Welcome to the Piano World Piano Forums
Over 2 million posts about pianos, digital pianos, and all types of keyboard instruments
Join the World's Largest Community of Piano Lovers (it's free)
It's Fun to Play the Piano ... Please Pass It On!

SEARCH
the Forums & Piano World

This custom search works much better than the built in one and allows searching older posts.
(ad 125) Sweetwater - Digital Keyboards & Other Gear
Digital Pianos at Sweetwater
(ad) Pearl River
Pearl River Pianos
(ad) Pianoteq
Latest Pianoteq add-on instrument: U4 upright piano
(ad) P B Guide
Acoustic & Digital Piano Guide
PianoSupplies.com (150)
Piano Accessories Music Related Gifts Piano Tuning Equipment Piano Moving Equipment
We now offer Gift Certificates in our online store!
(ad) Estonia Piano
Estonia Piano
Quick Links to Useful Stuff
Our Classified Ads
Find Piano Professionals-

*Piano Dealers - Piano Stores
*Piano Tuners
*Piano Teachers
*Piano Movers
*Piano Restorations
*Piano Manufacturers
*Organs

Quick Links:
*Advertise On Piano World
*Free Piano Newsletter
*Online Piano Recitals
*Piano Recitals Index
*Piano Accessories
* Buying a Piano
*Buying A Acoustic Piano
*Buying a Digital Piano
*Pianos for Sale
*Sell Your Piano
*How Old is My Piano?
*Piano Books
*Piano Art, Pictures, & Posters
*Directory/Site Map
*Contest
*Links
*Virtual Piano
*Music Word Search
*Piano Screen Saver
*Piano Videos
*Virtual Piano Chords
Page 1 of 2 1 2 >
Topic Options
#2110071 - 06/29/13 05:52 AM Classical music for beginners
King Norre Offline
Full Member

Registered: 10/04/02
Posts: 59
Loc: Antwerp, Belgium
Hi,

After listening to jazz, blues and roots music for many years I would love to learn about classical music, and specially classical piano music. I started taking piano lessons last week and I'm sure as my skills and lessons evolve I'll get to know more about the music and the great composers. I was wondering if someone could maybe give me some advice about CD's that a classical pianist *must* own or at least know. I guess it's not simple giving advice to someone not knowing anything. I'm sure there's many styles within the classical music. Maybe something that't easy to listen to for a beginner wink I do love the cello suites of Bach. Actually I like the preludes and fugues of Bach also. But that's a far as my knowledge goes.
I prefer recordings with piano only or maybe small ensembles.


Thanks,

KN
_________________________
Be yourself - no more, no less.
My Piano Links Page
My Piano Blog

Top
(ads P/S)

Petrof Pianos

#2110088 - 06/29/13 07:17 AM Re: Classical music for beginners [Re: King Norre]
earlofmar Online   content
1000 Post Club Member

Registered: 03/21/13
Posts: 1533
Loc: Australia
Can't answer the question, I hope to develop a love of classical piano recordings down the track. Although I really lean towards classical when I select new pieces to learn, when the day is done and I switch the piano off it's back to progressive rock for me.
_________________________
I thought I understood endurance sport; then I took up piano
XXXV-6-XXX

Top
#2110095 - 06/29/13 08:01 AM Re: Classical music for beginners [Re: King Norre]
zrtf90 Offline
2000 Post Club Member

Registered: 02/29/12
Posts: 2345
Loc: Ireland (ex England)
The major composers are best understood by listening to the major works. Opera aside, the symphony and the concerto have long been considered the main works of a composer. It is enough to study one or two of the main works but it also worthwhile having a wider knowledge of their output to build a context.

When I began studying classical music in detail I was quite surprised after dissecting a Concerto by Corelli that my tutors summed up his music and style by this one piece. Out of protestation I dissembled another concerto to try and prove a point. That's when I began to realise that you can indeed sum up a composers style and musical language based on one major work.

The first of the Great Composers is Bach. It would be misleading to consider his precursors as leading up to Bach - there was a lot going on and it is very interesting - but it was Bach that drew all the strings together and began to unite them into one homogenous whole. Corelli's Concerto Grossi and Church sonatas were a profound influence on both giants of the baroque era, Bach and Handel.

Bach and Handel's Concertos and Suites are worthy of study as orchestral music. For keyboard music Handel's suites are looser and freer than Bach's output and his body of keyboard music not as vast but a third composer, Domenico Scarlatti (all three were born in 1685), wrote over five hundred sonatas for harpsichord that represent first class writing. He, like Chopin, wrote specifically for the keyboard and wrote little that was not intended for it. It many ways he is the precursor of Chopin and his sonatas are better than anything Handel wrote for developing keyboard skills. They also transfer exceedingly well to the modern piano.

Apart from the sons of Bach, and principally CPE Bach, there was little productive music until the arrival of Haydn and Mozart in the 1770's. There was much going on but little of it reached the surface until these two greats wrought the symphony out of the suite and brought the sonata principle into being. This was to become all pervasive in music and just confined to the sonata or symphony.

Haydn and Mozart also made the piano sonata and the string quartet important chamber works. While Boccherini had written for a string quartet, Haydn established the form and made it an important genre.

Again, looking only at keyboard music, another composer, Clementi, is worthy of mention. He is the first to write specifically for the piano and and introduce new skills for the instrument. His piano sonatas drew the admiration of Beethoven, who insisted on his nephew Carl making use of them in his tuition. Brahms also rated Clementi highly.

Beethoven and Schubert are next up. Beethoven took piano technique to new heights and his 32 piano sonatas are among the greatest collections ever written with Bach's 48 and probably Chopin's 24 Preludes. The sonatas, similar to Rembrandt's series of self-portraits, tell the life story of one of the greatest creative forces in human history.

Schubert not only matched the quality of his predecessors in the major works but he also gave the Romantics an alternative to the larger forms. His Impromptus and Moments Musicaux paved the way for the smaller forms that were to dominate the next era.

Mendelssohn, Chopin, Schumann and Liszt are the four big noises of the Romantic period all produced first class keyboard music. History now begins to separate the major orchestral composers and the major keyboard composers with only a few exceptions such as Tchaikovsky and Rachmaninov.

The Romantics diverged geographically as well as musically. Chopin and Liszt were centered in Paris and extending keyboard virtuosity beyond normal limits while Mendelssohn and Schumann furthered the Germanic style.

