2022 our 25th year online!

Welcome to the Piano World Piano Forums
Over 3 million posts about pianos, digital pianos, and all types of keyboard instruments.
Over 100,000 members from around the world.
Join the World's Largest Community of Piano Lovers (it's free)
It's Fun to Play the Piano ... Please Pass It On!

SEARCH
Piano Forums & Piano World
(ad)
Who's Online Now
29 members (crab89, CraiginNZ, bwv543, Cominut, Colin Miles, Andre Fadel, 10 invisible), 1,231 guests, and 278 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Hop To
Page 21 of 35 1 2 19 20 21 22 23 34 35
JFP #2022094 01/27/13 11:18 AM
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 803
H
500 Post Club Member
Offline
500 Post Club Member
H
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 803
When can I buy one of these in the US?

I think the decision to leave other controllers off was a good idea. Those mechanisms tend to create slight noises, especially if used heavily. Small workstation keyboards are readily available and usually come with many more features suited to those tasks...

That's the reason I wish the top was just flat. Too much form over function there. I'm not sure if it was cost driven because of some underling similarity to the MP10 molding, but at the VPC's price, I hope that wasn't the reason.


Last edited by Hideki Matsui; 01/27/13 11:23 AM.

Shigeru Kawai SK5
Vintage Vibe 64
Roland LX-15e
Roland Jupiter 80
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 19,097
Yikes! 10000 Post Club Member
Online Content
Yikes! 10000 Post Club Member
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 19,097
Originally Posted by Hideki Matsui
When can I buy one of these in the US?


Kraft are showing end of February.

James
x


Employed by Kawai Japan, however the opinions I express are my own.
Nord Electro 3 & occasional rare groove player.
JFP #2022116 01/27/13 11:54 AM
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 424
Full Member
Offline
Full Member
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 424
+1, and I cannot decide it for the moment, whether GF or RM3 is the top Kawai action. While GF beeing with the longest keys, is still the question it is necessarily the better playable one.

Key length make the finger touch position (front/back of the keys) more neutral, it can have theoretically some negative effects too (perhaps bigger inertia). Very long keys on a concert grand are partially because of the long strings which have to be hitted by the hammer at certain otpimal point far enough from the key with long enough hammer parts. Not playability is the primary issue to have the longest keys on an accoustic concert grand.

We should wait for the reviews and own experience to be able to judge.

I don't know, how heavy it would have been with GF, I guess something over 40kg could have seemed to be a showstopper for Kawai.

Stand with boxes and soundboard - what would be the pros/cons in comparison with a CA95 e.g.? Price would probably be roughly the same, I can think of only the better movability of the keyboard + separate minimal cabinet.


Acoustic: own clavichord!, Burger&Jacoby,Biel (nice vintage vertical)
Digital: CA65; Pianoteq; Sampled:Galaxy VintageD+Vienna(Bösendorfer)
Sampletekk Black,PMI, etc...
Harpsi: Beurmann Dutch+Sampletekk, Clavichord:PMI+Wavelore+organs
JFP #2022117 01/27/13 11:55 AM
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 4,675
4000 Post Club Member
Offline
4000 Post Club Member
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 4,675
Originally Posted by JFP
I'm a bit lost on the negative tone and tenor of this thread. To me the VPC is especially defined by what is is NOT and does NOT pretend to be.

Well, it's NOT their best keys, in a case that is NOT the most ergonomic for PC use, with a UI that is NOT the most intuitive (use of the power switch & keys to select curves, no feedback whatsoever that I can see, though yes of course you can access these things and more via a PC but not a MAC).

The tone isn't so much negative or nit picky but to prod Kawai to make products that are more functional and perhaps less stylish if necessary. If this product made more sense I'd consider buying it, even though I'm pretty much against the bits and pieces approach to DPs.

