Welcome to the Piano World Piano Forums
Over 2 million posts about pianos, digital pianos, and all types of keyboard instruments
Join the World's Largest Community of Piano Lovers (it's free)
It's Fun to Play the Piano ... Please Pass It On!

SEARCH
the Forums & Piano World

This custom search works much better than the built in one and allows searching older posts.
(ad 125) Sweetwater - Digital Keyboards & Other Gear
Digital Pianos at Sweetwater
(ad) Pearl River
Pearl River Pianos
(ad) Pianoteq
Latest Pianoteq add-on instrument: U4 upright piano
(ad) P B Guide
Acoustic & Digital Piano Guide
PianoSupplies.com (150)
Piano Accessories Music Related Gifts Piano Tuning Equipment Piano Moving Equipment
We now offer Gift Certificates in our online store!
(ad) Estonia Piano
Estonia Piano
Quick Links to Useful Stuff
Our Classified Ads
Find Piano Professionals-

*Piano Dealers - Piano Stores
*Piano Tuners
*Piano Teachers
*Piano Movers
*Piano Restorations
*Piano Manufacturers
*Organs

Quick Links:
*Advertise On Piano World
*Free Piano Newsletter
*Online Piano Recitals
*Piano Recitals Index
*Piano Accessories
* Buying a Piano
*Buying A Acoustic Piano
*Buying a Digital Piano
*Pianos for Sale
*Sell Your Piano
*How Old is My Piano?
*Piano Books
*Piano Art, Pictures, & Posters
*Directory/Site Map
*Contest
*Links
*Virtual Piano
*Music Word Search
*Piano Screen Saver
*Piano Videos
*Virtual Piano Chords
Page 1 of 2 1 2 >
Topic Options
#2043347 - 03/05/13 12:20 PM Van Cliburn Competition 2013 - Finalists announced
fnork Offline
1000 Post Club Member

Registered: 10/01/04
Posts: 1709
Loc: Helsinki, finland
I don't think this has been mentioned on the forum so far. From Norman Lebrecht's blog:

http://www.artsjournal.com/slippeddisc/2...ion-finals.html

Two days after the founder’s funeral, 30 finalists have been announced for the 14th Van Cliburn International Piano Competition, to be held May 24-June 9 in Fort Worth, Texas. Three are from mainland China, one from Taiwan and at least one of the US entrants, YouYou Zhang, is of Chinese parentage.
The absence of British, German and Austrian candidates is striking, but may be ascribed to a sharper talent-spotting mechanism. A young UK or German pianist like Benjamin Grosvenor and Alice Sara Ott will be spotted and signed to a record label long before the audition juries at Cliburn report back with their shortlist.


The Cliburn is open to pianists aged 18 to 30. Here’s the full rundown.
Luca Buratto, Italy
Age during Competition: 20

Sean Chen, United States
Age during Competition: 24

Alexey Chernov, Russia
Age during Competition: 30

Sara Daneshpour, United States
Age during Competition: 26

Alessandro Deljavan, Italy
Age during Competition: 26

Fei-Fei Dong, China
Age during Competition: 22

François Dumont, France
Age during Competition: 27

Yury Favorin, Russia
Age during Competition: 26

Lindsay Garritson, United States
Age during Competition: 25

Jayson Gillham, Australia
Age during Competition: 26

Giuseppe Greco, Italy
Age during Competition: 23

Ruoyu Huang, China
Age during Competition: 24

Claire Huangci, United States
Age during Competition: 23

Vadym Kholodenko, Ukraine
Age during Competition: 26

Nikolay Khozyainov, Russia
Age during Competition: 20

Marcin Koziak, Poland
Age during Competition: 24

Kuan-Ting Lin, Taiwan
Age during Competition: 21

Steven Lin, United States
Age during Competition: 24

Alex McDonald, United States
Age during Competition: 30

Gustavo Miranda-Bernales, Chile
Age during Competition: 22

Nikita Mndoyants, Russia
Age during Competition: 24

Oleksandr Poliykov, Ukraine
Age during Competition: 25

Beatrice Rana, Italy
Age during Competition: 20

Tomoki Sakata, Japan
Age during Competition: 19

Scipione Sangiovanni, Italy
Age during Competition: 25

Hyung-Min Suh, South Korea
Age during Competition: 23

Alessandro Taverna, Italy
Age during Competition: 29

Jie Yuan, China
Age during Competition: 27

YouYou Zhang, United States
Age during Competition: 29

Eric Zuber, United States
Age during Competition: 28
_________________________
http://www.martinmalmgren.com/

Top
(ad) Piano & Music Accessories
piano accessories music gifts tuning and moving equipment
#2043353 - 03/05/13 12:26 PM Re: Van Cliburn Competition 2013 - Finalists announced [Re: fnork]
Mark_C Online   content
Yikes! 10000 Post Club Member

Registered: 11/11/09
Posts: 19658
Loc: New York
Thanks for posting this.

BTW it puzzles me a bit that such emphasis is sometimes placed on the nationality or ethnicity of the contestants, and for example I personally don't find it noteworthy at all that there are no British, German or Austrian contestants. I thought the nationality issue was very important at the Tchaikovsky in 1958, but otherwise, sure, it's been of some interest but not like all that.

Top
#2043376 - 03/05/13 01:33 PM Re: Van Cliburn Competition 2013 - Finalists announced [Re: fnork]
Opus_Maximus Offline
1000 Post Club Member

Registered: 11/27/04
Posts: 1480
Without even knowing most of them of their backgrounds, I already see three who I know study with Kaplinsky, the main pre-screening juror. You would think after all the problems they had with that in previous years they would make some amends, but no.


Edited by Opus_Maximus (03/05/13 01:37 PM)

Top
#2043384 - 03/05/13 01:48 PM Re: Van Cliburn Competition 2013 - Finalists announced [Re: Opus_Maximus]
Mark_C Online   content
Yikes! 10000 Post Club Member

Registered: 11/11/09
Posts: 19658
Loc: New York
Originally Posted By: Opus_Maximus
Without even knowing most of them of their backgrounds, I already see three who I know study with Kaplinsky, the main pre-screening juror. You would think after all the problems they had with that in previous years they would make some amends, but no.