Brahms continued in the neo-classical style from Schumann and took keyboard technique to another level with his Paganini Variations. He was an eclectic and discarded anything that didn't meet his high standards. His canon for piano, like that of Chopin, is small enough and important enough to be familiar in its entirety. Grieg, Sibelius, Tchaikovsky and the 'Mighty Handful' of Russian composers developed Nationalistic music, Debussy and Ravel making the two sides of French Impressionism.

The next major development in art music is atonality. It can be difficult to play and difficult to listen to until you either find something you like or start to understand how and why it has come about. Berg, Schoenberg, Webern and co. are the major names at its beginning.
_________________________
Richard

Top
#2110100 - 06/29/13 08:16 AM Re: Classical music for beginners [Re: King Norre]
BrainCramp Offline
Full Member

Registered: 04/09/12
Posts: 255
Loc: USA
Hi King,

One way to approach it is by composer. If you already like Bach, listen to some of his music played on the piano. Then move on to another composer. Listen to a variety of that composer's "greatest hits", regardless of the instrument(s). Then listen to his piano music.

For "piano with something else", I loved Brahms' violin sonatas when I was first learning about classical music. (There are 3 of them.)

Mozart's "Kegelstatt" trio for clarinet, piano, and viola was an early favorite of mine, too.

If you like piano and voice, Schubert's lieder are a joy. Bryn Terfel has a nice big selection on Deutsche Grammophon called "An Die Musik: Favorite Schubert Songs".

Most importantly, have fun. Don't feel you have to like a particular composer just because he wrote important piano music. (For me, that's a whole bunch of Russians.)

Top
#2110105 - 06/29/13 08:35 AM Re: Classical music for beginners [Re: King Norre]
JimF Offline
1000 Post Club Member

Registered: 10/08/09
Posts: 1713
Loc: south florida
King norre,


A good start would be just about anything recorded by Vladimir Horowitz. For solo piano, I couldn't imagine a collection that didn't include Chopin's Nocturnes (take your pick, all magnificent) and Beethoven's Sonatas (Appasionata and Waldstein are my favs).

If you do searches of "best _____ recordings" (insert artist, composer, or piece), you will find many past threads here and in the pianist corner topics with plenty of opinions.

Have fun.
_________________________
La Fille aux cheveux de lin - Debussy
Ma Mere L'Oye - Ravel
Mozart Sonata K545

Estonia L190 #7284





Top
#2110115 - 06/29/13 09:37 AM Re: Classical music for beginners [Re: JimF]
King Norre Offline
Full Member

Registered: 10/04/02
Posts: 59
Loc: Antwerp, Belgium
Thanks for the info all smile Thanks for the list Richard thumb
Also thanks for the suggested recordings and favorite pieces.
I think I'll start with Bach and then check out the others in chronological order. A new world awaits 3hearts
_________________________
Be yourself - no more, no less.
My Piano Links Page
My Piano Blog

Top
#2110385 - 06/29/13 11:22 PM Re: Classical music for beginners [Re: King Norre]
Charles Cohen Offline
1000 Post Club Member

Registered: 12/26/12
Posts: 1264
Loc: Richmond, BC, Canada
For Bach, Glenn Gould recorded the "Well-Tempered Clavier". I believe he did it twice -- once as a wunderkind, the second time as a mature musician.

With those, the Mozart piano sonatas, the Beethoven piano sonatas, some Chopin, and some Brahms / Schubert / Schumann, you'll have lots of hours of listening.

I expect that there are decent versions of all of those works online, as MP3 files. Otherwise, see what the CD stores (if there are any left) can dredge up.

. Charles

Top
#2110411 - 06/30/13 12:34 AM Re: Classical music for beginners [Re: Charles Cohen]
tangleweeds Offline

Silver Supporter until Jan 11 2012


Registered: 12/21/08
Posts: 1269
Loc: Portlandia
Originally Posted By: Charles Cohen
For Bach, Glenn Gould recorded the "Well-Tempered Clavier". I believe he did it twice -- once as a wunderkind, the second time as a mature musician.

I think you may be confusing the WTC with the Goldberg Variations. There's now a set containing both early and late versions of the Goldberg Variations, called "A State of Wonder".

...which I had been meaning to recommend to the OP earlier in the thread, only I've been too sweaty and lazy to type.

And somebody, do please correct me if Gould actually also did two versions of the WTC... if so, I'd better check which one I already have, so I can go find the other one too laugh


Edited by tangleweeds (06/30/13 12:35 AM)
Edit Reason: incomplete
_________________________
Oops... extremely distracted by mandolins at the moment... brb

neglected piano blog

Top
#2110453 - 06/30/13 05:08 AM Re: Classical music for beginners [Re: King Norre]
Hammertime Offline
Junior Member

Registered: 05/27/13
Posts: 8
Loc: Worcs, UK
If you really want to 'get' classical music then work your way through this free Yale course - it really is very interesting, informative and engaging. It starts off very 'basic' and works upwards from there. The course book is great too.

http://oyc.yale.edu/music/musi-112#sessions

Top
#2110470 - 06/30/13 06:07 AM Re: Classical music for beginners [Re: Hammertime]
King Norre Offline
Full Member

Registered: 10/04/02
Posts: 59
Loc: Antwerp, Belgium
Wow! Thanks for the link thumb
_________________________
Be yourself - no more, no less.
My Piano Links Page
My Piano Blog

Top
#2110471 - 06/30/13 06:08 AM Re: Classical music for beginners [Re: King Norre]
King Norre Offline
Full Member

Registered: 10/04/02
Posts: 59
Loc: Antwerp, Belgium
I'll definitely check out Glen Gould. Thanks for the advice!
_________________________
Be yourself - no more, no less.
My Piano Links Page
My Piano Blog

Top
#2110500 - 06/30/13 07:43 AM Re: Classical music for beginners [Re: Hammertime]
raikkU Offline
Full Member

Registered: 03/20/13
Posts: 73
Originally Posted By: Hammertime
If you really want to 'get' classical music then work your way through this free Yale course - it really is very interesting, informative and engaging. It starts off very 'basic' and works upwards from there. The course book is great too.

http://oyc.yale.edu/music/musi-112#sessions


Amazing, thank you.
_________________________
yamaha p-35. a piano neophyte since 04/13. my piano links

Top
#2110509 - 06/30/13 08:02 AM Re: Classical music for beginners [Re: King Norre]
Palmpirate Offline
Full Member

