________________ Algernon: I hope, Cecily, I shall not offend you if I state quite frankly and openly that you seem to me to be in every way the visible personification of absolute perfection. www.youtube.com/jolteon206
One of the best recordings i've heard of his Grosses Konzertsolo, a work that has so many wonderful things in it, but unfortunately I find some of the repeated chords and tremolos to be a little tiresome (a vice that Liszt occasionally falls prey to). It is, however, a good and highly original work that I really enjoy.
While I'm here, I thought I'd share this. I recently stumbled upon a beautifully presented box-set CD of Berman's recording of the complete Annees de pelerinage. I've listened through it all several times now and am in awe. He makes a lot of these works, especially in the third book, really come alive like nobody else.
Berman's is a great complete Annees, among my favourites for sure, and I agree that he is as good as it gets in the third book. I find he's so good throughout...except in the Dante Sonata where he is quite uneven. He is great for the first ten minutes or so (especially the presto agitato assai, which is just breathtaking), but -imo- he makes the rest sound quite discursive and disjointed through use of an unforgiveably slow tempo in some sections. Still, for a complete set he is essential.
One of the best recordings i've heard of his Grosses Konzertsolo, a work that has so many wonderful things in it, but unfortunately I find some of the repeated chords and tremolos to be a little tiresome (a vice that Liszt occasionally falls prey to). It is, however, a good and highly original work that I really enjoy.
A long time ago I got a Guiseppe Andaloro CD with the 4 Mephisto Valses, Grosses Konzertsolo, and 2 other pieces I can't remember off the top of my head.
It's been a while since I've listened to the Grosses Konzertsolo, but the grandeur always moves me.
Am I the only one that thinks his oft-criticized Totentanz is one of his greatest works?
No, you aren't the only one (I see that Jolteon is also saying you aren't the only one). But that's not to say it's an altogether easy work to appreciate - there's something about it that can seem almost cruel and heartless, when done right, and that puts some people off. It's funny how that hard and steely tone almost completely disappeared out of his music for a long time, but it reappeared in full force towards the end of his life. At least that is the way it seems to me.
Am I the only one that thinks his oft-criticized Totentanz is one of his greatest works?
there's something about it that can seem almost cruel and heartless, when done right, and that puts some people off.
I don't even think it's necessarily that. A recent amazon.com comment I read accused it as "offering such empty bombast it just blows the lid off of vulgarity." Obviously this is a bit extreme, but I see comments along similar lines often, denigrating it to the realm of a superficial showpiece of no true musical merit. This sort of thing isn't exclusive to the Totentanz in his output, mind you.
As for that hard and steely tone disappearing, what years are you thinking of here? It's an interesting observation.
#2016039 - 01/17/1310:19 AMRe: Franz Liszt appreciation thread.
[Re: Jolteon]
argerichfan
8000 Post Club Member
Registered: 11/15/06
Posts: 8184
Loc: Pacific Northwest, US.
Originally Posted By: Jolteon
The piano writing is transcendental in every sense of the word, it is genius! And what he does with the Dies Irae is very imaginative.
Would very much tend to agree. And yet I've always felt the ending to be curiously unsatisfying. There's something rather perfunctory about it, as if Liszt all of sudden got distracted, then said 'oh yes, I need to finish this!'
Lewenthal's recording very effectively integrates passages from an earlier version of the work.
#2016045 - 01/17/1310:34 AMRe: Franz Liszt appreciation thread.
[Re: pianojosh23]
argerichfan
8000 Post Club Member
Registered: 11/15/06
Posts: 8184
Loc: Pacific Northwest, US.
Originally Posted By: pianojosh23
One of the best recordings i've heard of his Grosses Konzertsolo, a work that has so many wonderful things in it, but unfortunately I find some of the repeated chords and tremolos to be a little tiresome (a vice that Liszt occasionally falls prey to). It is, however, a good and highly original work that I really enjoy.
That is a very fine recording. Thank-you for sharing it! Like most people I know (both in person and in cyberspace), I'm not the biggest fan of Leslie Howard, though his recording of the Grosses Konzertsolo is one of his best. (At several points, if you listen carefully, you can hear birds chirping outside the studio.)
In spite of any perceived weaknesses, Liszt's honest, outsized, over-the-top essay has alternately thrilled and caressed me. Alas, it is more of a work for a true Lisztian, but not the best example to gain any new converts to Liszt. (That's why he wrote the B minor Sonata. )
Am I the only one that thinks his oft-criticized Totentanz is one of his greatest works?
there's something about it that can seem almost cruel and heartless, when done right, and that puts some people off.
I don't even think it's necessarily that. A recent amazon.com comment I read accused it as "offering such empty bombast it just blows the lid off of vulgarity." Obviously this is a bit extreme, but I see comments along similar lines often, denigrating it to the realm of a superficial showpiece of no true musical merit. This sort of thing isn't exclusive to the Totentanz in his output, mind you.