But legitimately, is it surprising that some of the contestants would be students of one of the most noted teachers? I don't think so. It seems well within what would legitimately be expected. And BTW I don't know that there has been any established "problem" of the sort you're mentioning, and I don't think there has been.

Top
#2043387 - 03/05/13 01:49 PM Re: Van Cliburn Competition 2013 - Finalists announced [Re: Opus_Maximus]
fnork Offline
1000 Post Club Member

Registered: 10/01/04
Posts: 1709
Loc: Helsinki, finland
I was going to say that I see a rather large amount of students from the Juilliard school overall...
_________________________
http://www.martinmalmgren.com/

Top
#2043389 - 03/05/13 01:51 PM Re: Van Cliburn Competition 2013 - Finalists announced [Re: fnork]
Mark_C Online   content
Yikes! 10000 Post Club Member

Registered: 11/11/09
Posts: 19658
Loc: New York
Originally Posted By: fnork
I was going to say that I see a rather large amount of students from the Juilliard school overall...

Oy. grin

Isn't that like expressing surprise over Nobel Prize nominees often coming from Harvard and Oxford?

Top
#2043393 - 03/05/13 02:06 PM Re: Van Cliburn Competition 2013 - Finalists announced [Re: Mark_C]
Opus_Maximus Offline
1000 Post Club Member

Registered: 11/27/04
Posts: 1480
Originally Posted By: Mark_C
Originally Posted By: Opus_Maximus
Without even knowing most of them of their backgrounds, I already see three who I know study with Kaplinsky, the main pre-screening juror. You would think after all the problems they had with that in previous years they would make some amends, but no.

But legitimately, is it surprising that some of the contestants would be students of one of the most noted teachers? I don't think so. It seems well within what would legitimately be expected. And BTW I don't know that there has been any established "problem" of the sort you're mentioning, and I don't think there has been.


Now that i just checked, it's actually five - five that all study with the same teacher. That is 1/6 of the contestants. And those are the only ones I even checked, there maybe even more.

And mark, legitimately, yes, I do think it is surprising because when you think of how many other great pianists are studying around the world not with her (All of the pianists in the great Russian and European conservatories, people in Curtis and Yale or Colburn, young pianists in China, etc.) you realize it should be much more evenly dispersed. 280 pianists applied for this competition, of the 30 that got in, at least 5 study with the same person - not even just at Juilliard, but with the same person, the one that happens to be deciding who gets in.

In the 2005 Cliburn, there was the same situation (I think it's in the archives here somewhere), the foundation took very heavy criticism, and Kaplinsky received several death threats, so it was in fact quite a problem for them.


Edited by Opus_Maximus (03/05/13 02:08 PM)

Top
#2043394 - 03/05/13 02:08 PM Re: Van Cliburn Competition 2013 - Finalists announced [Re: Opus_Maximus]
Mark_C Online   content
Yikes! 10000 Post Club Member

Registered: 11/11/09
Posts: 19658
Loc: New York
Originally Posted By: Opus_Maximus
....In the 2005 Cliburn, there was the same situation (I think it's in the archives here somewhere), the foundation took very heavy criticism, and Kaplinsky received several death threats, so it was in fact quite a problem for them.

The "death threats" thing doesn't do much to support the legitimacy of the complaints. If anything, we should admire them for not shying away from doing whatever their musical judgment told them was best, in the face of "death threats."

Top
#2043415 - 03/05/13 02:46 PM Re: Van Cliburn Competition 2013 - Finalists announced [Re: fnork]
Ataru074 Online   content
Full Member

Registered: 06/22/11
Posts: 289
Loc: Houston, TX
Why nobody did notice that there are SIX Italians ( I'm quite proud of that ) instead? At the end Italy is only 23 times smaller as population than China.
_________________________
===============================================
working on:
Bach: BWV 871
Mozart: Kv397
Beethoven: Op 14 #2
Prokofiev: Op.10
Bartok: Notturno
===============================================

Top
#2043423 - 03/05/13 03:00 PM Re: Van Cliburn Competition 2013 - Finalists announced [Re: Ataru074]
Mark_C Online   content
Yikes! 10000 Post Club Member

Registered: 11/11/09
Posts: 19658
Loc: New York
Originally Posted By: Ataru074
Why nobody did notice that there are SIX Italians ( I'm quite proud of that ) instead? At the end Italy is only 23 times smaller as population than China.

I modestly propose that at least 5 of the Italian candidates be stricken, and that the entire roster be revised to reflect proportional representation from every country and ethnicity, and from every conservatory, university, and teacher. smokin

Top
#2043426 - 03/05/13 03:11 PM Re: Van Cliburn Competition 2013 - Finalists announced [Re: fnork]
AldenH Offline
Full Member

Registered: 03/22/11
Posts: 412
Loc: Texas
Well, one or two of the prescreening jury are Italian, after all! laugh

Top
#2043439 - 03/05/13 03:34 PM Re: Van Cliburn Competition 2013 - Finalists announced [Re: Mark_C]
Derulux Offline
5000 Post Club Member

Registered: 06/06/05
Posts: 5286
Loc: Philadelphia
Originally Posted By: Mark_C
Originally Posted By: Opus_Maximus
Without even knowing most of them of their backgrounds, I already see three who I know study with Kaplinsky, the main pre-screening juror. You would think after all the problems they had with that in previous years they would make some amends, but no.

But legitimately, is it surprising that some of the contestants would be students of one of the most noted teachers? I don't think so. It seems well within what would legitimately be expected. And BTW I don't know that there has been any established "problem" of the sort you're mentioning, and I don't think there has been.

I think the problem arises when one's own teacher becomes their judge at such a prestigious competition. You're not just demanding of the judge/teacher that they avoid bias due to relationship (which I think is easily possible), but you're also asking that judge/teacher to avoid bias based on the fact that the student is going to play most like the way you like to hear it simply by virtue of their studying with you (which is much more difficult to ignore).