Registered: 01/31/13
Posts: 221
Loc: B.C.Canada
Glenn Gould is also a Beethoven hero as well as his Bach. Like tangleweeds I shall have to check which recordings I've got.
Richard's run down is a great re-cap . Thanks sftr90 I shall keep a copy ot that handy! And Thanks King Norre for asking the question. It's good to have all these composers sorted out.
_________________________

Top
#2110514 - 06/30/13 08:14 AM Re: Classical music for beginners [Re: King Norre]
rnaple Offline

Silver Supporter until April 24 2014


Registered: 12/23/10
Posts: 2070
Loc: Rocky Mountains
The theme from Gilligan's Island is in the back of Alfred's book one. smile
Talk about classic. smile




I hope you all enjoyed this humorous interruption to your regularly scheduled classical thread.
_________________________
Ron
Your brain is a sponge. Keep it wet. Mary Gae George
The focus of your personal practice is discipline. Not numbers. Scott Sonnon

Top
#2110632 - 06/30/13 01:56 PM Re: Classical music for beginners [Re: King Norre]
floydthebarber71 Offline
Full Member

Registered: 12/07/12
Posts: 178
Loc: South Africa
Awesome post, Richard.
_________________________
Zaahir

Self-taught renegade - Kawai CL-36

Top
#2110646 - 06/30/13 02:28 PM Re: Classical music for beginners [Re: King Norre]
casinitaly Offline

Gold Supporter until March 1 2014


Registered: 03/01/10
Posts: 4973
Loc: Italy
Great thread!

Richard your overview was splendid!

One thing that can be helpful when trying to get exposure to a lot of music is to find a really good "classical" music station - some stations have wonderful programming with commentary that can be very informative. Then you can jot down composers who catch your fancy and explore them in greater depth!



Edited by casinitaly (06/30/13 02:29 PM)
_________________________
XVIII-XXXIV
Everything's too hard until you make it easy. Follow your teacher's instructions and practice wisely/much, and you'll soon wonder how you ever found it hard ;)-BobPickle
Performance anxiety: make it part of your daily routine and deal with it...Cope! zrtf90

Top
#2110699 - 06/30/13 04:33 PM Re: Classical music for beginners [Re: King Norre]
4evrBeginR Offline
1000 Post Club Member

Registered: 06/27/09
Posts: 1607
Loc: California
Go to Pandora (pandora.com) and listen to their "Classical Solo Piano Radio" station as a start. They have a very decent amount variety, and is a good place to be introduced to things you won't necessarily know about or go for. Right now, the station is playing "Album Leaf No. 2 for Piano in F" by Dvorak, performed by Stefan Veselka. I've not heard Dvorak piano music before, and not something I would necessary choose to listen to. I find Pandora a good source of new / unknown music to me.
_________________________
Art is never finished, only abandoned. - da Vinci

Top
#2110767 - 06/30/13 06:16 PM Re: Classical music for beginners [Re: zrtf90]
johnnysd Offline
Full Member

Registered: 04/26/13
Posts: 26
Loc: San Diego CA
Originally Posted By: zrtf90
The major composers are best understood by listening to the major works. Opera aside, the symphony and the concerto have long been considered the main works of a composer. It is enough to study one or two of the main works but it also worthwhile having a wider knowledge of their output to build a context.





I know that yours is not a unique opinion but I really do not agree with it at all. If you want to learn about classical piano, I think for the most part listening to solo piano pieces is the best way to go probably starting with Chopin as his music more than any other composer is unique and more exclusive to the piano.

What you are saying is akin to saying if you want to learn about classical music than just concentrate on opera because they are the most important and complex works. While true, it is a very narrow view.

If I wanted to just expose myself to piano I would start with Chopin Nocturnes and then move to Bach, Beethoven and Mozart. Just my thoughts. But I would start with Chopins Nocturnes. No reason not to start with the best and most accessible piano music ever.

Top
#2110811 - 06/30/13 07:16 PM Re: Classical music for beginners [Re: johnnysd]
adultpianist Offline
500 Post Club Member

Registered: 12/01/12
Posts: 540
http://youtu.be/wWKTkByq2eE

I really like this 3hearts


Please do not ever attempt to play this at home, unless you want your neigbours to call the police and complain about the noise. It contains lots of STRONG forte.


Edited by adultpianist (06/30/13 07:23 PM)

Top
#2111258 - 07/01/13 03:19 PM Re: Classical music for beginners [Re: King Norre]
zrtf90 Offline
2000 Post Club Member

Registered: 02/29/12
Posts: 2345
Loc: Ireland (ex England)
Originally Posted By: johnnysd
What you are saying is akin to saying if you want to learn about classical music than just concentrate on opera because they are the most important and complex works. While true, it is a very narrow view.
This is a very mistaken interpretation.

Whilst opera is a major genre it does not necessarily represent a composer's best work. It is frequently considered a separate study but symphonies and concertos are more commonly considered the summit of a composers achievements, opera specialists such as Wagner and Verdi aside. Bach and Beethoven are considered among the greatest of the great composers and Beethoven's operatic output is woefully small and not comparable, artistically, to his greatest symphonies.

A composer puts his best efforts into his most major works. For the majority of the classical composers that is the symphony and concerto. If you want to compare the musical language of a composer then his best works provide his best examples. Comparing Beethoven's language to Wagner's needs to compare orchestral music with vocal. This is an awkward means of comparison because orchestral music is not necessarily to entertain and does not need to progress a story. It is more freely creative and can be more abstract, a deeper philosophical purpose, perhaps.

To understand classical music is really to understand the development of tonality and its forms from the modal music of the Renaissance to the atonality of the twentieth century. It does not need to be restricted to the solo piano genre. I wouldn't have chosen a composer who was unique as an introduction to classical music, but someone more representative. Using Chopin's Nocturnes as a starting point is tantamount to studying the Greeks or the Wild West as a summit of human existence or Rembrandt's sketches as the best of art history. You may have a preference for his music but, unfortunately, this is not about personal preference or popularity. It is about the amount of change brought to the musical language, the creative input, the influence on contemporaries and successors and the overall high quality of output. Few would contend that the Nocturnes are Chopin's best output and their influence on what followed is very small.

Some of today's popular song forms date back to the Renaissance and before but with the ability of music to change key, after the development of equal temperament, the idea of tonality became a significant tool in the composers arsenal and it was the ability to change key that showed one of the qualities as a composer.

The precursors of Bach changed key one accidental at a time and returned to tonic after each trip away, e.g. from C to G or E minor but then returning to C or A minor before venturing off to F or D minor. Bach extended this by making the new key a basecamp for further wanderings moving from what might be considered orbital tonality to satellite tonality. He could move from C to G major but then continued on to D or B minor before returning to C.