As for that hard and steely tone disappearing, what years are you thinking of here? It's an interesting observation.
I guess I meant "in addition to the usual nonsense about empty bombast in Lizst", it can have a certain quality that puts people off. After all, a dance of death isn't "nice".
About that hard and steely thing - I meant it was more or less gone until it showed up in late pieces like the last Mephisto waltzes and the late Hungarian rhapsodies, which seem that way to me. But that's just my personal response - I realize others may not hear the music that way.
#2016402 - 01/17/1310:57 PMRe: Franz Liszt appreciation thread.
[Re: wr]
Jolteon
500 Post Club Member
Registered: 04/11/11
Posts: 521
Loc: Perth, Australia
Originally Posted By: wr
Originally Posted By: pianojosh23
Originally Posted By: wr
Originally Posted By: pianojosh23
Am I the only one that thinks his oft-criticized Totentanz is one of his greatest works?
there's something about it that can seem almost cruel and heartless, when done right, and that puts some people off.
I don't even think it's necessarily that. A recent amazon.com comment I read accused it as "offering such empty bombast it just blows the lid off of vulgarity." Obviously this is a bit extreme, but I see comments along similar lines often, denigrating it to the realm of a superficial showpiece of no true musical merit. This sort of thing isn't exclusive to the Totentanz in his output, mind you.
As for that hard and steely tone disappearing, what years are you thinking of here? It's an interesting observation.
I guess I meant "in addition to the usual nonsense about empty bombast in Lizst", it can have a certain quality that puts people off. After all, a dance of death isn't "nice".
About that hard and steely thing - I meant it was more or less gone until it showed up in late pieces like the last Mephisto waltzes and the late Hungarian rhapsodies, which seem that way to me. But that's just my personal response - I realize others may not hear the music that way.
By 'hard and steely,' are you referring to this, sort of, darker music with a fixation on death and themes of this kind? I think he probably stopped once he became involved with religious activities in the way that he did. It then returned later, if the Wikipedia article is anything to go by, because:
"Liszt fell down the stairs of the Hotel in Weimar on July 2, 1881. Though friends and colleagues had noted swelling in his feet and legs when he had arrived in Weimar the previous month (an indication of possible congestive heart failure), he had been in good health up to that point and was still fit and active. He was left immobilized for eight weeks after the accident and never fully recovered from it. A number of ailments manifested—dropsy, asthma, insomnia, a cataract of the left eye and heart disease. The last-mentioned eventually contributed to Liszt's death. He became increasingly plagued by feelings of desolation, despair and preoccupation with death—feelings which he expressed in his works from this period. As he told Lina Ramann, "I carry a deep sadness of the heart which must now and then break out in sound."
He was given several religious duties in 1865, by which time he had already finished the Totentanz (1859). But in the earlier period, I can't really think of many pieces, off the top of my head, that really had this fixation anyway; even though he is quite famous for this now. Apart from the Totentanz, there's, really, only the first Mephisto Waltz, and the Dante Sonata and Funerailles (unless I am missing something) - but maybe his fame for music of this nature can stem from the fact that these some of his most popular works; despite most of his (pianistic) output from the early period being etudes, transcriptions and the rhapsodies.
_________________________ Algernon: I hope, Cecily, I shall not offend you if I state quite frankly and openly that you seem to me to be in every way the visible personification of absolute perfection. www.youtube.com/jolteon206
Am I the only one that thinks his oft-criticized Totentanz is one of his greatest works?
there's something about it that can seem almost cruel and heartless, when done right, and that puts some people off.
I don't even think it's necessarily that. A recent amazon.com comment I read accused it as "offering such empty bombast it just blows the lid off of vulgarity." Obviously this is a bit extreme, but I see comments along similar lines often, denigrating it to the realm of a superficial showpiece of no true musical merit. This sort of thing isn't exclusive to the Totentanz in his output, mind you.
As for that hard and steely tone disappearing, what years are you thinking of here? It's an interesting observation.
I guess I meant "in addition to the usual nonsense about empty bombast in Lizst", it can have a certain quality that puts people off. After all, a dance of death isn't "nice".
About that hard and steely thing - I meant it was more or less gone until it showed up in late pieces like the last Mephisto waltzes and the late Hungarian rhapsodies, which seem that way to me. But that's just my personal response - I realize others may not hear the music that way.