I feel, if one's teacher is involved in a competition, then that pianist should be judged by another. It is not fair to the teacher or the student, nor is it fair to anyone else entering the competition who is not studying with that particular teacher.
_________________________
Every day we are afforded a new chance. The problem with life is not that you run out of chances. In the end, what you run out of are days.

Top
#2043440 - 03/05/13 03:34 PM Re: Van Cliburn Competition 2013 - Finalists announced [Re: fnork]
Orange Soda King Offline
6000 Post Club Member

Registered: 11/25/09
Posts: 6070
Loc: Louisville, Kentucky, United S...
I wonder about the same thing O-Max was talking about... But I guess I shouldn't be too surprised.

But at the same time, if someone is a juror, don't they abstain from hearing/submitting their feedback from their own students? For example, let's pretend there are 5 jurors for a competition. If a contestant is the student of one of the jurors, doesn't that juror abstain from any sort of judging for that student? Does the Cliburn work like that?

Top
#2043486 - 03/05/13 05:19 PM Re: Van Cliburn Competition 2013 - Finalists announced [Re: fnork]
Brendan Online   content



Registered: 05/26/01
Posts: 5289
Loc: McAllen, TX
Hmmm, there are actually quite a few names that I was expecting to see that, surprisingly, aren't there. I am, however, not surprised by the...ahem...backgrounds of some of the contestants.
_________________________
http://www.BrendanKinsella.com

Top
#2043534 - 03/05/13 07:13 PM Re: Van Cliburn Competition 2013 - Finalists announced [Re: fnork]
Numerian Offline
1000 Post Club Member

Registered: 11/04/05
Posts: 1075
As I understood it from the website, there were 13 members of the screening jury of which Ms. Kaplinsky was one person. Maybe she is the Nadia Boulanger of our day and everyone so respects her that her students automatically get higher scores in competitions because of their teacher. I would prefer to think there is a different halo affect going on here: that certain conservatories, Julliard being the most noted example, attract the best students interested in a performance career, and that therefore the bias in selecting finalists is by conservatory, not really by teacher. Or maybe it's something of a talent bias: the most talented competitors rise to the top by virtue of going to the top schools and studying with the top teachers, who impart to them the secrets of become a top-notch concert pianist. These secrets are then used by them to put together compelling professional performances on CD or live on stage.

Of course, that can't be quite true either, or how else would Lang Lang, Yevgeny Kissin, Benjamin Grosvenor, and quite a few others have careers without being competition winners? Given that fact, I would go along with Mark's suggestion that the competition finalists be allocated by nationality, school, and teacher, since out in the concert world, and over time, it doesn't seem to matter who wins these competitions.

Top
#2043559 - 03/05/13 08:14 PM Re: Van Cliburn Competition 2013 - Finalists announced [Re: fnork]
Andromaque Offline
3000 Post Club Member

Registered: 08/29/08
Posts: 3886
Loc: New York
The list of competitors comprises a fair number of repeat offenders . And the Kaplinsky discussions are off to an early start, though not much there is beyond the déjà vu category.. I have a bit less enthusiasm for this competition already. But may be I will change my mind later. Who is running it now that Van and Rodzinsky are out (is he not) ?
I am also wondering who among today's top stage performers are former Kaplinsky students ?

Top
#2043614 - 03/05/13 10:00 PM Re: Van Cliburn Competition 2013 - Finalists announced [Re: Numerian]
Mark_C Online   content
Yikes! 10000 Post Club Member

Registered: 11/11/09
Posts: 19658
Loc: New York
Originally Posted By: Numerian
....I would go along with Mark's suggestion that the competition finalists be allocated by nationality, school, and teacher, since out in the concert world, and over time, it doesn't seem to matter who wins these competitions.

I hope you're kidding as much as I was, which was 100%. grin

But seriously folks... ha ...I think it's mostly this thing you said:

Quote:
....Or maybe it's something of a talent bias: the most talented competitors rise to the top by virtue of going to the top schools and studying with the top teachers....

Top
#2043617 - 03/05/13 10:07 PM Re: Van Cliburn Competition 2013 - Finalists announced [Re: fnork]
wr Offline
7000 Post Club Member

Registered: 11/23/07
Posts: 7767
Originally Posted By: fnork

Two days after the founder’s funeral, 30 finalists have been announced for the 14th Van Cliburn International Piano Competition, to be held May 24-June 9 in Fort Worth, Texas.


Cliburn was not the founder of the competition. In fact, I read in one of the obits that he was embarrassed by the idea of naming the competition after him.

Top
#2043628 - 03/05/13 10:25 PM Re: Van Cliburn Competition 2013 - Finalists announced [Re: Orange Soda King]
wr Offline
7000 Post Club Member

Registered: 11/23/07
Posts: 7767
Originally Posted By: Orange Soda King
I wonder about the same thing O-Max was talking about... But I guess I shouldn't be too surprised.

But at the same time, if someone is a juror, don't they abstain from hearing/submitting their feedback from their own students? For example, let's pretend there are 5 jurors for a competition. If a contestant is the student of one of the jurors, doesn't that juror abstain from any sort of judging for that student? Does the Cliburn work like that?


I think you are right - jurors at the Cliburn don't vote on their own students, at least not in the main competition. I'm not sure about the pre-screening.

There are several problems with that practice, the most obvious of which is that it means that the jury is not the same for all of the competitors, which makes the competition inherently unfair.

I forgot which competition it is, but I remember that there is at least one that simply bans the students of jurors from entering, which seems the best thing to do, at least to me. I know there are arguments against doing that, but I don't think they are as strong as the argument for it.

Top
#2043654 - 03/05/13 11:33 PM Re: Van Cliburn Competition 2013 - Finalists announced [Re: Derulux]
Opus_Maximus Offline
1000 Post Club Member

Registered: 11/27/04
Posts: 1480
I think the problem arises when one's own teacher becomes their judge at such a prestigious competition. studying with that particular teacher. [/quote]


This, I believe is the crux of the issue. It's simply not fair to the other competitors. Even if they are not allowed to vote, other problems arise. They can (and will):

- Give low scores to other strong performers to lessen the threat against their student.
- Manipulate and coerce other jury members to vote for the student
-Throw off the balance of scores - as WR said - for pianists being judged by 10 jurors as opposed to 13 (Or whatever).