Haydn and Mozart established the sonata principle by using tonality to define the form of the music instead of architectural means and introduced drama by contrasting keys and themes. The first movement of a sonata followed this principle but the remainder of the symphony was less intellectually involving.

Beethoven turned that metaphor on its head and the last movement became the most important. In the Eroica symphony he changed key by three accidentals in one chord. While still earning his living from royalty and aristocracy, they had to dance to his tune not he to theirs and the status of a composer changed. The scale of a symphony reached new heights and it's import became newly defined. Where Haydn produced over 100 symphonies and Mozart in a shorter lifetime wrote over forty, Beethoven only completed nine. No composer since has written them as prolifically as his precursors and few can match his mastery of scale especially while also matching his ability with miniatures. His last five sonatas test even the greatest virtuosi yet his bagatelles are common fare for beginner pianists. How many of the great composers have since written more than one violin concerto? Compare the number of concerted works of Haydn and Mozart with the successors of Beethoven.

The lyricism of Schubert and his understanding of form are unmatched. Not only do his greatest works compete on many levels with Beethoven's, his smaller works had enormous impact on his immediate successors.

Trying to match or surpass the acheivements of Beethoven was a daunting task and the expression of more personal emotion in smaller works was more appealing. The Romantics moved away from large scale works but added greater chromaticism, more diverse rhythms and new forms. Liszt and Wagner pressed this chromaticism so far that the next logical step was atonality. Tonality had within itself the seeds of its own destruction and Berg, Schoenberg et al brought it about.

If you want to restrict yourself to solo piano music Chopin may well be a good start, though his Nocturnes are not his most characteristic output nor musically his best. His Preludes are widely considered his greatest achievement while his Mazurkas are more personal and intimate. But to understand his musical language in the context of tonal music demands a knowledge of all that went before him and had most influence on him and that means a comprehensive study of Bach and Mozart as well as his nearest contemporary, Liszt. From there a wider knowledge can grow.

The Fitzwilliam Virginal book is as good a summary of early keyboard music as any.
The high Baroque can be studied using Bach's Inventions, Sinfonias, Suites & Partitas, the WTC, and the Goldberg Variations, Handel's 8 Great Suites, and Scarlatti's 15 volumes of Sonatas.

There might be merit in studying CPE Bach as a bridge between Bach and the Classical age of Haydn and Mozart. His Versuch was influential.

Haydn's Sonatas are his best keyboard output and Mozart's are also accompanied by miscellaneous Fantasies, Adagios and Rondos. Both offer worthwhile sets of variations. Clementi's sonatas are as good and are perhaps more pianistic technically though demanding of thirds. His sonatinas are regular fare for beginners.

Beethoven's sonatas are unparalleled and his bagatelles are fertile ground for study. Schubert's sonatas are not all finished but make ideal study of the form and are much more lyrical. His Impromptus and Musical Moments are the foundation for the lyrical forms of the Romantic era such as Mendelssohn's Songs Without Words and Grieg's Lyric pieces that have recently been studied en masse in this forum.

The works of Mendelssohn, Chopin, Schumann and Liszt are, perhaps, the best known of solo 'classical' piano works and their successors are perhaps more widely divergent and probably more esoteric but Brahms, Grieg, Tchaikovsky, Debussy and Rachmaninov are popular and deserve more than a passing acquaintance.
_________________________
Richard

Top
#2111276 - 07/02/13 12:02 AM Re: Classical music for beginners [Re: zrtf90]
johnnysd Offline
Full Member

Registered: 04/26/13
Posts: 26
Loc: San Diego CA
Originally Posted By: zrtf90
Originally Posted By: johnnysd
What you are saying is akin to saying if you want to learn about classical music than just concentrate on opera because they are the most important and complex works. While true, it is a very narrow view.
This is a very mistaken interpretation.

Whilst opera is a major genre it does not necessarily represent a composer's best work. It is frequently considered a separate study but symphonies and concertos are more commonly considered the summit of a composers achievements, opera specialists such as Wagner and Verdi aside. Bach and Beethoven are considered among the greatest of the great composers and Beethoven's operatic output is woefully small and not comparable, artistically, to his greatest symphonies.

A composer puts his best efforts into his most major works. For the majority of the classical composers that is the symphony and concerto. If you want to compare the musical language of a composer then his best works provide his best examples. Comparing Beethoven's language to Wagner's needs to compare orchestral music with vocal. This is an awkward means of comparison because orchestral music is not necessarily to entertain and does not need to progress a story. It is more freely creative and can be more abstract, a deeper philosophical purpose, perhaps.

To understand classical music is really to understand the development of tonality and its forms from the modal music of the Renaissance to the atonality of the twentieth century. It does not need to be restricted to the solo piano genre. I wouldn't have chosen a composer who was unique as an introduction to classical music, but someone more representative. Using Chopin's Nocturnes as a starting point is tantamount to studying the Greeks or the Wild West as a summit of human existence or Rembrandt's sketches as the best of art history. You may have a preference for his music but, unfortunately, this is not about personal preference or popularity. It is about the amount of change brought to the musical language, the creative input, the influence on contemporaries and successors and the overall high quality of output. Few would contend that the Nocturnes are Chopin's best output and their influence on what followed is very small.

Some of today's popular song forms date back to the Renaissance and before but with the ability of music to change key, after the development of equal temperament, the idea of tonality became a significant tool in the composers arsenal and it was the ability to change key that showed one of the qualities as a composer.

The precursors of Bach changed key one accidental at a time and returned to tonic after each trip away, e.g. from C to G or E minor but then returning to C or A minor before venturing off to F or D minor. Bach extended this by making the new key a basecamp for further wanderings moving from what might be considered orbital tonality to satellite tonality. He could move from C to G major but then continued on to D or B minor before returning to C.

Haydn and Mozart established the sonata principle by using tonality to define the form of the music instead of architectural means and introduced drama by contrasting keys and themes. The first movement of a sonata followed this principle but the remainder of the symphony was less intellectually involving.

Beethoven turned that metaphor on its head and the last movement became the most important. In the Eroica symphony he changed key by three accidentals in one chord. While still earning his living from royalty and aristocracy, they had to dance to his tune not he to theirs and the status of a composer changed. The scale of a symphony reached new heights and it's import became newly defined. Where Haydn produced over 100 symphonies and Mozart in a shorter lifetime wrote over forty, Beethoven only completed nine. No composer since has written them as prolifically as his precursors and few can match his mastery of scale especially while also matching his ability with miniatures. His last five sonatas test even the greatest virtuosi yet his bagatelles are common fare for beginner pianists. How many of the great composers have since written more than one violin concerto? Compare the number of concerted works of Haydn and Mozart with the successors of Beethoven.