Negative assessments are potentially much more valuable to manufacturers than positive. Anyone can praise a product, and manufacturers usually pay people to do so. I'm not crabbing here to make Kawai or anyone that works for them or anyone who owns their products upset. I just want better DPs - even the very best have some pretty awful things to crab about.

davinwv #2022155 01/27/13 12:55 PM
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,237
V
3000 Post Club Member
Offline
3000 Post Club Member
V
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,237
Well, if nothing else, it's generated a lot of discussion - and that's grist to Kawai's mill. Without these forum debates I suspect it would be quite difficult to get recognition for such a niche product.

Although one can bitch and moan about the VPC for what it is not, the more interesting thing will be to see how much traction it gains among the increasing number of people who exclusively play outboard VSTs (itself a rather sad testament to the DP manufacturers' generally slow pace of innovation). I would speculate that it was relatively straightforward for Kawai to re-engineer their MP10 case to accommodate the VPC, and so the presumably low investment in R&D made it worthwhile for them to float this product - almost as a toe-in-the-water.


"you don't need to have been a rabbit in order to become a veterinarian"

mabraman, 2015
dewster #2022170 01/27/13 01:19 PM
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 148
K
Full Member
Offline
Full Member
K
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 148
Originally Posted by dewster
Originally Posted by JFP
I'm a bit lost on the negative tone and tenor of this thread. To me the VPC is especially defined by what is is NOT and does NOT pretend to be.

Well, it's NOT their best keys, in a case that is NOT the most ergonomic for PC use, with a UI that is NOT the most intuitive (use of the power switch & keys to select curves, no feedback whatsoever that I can see, though yes of course you can access these things and more via a PC but not a MAC).

The tone isn't so much negative or nit picky but to prod Kawai to make products that are more functional and perhaps less stylish if necessary. If this product made more sense I'd consider buying it, even though I'm pretty much against the bits and pieces approach to DPs.

Negative assessments are potentially much more valuable to manufacturers than positive. Anyone can praise a product, and manufacturers usually pay people to do so. I'm not crabbing here to make Kawai or anyone that works for them or anyone who owns their products upset. I just want better DPs - even the very best have some pretty awful things to crab about.


+1 thumb

K.


Kevin L. Spindler
Early Keyboard Instruments
Stonington, CT
Harpsichords & Clavichords
Custom Instruments Built to Order
Rebuilding, Repair & Restoration
http://www.facebook.com/kevin.spindler.129
Kawai James #2022183 01/27/13 01:52 PM
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 3,552
G
3000 Post Club Member
Offline
3000 Post Club Member
G
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 3,552
Originally Posted by Kawai James
Originally Posted by gvfarns
However, the price for the MP10 is about $500 too high for what it is--I'd say the mp10 should cost about $2k and the VPC should cost $1500 or so.


How about the price of the RD-700NX?


Roland is always overpriced, which is why I never recommend it unless someone has already decided that only Roland will do. Actually, it's relatively seldom recommended outright here because it's too pricey (the FP7F gets far more recommendations despite not having the studio piano voice, which is apparently divine).

The FP7F is marginal at $2000. Once you get above $2000 for a slab-style piano, in my opinion you are charging too much. I don't know of any pure digital slab that has features I consider worth more than that.

Last edited by gvfarns; 01/27/13 01:55 PM.
Kawai James #2022188 01/27/13 01:58 PM
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 3,552
G
3000 Post Club Member
Offline
3000 Post Club Member
G
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 3,552
Originally Posted by Kawai James
That's good to hear, thank you. I'm hopeful that others expressing concern about the lack of pitchbend/modulation wheels will also change their opinion once they experience how great the action feels for themselves.


They can have the wheels from my MP8 if they want. For most people, these seem to me to be quite a waste of space!

davinwv #2022203 01/27/13 02:41 PM
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 1,482
J
JFP Offline
1000 Post Club Member
Offline
1000 Post Club Member
J
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 1,482
@Dewster

Since this VPC is made to be used with software instruments; accessing curves and switching presets can perfectly well be done from within the PC. Which is connected anyway - to run your virtual instrument(s). Don't really see the problem here. True there's no Mac version (yet) , but here are workarounds and I would be very surprised if no Mac version would come somewhere in the future.

