This custom search works much better than the built in one and allows searching older posts.
|
|
69827 Members
40 Forums
143344 Topics
2073024 Posts
Max Online: 15252 @ 03/21/10 11:39 PM
|
|
|
#2022384 - 01/27/13 08:12 PM
Lowest "A" (27.5Hz) vs. subwoofer capacity
|
1000 Post Club Member
Registered: 08/31/10
Posts: 1628
|
Question: How many of you have subwoofers that can handle the lowest "A" on your digital? Here is the "Hertz" range for all 88 notes in the chart below: http://www.pianoworld.com/pitch.htmJust noticed that my Klipsch Promedia 2.1 speakers (with subwoofer) only goes as far as 31Hz, which means there are three notes that do not get reinforcement from my subwoofer to actually sound them with fully resonating bass, i.e., the lowest A, A-sharp, and, B. Have tested the Klipsch setup at the V-Piano and it is interesting to note that I do not have the full and resounding bass resonance on the three lowest notes, as it is the next "C" and above that the subwoofer can handle. Please keep this in mind when buying speakers for your digital as you will need to be able to handle at least 27.5Hz (or, lower) to hear the fundamental frequencies of the lowest bass notes. So, does your current speaker system handle 27.5Hz, or, lower? Extra note: Low "A" test on the Kawai EP3: [19 seconds of silence before playing starts] https://www.box.com/s/s82l507tkqhgzyn4db0j
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#2022387 - 01/27/13 08:20 PM
Re: Lowest "A" (27.5 Hz) vs. speaker ranges
[Re: pv88]
|
Full Member
Registered: 11/30/12
Posts: 161
Loc: Connecticut, USA
|
From my research, most speakers (hi-fi, not monitors) do not go to 27.5Hz, alone. You need the subwoofer to get you there. I believe that is why many (including DP dealers) suggest getting a subwoofer first, then adding speakers.
_________________________
Current Work: Yamaha P-155 Start Date: 01/01/2013
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#2022393 - 01/27/13 08:30 PM
Re: Lowest "A" (27.5Hz) vs. subwoofer capacity
[Re: scorpio]
|
1000 Post Club Member
Registered: 08/31/10
Posts: 1628
|
From my research, most speakers (hi-fi, not monitors) do not go to 27.5Hz, alone. You need the subwoofer to get you there. The subwoofer I have (with the Klipsch satellite speakers) only handles 31Hz, as I may have wrongly assumed from the start that this Klipsch subwoofer (or, any subwoofer) would handle the lowest notes on the piano, although this is apparently not true. You can actually hear that the lowest three notes (A, A-sharp, B) do not have the full bass resonance as does the low "C" which is the next neighboring note, as the lowest three are obviously thinner in sound without the full impact. Keep this in mind if you buy the Klipsch Promedia 2.1 speakers with subwoofer. Do check the specs before buying.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#2022404 - 01/27/13 08:43 PM
Re: Lowest "A" (27.5 Hz) vs. speaker ranges
[Re: pv88]
|
500 Post Club Member
Registered: 09/30/11
Posts: 575
Loc: Portugal
|
It's an interesting question as to whether most acoustic pianos resonate at 27.5 to around 40 herz. I wouldn't have thought they do - it certainly doesn't sound as if they do. It sounds as if the harmonics of the lowest notes on most pianos I've played (perhaps it's different with full length concert grands) are the predominant components of the tone, not the 'true bass' or fundamentals.
_________________________
My piano is Roland HP 302 Other keyboards: Fender Rhodes Suitcase 88 piano (c. 1970), Yamaha SY85 (synth c.1991) Previously: Korg Polysix, Roland Juno 60, Ensoniq ESQ1 Favourite piano: Blüthner (6'early 20th century)
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#2022410 - 01/27/13 08:50 PM
Re: Lowest "A" (27.5Hz) vs. subwoofer capacity
[Re: pv88]
|
1000 Post Club Member
Registered: 08/31/10
Posts: 1628
|
I noticed the discrepancy in the Klipsch subwoofer after having played the lowest "C" on the V-Piano with different silver string presets as the low "C" resonates very powerfully with full harmonics and the remaining three notes (B, A-sharp, and, low A) do not have this. My ear immediately picked up on the three thinner sounding notes with far less bass "oomph."
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#2022411 - 01/27/13 08:50 PM
Re: Lowest "A" (27.5 Hz) vs. subwoofer capacity
[Re: pv88]
|
3000 Post Club Member
Registered: 09/24/09
Posts: 3117
Loc: North Carolina
|
Don't misunderstand the specs.
That speaker doesn't stop at 31 Hz. It works all the way down to 0 Hz. Virtually all speakers do.
The low-end spec (in this case, 31 Hz) means that the speakers output has dropped to 1/2 at that point ... if you believe the specs ... and if the (unknown) test conditions are in any way relevant to your own use case.
