Welcome to the Piano World Piano Forums
Over 2 million posts about pianos, digital pianos, and all types of keyboard instruments
Join the World's Largest Community of Piano Lovers (it's free)
It's Fun to Play the Piano ... Please Pass It On!

SEARCH
the Forums & Piano World

This custom search works much better than the built in one and allows searching older posts.
(ad 125) Sweetwater - Digital Keyboards & Other Gear
Digital Pianos at Sweetwater
(ad) Pearl River
Pearl River Pianos
(ad) Pianoteq
Latest Pianoteq add-on instrument: U4 upright piano
(ad) P B Guide
Acoustic & Digital Piano Guide
PianoSupplies.com (150)
Piano Accessories Music Related Gifts Piano Tuning Equipment Piano Moving Equipment
We now offer Gift Certificates in our online store!
(ad) Estonia Piano
Estonia Piano
Quick Links to Useful Stuff
Our Classified Ads
Find Piano Professionals-

*Piano Dealers - Piano Stores
*Piano Tuners
*Piano Teachers
*Piano Movers
*Piano Restorations
*Piano Manufacturers
*Organs

Quick Links:
*Advertise On Piano World
*Free Piano Newsletter
*Online Piano Recitals
*Piano Recitals Index
*Piano Accessories
* Buying a Piano
*Buying A Acoustic Piano
*Buying a Digital Piano
*Pianos for Sale
*Sell Your Piano
*How Old is My Piano?
*Piano Books
*Piano Art, Pictures, & Posters
*Directory/Site Map
*Contest
*Links
*Virtual Piano
*Music Word Search
*Piano Screen Saver
*Piano Videos
*Virtual Piano Chords
Topic Options
#2095230 - 06/04/13 12:24 PM Rachmaninoff op. 23 no. 4
ansatz737 Offline
Full Member

Registered: 06/27/12
Posts: 156
So I started feeling guilty that all my posts on this site have been in the Van Cliburn thread. I thought I might assuage that guilt by posting a recording so everyone can see just how hypocritical I am for criticizing pianists my age or slightly older who are a million times more accomplished than I ever will be grin

I've been playing this prelude casually for at least a couple of months now, but had one lesson on it recently. There are lots of things obviously wrong with it, but I'll let you guys figure them out instead of apologizing in advance. I will, however, apologize for the weirdly low volume [fixed in the second take], my out-of-tune piano, and the unfortunate timing of my clock's hourly chirp at the very end [also fixed]...

EDIT: This is different take with better volume

https://soundcloud.com/ansatz737/rach23-4-bettervolume2


Edited by ansatz737 (06/04/13 01:45 PM)
_________________________
Student and shamefully occasional pianist
Currently attempting:
Rachmaninoff - Preludes op. 23 nos. 4 and 7
Deciding between Mozart K. 310 and Beethoven op. 10 no. 3
Albeniz - Almeria from Iberia book II

Top
#2095253 - 06/04/13 12:50 PM Re: Rachmaninoff op. 23 no. 4 [Re: ansatz737]
Mark_C Offline
Yikes! 10000 Post Club Member

Registered: 11/11/09
Posts: 19777
Loc: New York
I had to go listen, including because of your mentioning Cliburn (even though it wasn't really about him!) and that it was from his LP recording that I came to know and love the piece.

The volume really is too low for me to say much, but I can say that it seems to me that this is excellent, with a great tempo, very good and relaxed pacing, and (yes, even with the very low volume I felt I could tell this!) ....and very good dynamic range, with good and interesting shaping within phrases.

Top
#2095260 - 06/04/13 01:02 PM Re: Rachmaninoff op. 23 no. 4 [Re: ansatz737]
Cinnamonbear Offline
3000 Post Club Member

Registered: 01/09/10
Posts: 3905
Loc: Rockford, IL
What I hear in your performance, ansatz, is a degree of musical maturity and depth that is largely missing from a number of this year's Cliburn performances, despite the competitors' technical mastery and wide-ranging virtuoso rep. I know there are a ton of qualifying differences, but I also know what I'm hearing in the making and shaping of music.

Beautiful, sensitive playing. And I loved the bird song at the end. Thank you for sharing this. It takes a lot of courage to post to an international forum and throw yourself to potential wolves! smile

--Andy
_________________________
I may not be fast,
but at least I'm slow.