The above is not speculation. I've witnessed it many, many times, and had a teacher admit to me that he frequently did #1.






Edited by Opus_Maximus (03/05/13 11:34 PM)

Top
#2043656 - 03/05/13 11:42 PM Re: Van Cliburn Competition 2013 - Finalists announced [Re: Opus_Maximus]
Orange Soda King Offline
6000 Post Club Member

Registered: 11/25/09
Posts: 6070
Loc: Louisville, Kentucky, United S...
Originally Posted By: Opus_Maximus

...and had a teacher admit to me that he frequently did #1.


Which is:
Originally Posted By: Opus_Maximus

Give low scores to other strong performers to lessen the threat against their student.


eek

This is one reason why I despise music competitions...

Top
#2043772 - 03/06/13 05:54 AM Re: Van Cliburn Competition 2013 - Finalists announced [Re: fnork]
Numerian Offline
1000 Post Club Member

Registered: 11/04/05
Posts: 1075
This was reportedly how Van Cliburn won the first Tchaikovsky competition. One of the jurors, Sviatoslav Richter, gave Cliburn all 10's and all the rest of the competitors all 0's.

Top
#2043791 - 03/06/13 07:15 AM Re: Van Cliburn Competition 2013 - Finalists announced [Re: fnork]
izaldu Offline
1000 Post Club Member

Registered: 09/18/08
Posts: 1248
Loc:
The whole thing sounds very questionable.

Top
#2043800 - 03/06/13 07:54 AM Re: Van Cliburn Competition 2013 - Finalists announced [Re: fnork]
Ridicolosamente Offline
1000 Post Club Member

Registered: 07/08/08
Posts: 1456
Loc: Miami, Florida, USA
I look forward to hearing more from Fei-Fei Dong. I found her playing at the Chopin competition very interesting - even with a few slips of the fingers.

I wonder how many Liszt Sonatas and Prokofiev #2s we get to hear this quad!

-Daniel
_________________________
Currently working on:
-Dane Rudhyar's Stars from Pentagrams No 3

Top
#2043842 - 03/06/13 09:34 AM Re: Van Cliburn Competition 2013 - Finalists announced [Re: Numerian]
pianoloverus Online   content
Yikes! 10000 Post Club Member

Registered: 05/29/01
Posts: 19228
Loc: New York City
Originally Posted By: Numerian
This was reportedly how Van Cliburn won the first Tchaikovsky competition. One of the jurors, Sviatoslav Richter, gave Cliburn all 10's and all the rest of the competitors all 0's.
While what you say about Richter's scoring seems to be generally held as true, that doesn't mean it caused Cliburn to win the Tchaikovsky, i.e. someone else would have won if Richter hadn't given other competitors 0.

Top
#2043845 - 03/06/13 09:45 AM Re: Van Cliburn Competition 2013 - Finalists announced [Re: fnork]
Kreisler Offline



Registered: 11/27/02
Posts: 13763
Loc: Iowa City, IA
Also, Richter wasn't a teacher with a vested interest in a particular competitor.
_________________________
"If we continually try to force a child to do what he is afraid to do, he will become more timid, and will use his brains and energy, not to explore the unknown, but to find ways to avoid the pressures we put on him." (John Holt)

www.pianoped.com
www.youtube.com/user/UIPianoPed

Top
#2043869 - 03/06/13 10:57 AM Re: Van Cliburn Competition 2013 - Finalists announced [Re: Kreisler]
Mark_C Online   content
Yikes! 10000 Post Club Member

Registered: 11/11/09
Posts: 19658
Loc: New York
BTW, somebody should say.....

These aren't the "finalists," they're the contestants. (I see that Fnork was just quoting from the blog, but the blog has it wrong.)

Back to the discussion: I'm surprised there's so much feeling like what's being expressed. I wonder if it's representative of what the music world at large thinks. I sure hope not. Competitions are imperfect, and many people think they're inherently terrible -- but for what a competition is, I just fail to see anything in the Cliburn that's close to the corrupt and scandalous kinds of things being said here.

Top
#2043871 - 03/06/13 11:03 AM Re: Van Cliburn Competition 2013 - Finalists announced [Re: fnork]
sophial Offline
3000 Post Club Member

Registered: 04/11/05
Posts: 3446
Loc: US
It seems to me that a teacher who has students participating in a competition should automatically be ineligible to be a judge in that competition at any level because objectivity is compromised. There is an inherent conflict of interest. It is a principle in many other areas -- law, business, science. Not sure why it is so foreign to music .

Top
#2043896 - 03/06/13 11:53 AM Re: Van Cliburn Competition 2013 - Finalists announced [Re: sophial]
pianoloverus Online   content
Yikes! 10000 Post Club Member

Registered: 05/29/01
Posts: 19228
Loc: New York City
Originally Posted By: sophial
It seems to me that a teacher who has students participating in a competition should automatically be ineligible to be a judge in that competition at any level because objectivity is compromised. There is an inherent conflict of interest. It is a principle in many other areas -- law, business, science. Not sure why it is so foreign to music.
Although perhaps not the perfect solution, I agree with this. As has already been pointed out teachers, even if teachers are not permitted to vote for their students, there are other ways of influencing the outcome in favor of their students and so the conflict of interest cannot be eliminated.

Are there any competitions that have tried this approach?


Edited by pianoloverus (03/06/13 11:54 AM)

Top
#2043910 - 03/06/13 12:11 PM Re: Van Cliburn Competition 2013 - Finalists announced [Re: sophial]
bennevis Online   content
4000 Post Club Member

Registered: 10/14/10
Posts: 4846
How things have changed....

