|
Welcome to the Piano World Piano Forums Over 3 million posts about pianos, digital pianos, and all types of keyboard instruments. Over 100,000 members from around the world.
Join the World's Largest Community of Piano Lovers
(it's free)
It's Fun to Play the Piano ... Please Pass It On!
|
|
71 members (Abdulrohmanoman, Charles Cohen, accordeur, BWV846, Animisha, benkeys, Anglagard44, 14 invisible),
2,335
guests, and
433
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 208
Full Member
|
OP
Full Member
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 208 |
Quoth the examiner "There was facility and energy in the playing and some good memory work. Greater accuracy and understanding performance conventions is needed, and at time, a more coherent approach to rhythm is necessary to gain this award! This award is within your reach!"
What on earth are performance conventions?
HSC pieces: Shostakovich Piano Concerto op 102. movement 1 Chopin Op10 No1 Debussy Broulliards Preludes Bk1 Kats-Chernin Russian Rag Messiaen Regard d'letoile Mozart Sonata for 2 pianos D major
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 24,601
Yikes! 10000 Post Club Member
|
Yikes! 10000 Post Club Member
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 24,601 |
Tell us what composers (and preferably also pieces) were played, and we can answer better. As a general thing (since we don't know more yet), I think all we can say is that it refers to being "stylistically correct," and/or grossly disobeying important things in the score. Like: Using too much pedal in Bach. (And of course some people think using any pedal is too much.) Or, doing Wagnerian crescendos and phrasings in Mozart. Or, ending a Mozart slow movement with a dramatic flourish, punctuated by jumping up from the bench and throwing the arms in the air in triumph. I think most people would say that goes against "performance conventions." Or, using "terrace dynamics" in Chopin. (What's terrace dynamics?? Well, it's a "performance convention." But for certain types of music more than others.) Or, consistently using tempos and/or dynamics that are different from what's written and different from what almost anyone in their right mind ever does. Etc. etc. Tell us what the pieces were, and we can say better. P.S. For examples of not following "performance conventions," check out Glenn Gould playing just about anything but Bach. Or, in the minds of some, even Bach, maybe especially Bach.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 208
Full Member
|
OP
Full Member
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 208 |
Well, I played Bach's Partita no2 Sinfonia, Beethoven's op2 no1, Brahms Intermezzo from Ballades op 10, Debussy's broulliard from preludes book2 and Messiaen's Regard de l'etoile from Vingt Regards. I think I played them all according to 'performance conventions'.
HSC pieces: Shostakovich Piano Concerto op 102. movement 1 Chopin Op10 No1 Debussy Broulliards Preludes Bk1 Kats-Chernin Russian Rag Messiaen Regard d'letoile Mozart Sonata for 2 pianos D major
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 208
Full Member
|
OP
Full Member
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 208 |
Or, doing Wagnerian crescendos and phrasings in Mozart. Or, ending a Mozart slow movement with a dramatic flourish, punctuated by jumping up from the bench and throwing the arms in the air in triumph. I think most people would say that goes against "performance conventions." HAHAHA
HSC pieces: Shostakovich Piano Concerto op 102. movement 1 Chopin Op10 No1 Debussy Broulliards Preludes Bk1 Kats-Chernin Russian Rag Messiaen Regard d'letoile Mozart Sonata for 2 pianos D major
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 5,998
5000 Post Club Member
|
5000 Post Club Member
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 5,998 |
I must say, when I saw the term "performance conventions" I just thought of things like: - how you approach the stage - how you acknowledge your audience - how you seat yourself - how you look when you perform - how you dress - how you bow at the end
those sorts of things. I don't think performance conventions can be applied to music itself without making some dangerously broad and limiting statements about interpreting music.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 6,453
6000 Post Club Member
|
6000 Post Club Member
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 6,453 |
Yes, I think ando got it right.
Music is my best friend.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 3,340
3000 Post Club Member
|
3000 Post Club Member
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 3,340 |
sometimes it's a euphemism for 'my personal taste'
Longtemps, je me suis couché de bonne heure, but not anymore!
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 36,805
Yikes! 10000 Post Club Member
|
Yikes! 10000 Post Club Member
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 36,805 |
I have never heard "performance convention" apply to the performer's on stage demeanor(dress, how they walk on stage, bow, etc.). I think stage presence would be one typical term for describing those things.
I think the standard meaning of performance convention refers to musical conventions, i.e. generally agreed upon/accepted ideas about performing music. These could be musical conventions regarding specific periods in classical music, specific composers, or music in general.
It is impossible to figure out precisely what the examiner meant without asking him or at least hearing the performance under question.
Last edited by pianoloverus; 10/05/12 08:44 AM.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 717
500 Post Club Member
|
500 Post Club Member
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 717 |
I must say, when I saw the term "performance conventions" I just thought of things like: - how you approach the stage - how you acknowledge your audience - how you seat yourself - how you look when you perform - how you dress - how you bow at the end
those sorts of things. I don't think performance conventions can be applied to music itself without making some dangerously broad and limiting statements about interpreting music. I have the same understanding of the term as Ando. Along those lines, there's one difference between U.S. and Europenan "conventions" that has always puzzled me. Why do pianists in our country take the stage from the left wing and make their introductory bow from the front of the piano, while most Europeans I've seen enter from the other side and bow behind the piano?
