|
Welcome to the Piano World Piano Forums Over 3 million posts about pianos, digital pianos, and all types of keyboard instruments. Over 100,000 members from around the world.
Join the World's Largest Community of Piano Lovers
(it's free)
It's Fun to Play the Piano ... Please Pass It On!
|
|
73 members (AaronSF, apianostudent, beeboss, brdwyguy, benkeys, Abdulrohmanoman, 15 invisible),
2,241
guests, and
453
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 6,425
6000 Post Club Member
|
6000 Post Club Member
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 6,425 |
Hi Jeff,
Thanks for taking the time to find your old posts.
I read through some of them. I have to be honest. As a mechanical engineer and professional musician and piano tuner, I have delved deeply into mathematics and also holistic practical performance. I have always found mathematical analysis to come up short of high level practical performance execution.
For example, your analysis uses 4:2 octaves as assumptions. Regardless of what the graphs show, 4:2 octaves are just not good enough.
Also, your assertion of always beating partials somewhere in the octave is argued by many experienced tuners, including myself, claiming that octaves can be tuned beatless. How do you explain that? Remember, I'm an engineer, I know the math, and I know the math says it isn't possible. However, as a human piano tuner, I do it every day.
My claim of being able to create in tune single, double, and triple octaves can only be proven in practice; I have to post a video proving my technique. I think then you will hear what I am talking about. Until then...
Mark: I am mistaken. You do not show a "true interest." It seems that what you think you hear must be what everybody actually hears, but are sometimes mistaken. And since you have "delved deeply into mathematics" you do not need me to show you the proof. You can come up with your own proof. But why bother? If it does not agree with what you think you hear, the math is obviously wrong. As I said: ..... OK, so you hear something different. Let's leave it at that. I am not interested in some "Schwartz" comparison.
Jeff Deutschle Part-Time Tuner Who taught the first chicken how to peck?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 3,087
3000 Post Club Member
|
3000 Post Club Member
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 3,087 |
Hi Jeff,
With your permission I will still post the video if I can get around to it.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 6,425
6000 Post Club Member
|
6000 Post Club Member
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 6,425 |
With my permission?
Folks, am I missing something here? It wouldn't be the first time.
Jeff Deutschle Part-Time Tuner Who taught the first chicken how to peck?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 3,087
3000 Post Club Member
|
3000 Post Club Member
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 3,087 |
Hi Jeff,
I tried to send you a PM but your account doesn't accept them.
Yes, you are missing something here. I asked your permission as a matter of courtesy since you feel I do not show a "true interest" in the subject. I found your post to be a bit defensive and I didn't want to agrivate you any further.
I also feel that your 'true interest' is in the playing with of numbers and not the practical execution of the art of piano tuning. Please don't get me wrong. I do not feel that an interest in the purely mathematical aspect of piano tuning is inferior. I admire anyone who can "delve deeply" into that and come up with some interesting proofs. The proofs I am interested in are more practical and similar to the ones I've already posted. My critiques of your approach were from that perspective, and not from that of the validity of the mathematical analysis.
I hope you are ok with that and do not take the posts too personally. I have more than a true interest in this subject. It is my passion, as I know it is yours. I hope we can see the validity in each other's perspective.
Peace,
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 4,263
4000 Post Club Member
|
4000 Post Club Member
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 4,263 |
With regard to “proofs†here is our former Prime Minister on the subject of proofs that need to be proven. What he actually says is below the video in text. A proof is a proof
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 6,425
6000 Post Club Member
|
6000 Post Club Member
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 6,425 |
Mark:
I am frustrated with myself for jumping to a conclusion. I am not going to say just what it was.
Here's the thing: Through the years I have read that people hear things different than I do. And I have read that the math says one thing when I have found that it says another. And I have found that what I hear and the math that I use agree with each other.
OK, so you hear something different than my ears hear, and perhaps your math says something different than my math says, and perhaps what you hear and what your math says do not agree with each other.
Post what you like. I am confused by your courtesy.