Fanny Waterman, founder and chairman of the jury of the Leeds Competition since its inception in 1963, was very embarrassed when her pupil Michael Roll kept getting through each round as favorite, and eventually won that first competition, despite her trying to get the jury members not to give him first place.... wink

Top
#2043926 - 03/06/13 01:11 PM Re: Van Cliburn Competition 2013 - Finalists announced [Re: fnork]
izaldu Offline
1000 Post Club Member

Registered: 09/18/08
Posts: 1248
Loc:
Caesar's wife must be above suspicion ...

Top
#2043970 - 03/06/13 02:25 PM Re: Van Cliburn Competition 2013 - Finalists announced [Re: Mark_C]
Ataru074 Online   content
Full Member

Registered: 06/22/11
Posts: 289
Loc: Houston, TX
Originally Posted By: Mark_C
Originally Posted By: Ataru074
Why nobody did notice that there are SIX Italians ( I'm quite proud of that ) instead? At the end Italy is only 23 times smaller as population than China.

I modestly propose that at least 5 of the Italian candidates be stricken, and that the entire roster be revised to reflect proportional representation from every country and ethnicity, and from every conservatory, university, and teacher. smokin


Mark, if the italian economy keeps going down this fast they won't even have the strings on the piano to play by next month. :-\
:-p :-p :-p
_________________________
===============================================
working on:
Bach: BWV 871
Mozart: Kv397
Beethoven: Op 14 #2
Prokofiev: Op.10
Bartok: Notturno
===============================================

Top
#2044088 - 03/06/13 06:58 PM Re: Van Cliburn Competition 2013 - Finalists announced [Re: pianoloverus]
fnork Offline
1000 Post Club Member

Registered: 10/01/04
Posts: 1709
Loc: Helsinki, finland
Originally Posted By: Numerian
This was reportedly how Van Cliburn won the first Tchaikovsky competition. One of the jurors, Sviatoslav Richter, gave Cliburn all 10's and all the rest of the competitors all 0's.

I'm not so sure Richter gave ALL contestants lowest marks with the exception of Cliburn. Richter's attitude seems to have been similar to what Charles Rosen discusses in "Piano notes: The world of a pianist" - that when he listens to a competition, he's giving a vote either in favour or against a concert career. In other words, what may seem completely "fine" and "average" at a normal music conservatory examination is of no relevance, hence Charles Rosen argued that if he'd give a decent mark (say, 6-7 out of 10) for a conservatory examination, he still would go for a lower mark for a similar performance in a competition situation.
I by the way studied with a pianist who participated in the very same competition where Cliburn won - while my teacher didn't get to the finals that time (he was in semi), he was on friendly terms with Richter after the competition. As far as I remember, they exchanged letters and so on.
_________________________
http://www.martinmalmgren.com/

Top
#2044104 - 03/06/13 07:30 PM Re: Van Cliburn Competition 2013 - Finalists announced [Re: sophial]
fnork Offline
1000 Post Club Member

Registered: 10/01/04
Posts: 1709
Loc: Helsinki, finland
Originally Posted By: sophial
It seems to me that a teacher who has students participating in a competition should automatically be ineligible to be a judge in that competition at any level because objectivity is compromised. There is an inherent conflict of interest. It is a principle in many other areas -- law, business, science. Not sure why it is so foreign to music .

It is also true that in many areas, this "connection" is simply impossible to avoid, especially within smaller "circles". To give an example, my dad has a professor position since many years in a university where he has been working for several decades, and when that job position was first opened, he not only had personal contacts within these small university circles (the job position was offered in his hometown, after all), but there were also people within those circles that knew his qualities very well and wanted him to get the position. What, then, was the solution when they needed to announce the job offer, if a certain person was on their mind already before the application process itself? It's rather simple - you look in advance at what 'specific' qualifications the person you are already interested in has in his/her CV, and you put these in the job offer announcment. It's a way of guaranteeing that one job applicant will stick out among the many that you might receive.

Perhaps this sounds a bit simple-minded, but I do think there's a fair amount of truth in it, within smaller circles in particular. I know several cases of people getting university positions in such ways.

Relating this to competitions isn't too difficult - the small circles are there, people go and take lessons from teachers privately or during summer courses/festivals and then they end up in competitions where the same people are judging them. It's somewhat surprising how the same names keep reoccuring among competitions worldwide. In the documentary "Why competitions", Geoffrey Swann made the observation that he had several colleagues during a competition (Busoni perhaps) who went STRAIGHT to Leeds right after that competition to judge, after which they also went to the Chopin competition. It's not entirely uncommon.

One solution regarding having teachers and their students in the jury is that if a jury member gives a plus to his or her own student (assuming there's a plus/minus system), it does not count unless the majority of the other jurors agreed with it.
_________________________
http://www.martinmalmgren.com/

Top
#2044124 - 03/06/13 08:13 PM Re: Van Cliburn Competition 2013 - Finalists announced [Re: Mark_C]
fnork Offline
1000 Post Club Member

Registered: 10/01/04
Posts: 1709
Loc: Helsinki, finland
Originally Posted By: Mark_C
Originally Posted By: fnork
I was going to say that I see a rather large amount of students from the Juilliard school overall...

Oy. grin

Isn't that like expressing surprise over Nobel Prize nominees often coming from Harvard and Oxford?

Juilliard is a name familiar to everyone for sure, buth whether or not that name signifies the Highest Possible Standard among young musicians today I cannot really tell. Though I have heard some fabulous musicians coming out of this school, I can also say that there are pianists from there that supposedly "succeed" in the competition circuit but that I'd never bother to hear in concert. That includes some Juilliard names on the list of contestants of the 2013 competition.

I can offer you a few observations though - a friend of mine, brilliant pianist and competition winner here and there, studied with the very same teacher at Juilliard and Hannover (he switched to the former mainly because his teacher quit in Hannover), and said that this teacher had a better piano class in Hannover than in Juilliard. Also, did you know that the school in america that receives the LEAST donations among former students is...Juilliard?
_________________________
http://www.martinmalmgren.com/

Top
#2045592 - 03/09/13 05:36 PM Re: Van Cliburn Competition 2013 - Finalists announced [Re: fnork]
fnork Offline
1000 Post Club Member

Registered: 10/01/04
Posts: 1709
Loc: Helsinki, finland
It seems the discussion here just died...in any case, now that we are talking big piano competitions - the candidates for Queen Elisabeth later this year were recently chosen as well. It's probably a competition I'm more interested in following overall rather than Van Cliburn. But let's see...
_________________________
http://www.martinmalmgren.com/

Top
#2045675 - 03/09/13 08:26 PM Re: Van Cliburn Competition 2013 - Finalists announced [Re: fnork]
Mark_C Online   content
Yikes! 10000 Post Club Member

Registered: 11/11/09
Posts: 19658
Loc: New York
Originally Posted By: fnork
It seems the discussion here just died.....