Phil Bjorlo
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 32,060
Yikes! 10000 Post Club Member
|
Yikes! 10000 Post Club Member
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 32,060 |
George Antheil claimed that his innovation for entering the stage was to pull out his revolver and place it conspicuously on the piano.
Semipro Tech
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 521
500 Post Club Member
|
500 Post Club Member
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 521 |
Debussyist -- did the examiner comment specifically on the performance of any of your pieces? If so, that may provide some clarity. The comment you shared with us seems very general.
(My interpretation of performance convention is playing a piece stylistically appropriate.)
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 1,746
1000 Post Club Member
|
1000 Post Club Member
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 1,746 |
It sounds like the examiner was trying to somehow justify whatever evaluation they made of your performance. As for performer conventions I think one dispenses with entering, bowing and all that in an exam setting? If not then those things should be explicitly laid out as specific requirements.
- Schimmel Upright
- Kawai VPC-1 with Pianoteq
Any issues or concerns are piped to /dev/null
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 999
500 Post Club Member
|
500 Post Club Member
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 999 |
As I understand the term, performance conventions are musical nuances that are customary but which are are not explicit in the score.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 208
Full Member
|
OP
Full Member
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 208 |
Well, for the Bach, they said that ' A musical approach and sincere preparation is evident'. For the beethoven to 'be much more careful with notational accuracy'. Brahms: An involved performance with some broad tonal colours. Pulse needs to be more constant in main section.' Debussy: Care needs to be taken with subtlety and colours and precise reading of dynamics'. Messiaen: A dramatic performance overall - rubato marking misapplied to the entrance theme - be careful.Subtleties need attention.'
HSC pieces: Shostakovich Piano Concerto op 102. movement 1 Chopin Op10 No1 Debussy Broulliards Preludes Bk1 Kats-Chernin Russian Rag Messiaen Regard d'letoile Mozart Sonata for 2 pianos D major
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 24,601
Yikes! 10000 Post Club Member
|
Yikes! 10000 Post Club Member
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 24,601 |
As I understand the term, performance conventions are musical nuances that are customary but which are are not explicit in the score. So, now we've got 3 meanings! I'm going with the meaning that Plover and I gave. (Yes, the two of us actually took it basically the same way....well why not.) I realized that the phrase could be taken to refer to what Ando said, and my silly thing about the end of a slow movement of Mozart was sort of a riff on that -- but I wasn't imagining that the phrase might really have referred to that. But maybe it did. I think the third meaning -- i.e. what Ferdinand said -- would be a more esoteric thing than what might have been meant. It could have that meaning in some contexts, but I think rarely, and not here.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 24,601
Yikes! 10000 Post Club Member
|
Yikes! 10000 Post Club Member
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 24,601 |
Well, for the Bach, they said that ' A musical approach and sincere preparation is evident'. For the beethoven to 'be much more careful with notational accuracy'. Brahms: An involved performance with some broad tonal colours. Pulse needs to be more constant in main section.' Debussy: Care needs to be taken with subtlety and colours and precise reading of dynamics'. Messiaen: A dramatic performance overall - rubato marking misapplied to the entrance theme - be careful.Subtleties need attention.' While this doesn't make it greatly clear what exactly was meant by performance conventions, there are a few things that seem to hint at what Plover and I said: the "rubato-misapplied" thing about the Messiaen, also the "subtleties," and the whole thing about the Debussy. BTW I don't know what was meant about "notational accuracy" in the Beethoven. Did they mean that you seemed to have misread a lot of notes? Or maybe you're not sure about that either -- and I wouldn't blame you.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 6,453
6000 Post Club Member
|
6000 Post Club Member
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 6,453 |
I guess you will have to ask your teacher, Debussyist... (although maybe without the "what on earth are... ) Obviously the meaning was not clear if people have so different opinions. I first agreed with ando and still do, but it could also be what other members said (I agree with that too...)
Music is my best friend.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 24,601
Yikes! 10000 Post Club Member
|
Yikes! 10000 Post Club Member
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 24,601 |
Obviously the meaning was not clear if people have so different opinions.... Well, I do think the general meaning is pretty clear. The specifics are harder to know, but we get some hints in the additional thing that Debussyist posted.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 6,453
6000 Post Club Member
|
6000 Post Club Member
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 6,453 |
I hadn't seen her last post... Asking her teacher would still be a good idea though. After all, he/she is the one who will have to help her improve and correct that weakness pointed out by the examiner.
Music is my best friend.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 24,601
Yikes! 10000 Post Club Member
|
Yikes! 10000 Post Club Member
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 24,601 |
....Asking her teacher would still be a good idea though. Sure -- it was always the best idea!
|
|
|
|
Piano
by Gino2 - 04/17/24 02:34 PM
|
Piano
by Gino2 - 04/17/24 02:23 PM
|
|
|
|
Forums43
Topics223,405
Posts3,349,434
Members111,637
|
Most Online15,252 Mar 21st, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|