Case is not ergonomic ; if you mean the curve, I understood so far that this is only so little that it isn't a real problem in practice. Haven't seen one in real live, but for now I'll take their word for it.

GF may be their top keybed at the moment, so why the RM3 ? I don't know the exact reason, but I'm sure the GF has been considered at some stage, but fell through, because of weight, size, cost , or another factor. And the RM3 , especially with 3rd sensor and perhaps some other improvements, is certainly not a bad keybed ! Perhaps James can enlighten us on why its rm3 and not GF, or not, but still the new rm3 looks promising and will probably end up in the Mp10 successor and who knows other models to come.

I hope it will hi the shops soon, would like to try for myself. So far I like the VPC , especially because its such a nice basic approach from where you can build up your own setup around it and make it as simple or complex as you like or need.


davinwv #2022210 01/27/13 02:49 PM
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 7,268
7000 Post Club Member
Offline
7000 Post Club Member
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 7,268
I am sorry for the silly question but what's the difference between a specially dedicated touch curve in the controller versus touch curve in the VST? I am really confused as to why this has been advertised as something special and new. Pianoteq users already have a set of touch curves for most of the MIDI-capable keyboards.

Furthermore, I've noticed that with each piano in Ivory, I need to tweak the touch curve a little - Bosendorfer, Steinway, Yamaha, Fazioli - they all need a different touch curve and that's exactly what I've done - one custom curve for the German D and one for the Italian (both created and saved as presets in the Ivory software itself). So, VPC obviously has been optimized for one specific Ivory model and not all of them.

Last edited by CyberGene; 01/27/13 02:52 PM.

I'm not around. You can find me here
My YouTube, My Soundcloud
Yamaha N1X, Cybrid DIY hybrid controller
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 3,325
S
3000 Post Club Member
Offline
3000 Post Club Member
S
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 3,325
Originally Posted by In A Silent Way

If it makes it silly nonsense,....


The "silly nonsense" comment was just to warn folks that my post contained a video which is off topic - it was about cars, not digital pianos. smile

I was agreeing with you, and was showing you an example of a similar kind of thing happening with Porsche's lineup. (did you actually watch the video, and understand it?)

Greg.

Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 69
Full Member
Offline
Full Member
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 69
I'm really glad to see Kawai taking initiative and finally coming out with this type of board! Kawai's DP actions are one of their greatest assets, and people have been asking for this type of keyboard for quite a while.

When I was shopping for a keyboard over the summer to replace my aging Roland Fantom X8, I was debating between a Kawai MP6 and a MP8II/MP10, as my primary concern was getting the best action I could for the money and using software pianos. I went ahead and got the MP6, as I couldn't justify the cost of the MP10 when I knew I wasn't really going to use the other sounds/features and primarily just wanted the beefier action. If the VPC had been available at the time it would have been the obvious front runner for me.


I see it as Kawai being forward-thinking, realizing that digital piano players seek out the best AP piano sounds they can get, which usually leads them to a setup involving a outboard computer with some software pianos and a Midi controller. Instead of Kawai being stubborn and refusing to recognize that market (and only sticking to stage pianos and console pianos) they've opened up a new area in their product line that I think is pretty exciting.

The VPC1 is a first gen product of a new line/model, so people should lighten up a little if it doesn't meet every request they have the first time out. Although I can see how it doesn't need as frequent updates/releases as keyboards with on-board sounds, I still hope that Kawai listens to feedback consensus and makes whatever refinements they can to the eventual VPC2.


Here is some current early feedback:

First off, I was curious as to why it uses RM3 instead of GF action? Was it a space issue (GF being too big for a slab keyboard?) or something else? I was thinking the goal was put Kawai's best possible DP action into a controller, and while I'm sure RM3 (with the new third sensor too) is great, I'm confused why it wasn't designed with the GF action instead?
Originally Posted by JFP
@Dewster
GF may be their top keybed at the moment, so why the RM3 ? I don't know the exact reason, but I'm sure the GF has been considered at some stage, but fell through, because of weight, size, cost , or another factor. And the RM3 , especially with 3rd sensor and perhaps some other improvements, is certainly not a bad keybed ! Perhaps James can enlighten us on why its rm3 and not GF, or not, but still the new rm3 looks promising and will probably end up in the Mp10 successor and who knows other models to come.