By 'hard and steely,' are you referring to this, sort of, darker music with a fixation on death and themes of this kind? I think he probably stopped once he became involved with religious activities in the way that he did. It then returned later, if the Wikipedia article is anything to go by, because:
"Liszt fell down the stairs of the Hotel in Weimar on July 2, 1881. Though friends and colleagues had noted swelling in his feet and legs when he had arrived in Weimar the previous month (an indication of possible congestive heart failure), he had been in good health up to that point and was still fit and active. He was left immobilized for eight weeks after the accident and never fully recovered from it. A number of ailments manifested—dropsy, asthma, insomnia, a cataract of the left eye and heart disease. The last-mentioned eventually contributed to Liszt's death. He became increasingly plagued by feelings of desolation, despair and preoccupation with death—feelings which he expressed in his works from this period. As he told Lina Ramann, "I carry a deep sadness of the heart which must now and then break out in sound."
He was given several religious duties in 1865, by which time he had already finished the Totentanz (1859). But in the earlier period, I can't really think of many pieces, off the top of my head, that really had this fixation anyway; even though he is quite famous for this now. Apart from the Totentanz, there's, really, only the first Mephisto Waltz, and the Dante Sonata and Funerailles (unless I am missing something) - but maybe his fame for music of this nature can stem from the fact that these some of his most popular works; despite most of his (pianistic) output from the early period being etudes, transcriptions and the rhapsodies.
Before his late period (say, before 1863?) I can think of many works that are 'hard and steely.' Some examples:
^^Right on the threshold.
^That performance is, IMO, too slow (Pletnev is the only one who I feel does justice to the piece, one that's so easy to butcher), but he does do the climax pretty well (18:25 - 23:55), and that's the hardest/steeliest part .
Another one is a lesser work, his early Malediction. It, along with the first version of Pensee des Morts, show I think the first fruits of this style (both written in around 1834).
Before his late period (say, before 1863?) I can think of many works that are 'hard and steely.' Some examples:
But, to my sensibility, the examples you give are mostly displaying a somewhat different sort of hard and steely, perhaps just a degree or two warmer or maybe somehow a bit more human. But, like I said, it's just my individual response, and I don't really expect that others would necessarily hear the music in the same way.
That is a very fine recording. Thank-you for sharing it! Like most people I know (both in person and in cyberspace), I'm not the biggest fan of Leslie Howard, though his recording of the Grosses Konzertsolo is one of his best. (At several points, if you listen carefully, you can hear birds chirping outside the studio.)
Quite agree on the Howard performance. It is probably my favourite along with the recording by Jean-Efflam Bavouzet on his wonderful CD Hymne à la Nuit.
I've always enjoyed this piece from his Trois morceaux suisses: Un soir dans la montague, with its tranquil, meditative outer sections and the orage-esque storm in the middle (actually a more effective storm than in orage, I think).
And, from the first book of the same collection (well, before the previous piece was revised), the over-the-top, probably un-endearing to most, but actually (almost) appropriate for the subject, one of his most striking early (1835) works, Lyon.
#2034470 - 02/16/1308:23 PMRe: Franz Liszt appreciation thread.
[Re: pianojosh23]
argerichfan
8000 Post Club Member
Registered: 11/15/06
Posts: 8184
Loc: Pacific Northwest, US.
Do listen to this!
In an operatic performance it benefits from being just a tad slower, but in a piano arrangement it seems appropriate at a slightly faster tempo.
This is one of Wagner's most divine moments, for years this has always haunted me. Wagner's primal undulation has caused me to wake up in the middle of the night, sweating profusely, and shivering.
Try the "au bord d'une source". I saw a facsimile of the original. In the margin the master wrote "creation". It is a wonderful water piece. Also his Faust.
Here's a great performance of his Concerto Pathetique, a revised version of the Grosses Konzertsolo, for two pianos. I always preferred the Konzertsolo, but after hearing this great recording by Richter and Anton Ginzburg, I now think it the most fully worked out, and best, version of the work. One of his great Weimar works.
He also wrote versions for piano and orchestra, but I find them to be rather dull.
#2046924 - 03/12/1311:07 AMRe: Franz Liszt appreciation thread.
[Re: JoelW]
argerichfan
8000 Post Club Member
Registered: 11/15/06
Posts: 8184
Loc: Pacific Northwest, US.
Originally Posted By: JoelW
I think this thread has covered just about everything he wrote...
Yeah right...
Have you ever checked Groves' catalogue? It's a mystery to me where Liszt even found the time to notate all that music, let alone conceive it. This in addition to voluminous amounts of correspondence and teaching. He wrote more choral music than Chopin wrote piano music.
Registered: 03/03/13
Posts: 1199
Loc: New York City
Originally Posted By: argerichfan
Originally Posted By: JoelW
I think this thread has covered just about everything he wrote...
Yeah right...
Have you ever checked Groves' catalogue? It's a mystery to me where Liszt even found the time to notate all that music, let alone conceive it. This in addition to voluminous amounts of correspondence and teaching. He wrote more choral music than Chopin wrote piano music.
If you do the math you get that he must have lived thousands of years to do it all.