Jeff Deutschle Part-Time Tuner Who taught the first chicken how to peck?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 3,087
3000 Post Club Member
|
3000 Post Club Member
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 3,087 |
Hey Jeff,
No worries. I suggest a Skype meeting where we can demonstrate each others techniques. Send me a PM.
Mark
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 6,425
6000 Post Club Member
|
6000 Post Club Member
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 6,425 |
Hey Jeff,
No worries. I suggest a Skype meeting where we can demonstrate each others techniques. Send me a PM.
Mark No thank you.
Jeff Deutschle Part-Time Tuner Who taught the first chicken how to peck?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 728
500 Post Club Member
|
500 Post Club Member
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 728 |
From A#4, I tune 4:2 or 4:2+ octaves up. All depending, from about F5 >, I start tuning & checking my 3rd and 17th, for example, F3/A3 and F3/A5 etc...and continue up as far into the treble/high treble as I can on any particular piano. Then it is single octaves up to the top, either melodic or harmonic or both.
Sometimes, I tune M6/M17ths up through the treble.
Going down from F3, I tune a 5th down, check my 4th and octave and move on down as far as the piano will allow. For single bass strings, I use a variety of techniques, once again, all depending on the piano. It may be ghosting or it may be making the notes sound as good as I can get them to sound with octave, 10th, 17th, 12th and double octave.
Ok, I admit, I use a lot of checks as I tune, I actually, as I wrote earlier, tune with my checks and check with my tune!?!
For the high treble, if it is a good quality piano, and I am tuning for a discerning client, I have begun using the chord of nature, which I think Kent Swafford is the author of.
In general, I tune whole tone tuning. I strive for as clean sounding tuning as possible, smoothing out the 12th and D8ve. I used to stretch my tunings quiet abit but now prefer as clean sounding/just tuning as the piano will allow me.
Last edited by Mark Davis; 12/11/12 05:54 PM. Reason: a few additional words
Mark Piano tuner technician
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 376
Full Member
|
Full Member
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 376 |
I always view the 3 octaves to be my temperment.(the 3 most octaves in the center of the piano)I don't even THINK of "stretching" octaves until that prime space is perfect
Making the world a better sounding place, one piano at a time...
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 551
500 Post Club Member
|
500 Post Club Member
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 551 |
Gary, you seem to be going further and further backwards in time on the forum. Please check the date in the top right corner of the posts you are referring to - it can be a little strange to revive old conversations like this, and needs consideration.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 4,028
4000 Post Club Member
|
4000 Post Club Member
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 4,028 |
The topic here is an interesting question for which there is no one right or wrong answer. The inharmonicity that any piano has makes it technically impossible to have all octaves be perfectly in tune. Yet, over the years, I have heard and read about many ideas for compromise that can make it seem that single, double and triple octaves are all "perfectly" in tune. That, in fact as been for me a very long term goal: just enough width in the single and double octaves for them to be perceived as in tune but ultimately arriving at triple and even quadruple octaves which match perfectly with the fundamental. As long ago as 1992, I tuned a piano at a PTG convention for a recital. I had a very well respected technician who was elderly even then hurriedly approach me after that recital to say, "You have done something with the octaves! I don't know what it is but I like it!" It was a simple matter even at that time of equalizing double octaves and octave-fifths. The idea I used was so simple that it became to be known as "mindless octaves". A few years ago now, when my ETD was in the shop for service so I had to tune entirely by ear for a while, I came up with yet another idea. Why not play all of the notes simultaneously that had their coincident partials all be on the pitch in the upper register to be tuned? Some partial pitches would be slightly sharp, others slightly flat but there would be that one single pitch for the note being tuned that would lie exactly in the middle of all of that slight sharpness and flatness. The beats in all related intervals would literally