This custom search works much better than the built in one and allows searching older posts.
|
|
69880 Members
40 Forums
143486 Topics
2075790 Posts
Max Online: 15252 @ 03/21/10 11:39 PM
|
|
|
#1995478 - 12/06/12 01:53 PM
Yamaha C7 vs. Wilh.Steinberg 187
|
Junior Member
Registered: 06/14/12
Posts: 2
|
Hi, i have been pianoshopping for quite a while and I have narrowed my options to two pianos. One is a 1980 Yamaha C7. It has two pedals, so I assume it is grey market. It's in original, yet quite good condition. It has some minor scratches etc. of course, but it looks like it was played very mildly, the action is nice and even, but i think the hammers need some reshaping if not replacing. The sound is warm, mellow, not overpowering (probably because of the hammers, I saw a photo from its previous home, and they had it in a very small room). The other piano is a brand new Wilh.Steinberg P-187. It is basically the same piano as the Brodmann 187, but i suppose it has a different action. They say it has a Flemming action. I looked it up and Flemming is a brand name owned by Wilh.Steinberg, so i think it is just a glorified name for the Chinese action. The asking price on the Yamaha is slightly higher (about 10%) and I really like the idea of having a 7"+ feet grand. It is really a different world. I would like to know your opinions what investments might catch up on me in the next few years on a 30+y piano and I am aslo interested in your experiences with the Chinese pianos, Brodmann and Wilh.Steinberg. Thanks  Oh, and I almost forgot. I am a piano student (master), so the piano will be pounded 6hrs a day when i am home 
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#1995498 - 12/06/12 02:24 PM
Re: Yamaha C7 vs. Wilh.Steinberg 187
[Re: petzzo]
|
1000 Post Club Member
Registered: 05/18/06
Posts: 1444
Loc: Toronto
|
I teach on a couple of 25-30 year old C7's at a college where they get a lot of pounding and they hold up well. They certainly define the term 'workhorse' You really can't go wrong with a C7--presuming its been given a clean bill of health from a technician. Also dont underestimate the impact of some voicing and regulating on a piano that age. It's amazing how much the sound can be warmed up with voicing and the action can be 'tightened' with a regulation. Good luck.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#1995519 - 12/06/12 03:40 PM
Re: Yamaha C7 vs. Wilh.Steinberg 187
[Re: petzzo]
|
7000 Post Club Member
Registered: 03/25/06
Posts: 7102
Loc: Georgia, USA
|
Welcome to the Piano World Forums! I reckon I’m a little bias here, but I second AJF’s comments about the C7. I have an older C7 (1978 made for USA market) and I absolutely love it. The low bass will make your mouth water and the upper treble will bark loud enough to get your attention; even the C8 note is clear and recognizable. The action is smooth and quick. The instrument far exceeds my meager playing skills. Thing is, when I’m playing it, I have the perception that I can really play a piano.  Good luck. Rick
_________________________
Piano enthusiast and amateur musician: "Treat others the way you would like to be treated". Yamaha C7. YouTube Channel
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#1995520 - 12/06/12 03:40 PM
Re: Yamaha C7 vs. Wilh.Steinberg 187
[Re: petzzo]
|
1000 Post Club Member
Registered: 04/18/08
Posts: 1466
Loc: Lower Mainland, BC
|
C7 all the way. 6hrs a day is far too much for most pianos, but the Yamahas can take it. The Steinberg/Brodmann may sound a bit sweeter now, but it will never have the bass a C7 has, and most likely it will need more regulation the more you play it. Also, I remember another thread about a bar that had a Brodmann in it that continually had broken strings. If you're a heavy player this might be a consideration.
_________________________
Recordings of my recent solo piano and piano/keyboard trio jazz standards.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#1995525 - 12/06/12 03:46 PM
Re: Yamaha C7 vs. Wilh.Steinberg 187
[Re: petzzo]
|
1000 Post Club Member
Registered: 01/12/04
Posts: 1100
Loc: chicago, il
|
yamahas in general are workhorses; lots of highly qualified pianists (teachers and/or performers) have yamahas at home and perform on steinways in public.
_________________________
BA music performance former professional touring & recording musician (drums, percussion) former member, board of directors, music arts school and music inst. of chicago adult restarter (piano) circa 2000 diary of an amateur pianist
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#1995586 - 12/06/12 05:59 PM
Re: Yamaha C7 vs. Wilh.Steinberg 187
[Re: petzzo]
|
2000 Post Club Member
Registered: 02/18/05
Posts: 2377
Loc: Urbandale, Iowa
|
There's something about a 7+ foot piano that a mere 6 footer can't do. Get the C7 evaluated by a tech and if it passes don't look back. Nothing against the Steinberg, but the extra foot and a half will make a huge difference. I don't have a crystal ball, but I see a C7 in your future.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#1995600 - 12/06/12 06:30 PM
Re: Yamaha C7 vs. Wilh.Steinberg 187
[Re: petzzo]
|
Yikes! 10000 Post Club Member
Registered: 07/03/01
Posts: 13216
Loc: Surrey, B.C.
|
Why not try a 7'Brodmann and then compare again?
Apples to apples....
Norbert
_________________________
www.heritagepianos.com Greater Vancouver B.C. piano dealers for : C.Sauter, Estonia, Kayserburg, Ritmuller, Brodmann, Hailun, 604-951-8642
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#1995607 - 12/06/12 06:50 PM
Re: Yamaha C7 vs. Wilh.Steinberg 187
[Re: Norbert]
|
Junior Member
Registered: 06/14/12
Posts: 2
|
Thank you very much for all of your replies. Norbert, you are right about comparing with a similar size piano, but a new Steinberg 212 is out of my budget. As I am looking at the prices right now, the difference between 187 and 212 is more than 5k euros.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#1995609 - 12/06/12 07:00 PM
Re: Yamaha C7 vs. Wilh.Steinberg 187
[Re: petzzo]
|
Yikes! 10000 Post Club Member
Registered: 07/03/01
Posts: 13216
Loc: Surrey, B.C.
|
petzzo: As an as highly advanced pianist as you are, it should be us seeking your advice rather than the other way around.... Norbert
Edited by Norbert (12/06/12 07:01 PM)
_________________________
www.heritagepianos.com Greater Vancouver B.C. piano dealers for : C.Sauter, Estonia, Kayserburg, Ritmuller, Brodmann, Hailun, 604-951-8642
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#1995904 - 12/07/12 11:09 AM
Re: Yamaha C7 vs. Wilh.Steinberg 187
[Re: JazzPianoOnline]
|
Junior Member
Registered: 12/09/11
Posts: 8
Loc: Munich, Germany
|
Go with the yamaha. It is a known quantity. The Chinese piano is not. The scale design, the bass response and the tuning stability are proven and will stand up to your use and reward your efforts. +1
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#1996170 - 12/07/12 10:21 PM
Re: Yamaha C7 vs. Wilh.Steinberg 187
[Re: petzzo]
|
Full Member
Registered: 10/24/09
Posts: 410
Loc: Southwest
|
Since you've done a lot of shopping already, get a trusted independent tech to check the used C7 and give you an estimate of what it might need in the short and long term. If the tech gives it a thumbs up, then buy what you love. If you're gonna spend 6 hours a day practicing, the piano you buy should sound wonderful to you, stand up to the wear, and be affordable to maintain.
Best of luck and congratlations on achieving your level of piano proficiency!
_________________________
J & J Yahama C3 PE Casio Privia PX-330 "Inspiration exists, but it has to find you working." Pablo Picasso
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|