I wouldn't think size would be a concern, as it seems like the VPC is really designed to stay at home. Weight falls under a similar category - I don't people were planning on gigging with the VPC1. Cost? Maybe... Any input would be appreciated James smile


While I understand and appreciate the design focus of pure simplicity, I can't help but think this focus is a little too narrow for the VPC1. I envisioned this sort of board as being more common place in a studio setting and existing as a master controller.

The simplistic design of the VPC1 sort of feels like it's designed to go into a living room or something, and in that regard I think it may be intruding on, and conflicting with, and overlapping the space shared by some of the Kawai console DPs (like the CE220). I know they are different products, but I get an akward feeling that some of the same audience is targeted with both of them.

I feel like there is some identity ambiguity to the VPC. Is the intent of it to just be high end action-in-a-box with a USB out and nothing else - designed strictly for digital acoustic piano playing, or is the intent to be a more versatile "Master controller" that utilizes Kawai's great action, but is more at home in a studio (and less concerned with living room aesthetics) and more capable of controlling other sounds if need be although aimed at controlling acoustic piano sounds?

It seems like one option for the VPC is to embrace and commit to being a midi controller more, and let go of being a pure AP focused controller. It could go the whole nine-yards instead of being just an "Virtual Piano Controller". I was expecting something a little more utilitarian looking, with more control surfaces on it.


Maybe Kawai could have two midi controllers:

1) One like the current VPC1, which is just the bare bones action-in-a-box, designed for people who strictly want the best possible action at the lowest possible price, whether they are only going to be using it as solely for acoustic piano playing via outboard VSTs, or they just already have other misc. midi controllers to cover the other stuff and now need just a great piano action controller...

or,

2) A second model that builds off the first one but is designed more as a studio master controller for and adds more midi controllers (mod wheel, pitch bend, faders, knobs etc) at a higher cost. Again, strictly a midi controller, but just a more "complete" one.

Or maybe just a compromise between the two, still very simplistic but with just a few more controls on it.

Again, I do understand what Kawai was going for with this first iteration. Something about it just feels a little akward. Maybe it's the the looks of the current VPC that are throwing me off a little. It's just very strange to look at a slab style DP and not see any buttons and controls on it. It looks too clean to fit in with the "dirty" world of outboard sounds, with laptops and cables and wires - like it should look less like a piece of furniture cabinetry and more like a piece of computer hardware (similar to the keyboard cases on boards Roland/Korg), with possibly some more accommodations for the computer setup/environment it's designed to be paired too. I'm not sure what those accommodations would be yet, but just something to think about/brainstorm.


Anyways, once again I'm very glad and excited that Kawai is entering this space and I hope they keep this line around and continue to improve it. I got my MP6 less than a year ago (and love it) so I'm good on keyboards for a while, but there's a strong chance that whenever it does comes time to upgrade, I'll be a looking at this VPC line.


I'm quoting a post below that shares some similar thoughts/feedback, just so people can read it again if they missed it...


Originally Posted by In A Silent Way


- the action is certainly good, but it seems, not as good as it would have been if it were simply the best current available one. I'm ready to bet many people will have to decide if they catch the VPC1 train right now, or just delay their purchase to see if the coming VPC2 or MP12 will instead or not really be the complete deal at once. As it is, the VPC1 looks like the keyboard of the day before into the box of day to come, and the compromise is a bit of a turn off indeed.

- The missing mod wheels : it's a real question, why not include the mod wheels into a discrete trap onto the VPC1.2, so that you wouldn't have to face the technical detail if you don't need to, but wouldn't have either to buy or use another keyboard to simply access this necessary feature?