cancel each other out. So, I adopted this method of tuning both the temperament and extended octaves using tone clusters. Each tone cluster reveals the exact pitch for the note being tuned by exhibiting a ZERO beat! That is true, I must say, regardless of temperament, whether Equal Temperament (ET) or any Well Temperament (WT) or Meantone Temperament (MT) is chosen. On March 9 of this year, I had the opportunity to tune a piano for a Jazz concert event to be held the next day. I used a very slightly different version of ET where all 4ths and 5ths are equalized. The choice of temperament provided the most opportune time to exhibit both perfect octave and temperament relationships. The chords played by the pianist are complex and often deliberately and incisively dissonant. Yet, the piano sounds clear and in tune with itself, which is the goal. The following link is still current and has been running for weeks now but will ultimately be a past "episode" among the 280 such episodes posted as pod casts on the the website of live music from my home town, Madison, Wisconsin. If you like modern Jazz, you will find it intriguing. Even if you don't, you will hear the clarity from the Kawai RX-3 grand piano. All partials are matched perfectly for the ultimate compromise in octaves. All chords between octaves are perfectly balanced using this technique. Here is a rare opportunity to enjoy Jazz by a cutting edge ensemble using a state of the art tuned piano. The video is also in High Definition. You get to hear interviews and discussion of the music interspersed with the music itself. The musicians are all of the highest caliber and are all music educators to one degree or another. The following link is still current and has remained so for a number of weeks because of the very high number of accesses to it from the USA and around the world. This is how octaves on the piano should be tuned: http://www.madtoastlive.com/latest/2013/3/10/episode-280-johannes-wallman.html
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,607
1000 Post Club Member
|
OP
1000 Post Club Member
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,607 |
Thanks Bill and others for the responses. Yes, I was a bit surprised to see my question from the past, but I am still reading any responses; all very interesting and educational.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 32,060
Yikes! 10000 Post Club Member
|
Yikes! 10000 Post Club Member
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 32,060 |
I listened a bit to the video Bill Bremmer posted. It seems like a decent tuning, but I would not ascribe any special significance to it. For those who might be interested, it might be an interesting comparison to the video of one of my tunings that I posted as a sample not long ago, particularly since they are similar pianos, that is, same manufacturer and size.
Semipro Tech
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 944
500 Post Club Member
|
500 Post Club Member
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 944 |
So, I adopted this method of tuning both the temperament and extended octaves using tone clusters. Each tone cluster reveals the exact pitch for the note being tuned by exhibiting a ZERO beat! Bill, What are the clusters in the treble? Single Octave/5th/4th, ie 4 notes within 1 octave? Jim Ialeggio
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 376
Full Member
|
Full Member
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 376 |
That's similar to the question dentists love to answer. "Which teeth do I floss? Only the ones you want to keep"
Making the world a better sounding place, one piano at a time...
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 4,028
4000 Post Club Member
|
4000 Post Club Member
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 4,028 |
I listened a bit to the video Bill Bremmer posted. It seems like a decent tuning, but I would not ascribe any special significance to it. For those who might be interested, it might be an interesting comparison to the video of one of my tunings that I posted as a sample not long ago, particularly since they are similar pianos, that is, same manufacturer and size. Thanks, BDB for the compliment. I sent the link to a film producer client of mine in Los Angeles who has me tune his piano at home (a Yamaha S6) every time I am out there. This is what he had to say: Good grief Bill,
The piano sounds FANTASTIC!! Clear as a bell and it completely sits in the pocket with the rest of the band. And the players on this session really are spectacular. This is the real deal!! I thoroughly enjoyed it, all of it!!
Thanks for sharing and thanks for being so ground breaking in your tuning philosophy!!!! You are making your contribution to the planet!!!