I don't think it "died." I think it's more like the discussion was complete for now, maybe until the next stages of the competition.

Top
#2046845 - 03/12/13 07:57 AM Re: Van Cliburn Competition 2013 - Finalists announced [Re: fnork]
Ridicolosamente Offline
1000 Post Club Member

Registered: 07/08/08
Posts: 1456
Loc: Miami, Florida, USA
Originally Posted By: fnork
...Queen Elisabeth later this year... It's probably a competition I'm more interested in following overall rather than Van Cliburn. But let's see...
What makes you prefer QE? Last competition there were some great moments, but also some "meh.." performances if I remember correctly. I did enjoy Kuzhukin's performances though, and thought he was a rightful winner (unlike that disaster at 2009 Cliburn.) But I don't see Kuzhukin discussed at all in the States - too bad. I hope he's doing well overseas.

-Daniel
_________________________
Currently working on:
-Dane Rudhyar's Stars from Pentagrams No 3

Top
#2046857 - 03/12/13 08:29 AM Re: Van Cliburn Competition 2013 - Finalists announced [Re: fnork]
debrucey Offline
2000 Post Club Member

Registered: 01/18/06
Posts: 2600
Loc: Manchester, UK
I met Fanny Waterman the other day. She told us how she is extremely adamant that in the Leeds competition the judges are forbidden from discussing their thoughts with each other at all, they must deliberate in absolute silence and secrecy, and apparently in the past she has fired people for breaking these rules. I don't know how much truth there is in this, but it did seem very important to her that the process be as fair as possible.


Edited by debrucey (03/12/13 08:29 AM)

Top
#2046895 - 03/12/13 10:13 AM Re: Van Cliburn Competition 2013 - Finalists announced [Re: fnork]
Andromaque Offline
3000 Post Club Member

Registered: 08/29/08
Posts: 3886
Loc: New York
It seems to me that removing Kaplinsky alone from the jury would address 70% of the problem, including most of the appearance of wrongdoing. A situation that is too complex for a perfect solution can still lend itself to partial remedies.
Moreover, refreshing the Jury would not be a bad strategy for this competition.


Edited by Andromaque (03/12/13 02:38 PM)

Top
#2047021 - 03/12/13 02:31 PM Re: Van Cliburn Competition 2013 - Finalists announced [Re: fnork]
Orange Soda King Offline
6000 Post Club Member

Registered: 11/25/09
Posts: 6070
Loc: Louisville, Kentucky, United S...
Kind of off-topic: what if there were also an audience (both live audience and people viewing online) voting option? It would not count for the actual judging, but it would be interesting. Thoughts?

Top
#2047027 - 03/12/13 02:52 PM Re: Van Cliburn Competition 2013 - Finalists announced [Re: fnork]
Kreisler Offline



Registered: 11/27/02
Posts: 13763
Loc: Iowa City, IA
What usually happens is that someone starts campaigning for votes and the person who wins the "audience favorite" ends up being the person who was able to get the word out and create the largest audience for themselves. This happens all the time in various YouTube talent contests, for example. Competitor X is clearly better than Competitor Y, but Competitor Y's uncle works at a company with 1000 employees and puts a notice about it in the company's newsletter asking everyone and their friends and family to announce it on Facebook and put in a quick vote for his nephew. So competitor Y ends up with 5000 more votes than competitor Y.

The only way around it would be to require people to listen to the entire performance or be in attendance, but even then it's tricky. When I attended the Cliburn in 2005, it was clear that competitors who lived in Texas often had a friendlier audience than some of the unknowns from other countries. Or you'd get people voting against Kaplinsky students on ideological grounds.

In other words, it's a giant can of worms, the results of which wouldn't be nearly as interesting as one would think.
_________________________
"If we continually try to force a child to do what he is afraid to do, he will become more timid, and will use his brains and energy, not to explore the unknown, but to find ways to avoid the pressures we put on him." (John Holt)

www.pianoped.com
www.youtube.com/user/UIPianoPed

Top
#2047102 - 03/12/13 05:10 PM Re: Van Cliburn Competition 2013 - Finalists announced [Re: fnork]
Nikolas Offline
5000 Post Club Member

Registered: 11/26/07
Posts: 5221
Loc: Europe
popularity contests (aka facebook likes and the such) are idiotic! The rest is explained in Kreisler's post clearly!
_________________________
http://www.musica-ferrum.com

Top
#2047117 - 03/12/13 05:25 PM Re: Van Cliburn Competition 2013 - Finalists announced [Re: Orange Soda King]
1091Piano Offline
Full Member

Registered: 01/25/12
Posts: 31
Originally Posted By: Orange Soda King
But at the same time, if someone is a juror, don't they abstain from hearing/submitting their feedback from their own students? For example, let's pretend there are 5 jurors for a competition. If a contestant is the student of one of the jurors, doesn't that juror abstain from any sort of judging for that student? Does the Cliburn work like that?


You are correct. Kaplinsky is definitely NOT allowed to judge her students in Cliburn.

Top
#2047135 - 03/12/13 05:47 PM Re: Van Cliburn Competition 2013 - Finalists announced [Re: Andromaque]
1091Piano Offline
Full Member

Registered: 01/25/12
Posts: 31
Originally Posted By: Andromaque
I am also wondering who among today's top stage performers are former Kaplinsky students ?


There are plenty that I can think of just from the top of my head: Joyce Yang, Conrad Tao, Anderson & Roe Piano Duo, Peng-Peng Gong, Charlie Albright, and Naomi Kudo.