It will drop off even more at lower frequencies. But there's still enough to meet a piano's requirements. Pianos don't put out much energy at the low end. Most of the energy in in the harmonics.
You don't need a subwoofer. (Well, you don't need a real subwoofer, the kind that goes down yet another octave.)
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#2022422 - 01/27/13 09:12 PM
Re: Lowest "A" (27.5 Hz) vs. speaker ranges
[Re: pv88]
|
Full Member
Registered: 01/02/09
Posts: 208
Loc: North Carolina
|
pv88, toddy is onto the answer. You do not have to produce 27.5 Hz on your 2.1 system in order to "hear" the low A. And a string vibrating at 27.5 Hz produces very little of what the human ear hears, even from the largest pianos. Your brain combines the higher frequency overtones of the note so that you "hear" the fundamental tone or pitch. Fascinating! Google "the missing fundamental" or go to this link :
http://homepage.ntu.edu.tw/~karchung/Phonetics%20II%20page%20thirteen.htm
I always wondered how those Bose compact stereos create the illusion of "big sound"--now I have stopped worrying whether my gear is rated to the lowest frequencies. Of course, what a person likes to hear is subjective--I'm sure my console does not produce much of the lowest frequencies but I am very happy with the tones in the lowest octave.
_________________________
Bob M
Charles Walter Model 1520 Yamaha NP 30, NP 11, PSR E333
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#2022425 - 01/27/13 09:16 PM
Re: Lowest "A" (27.5 Hz) vs. speaker ranges
[Re: pv88]
|
2000 Post Club Member
Registered: 02/20/10
Posts: 2450
|
Also keep in mind that the lowest frequency spec'd on your speakers could be a - 3dB down point, or a -6 dB point, or a -10 dB point, or really anything at all. You have to look at the entire spec, not just what the low end of the FR number is... and Klipsch doesn't provide a tolerance, so it's one of the cases where it really could be anything.
At any rate, if you want to reproduce the bottom notes of a piano at anywhere near the volume level that you can get out of a real piano, I doubt any 2.1 multimedia speaker system is going to do it. The "subwoofer" in that Klipsch is only 6.5". But I have to say I'm very happy with what I get out of the JBL PRX625 with its two 15" woofers, the low end sounds killer! I don't gig with it often, because it weighs 60 lbs.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#2022441 - 01/27/13 09:39 PM
Re: Lowest "A" (27.5Hz) vs. subwoofer capacity
[Re: pv88]
|
1000 Post Club Member
Registered: 08/31/10
Posts: 1628
|
Looks like the Sennheiser headphones I have cover the lowest bass notes easily as they are rated down to 14Hz. As for the V-Piano, it tends to sound somewhat better with headphones as compared to speakers. Actually, neither headphones/speakers improve upon the "Vintage II" presets.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#2022448 - 01/27/13 09:45 PM
Re: Lowest "A" (27.5Hz) vs. subwoofer capacity
[Re: pv88]
|
2000 Post Club Member
Registered: 04/16/07
Posts: 2663
Loc: Pennsylvania
|
Pretty sure very little actual energy in low note on the piano is in the fundamental frequency. It's mostly the harmonics. Otherwise our speakers would do much worse at representing it than they do.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#2022473 - 01/27/13 10:04 PM
Re: Lowest "A" (27.5Hz) vs. subwoofer capacity
[Re: pv88]
|
2000 Post Club Member
Registered: 02/20/10
Posts: 2450
|
Looks like the Sennheiser headphones I have cover the lowest bass notes easily as they are rated down to 14Hz. at how many dB down? The best Sennheisers, the HD800, are only 3 dB down at 14 Hz. Unfortunately, they cost $1500. ;-) At any rate, yes, you can get lots of bass out of small drivers in a headphone, since the output levels are so low, they don't need to move much air (i.e. they would be pretty much useless if they weren't directed right into your ear canal).
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#2022511 - 01/27/13 11:25 PM
Re: Lowest "A" (27.5Hz) vs. subwoofer capacity
[Re: pv88]
|
1000 Post Club Member
Registered: 08/31/10
Posts: 1628
|
Here is an example of the low "A" being played in context of a real concerto, as it appears that Gyro never did get around to demonstrating any of his "concerto" performances on his Williams digital: [19 seconds of silence before playing starts] https://www.box.com/s/s82l507tkqhgzyn4db0jAlso, the resonance and decay is very good on the Kawai EP3 as the low A sounds very full with decent sonority.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#2023141 - 01/28/13 11:26 PM
Re: Lowest "A" (27.5Hz) vs. subwoofer capacity
[Re: pv88]
|
Full Member
Registered: 12/26/12
Posts: 324
Loc: Richmond, BC, Canada
|
I recorded my PX-350 "Grand Piano Concert", low "A", bypassing loudspeakers, straight into a soundcard.