The lyricism of Schubert and his understanding of form are unmatched. Not only do his greatest works compete on many levels with Beethoven's, his smaller works had enormous impact on his immediate successors.

Trying to match or surpass the acheivements of Beethoven was a daunting task and the expression of more personal emotion in smaller works was more appealing. The Romantics moved away from large scale works but added greater chromaticism, more diverse rhythms and new forms. Liszt and Wagner pressed this chromaticism so far that the next logical step was atonality. Tonality had within itself the seeds of its own destruction and Berg, Schoenberg et al brought it about.

If you want to restrict yourself to solo piano music Chopin may well be a good start, though his Nocturnes are not his most characteristic output nor musically his best. His Preludes are widely considered his greatest achievement while his Mazurkas are more personal and intimate. But to understand his musical language in the context of tonal music demands a knowledge of all that went before him and had most influence on him and that means a comprehensive study of Bach and Mozart as well as his nearest contemporary, Liszt. From there a wider knowledge can grow.

The Fitzwilliam Virginal book is as good a summary of early keyboard music as any.
The high Baroque can be studied using Bach's Inventions, Sinfonias, Suites & Partitas, the WTC, and the Goldberg Variations, Handel's 8 Great Suites, and Scarlatti's 15 volumes of Sonatas.

There might be merit in studying CPE Bach as a bridge between Bach and the Classical age of Haydn and Mozart. His Versuch was influential.

Haydn's Sonatas are his best keyboard output and Mozart's are also accompanied by miscellaneous Fantasies, Adagios and Rondos. Both offer worthwhile sets of variations. Clementi's sonatas are as good and are perhaps more pianistic technically though demanding of thirds. His sonatinas are regular fare for beginners.

Beethoven's sonatas are unparalleled and his bagatelles are fertile ground for study. Schubert's sonatas are not all finished but make ideal study of the form and are much more lyrical. His Impromptus and Musical Moments are the foundation for the lyrical forms of the Romantic era such as Mendelssohn's Songs Without Words and Grieg's Lyric pieces that have recently been studied en masse in this forum.

The works of Mendelssohn, Chopin, Schumann and Liszt are, perhaps, the best known of solo 'classical' piano works and their successors are perhaps more widely divergent and probably more esoteric but Brahms, Grieg, Tchaikovsky, Debussy and Rachmaninov are popular and deserve more than a passing acquaintance.



Wow that is a lot of words and completely misses the point.

He asked to learn and get a feel for classical piano music and he even stated:


Maybe something that't easy to listen to for a beginner

Concertos don't really fit that. He already likes Bach so exposing him to Bach piano does not really fit the above request but listening to Chopin Nocturnes (which despite what you think have the widest appeal) is a terrific place to start.

Everything else you stated is completely irrelevant. It does not matter the progression of composing styles and the histories of the development of piano music. He is not asking to study classical piano, he is interested in listening to something that will inspire him and something he will enjoy. He does not need to understand it at all.

Top
#2111277 - 07/02/13 12:02 AM Re: Classical music for beginners [Re: zrtf90]
johnnysd Offline
Full Member

Registered: 04/26/13
Posts: 26
Loc: San Diego CA
[quote=zrtf90][quote=johnnysd]What you are saying is akin to saying if you want to learn about classical music than just concentrate on opera because they are the most important and complex works. While true, it is a very narrow view.[/quote]This is a very mistaken interpretation. Whilst opera is a major genre it does not necessarily represent a composer's best work. It is frequently considered a separate study but symphonies and concertos are more commonly considered the summit of a composers achievements, opera specialists such as Wagner and Verdi aside. Bach and Beethoven are considered among the greatest of the great composers and Beethoven's operatic output is woefully small and not comparable, artistically, to his greatest symphonies. A composer puts his best efforts into his most major works. For the majority of the classical composers that is the symphony and concerto. If you want to compare the musical language of a composer then his best works provide his best examples. Comparing Beethoven's language to Wagner's needs to compare orchestral music with vocal. This is an awkward means of comparison because orchestral music is not necessarily to entertain and does not need to progress a story. It is more freely creative and can be more abstract, a deeper philosophical purpose, perhaps. To understand classical music is really to understand the development of tonality and its forms from the modal music of the Renaissance to the atonality of the twentieth century. It does not need to be restricted to the solo piano genre. I wouldn't have chosen a composer who was unique as an introduction to classical music, but someone more representative. Using Chopin's Nocturnes as a starting point is tantamount to studying the Greeks or the Wild West as a summit of human existence or Rembrandt's sketches as the best of art history. You may have a preference for his music but, unfortunately, this is not about personal preference or popularity. It is about the amount of change brought to the musical language, the creative input, the influence on contemporaries and successors and the overall high quality of output. Few would contend that the Nocturnes are Chopin's best output and their influence on what followed is very small. Some of today's popular song forms date back to the Renaissance and before but with the ability of music to change key, after the development of equal temperament, the idea of tonality became a significant tool in the composers arsenal and it was the ability to change key that showed one of the qualities as a composer. The precursors of Bach changed key one accidental at a time and returned to tonic after each trip away, e.g. from C to G or E minor but then returning to C or A minor before venturing off to F or D minor. Bach extended this by making the new key a basecamp for further wanderings moving from what might be considered orbital tonality to satellite tonality. He could move from C to G major but then continued on to D or B minor before returning to C. Haydn and Mozart established the sonata principle by using tonality to define the form of the music instead of architectural means and introduced drama by contrasting keys and themes. The first movement of a sonata followed this principle but the remainder of the symphony was less intellectually involving. Beethoven turned that metaphor on its head and the last movement became the most important. In the Eroica symphony he changed key by three accidentals in one chord. While still earning his living from royalty and aristocracy, they had to dance to his tune not he to theirs and the status of a composer changed. The scale of a symphony reached new heights and it's import became newly defined. Where Haydn produced over 100 symphonies and Mozart in a shorter lifetime wrote over forty, Beethoven only completed nine. No composer since has written them as prolifically as his precursors and few can match his mastery of scale especially while also matching his ability with miniatures. His last five sonatas test even the greatest virtuosi yet his bagatelles are common fare for beginner pianists. How many of the great composers have since written more than one violin concerto? Compare the number of concerted works of Haydn and Mozart with the successors of Beethoven. The lyricism of Schubert and his understanding of form are unmatched. Not only do his greatest works compete on many levels with Beethoven's, his smaller works had enormous impact on his immediate successors. Trying to match or surpass the acheivements of Beethoven was a daunting task and the expression of more personal emotion in smaller works was more appealing. The Romantics moved away from large scale works but added greater chromaticism, more diverse rhythms and new forms. Liszt and Wagner pressed this chromaticism so far that the next logical step was atonality. Tonality had within itself the seeds of its own destruction and Berg, Schoenberg et al brought it about. If you want to restrict yourself to solo piano music Chopin may well be a good start, though his Nocturnes are not his most characteristic output nor musically his best. His Preludes are widely considered his greatest achievement while his Mazurkas are more personal and intimate. But to understand his musical language in the context of tonal music demands a knowledge of all that went before him and had most influence on him and that means a comprehensive study of Bach and Mozart as well as his nearest contemporary, Liszt. From there a wider knowledge can grow. The Fitzwilliam Virginal book is as good a summary of early keyboard music as any. The high Baroque can be studied using Bach's Inventions, Sinfonias, Suites & Partitas, the WTC, and the Goldberg Variations, Handel's 8 Great Suites, and Scarlatti's 15 volumes of Sonatas. There might be merit in studying CPE Bach as a bridge between Bach and the Classical age of Haydn and Mozart. His Versuch was influential. Haydn's Sonatas are his best keyboard output and Mozart's are also accompanied by miscellaneous Fantasies, Adagios and Rondos. Both offer worthwhile sets of variations. Clementi's sonatas are as good and are perhaps more pianistic technically though demanding of thirds. His sonatinas are regular fare for beginners. Beethoven's sonatas are unparalleled and his bagatelles are fertile ground for study. Schubert's sonatas are not all finished but make ideal study of the form and are much more lyrical. His Impromptus and Musical Moments are the foundation for the lyrical forms of the Romantic era such as Mendelssohn's Songs Without Words and Grieg's Lyric pieces that have recently been studied en masse in this forum. The works of Mendelssohn, Chopin, Schumann and Liszt are, perhaps, the best known of solo 'classical' piano works and their successors are perhaps more widely divergent and probably more esoteric but Brahms, Grieg, Tchaikovsky, Debussy and Rachmaninov are popular and deserve more than a passing acquaintance. [/quote] Wow that is a lot of words and completely misses the point. He asked to learn and get a feel for classical piano music and he even stated: Maybe something that't easy to listen to for a beginner Concertos don't really fit that. He already likes Bach so exposing him to Bach piano does not really fit the above request but listening to Chopin Nocturnes (which despite what you think have the widest appeal) is a terrific place to start. Everything else you stated is completely irrelevant. It does not matter the progression of composing styles and the histories of the development of piano music. He is not asking to study classical piano, he is interested in listening to something that will inspire him and something he will enjoy. He does not need to understand it at all.