Top
#2095287 - 06/04/13 01:43 PM Re: Rachmaninoff op. 23 no. 4 [Re: ansatz737]
ansatz737 Offline
Full Member

Registered: 06/27/12
Posts: 156
Wow, thanks Mark and Andy! I certainly wasn't expecting a positive reception. I adjusted the settings on my recording device and did another take, and the volume appears to be normal now. I edited out a short false start at the beginning, but otherwise didn't change the performance. The flaws in my playing will probably be more obvious now, but hopefully some good things will be too ha
_________________________
Student and shamefully occasional pianist
Currently attempting:
Rachmaninoff - Preludes op. 23 nos. 4 and 7
Deciding between Mozart K. 310 and Beethoven op. 10 no. 3
Albeniz - Almeria from Iberia book II

Top
#2095306 - 06/04/13 01:56 PM Re: Rachmaninoff op. 23 no. 4 [Re: ansatz737]
Mark_C Offline
Yikes! 10000 Post Club Member

Registered: 11/11/09
Posts: 19777
Loc: New York
Yeah. grin

It's still very good, even now that we can actually hear it ha ....but there's one 'new' thing (only 1!), which I couldn't tell before. You almost always PAUSE when the left hand has to leap downward, like at the ends of measures -- through most of the piece, except when there isn't such a leap. That's a very common 'amateur' thing with such figurations. I've been prone to it myself. I once played Chopin's E-flat major Nocturne (Op. 9 #2) as an encore, and then to my horror, my teacher pointed out afterwards that I had done this. The nocturne has exactly the same issue; it's easier there but the issue is the same. I didn't even realize I was doing it. I had gotten into it as a matter of convenience, or probably more accurately, laziness grin ....and just got used to it, so that I didn't even notice it; it just felt like part of my "rubato," but it wasn't. Of course it's OK to be flexible with rhythms and to have little pauses, and often a pause is probably intended by the composer when a hand has to jump like that. But it's not OK when it wasn't intended (as I doubt it was in this piece) and when we don't even realize it and just doing it as a technical concession rather than as an expressive choice.

If you fix that, it'll be pretty close to perfect. smile
And if you need clues on how to work on it, we can help with that.

Top
#2095311 - 06/04/13 02:02 PM Re: Rachmaninoff op. 23 no. 4 [Re: Mark_C]
ansatz737 Offline
Full Member

Registered: 06/27/12
Posts: 156
Yup, that's definitely one of the major issues ha But I only really noticed it when listening to these recordings! Now it seems glaringly obvious and I wonder how I could have missed it before, but I guess that's how it works sometimes. I'll work on it smile
_________________________
Student and shamefully occasional pianist
Currently attempting:
Rachmaninoff - Preludes op. 23 nos. 4 and 7
Deciding between Mozart K. 310 and Beethoven op. 10 no. 3
Albeniz - Almeria from Iberia book II

Top
#2095601 - 06/04/13 09:36 PM Re: Rachmaninoff op. 23 no. 4 [Re: ansatz737]
Polyphonist Offline
7000 Post Club Member

Registered: 03/03/13
Posts: 7605
Loc: New York City
Here goes. I have not read any of the previous comments on this thread, so my opinions are unbiased. ha

I like your tempo starting out. There may be a little too much pause when your LH is leaping down at the beginning of measures - try to work on that.

Try to think about making the phrases a bit longer; you're cutting off a few of them.

2:13 is an amazing moment - maybe even use a little more rubato.

You could be bringing out the melodies over the LH a little more, I think.

I love 3:03 - 3:10 so much - you do a great job with that section.

You have excellent control of crescendi and diminuendi towards the end. Your LH is probably slightly too loud, but it's OK.

The chord at 4:39 - this is what I don't like so much. Try to work on the voicing, and maybe take a little more time before that chord and play it a little softer.

All in all - I'm impressed. One of the more musical performances of this prelude I've heard (and I've heard a lot of great ones). You're only in college? You have some serious potential as a pianist.

_________________________
Regards,

Polyphonist

Top
#2095614 - 06/04/13 10:07 PM Re: Rachmaninoff op. 23 no. 4 [Re: ansatz737]
Derulux Offline
5000 Post Club Member

Registered: 06/06/05
Posts: 5318
Loc: Philadelphia
I have a personal policy that I don't listen to a recording without commenting, and offering feedback when requested. Unfortunately, I don't have a lot of time right this second, so I may come back and post a longer reply later.