Analyzed spectrum with Audacity, linear frequency plot. Results (* = harmonic):
Frequency (Hz) Level (dB) 2.691650 -39.150024 5.383301 -65.072296 8.074951 -62.196373 10.766602 -60.485279 13.458252 -57.731060 16.149902 -54.396046 18.841553 -58.861359 21.533203 -60.499825 24.224854 -44.113499 26.916504 -36.500988 * 29.608154 -40.888565 32.299805 -58.613850 34.991455 -63.060375 37.683105 -71.717613 40.374756 -70.804306 43.066406 -68.449219 45.758057 -62.736332 48.449707 -56.880455 51.141357 -38.490273 53.833008 -29.661631 * 56.524658 -33.416801 59.216309 -59.693230 61.907959 -57.321259 64.599609 -58.147289 67.291260 -67.900688 69.982910 -67.600990 72.674561 -60.603504 75.366211 -50.914921 78.057861 -33.693363 80.749512 -22.516109 * 83.441162 -24.377993 86.132813 -42.158592 88.824463 -58.042770 91.516113 -65.257164 94.207764 -69.707100 96.899414 -56.537148 99.591064 -55.817043 102.282715 -49.083015 104.974365 -32.362888 107.666016 -17.900251 * 110.357666 -17.545877 * 113.049316 -30.912169 115.740967 -47.269100 118.432617 -58.042248 121.124268 -66.189240 123.815918 -62.979458 126.507568 -68.093140 129.199219 -59.167812 131.890869 -42.953117 134.582520 -27.787729 * 137.274170 -26.056885 * 139.965820 -35.940960 142.657471 -54.008938 145.349121 -62.478085 148.040771 -67.888054 150.732422 -67.665939 153.424072 -66.114731 156.115723 -60.035522 158.807373 -46.143494 161.499023 -24.068861 164.190674 -20.731262 * 166.882324 -29.725271 169.573975 -53.313942
So everybody is _very_ right -- the energy in the fundamental is considerably smaller than the energy in the harmonics, down more than 10 dB.
. Charles
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#2023290 - 01/29/13 06:29 AM
Re: Lowest "A" (27.5Hz) vs. subwoofer capacity
[Re: Charles Cohen]
|
1000 Post Club Member
Registered: 07/21/12
Posts: 1040
Loc: England.
|
"the energy in the fundamental is considerably smaller than the energy in the harmonics, down more than 10 dB."
Just like a real piano. And real pianos have some notes that come out stronger than others for various reasons.
27 cps would annoy your neighbours dreadfully! If you hear a thinner version of a good fundamental (Bottom A is notoriously bad, and hardly gets played) then - be happy!
_________________________
I rather like being pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed, debriefed,or numbered
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#2023291 - 01/29/13 06:36 AM
Re: Lowest "A" (27.5 Hz) vs. speaker ranges
[Re: MacMacMac]
|
4000 Post Club Member
Registered: 07/07/04
Posts: 4985
Loc: Vught, The Netherlands
|
Finally, someone owns a real woofer. And recognizes that a 6.5" speaker is not a subwoofer (nor even a woofer). No, but if you put enough of them together you can move a lot of air. I use two Bose 802's on jobs and the bass response is excellent. I have 16 x 4.25" or 4.5" speakers in that system. I've worked with bass players who use two 802's as their set up. I have thought of buying a small sub woofer for my N3 for those times when I'm not using headphones. It would be nice to have a little more bottom at softer levels ... and then I'd have to worry about the cat destroying the cloth grill work. 
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#2023292 - 01/29/13 06:39 AM
Re: Lowest "A" (27.5 Hz) vs. speaker ranges
[Re: Dave Horne]
|
1000 Post Club Member
Registered: 07/05/09
Posts: 1954
Loc: Sydney, Australia
|
It would be nice to have a little more bottom at softer levels Looks like you want one of those IAC buttons! Greg.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#2023295 - 01/29/13 06:44 AM
Re: Lowest "A" (27.5 Hz) vs. speaker ranges
[Re: sullivang]
|
4000 Post Club Member
Registered: 07/07/04
Posts: 4985
Loc: Vught, The Netherlands
|
It would be nice to have a little more bottom at softer levels Looks like you want one of those IAC buttons! Greg. A 'Loudness' button. I had one on my Dynaco PAT pre amp back in the 1960's. It was a kit and I assembled and soldered it up myself.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#2023298 - 01/29/13 06:55 AM
Re: Lowest "A" (27.5 Hz) vs. speaker ranges
[Re: pv88]
|
1000 Post Club Member
Registered: 07/05/09
Posts: 1954
Loc: Sydney, Australia
|
Yes, a glorified loudness button. I suspect that the IAC adjusts the EQ automatically as the volume control is adjusted though, either continuously or in steps.
Greg.
Edited by sullivang (01/29/13 06:58 AM)
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|