Top
#2111335 - 07/02/13 02:40 AM Re: Classical music for beginners [Re: King Norre]
casinitaly Offline

Gold Supporter until March 1 2014


Registered: 03/01/10
Posts: 4973
Loc: Italy
Quote:
Everything else you stated is completely irrelevant. It does not matter the progression of composing styles and the histories of the development of piano music. He is not asking to study classical piano, he is interested in listening to something that will inspire him and something he will enjoy. He does not need to understand it at all.




While I could agree that you don't need to study in-depth to enjoy music, I would argue quite strongly that for many people, myself definitely included, understanding how a piece of music fits into a historical context is fascinating and brings another, richer, dimension to our enjoyment of it.

If I learn something about what Beethoven did differently than his predecessors, I can understand why he became - and remains- so popular. If I'm learning to play Schumann and learn about the lyric aspects of his works - it helps me with my playing.

It is like studying a language - you don't need to study etymology, but if you do understand the roots of words and where they come from - it is quite fascinating to see how they have evolved and to make links in concepts. Again, that's not for everyone, but many people thrive on this kind of information.

Maybe the OP isn't looking for this level of detail -- but if s/he knows nothing about "classical" , I think that this sort of detail gives a great overview and puts things in context.

And if the OP knows nothing about the genres within classical, s/he doesn't even know what s/he doesn't know.

Painting a broad picture to provide an overview of what's what, in my opinion, does a lot to help the OP think about what might be an interesting place to start.
_________________________
XVIII-XXXIV
Everything's too hard until you make it easy. Follow your teacher's instructions and practice wisely/much, and you'll soon wonder how you ever found it hard ;)-BobPickle
Performance anxiety: make it part of your daily routine and deal with it...Cope! zrtf90

Top
#2111341 - 07/02/13 03:39 AM Re: Classical music for beginners [Re: King Norre]
sinophilia Offline

Gold Supporter until Sept. 05 2014


Registered: 06/26/12
Posts: 977
Loc: Italy
I totally agree with casinitaly. And thank you Richard for a wonderful overview.

Classical music is a huge and complex world to explore. Random listening here and there may be pleasing but putting things into context and trying to understand concepts, forms and frameworks is certainly more rewarding on the long term. I took the Yale online course and then went through Prof. Greenberg's course How to Listen to and Understand Great Music, and while I am no expert whatsoever, if I listen to classical radio I can figure out if it's Baroque or Romantic and maybe even the composer. Our brains just love to connect things and pick up differences and similarities.

While I enjoy piano solo recordings, IMHO orchestral music is a different matter entirely. Going to the theatre and listening to a live performance of a Brahms or Beethoven concerto is a transcendental experience, especially if you get to listen to a really good orchestra and director.
_________________________
Diana & Wally - Yamaha W110BW
Martha Argerich... is an incarnation of the artistic metaphor of the "eternal feminine" that draws us upward. (Sergio Sablich)

Top
#2111367 - 07/02/13 05:39 AM Re: Classical music for beginners [Re: johnnysd]
dire tonic Offline
1000 Post Club Member

Registered: 07/17/11
Posts: 1243
Loc: uk south
Originally Posted By: johnnysd
It does not matter the progression of composing styles and the histories of the development of piano music. He is not asking to study classical piano, he is interested in listening to something that will inspire him and something he will enjoy. He does not need to understand it at all.


I agree, and I believe there are many who claim to 'understand' music who really don't at all.