I'm sure there are many more that I forgot to add.

Top
#2047163 - 03/12/13 06:12 PM Re: Van Cliburn Competition 2013 - Finalists announced [Re: Orange Soda King]
bennevis Online   content
4000 Post Club Member

Registered: 10/14/10
Posts: 4846
Originally Posted By: Orange Soda King
Kind of off-topic: what if there were also an audience (both live audience and people viewing online) voting option? It would not count for the actual judging, but it would be interesting. Thoughts?


The Leeds Competition has an Orchestra Prize, voted for by the conductor and the orchestral players: last year, the American Andrew Tyson won it. He came across in interviews as the most easy-going, relaxed and accommodating of the six finalists, and one would guess, the easiest to accompany in a concerto......

Top
#2047167 - 03/12/13 06:15 PM Re: Van Cliburn Competition 2013 - Finalists announced [Re: Kreisler]
Polyphonist Offline
7000 Post Club Member

Registered: 03/03/13
Posts: 7514
Loc: New York City
Originally Posted By: Kreisler
So competitor Y ends up with 5000 more votes than competitor Y.


Or competitor X, as the case may be. wink grin
_________________________
Regards,

Polyphonist

Top
#2047304 - 03/12/13 10:23 PM Re: Van Cliburn Competition 2013 - Finalists announced [Re: fnork]
jdhampton924 Offline
1000 Post Club Member

Registered: 01/13/08
Posts: 1009
Loc: Evansville, Indiana
I am not sure if somebody asked, but I know in a lot of smaller competitions. If your teacher is judging you are not allowed. Why is that not the case here? I mean, not like there are a shortage of big International competitions.

Or is it a case that it is easy to be vague about who is or isn't your teacher?

Top
#2047470 - 03/13/13 05:21 AM Re: Van Cliburn Competition 2013 - Finalists announced [Re: jdhampton924]
fnork Offline
1000 Post Club Member

Registered: 10/01/04
Posts: 1709
Loc: Helsinki, finland
Originally Posted By: jdhampton924
I am not sure if somebody asked, but I know in a lot of smaller competitions. If your teacher is judging you are not allowed. Why is that not the case here? I mean, not like there are a shortage of big International competitions.

Or is it a case that it is easy to be vague about who is or isn't your teacher?

I've been to smaller competitions where there hasn't been a single jury member who did NOT have a connection of some sort with some competitors. The competition that came to my mind the most was one in Italy though, heh.

Being vague about teachers is another route jurors/competitors might take. For instance, there was a major competition sometime ago where two friends of mine were in the finals and their ex-teacher was in the jury. While he did not have the possibility to vote for his students, he also by himself decided not to participate in the discussions after the finals when his ex-students participated. However, one of them was his student for merely half a year, and about 5-6 years prior to the competition...and it turned out that another competitor had been taking "private lessons" every now and then from another juror who seemingly didn't count that as having studied formally with her - in other words, she was still free to vote for him. I don't know if she even acknowledged it, until it was uncovered by others.

In competitions that employ the simple +/- system, there's one thing one can do. The juror who has students participating is still allowed to give a + to his students, but it counts ONLY if the majority of the other jury members agree.
_________________________
http://www.martinmalmgren.com/

Top
#2047474 - 03/13/13 05:43 AM Re: Van Cliburn Competition 2013 - Finalists announced [Re: 1091Piano]
fnork Offline
1000 Post Club Member

Registered: 10/01/04
Posts: 1709
Loc: Helsinki, finland
Originally Posted By: 1091Piano
Originally Posted By: Andromaque
I am also wondering who among today's top stage performers are former Kaplinsky students ?


There are plenty that I can think of just from the top of my head: Joyce Yang, Conrad Tao, Anderson & Roe Piano Duo, Peng-Peng Gong, Charlie Albright, and Naomi Kudo.

I'm sure there are many more that I forgot to add.

Are those pianists what they are (whatever you consider that to be) thanks to Kaplinsky? She's the head of a top school in America where there are basically only 4 active piano teachers (the list of teachers looks more impressive, but when you look at how many students each teacher has, it's pretty clear that the majority of students are split between Lowenthal/Raekallio/Kaplinsky/McDonald). It's hard not to end up having some good students...Out of those mentioned however, I heard Conrad and don't think I would bother again, and Peng Peng basically just sits and composes all day long (couldn't find a single youtube clip of him playing something else than his own nonsense music). I listened a bit to Charlie which was much more interesting - from the list of names you mentioned he seemed the most interesting one perhaps. In any case, the stories I hear of the "teachings" that Kaplinsky offers her students leaves room for doubts on her abilities as a pedagogue. A friend was accompanying a Kaplinsky student in Prok 3 in a private lesson, and she kept stopping my friend because he was "rushing" (more likely, just playing the music he felt it should go, and how he had rehearsed it with Kaplinsky's student). Each and every time the tempo was too rushed for her liking, she kept slowing it down, slowing it down, eventually hammering out the 4th-note pulse banging with her left hand on the piano, until they were roughly somewhere around half of the original tempo...
_________________________
http://www.martinmalmgren.com/

Top
#2047477 - 03/13/13 05:47 AM Re: Van Cliburn Competition 2013 - Finalists announced [Re: Ridicolosamente]
fnork Offline
1000 Post Club Member

Registered: 10/01/04
Posts: 1709
Loc: Helsinki, finland
Originally Posted By: Ridicolosamente
Originally Posted By: fnork
...Queen Elisabeth later this year... It's probably a competition I'm more interested in following overall rather than Van Cliburn. But let's see...
What makes you prefer QE? Last competition there were some great moments, but also some "meh.." performances if I remember correctly. I did enjoy Kuzhukin's performances though, and thought he was a rightful winner (unlike that disaster at 2009 Cliburn.) But I don't see Kuzhukin discussed at all in the States - too bad. I hope he's doing well overseas.

