|
Welcome to the Piano World Piano Forums Over 3 million posts about pianos, digital pianos, and all types of keyboard instruments. Over 100,000 members from around the world.
Join the World's Largest Community of Piano Lovers
(it's free)
It's Fun to Play the Piano ... Please Pass It On!
|
|
69 members (Burkhard, benkeys, Abdulrohmanoman, accordeur, BWV846, Animisha, Anglagard44, 11 invisible),
1,954
guests, and
438
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,794
1000 Post Club Member
|
OP
1000 Post Club Member
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,794 |
Last edited by music32; 02/15/13 02:47 PM.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 13,837
Yikes! 10000 Post Club Member
|
Yikes! 10000 Post Club Member
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 13,837 |
I think the whole "accompanist" vs "collaborator" debate is silly. All a pianist need do to be more than an "accompanist" is demand action:
Demand to be included in programs, along with a bio. Demand to be prominently credited on recordings, YouTube videos, etc... Refuse to work with people who don't view you as a musical partner. Ask to be compensated on the same level as the person you're collaborating with.
Far too many pianists settle for words, and far too many instrumentalists and singers give lip service to "collaboration" instead of actually collaborating. (And far too many pianists whine about it, then go ahead and do the work anyway.)
So I'm all for getting the recognition and taking part in musical decisions, but words are cheap; it has to be put into action.
"If we continually try to force a child to do what he is afraid to do, he will become more timid, and will use his brains and energy, not to explore the unknown, but to find ways to avoid the pressures we put on him." (John Holt) www.pianoped.comwww.youtube.com/user/UIPianoPed
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 17,277
Yikes! 10000 Post Club Member
|
Yikes! 10000 Post Club Member
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 17,277 |
In chamber music, pianists usually expect to be recognized as equal with their partners, whether they are string or woodwind or brass players (in fact, they are often regarded as first among equals when in bigger groups than duos), but a different mentality exists when they 'accompany' singers, as wittily shown by Gerald Moore in his book 'Am I too Loud?'. Unless, of course, if the pianist is a BIG name like Richter, Brendel or Schiff....
When Itzhak Perlman played violin sonatas with Vladimir Ashkenazy, they were given equal billing on programs. But when Perlman played Kreisler, Sarasate, Wieniewski and Heifetz transcriptions (i.e encore-type pieces) with Samuel Sanders, the latter was relegated to the rôle of an accompanist, and probably paid accordingly......
OK, in the Franck and Fauré violin sonatas, and of course the Rachmaninoff Cello Sonata, the pianist has the more difficult part. But what about some Schubert, Schumann, Wolf (especially) and R Strauss Lieder? Often, the 'accompanist' even coaches the singer like a repetitur and builds the program, especially if the singer is inexperienced (though not necessarily unknown). Moore in his book mentions a diva who actually wanted him to omit a brilliant Wolf postlude so that all the glory would be for her.......
If music be the food of love, play on!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 17,391
Yikes! 10000 Post Club Member
|
Yikes! 10000 Post Club Member
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 17,391 |
I think the whole "accompanist" vs "collaborator" debate is silly. All a pianist need do to be more than an "accompanist" is demand action:
Demand to be included in programs, along with a bio. Demand to be prominently credited on recordings, YouTube videos, etc... Refuse to work with people who don't view you as a musical partner. Ask to be compensated on the same level as the person you're collaborating with.
Far too many pianists settle for words, and far too many instrumentalists and singers give lip service to "collaboration" instead of actually collaborating. (And far too many pianists whine about it, then go ahead and do the work anyway.)
So I'm all for getting the recognition and taking part in musical decisions, but words are cheap; it has to be put into action. Thank you Kreisler! I agree 100%. The whole name thing is ridiculous, and I just don't work with people who don't appreciate my contribution. However, I think it's much easier to say accompanist than collaborative pianist anyways. What is wrong with the word "accompany" anyways? Does it not mean to go along with? Certainly not "tag along on someone's coattails".
private piano/voice teacher FT
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,675
1000 Post Club Member
|
1000 Post Club Member
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,675 |
The 8-syllable "collaborative pianist" is too complicated of a term to catch on. When people ask me what degree I'm getting, I sometimes answer "accompanying" even though the official degree name is "collaborative piano". It just requires less explanation.
Another comment I read a while ago is that if a violinist was playing with someone calling themselves a collaborative pianist, shouldn't the violinist also call him/herself a collaborative violinist? And in that case, just drop the "collaborative" part altogether. I am a pianist.
Professional pianist and piano teacher.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 521
500 Post Club Member
|
500 Post Club Member
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 521 |
I really like what Kreisler said. I gave a voice recital recently and my pianist thanked me profusely for not referring to him as a collaborative artist in the program lol. And he is absolutely a collaborative artist in the truest sense. I'm not a fan of 'accompanist' or 'collaborative artist' so I just call him my pianist!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 7,061
7000 Post Club Member
|
7000 Post Club Member
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 7,061 |
It doesn't bother me either way what you say, as long as you don't say "accompany-ist"
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 6,305
6000 Post Club Member
|
6000 Post Club Member
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 6,305 |
It doesn't bother me either way what you say, as long as you don't say "accompany-ist" haha - absolutely. Another comment I read a while ago is that if a violinist was playing with someone calling themselves a collaborative pianist, shouldn't the violinist also call him/herself a collaborative violinist? And in that case, just drop the "collaborative" part altogether. I am a pianist. We don't tend to use the collaborative word quite so much here yet, and "accompanist" need not imply subservience (Gerald Moore wore it with pride). But, like Arghhh, my favourite description is pianist.
Du holde Kunst...
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 32,060
Yikes! 10000 Post Club Member
|
Yikes! 10000 Post Club Member
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 32,060 |
As long as one is not a co-conspirator, indicted or not!
Semipro Tech
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 6,305
6000 Post Club Member
|
6000 Post Club Member
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 6,305 |
There's a cute cartoon in one of Gerald Moore's books (Farewell Recital I think), where there's a large singer in full flight on stage, and a smallish pianist collaboratively beavering away. One audience member says to another: "What's the name of her accomplice?"
Du holde Kunst...
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,794
1000 Post Club Member
|
OP
1000 Post Club Member
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,794 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Piano
by Gino2 - 04/17/24 02:34 PM
|
Piano
by Gino2 - 04/17/24 02:23 PM
|
|
Forums43
Topics223,405
Posts3,349,434
Members111,637
|
Most Online15,252 Mar 21st, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|