I liked this performance. A couple minor flubs which I think you already knew about, but nothing major. I agree with eliminating the hesitation. It really makes the line drag.

I would like to hear the middle melody more in the 2nd "section" with the triplets on top. Most of the notes come out clean and clear, but some of the trickier ones weren't as clear.

That's the major stuff.. really solid take. With a little tightening, this could be performance-ready. Good take! smile
_________________________
Every day we are afforded a new chance. The problem with life is not that you run out of chances. In the end, what you run out of are days.

Top
#2096024 - 06/05/13 08:22 AM Re: Rachmaninoff op. 23 no. 4 [Re: Polyphonist]
ansatz737 Offline
Full Member

Registered: 06/27/12
Posts: 156
Polyphonist - thanks for the detailed comments! I'll try to give a point-by-point response.

Originally Posted By: Polyphonist

I like your tempo starting out. There may be a little too much pause when your LH is leaping down at the beginning of measures - try to work on that.


Definitely, as discussed before.

Originally Posted By: Polyphonist

Try to think about making the phrases a bit longer; you're cutting off a few of them.


My teacher mentioned this too and I think I've improved in that respect, but I can work on it more.

Originally Posted By: Polyphonist

2:13 is an amazing moment - maybe even use a little more rubato.


Yeah, you're probably right. But I think the effect of the rubato there was dulled by the fact that I was delaying the beginnings of measures far too frequently. So maybe if I fix that, I won't even need to slow down much more there, I don't know yet.

Originally Posted By: Polyphonist

You could be bringing out the melodies over the LH a little more, I think.


Possibly. One of the things my teacher made a big point of was making the LH a bit more prominent since I had been keeping it overly light before. Maybe I've gone too far in the other direction.

Originally Posted By: Polyphonist

I love 3:03 - 3:10 so much - you do a great job with that section.


I actually thought it was pretty good too!

Originally Posted By: Polyphonist

You have excellent control of crescendi and diminuendi towards the end. Your LH is probably slightly too loud, but it's OK.


(same reason for loud LH as explained earlier)

Originally Posted By: Polyphonist

The chord at 4:39 - this is what I don't like so much. Try to work on the voicing, and maybe take a little more time before that chord and play it a little softer.


I will admit that I haven't given enough thought to how I want the last few measures to sound yet, so I may end up agreeing with you. But in my score that chord is marked mf, which is distinctly louder than much of what precedes it. I might decide to play it softer anyway, but IMO that's a distortion of the score, albeit a very reasonable one.

Originally Posted By: Polyphonist

All in all - I'm impressed. One of the more musical performances of this prelude I've heard (and I've heard a lot of great ones). You're only in college? You have some serious potential as a pianist.


Thanks again! But I have to laugh at the "serious potential" bit grin I assure you that you wouldn't feel the same way if you heard me playing anything remotely fast or virtuosic ha My technique is extremely weak. I've played only sporadically over the past two years, and only started practicing regularly again a couple of months ago since taking temporary leave of absence from university.


Edited by ansatz737 (06/05/13 08:24 AM)
_________________________
Student and shamefully occasional pianist
Currently attempting:
Rachmaninoff - Preludes op. 23 nos. 4 and 7
Deciding between Mozart K. 310 and Beethoven op. 10 no. 3
Albeniz - Almeria from Iberia book II

Top
#2096026 - 06/05/13 08:28 AM Re: Rachmaninoff op. 23 no. 4 [Re: Derulux]
ansatz737 Offline
Full Member

Registered: 06/27/12
Posts: 156
Originally Posted By: Derulux
I have a personal policy that I don't listen to a recording without commenting, and offering feedback when requested. Unfortunately, I don't have a lot of time right this second, so I may come back and post a longer reply later.

I liked this performance. A couple minor flubs which I think you already knew about, but nothing major. I agree with eliminating the hesitation. It really makes the line drag.

I would like to hear the middle melody more in the 2nd "section" with the triplets on top. Most of the notes come out clean and clear, but some of the trickier ones weren't as clear.

That's the major stuff.. really solid take. With a little tightening, this could be performance-ready. Good take! smile


Thank you for your comments! The hesitation point has been discussed enough by now, I think smile I was reasonably happy with the 2nd section you mention, but it's very difficult for me and there's always room for improvement. I will say though that I don't like the melody to be quite as loud there as I've heard some pianists make it. I think it sounds more beautiful and natural if it doesn't stick out *that* much (i.e. to the point of harshness) from the surrounding textures.