I'm certain the VPC1 might be a valuable good for 2 decades, but I won't be purchasing one now because of these (as for now) two major points 1 and 2, and it's a real pity to feel so, because if Kawai had say delayed by a half year the launch of the perfect piano controller to include the very demands of musicians, and, say had simply announced at winter NAMM 2013 such a launch within 6 months to go, the expectations would have retained many people from buying a current average other controller, and the VPC1 would really have started as a legend already, be it the price an extra 300-500$ to fill in the extra features. Maybe I'm wrong, I'm not into marketing after all, but maybe I read the comments and I feel the thing as well as many people do?


So What would the VPC1 be to me in this situation? I'm afraid to answer, not a replacement for the action of my midified upright piano or an alternate/stage solution, nor a fully satisfying piano controller for the studio, but an ersatz still, ok a one ersatz significantly better than the ones of the other manufacturers, but not the promised land's gear yet.

...the best to date wooden action with the bare minimum controls on board, elegantly hidden behind a simple trap into the cabinet, so that in 30 years from now, people do still remember this product as the thing to go with of all time?

And all this doesn't really reduce my enthusiasm for Kawai products, simply it reduces my interest for the purchase of the current VPC1. For the price difference, the MP10 or coming MP12 (or whatever the name) or the Ca65 might just be as good to a new comer. Some brands prefer to scale their products without compromising, highest price the highest value, but somehow Kawai DP dpt ask you to choose between best action/best sound/best value, and you can't seem to be able to get the best of it all, whatever the price, making it all tocks in a strategy that is hard to read and somehow unsatisfying in a way. I can understand the fact is due to the calendar of the market and shows and launch schedules, but it tends to last for years now, and while it keeps the interest alive, it keeps disappointing the people who really need these instruments and actually, happen to really buy them occasionally, or not at the end of the day.

Maybe the idea stipulating that 'less is more' is fully operating on this concept. Compare to the MP10 or CA65, it's less because it's a wooden controller, but it's much more because it's the promise of a couple of decades of a real solid reliable piano touch. I'm pretty certain in 20 years from now people will remember the VPC1 as a excellent virtual piano keyboard, and the products in this aisle of the hall of fame are quite not so many, maybe the Roland V-Piano, the Korg SV series, the Yamaha Avant Grand series, and some others will be as well. In this perspective of 'less is more' though, not including any rocket science optional board or expansion card ability is certainly coherent, as the laptop market will anyway always have so much more to compete with expansion, and at constant falling prices and raising capacities.

this is the league in which it is playing. A unique product today you'd still probably be wanting to buy used in a third hand deposit in 20 years from now. But maybe the 'less' of the motto is a little too restrictive with the VPC1 : it's clearly oriented toward DAW music production or virtual instruments playing, and in the DAW music production of today, the mod wheel, the after touch and the pitch wheel remain essential expression controllers, as well as software samplers and synths articulations and modulations necessities. And it's a little different not to have on board logical MIDI features like splitting and multi-timbral routing ability, because you can certainly fix all this from within the DAW software itself, and not to have the hardware wheels and MIDI implementations for current basic modulations, because it limits the range of use strictly and for good. In this perspective, including in a panel, hidden behind a trap into the unit or as an after-market option, 2 or better 3 distinct controllers for the available expression options of software gears, as long as they remain assignable on the software side to any of the available 127 controllers value, and you can do anything you want. In the old days this was summed up into an XY matrix controller with pressure as well on hardware synths, there are certainly ways to design an elegant button for that, it might require periods of intense testing for durability, but it should not be a problem to a company like Kawai to include this as a minimal service to the people who in the end will really make use of such a virtual piano controller, or should it?

You could as well see it from a customer casuistic point of view : 1) I am a piano player, then why not buy a piano instead of a controller? ; 2) I am a music producer, I need a fully operating controller ; 3) I'm a hardware junky, I won't see the difference between the wooden keys and the plastic one anyway ; 4) I'm a home musician and I need a dp to play at night, but I most certainly then don't have the patience to catch with the knowledge graph to plug VSTIs into a mute keyboard ; and so on.