best, Randy As I often say, I don't tune to please or impress other piano technicians, I do it for the artists and clients I serve. Jim, I hope you will be at the convention so you can find out what it is all about. Actually, you can find out a lot more what it is not about than what it is. There will be a whole day tuning seminar with one guy taking the whole day to tune the piano. I can't imagine the long windedness and complexity of what will be offered. There will be another where the instructor takes two periods to tune the piano. Knowing the style pf presentation, it will probably be more mystical and magical than about good, solid technique that gets the job done. Aural tuning has become increasingly out of reach for many tuners. All of the complex checks and dizzying rapid beats are beyond what many people can handle today. But guess what? They were also beyond what 17th and 18th Century (probably 19th Century too) keyboard tuners could handle. So, I looked for a way to simplify everything. The way the piano was tuned in that recording could be written on a half page. To answer your question, the notes, F#4 to E5 are tuned by playing the octave, 4th & 5th below them and tuning the note to be tuned until zero beat is heard. The notes, F5 to E6 are tuned by playing the double octave, octave-fifth and single octave while holding them with the Sostenuto pedal and tuning the note to be tuned until there is zero beat heard. The notes from F6 to C8 are tuned by playing the triple octave, double octave-fifth, double octave, octave-fifth and single octave while holding with the Sostenuto pedal and tuning the note to be tuned until there is zero beat. The notes from E3 to F2 are tuned similarly: octave, 4th & 5th. E2 to F1: double octave, octave-fifth and single octave using the sostenuto pedal. The lowest Bass from A0 to E1 are tuned by playing just a single octave loudly but with the damper pedal fully open, allowing the entire rest of the piano which has been previously tuned to resonate. The not being tuned is placed at the point where there is the quietest resonance. Even the temperament is constructed using tone clusters. Rather than complex checks, the zero beat approach gets each note right the first time, every time with no need to perform any further checks. It also works for getting the pitch dead on to the pitch source. I used to only be able to get my pitch to measure somewhere within a cent of dead on, 0.0 but with the tone cluster approach, I can get it to read amazingly at 0.0 every time! The high treble can be adapted for the tuning exam simply by changing the tone cluster selection. For the notes C7-B7 during a tuning exam, play the single octave and M10 below the note being tuned and tune for the least amount of resonance. The entire idea works because of the canceling effect of any two or more sets of equal beats.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 2,667
2000 Post Club Member
|
2000 Post Club Member
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 2,667 |
Even the temperament is constructed using tone clusters. Rather than complex checks, the zero beat approach gets each note right the first time, every time with no need to perform any further checks. Bill, this seems to be a new development, different to your previously posted methods/sequences (e.g. ET via Marpurg, which was centered strongly around comparing the beat rate of a 4th to that of a 5th, or judging beat rates of contiguous M3s). I'd be very interested if you could elaborate somewhat on this cluster technique without the need for further checks... Thanks, Mark
Autodidact interested in piano technology. 1970 44" Ibach, daily music maker. 1977 "Ortega" 8' + 8' harpsichord (Rainer Schütze, Heidelberg)
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 944
500 Post Club Member
|
500 Post Club Member
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 944 |
Bill,
...Won't be in Chicago...
I'm already using quite a bit of this in my tunings, given your previous postings on this, Stoppers aural approach to setting octaves, and the tonal goal I've been shooting for from the start.
A procedural or efficiency question:
The double and triple octave clusters are important, but I also find them time consuming to use as they require both hands on the keys...back and forth, keys-to-the-lever, keys-to-the-lever. On an upright with the lack of sostenuto makes things a bit more clumsy as well. Any comment on achieving more efficiency of movement doing this.
Stopper's aural procedure achieved the beat cancelling effect withing the span of a single octave , but I have not been able to get it working as well as the multi-octave approach you are using.
By the way, finding the place where the low bass, and even the high bass kicks the whole open damper belly into resonance is so easy it's not funny. Couples the whole instrument together into a single whole...especially on smaller instruments.
Jim Ialeggio
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 944
500 Post Club Member
|
500 Post Club Member
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 944 |
Another interesting thing about this procedure is that it uses and refers to the temperament region directly to tune the entire instrument, rather than working off of whatever accumulated error may have crept in to the usual octave-by-octave approach.
Jim Ialeggio
|
|
|
|
|
|
Piano
by Gino2 - 04/17/24 02:34 PM
|
Piano
by Gino2 - 04/17/24 02:23 PM
|
|
Forums43
Topics223,405
Posts3,349,434
Members111,637
|
Most Online15,252 Mar 21st, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|