-Daniel

Well, Kozhukin is doing great of course, and has a busy-enough concert schedule. As for QE in general, well, I'm not entirely sure of course about the overall level, but just from reading the guidelines and repertoire requirements it gives a rather different and a rather more serious impression to my mind. Also, I know some talented people taking part, so...
_________________________
http://www.martinmalmgren.com/

Top
#2047797 - 03/13/13 06:16 PM Re: Van Cliburn Competition 2013 - Finalists announced [Re: Ridicolosamente]
wr Offline
7000 Post Club Member

Registered: 11/23/07
Posts: 7767
Originally Posted By: Ridicolosamente
Originally Posted By: fnork
...Queen Elisabeth later this year... It's probably a competition I'm more interested in following overall rather than Van Cliburn. But let's see...
What makes you prefer QE? Last competition there were some great moments, but also some "meh.." performances if I remember correctly. I did enjoy Kuzhukin's performances though, and thought he was a rightful winner (unlike that disaster at 2009 Cliburn.) But I don't see Kuzhukin discussed at all in the States - too bad. I hope he's doing well overseas.



Kozhukhin is the transliteration he uses - and he's had two orchestral dates in the US this season (Baltimore and Seattle).

He's about the most interesting competition winner I've heard in the last decade or so, I think. His Prokofiev 2nd at the QE was quite memorable. And it had the effect of showing just how vapid most performances of that piece in competitions are.

Top
#2047928 - 03/13/13 11:02 PM Re: Van Cliburn Competition 2013 - Finalists announced [Re: wr]
Brendan Online   content



Registered: 05/26/01
Posts: 5289
Loc: McAllen, TX
Originally Posted By: wr
Originally Posted By: Ridicolosamente
Originally Posted By: fnork
...Queen Elisabeth later this year... It's probably a competition I'm more interested in following overall rather than Van Cliburn. But let's see...
What makes you prefer QE? Last competition there were some great moments, but also some "meh.." performances if I remember correctly. I did enjoy Kuzhukin's performances though, and thought he was a rightful winner (unlike that disaster at 2009 Cliburn.) But I don't see Kuzhukin discussed at all in the States - too bad. I hope he's doing well overseas.



Kozhukhin is the transliteration he uses - and he's had two orchestral dates in the US this season (Baltimore and Seattle).

He's about the most interesting competition winner I've heard in the last decade or so, I think. His Prokofiev 2nd at the QE was quite memorable. And it had the effect of showing just how vapid most performances of that piece in competitions are.


Agreed. He had a very interesting Rach 2 in Leeds a few cycles ago.
_________________________
http://www.BrendanKinsella.com

Top
#2048694 - 03/15/13 12:10 PM Re: Van Cliburn Competition 2013 - Finalists announced [Re: fnork]
jdhampton924 Offline
1000 Post Club Member

Registered: 01/13/08
Posts: 1009
Loc: Evansville, Indiana
Originally Posted By: fnork
Originally Posted By: jdhampton924
I am not sure if somebody asked, but I know in a lot of smaller competitions. If your teacher is judging you are not allowed. Why is that not the case here? I mean, not like there are a shortage of big International competitions.

Or is it a case that it is easy to be vague about who is or isn't your teacher?

I've been to smaller competitions where there hasn't been a single jury member who did NOT have a connection of some sort with some competitors. The competition that came to my mind the most was one in Italy though, heh.

Being vague about teachers is another route jurors/competitors might take. For instance, there was a major competition sometime ago where two friends of mine were in the finals and their ex-teacher was in the jury. While he did not have the possibility to vote for his students, he also by himself decided not to participate in the discussions after the finals when his ex-students participated. However, one of them was his student for merely half a year, and about 5-6 years prior to the competition...and it turned out that another competitor had been taking "private lessons" every now and then from another juror who seemingly didn't count that as having studied formally with her - in other words, she was still free to vote for him. I don't know if she even acknowledged it, until it was uncovered by others.

In competitions that employ the simple +/- system, there's one thing one can do. The juror who has students participating is still allowed to give a + to his students, but it counts ONLY if the majority of the other jury members agree.


Ahh, that clears a lot of things up...Thanks!

Top
Page 1 of 2 1 2 >

Moderator:  Brendan, Kreisler 
What's Hot!!
Our latest Issue is available now...
Piano News - Interesting & Fun Piano Related Newsletter! (free)
-------------------
HOW TO POST PICTURES on the Piano Forums
-------------------
Sharing is Caring!
About the Buttons
-------------------
Forums Rules & Help
-------------------
ADVERTISE
on Piano World

The world's most popular piano web site.
(ad) HAILUN Pianos
Hailun Pianos - Click for More
Ad (Seiler/Knabe)
Seiler Pianos
Sheet Music
(PW is an affiliate)
Sheet Music Plus Featured Sale
(125ad) Dampp Chaser
Dampp Chaser Piano Life Saver
(ad) Lindeblad Piano
Lindeblad Piano Restoration
Who's Online
135 registered (ajames, aesop, Alex-SapRenovation, accordeur, 35 invisible), 1750 Guests and 13 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Stats
75583 Members
42 Forums
156278 Topics
2295140 Posts

Max Online: 15252 @ 03/21/10 11:39 PM
New Topics - Multiple Forums
Help with dynamics
by noobpianist90
07/30/14 03:53 AM
Using Kawai MP6 faders/knobs with virtual instruments?
by chicolom
07/30/14 02:35 AM
Coming up with new compositional methods.
by gsmonks
07/30/14 01:58 AM
Impromptu in A
by Ritzycat
07/30/14 12:42 AM
what do you think piano teachers about it?
by Maximillyan
07/30/14 12:15 AM
(ads by Google)

Visit our online store for gifts for music lovers

 
Our Piano Related Classified Ads
| Dealers | Tuners | Lessons | Movers | Restorations | Pianos For Sale | Sell Your Piano |

Advertise on Piano World
| Subscribe | Piano World | PianoSupplies.com | Advertise on Piano World | Donate | Link to Us | Classifieds |
| |Contact | Privacy | Legal | About Us | Site Map | Free Newsletter | Press Room |


copyright 1997 - 2014 Piano World ® all rights reserved
No part of this site may be reproduced without prior written permission