So in the end who's left with a need for this certainly excellent, but quite slightly coming short of a button VPC1?

Instead of that, Kawai could have strike in right away, or the next time, with one genuine controller of which everyone would say soon enough to advise about DAW and piano music production : don't bother pal, VPC1 all the way for you as for anyone else, it's become a standard, can't go wrong with this. (I hope this will be the case anyhow over time.)

Concerning the keyboard itself, the fact that it's not labelled GF, maybe there's a general issue concerning the superlative outdoing into the process of this labelling, all across the market, like it were with software versions at times, DeLuxe, silver, gold, platinum, titanium, polonium or what not, etc. It would be simple to clarify this for Kawai and stop calling versions and confusing the end user all the time, it would furthermore leave the other brands to their label names dropping : why Kawai not to switch to a cristal clear marketing about their product lines, and simply explain they use the best keyboard available for the line and price range of the product, in a way that involved design and technology would be easy for the end user to scale across the same keyboard label once for all? I bet the one manufacturer that is able the first to cut the superlative overbid upon this labelling, will see its sales rise every September.


iasw

Last edited by chicolom; 01/27/13 04:25 PM.

Kawai MP6 | Ravenscroft 275 | True Keys American & Italian | Galaxy Vintage D, II, & Giant | Old Black Grand | Imperfect Fazioli
JFP #2022244 01/27/13 04:16 PM
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 213
K
Full Member
Offline
Full Member
K
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 213
Originally Posted by JFP

GF may be their top keybed at the moment, so why the RM3 ? I don't know the exact reason, but I'm sure the GF has been considered at some stage, but fell through, because of weight, size, cost , or another factor. And the RM3 , especially with 3rd sensor and perhaps some other improvements, is certainly not a bad keybed ! Perhaps James can enlighten us on why its rm3 and not GF, or not, but still the new rm3 looks promising and will probably end up in the Mp10 successor and who knows other models to come.


How much better is GF compared to RM3? I tried the RM3 in a MP10 and found it to be an amazing action... and the RM3 in the VPC is improved. Never tried a GF action. My question is: Is the GF action so much better that makes the RM3 II look bad?

Anyway, right now the VPC is probably the controller (not the DP) with the best keybed out there. That's an achievement.

Regards,
Kurt.-

sullivang #2022256 01/27/13 04:39 PM
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 75
I
Full Member
Offline
Full Member
I
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 75
No I didn't watch it sorry but it's ok, nothing was meant personally, sorry I didn't quite get your point at first Master nomothetics wink

I was thinking about the move that would be really good for Kawai to develop : a VPCx that would integrate a physically modelled piano. That's a lot to develop though.

I also wonder what the VPC1 would be with a Gem RP-X hooked up to it, and the good over time such a virtual piano controller could bring to the piano expander market as well, which seem quite anaemic at the moment. I think CME in Italy still keeps the GEM RP-X production up right now, but maybe CME would be trading the license for this GEM product and Kawai could acquire it to build upon this past success and propose a complementary piano expander? Kawai already knows how to program modelled sympathetic resonances, and the Harmonic Imaging technology seems pretty hybrid all the way like the RP-X series, maybe they could split the MP10 or the ES7 in half for good and offer the other half to the expander market?


davinwv #2022264 01/27/13 05:22 PM
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 3,552
G
3000 Post Club Member
Offline
3000 Post Club Member
G
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 3,552
Question about this VPC: it appears to be powered by USB, right? So if you are using the actual MIDI connector, is there power supplied through that, or do you need to connect a USB cable as well? Or does it have an optional power supply of some type.

I'll be using USB, so it won't matter in my case, but I'm curious.

davinwv #2022272 01/27/13 05:43 PM
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 5,894
D
dmd Offline
5000 Post Club Member
Offline
5000 Post Club Member
D
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 5,894
Well, one concept that has taken a forward step in this product is probably the velocity curve setting.

If you are using one of the software products that has given their "seal of approval" for the built-in velocity curves you can be assured (theoretically) that the presets within each of those software packages has the sound the authors intended ... theoretically.