To the OP: my advice is to follow your instincts and your passion since it sounds like you have both. Musical analysis and history are there for those so inclined but if you have enough curiosity you’ll lead yourself into a much deeper involvement. You'll learn to ask the right questions as and when they’re relevant.

You’ll often find others will want to persuade you that there are absolute benchmarks, that some works are more worthy of your attention than others. I rail against such an idea – so much depends on whether or not you can actually ‘hear’ in the music what is there to be heard and most importantly what the music does for you. An understanding of analysis, history and context may or may not help. And while the great works are evidently grand in scale they’re by no means necessarily more beautiful or more musically satisfying than the miniatures so many of us choose to play. Think of William Blake's "To see a world in a grain of sand…”

Top
#2111368 - 07/02/13 05:40 AM Re: Classical music for beginners [Re: King Norre]
Marco M Offline
Full Member

Registered: 08/28/12
Posts: 451
Loc: Europe
King Norre, maybe just enter some internet streaming service like SPOTIFY or alike and search for CDs by terms like "best piano". You will quickly find CDs called something like "the 100 most beautiful piano pieces ever", "piano essentials", etc.

You will find some music to appear repeatedly in those offers, which you could call the milestones of classical piano music for beginners in listening classical piano music.
From there you will quickly discover how wide, different, interisting and also boring piano music can be and have your start to find your personal preferences. The piano is best if it is personal, like all music and hobby.

Top
#2111377 - 07/02/13 06:16 AM Re: Classical music for beginners [Re: johnnysd]
Bobpickle Offline

Gold Supporter until July 10  2014


Registered: 05/24/12
Posts: 1383
Loc: Cameron Park, California
Originally Posted By: johnnysd
Everything else you stated is completely irrelevant. It does not matter the progression of composing styles and the histories of the development of piano music. He is not asking to study classical piano, he is interested in listening to something that will inspire him and something he will enjoy. He does not need to understand it at all.


I would argue in listing all of the major composers of the instrument chronologically up to Debussy, as well as providing brief backgrounds, he is more than laying the groundwork from which the original poster may garner "inspiration" on further exploration of his own. Perhaps in situations such as this, spoon-feeding an answer isn't the best solution.

Regards

Top
#2111450 - 07/02/13 09:38 AM Re: Classical music for beginners [Re: King Norre]
zrtf90 Offline
2000 Post Club Member

Registered: 02/29/12
Posts: 2345
Loc: Ireland (ex England)
Originally Posted By: King Norre
I would love to learn about classical music
...
and specially classical piano music
...
I was wondering if someone could maybe give me some advice about CD's that a classical pianist *must* own or at least know.
...
I do love the cello suites of Bach...But that's a far as my knowledge goes.
Classical music is generally considered to be the period of tonal music, from the Renaissance to the advent of atonality and the most obvious path is that which covers the 'Great Composers'.

Looking specially at classical piano music we can dispense with the great operatic composers (Gluck, Weber, Rossini, Donizetti, Verdi and Wagner) and those that don't write for the piano (Berlioz). But the great composers that wrote for keyboard are perhaps better understood in the context of their writing as a whole and putting an emphasis on the major works.

I would contend that no classical pianist be unfamiliar with the major orchestral works of Bach, Handel, Haydn, Mozart, Beethoven and Schubert. The development of musical style in keyboard and orchestral music went hand in hand until the advent of the modern piano at the time of Chopin and Liszt.

The composers who specialised in keyboard writing (but might not fit the 'Great Composer' title) include Scarlatti and Clementi.

From the Romantics onward piano writing became more distinct from orchestral writing and took on its own characteristics.

Knowledge of the history and breadth of classical piano music, with some of the main landmarks, was my main thrust. Understanding of the music was not.

While my posts were of inordinate length (my boss was away) and the message unclear to some (it seems) I don't think they were irrelevant.
_________________________
Richard

Top
#2111467 - 07/02/13 10:07 AM Re: Classical music for beginners [Re: zrtf90]
King Norre Offline
Full Member

Registered: 10/04/02
Posts: 59
Loc: Antwerp, Belgium
Quote:
While my posts were of inordinate length (my boss was away) and the message unclear to some (it seems) I don't think they were irrelevant.


Nope, I really appreciate it. It's true that I'm especially interested in piano music, because the piano is my new love, but also classical music by itself interests me. Btw, I really appreciate all the comments here. And it's great that people have different opinions. Discussion, in a positive way, can be really good for learning things. Thank you all!
_________________________
Be yourself - no more, no less.
My Piano Links Page
My Piano Blog

Top
#2111504 - 07/02/13 11:02 AM Re: Classical music for beginners [Re: zrtf90]
johnnysd Offline
Full Member

Registered: 04/26/13
Posts: 26
Loc: San Diego CA
Originally Posted By: zrtf90
Originally Posted By: johnnysd
What you are saying is akin to saying if you want to learn about classical music than just concentrate on opera because they are the most important and complex works. While true, it is a very narrow view.
This is a very mistaken interpretation.

Whilst opera is a major genre it does not necessarily represent a composer's best work. It is frequently considered a separate study but symphonies and concertos are more commonly considered the summit of a composers achievements, opera specialists such as Wagner and Verdi aside. Bach and Beethoven are considered among the greatest of the great composers and Beethoven's operatic output is woefully small and not comparable, artistically, to his greatest symphonies.

A composer puts his best efforts into his most major works. For the majority of the classical composers that is the symphony and concerto. If you want to compare the musical language of a composer then his best works provide his best examples. Comparing Beethoven's language to Wagner's needs to compare orchestral music with vocal. This is an awkward means of comparison because orchestral music is not necessarily to entertain and does not need to progress a story. It is more freely creative and can be more abstract, a deeper philosophical purpose, perhaps.

To understand classical music is really to understand the development of tonality and its forms from the modal music of the Renaissance to the atonality of the twentieth century. It does not need to be restricted to the solo piano genre. I wouldn't have chosen a composer who was unique as an introduction to classical music, but someone more representative. Using Chopin's Nocturnes as a starting point is tantamount to studying the Greeks or the Wild West as a summit of human existence or Rembrandt's sketches as the best of art history. You may have a preference for his music but, unfortunately, this is not about personal preference or popularity. It is about the amount of change brought to the musical language, the creative input, the influence on contemporaries and successors and the overall high quality of output. Few would contend that the Nocturnes are Chopin's best output and their influence on what followed is very small.

Some of today's popular song forms date back to the Renaissance and before but with the ability of music to change key, after the development of equal temperament, the idea of tonality became a significant tool in the composers arsenal and it was the ability to change key that showed one of the qualities as a composer.