Edited by ansatz737 (06/05/13 08:32 AM)
_________________________
Student and shamefully occasional pianist
Currently attempting:
Rachmaninoff - Preludes op. 23 nos. 4 and 7
Deciding between Mozart K. 310 and Beethoven op. 10 no. 3
Albeniz - Almeria from Iberia book II

Top
#2096153 - 06/05/13 11:50 AM Re: Rachmaninoff op. 23 no. 4 [Re: ansatz737]
Derulux Offline
5000 Post Club Member

Registered: 06/06/05
Posts: 5318
Loc: Philadelphia
Originally Posted By: ansatz737
Originally Posted By: Derulux
I have a personal policy that I don't listen to a recording without commenting, and offering feedback when requested. Unfortunately, I don't have a lot of time right this second, so I may come back and post a longer reply later.

I liked this performance. A couple minor flubs which I think you already knew about, but nothing major. I agree with eliminating the hesitation. It really makes the line drag.

I would like to hear the middle melody more in the 2nd "section" with the triplets on top. Most of the notes come out clean and clear, but some of the trickier ones weren't as clear.

That's the major stuff.. really solid take. With a little tightening, this could be performance-ready. Good take! smile


Thank you for your comments! The hesitation point has been discussed enough by now, I think smile I was reasonably happy with the 2nd section you mention, but it's very difficult for me and there's always room for improvement. I will say though that I don't like the melody to be quite as loud there as I've heard some pianists make it. I think it sounds more beautiful and natural if it doesn't stick out *that* much (i.e. to the point of harshness) from the surrounding textures.

I agree, but a couple times it disappeared into the surrounding textures. wink

You entered the 2nd section very well.. I was delighted by how soft you kept the triplets. Most pianists I've heard (including some pros) do the opposite and play the triplets way too loud.
_________________________
Every day we are afforded a new chance. The problem with life is not that you run out of chances. In the end, what you run out of are days.

Top

Moderator:  Kreisler 
What's Hot!!
HOW TO POST PICTURES on the Piano Forums
-------------------
Sharing is Caring!
About the Buttons
-------------------
Forums Rules & Help
-------------------
ADVERTISE
on Piano World

The world's most popular piano web site.
-------------------
PIANO BOOKS
Interesting books about the piano, pianists, piano history, biographies, memoirs and more!
(ad) HAILUN Pianos
Hailun Pianos - Click for More
ad (Casio)
Celviano by Casio Rebate
Ad (Seiler/Knabe)
Knabe Pianos
Sheet Music
(PW is an affiliate)
Sheet Music Plus Featured Sale
(125ad) Dampp Chaser
Dampp Chaser Piano Life Saver
(ad) Lindeblad Piano
Lindeblad Piano Restoration
New Topics - Multiple Forums
Kawai CN24 vs Kawai CA65 Vs Acoustic
by Luca33
09/22/14 08:55 AM
What happpened to the "edit" button?
by jim ialeggio
09/22/14 07:38 AM
AMusA reports?
by Badinage
09/22/14 07:03 AM
Dipabrsm starting as an adult?
by Franz Beebert
09/22/14 06:37 AM
Just Checked out a Richmond Studio upright
by Paul678
09/22/14 06:01 AM
Who's Online
110 registered (Anne'sson, AndresD, Allard, 36251, 39 invisible), 1175 Guests and 19 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Stats
76285 Members
42 Forums
157687 Topics
2316123 Posts

Max Online: 15252 @ 03/21/10 11:39 PM
(ads by Google)

Visit our online store for gifts for music lovers

 
Help keep the forums up and running with a donation, any amount is appreciated!
Or by becoming a Subscribing member! Thank-you.
Donate   Subscribe
 
Our Piano Related Classified Ads
|
Dealers | Tuners | Lessons | Movers | Restorations | Pianos For Sale | Sell Your Piano |

Advertise on Piano World
| Subscribe | Piano World | PianoSupplies.com | Advertise on Piano World | Donate | Link to Us | Classifieds |
| |Contact | Privacy | Legal | About Us | Site Map | Free Newsletter | Press Room |


copyright 1997 - 2014 Piano World ® all rights reserved
No part of this site may be reproduced without prior written permission