That should mean less need for fussing with the velocity curves within the software itself.... theoretically.


Of course, I do not really understand why that would be necessary. You would think that all the software packages would expect the exact same standard midi codes but that is a whole new topic.





Last edited by dmd; 01/27/13 05:47 PM.

Don

Kawai MP7SE, On Stage KS7350 keyboard stand, KRK Classic 5 powered monitors, SennHeiser HD 559 Headphones
dmd #2022277 01/27/13 05:55 PM
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 6,730
A
6000 Post Club Member
Offline
6000 Post Club Member
A
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 6,730
Originally Posted by dmd
Of course, I do not really understand why that would be necessary. You would think that all the software packages would expect the exact same standard midi codes but that is a whole new topic.

They expect the same MIDI codes... i.e. out of the box, they all know what they want to do when they receive a note velocity of 50 (or whatever other number). The problem is that different keyboards require a different amount of finger force to generate that note velocity of 50. So for ideal response, there has to be some calibration between how hard you're striking the keys, and how you want the software to respond, and that will be different with different keyboards.

davinwv #2022281 01/27/13 06:04 PM
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 7,268
7000 Post Club Member
Offline
7000 Post Club Member
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 7,268
I still don't understand why the "approved" touch curve should be in controller and not in the software. It doesn't make any difference. You either leave your controller on "default" and choose dedicated touch curve in the VST or vice versa. And according to me it's easier for software companies to do that since they already have touch curve screen. Did Kawai pay to Synthogy for putting the "approved" label? Is this part of an agreement than no other company could pay for a dedicated touch curve? Really, I don't get the idea.


I'm not around. You can find me here
My YouTube, My Soundcloud
Yamaha N1X, Cybrid DIY hybrid controller
dmd #2022283 01/27/13 06:06 PM
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 4,115
S
4000 Post Club Member
Offline
4000 Post Club Member
S
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 4,115
Originally Posted by dmd


That should mean less need for fussing with the velocity curves within the software itself.... theoretically.



Still need to have the capability to adjust for a players own touch. Per voice.

gvfarns #2022291 01/27/13 06:26 PM
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 19,097
Yikes! 10000 Post Club Member
Online Content
Yikes! 10000 Post Club Member
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 19,097
Originally Posted by gvfarns
Question about this VPC: it appears to be powered by USB, right? So if you are using the actual MIDI connector, is there power supplied through that, or do you need to connect a USB cable as well? Or does it have an optional power supply of some type.

I'll be using USB, so it won't matter in my case, but I'm curious.


A small power adaptor is included for MIDI-only use.

Cheers,
James
x


Employed by Kawai Japan, however the opinions I express are my own.
Nord Electro 3 & occasional rare groove player.
Page 21 of 35 1 2 19 20 21 22 23 34 35

Link Copied to Clipboard
What's Hot!!
Piano World Has Been Sold!
--------------------
Forums RULES, Terms of Service & HELP
(updated 06/06/2022)
---------------------
Posting Pictures on the Forums
(ad)
(ad)
New Topics - Multiple Forums
How Much to Sell For?
by TexasMom1 - 04/15/24 10:23 PM
Song lyrics have become simpler and more repetitive
by FrankCox - 04/15/24 07:42 PM
New bass strings sound tubby
by Emery Wang - 04/15/24 06:54 PM
Pianodisc PDS-128+ calibration
by Dalem01 - 04/15/24 04:50 PM
Forum Statistics
Forums43
Topics223,384
Posts3,349,178
Members111,631
Most Online15,252
Mar 21st, 2010

Our Piano Related Classified Ads
| Dealers | Tuners | Lessons | Movers | Restorations |

Advertise on Piano World
| Piano World | PianoSupplies.com | Advertise on Piano World |
| |Contact | Privacy | Legal | About Us | Site Map


Copyright © VerticalScope Inc. All Rights Reserved.
No part of this site may be reproduced without prior written permission
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5
When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission, which supports our community.