The precursors of Bach changed key one accidental at a time and returned to tonic after each trip away, e.g. from C to G or E minor but then returning to C or A minor before venturing off to F or D minor. Bach extended this by making the new key a basecamp for further wanderings moving from what might be considered orbital tonality to satellite tonality. He could move from C to G major but then continued on to D or B minor before returning to C.

Haydn and Mozart established the sonata principle by using tonality to define the form of the music instead of architectural means and introduced drama by contrasting keys and themes. The first movement of a sonata followed this principle but the remainder of the symphony was less intellectually involving.

Beethoven turned that metaphor on its head and the last movement became the most important. In the Eroica symphony he changed key by three accidentals in one chord. While still earning his living from royalty and aristocracy, they had to dance to his tune not he to theirs and the status of a composer changed. The scale of a symphony reached new heights and it's import became newly defined. Where Haydn produced over 100 symphonies and Mozart in a shorter lifetime wrote over forty, Beethoven only completed nine. No composer since has written them as prolifically as his precursors and few can match his mastery of scale especially while also matching his ability with miniatures. His last five sonatas test even the greatest virtuosi yet his bagatelles are common fare for beginner pianists. How many of the great composers have since written more than one violin concerto? Compare the number of concerted works of Haydn and Mozart with the successors of Beethoven.

The lyricism of Schubert and his understanding of form are unmatched. Not only do his greatest works compete on many levels with Beethoven's, his smaller works had enormous impact on his immediate successors.

Trying to match or surpass the acheivements of Beethoven was a daunting task and the expression of more personal emotion in smaller works was more appealing. The Romantics moved away from large scale works but added greater chromaticism, more diverse rhythms and new forms. Liszt and Wagner pressed this chromaticism so far that the next logical step was atonality. Tonality had within itself the seeds of its own destruction and Berg, Schoenberg et al brought it about.

If you want to restrict yourself to solo piano music Chopin may well be a good start, though his Nocturnes are not his most characteristic output nor musically his best. His Preludes are widely considered his greatest achievement while his Mazurkas are more personal and intimate. But to understand his musical language in the context of tonal music demands a knowledge of all that went before him and had most influence on him and that means a comprehensive study of Bach and Mozart as well as his nearest contemporary, Liszt. From there a wider knowledge can grow.

The Fitzwilliam Virginal book is as good a summary of early keyboard music as any.
The high Baroque can be studied using Bach's Inventions, Sinfonias, Suites & Partitas, the WTC, and the Goldberg Variations, Handel's 8 Great Suites, and Scarlatti's 15 volumes of Sonatas.

There might be merit in studying CPE Bach as a bridge between Bach and the Classical age of Haydn and Mozart. His Versuch was influential.

Haydn's Sonatas are his best keyboard output and Mozart's are also accompanied by miscellaneous Fantasies, Adagios and Rondos. Both offer worthwhile sets of variations. Clementi's sonatas are as good and are perhaps more pianistic technically though demanding of thirds. His sonatinas are regular fare for beginners.

Beethoven's sonatas are unparalleled and his bagatelles are fertile ground for study. Schubert's sonatas are not all finished but make ideal study of the form and are much more lyrical. His Impromptus and Musical Moments are the foundation for the lyrical forms of the Romantic era such as Mendelssohn's Songs Without Words and Grieg's Lyric pieces that have recently been studied en masse in this forum.

The works of Mendelssohn, Chopin, Schumann and Liszt are, perhaps, the best known of solo 'classical' piano works and their successors are perhaps more widely divergent and probably more esoteric but Brahms, Grieg, Tchaikovsky, Debussy and Rachmaninov are popular and deserve more than a passing acquaintance.



Wow that is a lot of words and completely misses the point.

He asked to learn and get a feel for classical piano music and he even stated:


Maybe something that't easy to listen to for a beginner

Concertos don't really fit that. He already likes Bach so exposing him to Bach piano does not really fit the above request but listening to Chopin Nocturnes (which despite what you think have the widest appeal) is a terrific place to start.

Everything else you stated is completely irrelevant. It does not matter the progression of composing styles and the histories of the development of piano music. He is not asking to study classical piano, he is interested in listening to something that will inspire him and something he will enjoy. He does not need to understand it at all.

Top
Page 1 of 2 1 2 >

Moderator:  BB Player, casinitaly 
What's Hot!!
HOW TO POST PICTURES on the Piano Forums
-------------------
Sharing is Caring!
About the Buttons
-------------------
Forums Rules & Help
-------------------
ADVERTISE
on Piano World

The world's most popular piano web site.
-------------------
PIANO BOOKS
Interesting books about the piano, pianists, piano history, biographies, memoirs and more!
(ad) HAILUN Pianos
Hailun Pianos - Click for More
Ad (Seiler/Knabe)
Seiler Pianos
Sheet Music
(PW is an affiliate)
Sheet Music Plus Featured Sale
(125ad) Dampp Chaser
Dampp Chaser Piano Life Saver
(ad) Lindeblad Piano
Lindeblad Piano Restoration
Who's Online
148 registered (A Guy, accordeur, 36251, acortot, 46 invisible), 1402 Guests and 16 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Stats
76037 Members
42 Forums
157217 Topics
2309123 Posts

Max Online: 15252 @ 03/21/10 11:39 PM
New Topics - Multiple Forums
Recognising Slash chords by ear
by Visalia
Today at 06:07 PM
Hammer blow distance, dynamic range, controllability
by prout
Today at 05:39 PM
Arrangers Comparable to Marilynn Ham Suggestions
by Hunt
Today at 04:13 PM
Bach well tempered clavier vs goldberg variations
by hag01
Today at 04:09 PM
Why are pianos measured by external dimensions?
by smrkdown
Today at 02:11 PM
(ads by Google)

Visit our online store for gifts for music lovers

 
Help keep the forums up and running with a donation, any amount is appreciated!
Or by becoming a Subscribing member! Thank-you.
Donate   Subscribe
 
Our Piano Related Classified Ads
|
Dealers | Tuners | Lessons | Movers | Restorations | Pianos For Sale | Sell Your Piano |

Advertise on Piano World
| Subscribe | Piano World | PianoSupplies.com | Advertise on Piano World | Donate | Link to Us | Classifieds |
| |Contact | Privacy | Legal | About Us | Site Map | Free Newsletter | Press Room |


copyright 1997 - 2014 Piano World ® all rights reserved
No part of this site may be reproduced without prior written permission