|
Welcome to the Piano World Piano Forums Over 3 million posts about pianos, digital pianos, and all types of keyboard instruments. Over 100,000 members from around the world.
Join the World's Largest Community of Piano Lovers
(it's free)
It's Fun to Play the Piano ... Please Pass It On!
|
|
38 members (Animisha, alexcomoda, benkeys, Burkhard, 20/20 Vision, AlkansBookcase, brennbaer, 9 invisible),
1,155
guests, and
318
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 418
Full Member
|
OP
Full Member
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 418 |
I've been away from piano for about 6 years! I was an older late starter and was determined to play piano. I had two years of wwekly lessons with a teacher, but felt I wasn't learning enough, using children's books. I loved this forum and recognised various people's names and followed the progress of others. I don't know what happened, I just stopped! My piano lid stayed closed for years. Then last month, I found my interest again. I realise now that my teacher was teaching me to read music and follow a classical path. I can see how much I learned and remembered and have been able to revise very quickly to where I left off. I am now using the Alfred's All in One, self teaching until I find the right teacher for me and have been trying to read the hundreds of posts regarding the Alfred's thread. I have seen it go through years and everyone seems to have moved on with their learning. I am trying not to regret where I would be if I had carried on, and am in a positive mood. Just now I am trying to understand the connection with key signatures and scales, it's just not sinking in why G Major key has F sharp for instance. I will be getting a scales book, but will be practising not knowing why. I hope someone will be able to help me understand, I have read alsorts on the internet, but I'm just not getting it. Thanks for help in anticipation, it's so good to be back.
Adult returner Practising Mindfulness Piano
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 7,088
7000 Post Club Member
|
7000 Post Club Member
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 7,088 |
Hi Shey, welcome back!
Your plan of not dwelling on where you would be had you not stopped is a good one - just focus on the here and now and see how it goes.
As for the question about why Gmajor has an F sharp.... The notes of a major scale go up in specific increments.
Often they are called tones and semi-tones - or whole steps and half steps. I think tone and semitone is easier to say.
T G to A = 1 full tone (G -to g sharp to A) T A to B = 1 full tone (A to A sharp to B) S B to C= 1 semi tone - no black key! T C to D = 1 full tone ( C to C sharp to D) T D to E = 1 full tone (D to D sharp to E) T E to F# = 1 full tone - (E to F to F sharp) S F# to G = 1 semi-tone (F# to G)
and so on.
If you start on C and repeat the same pattern of TTSTTTS you will see you end up with no sharps - if you start on D you'll end up with 2 sharps.
It is all very cool. Most basic books on theory will start off explaining this and then go on to discuss the notes in the scale that make up chords.
I hope that was helpful.
18 ABF Recitals, Order of the Red Dot European Piano Parties - Brussels, Lisbon, Lucern, Milan, Malaga, St. Goar Themed recitals: Grieg and Great American Songbook
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2013
Posts: 413
Full Member
|
Full Member
Joined: Jun 2013
Posts: 413 |
welcome back
"Doesn't practicing on the piano suck?!?!" "The joy is in the practicing. It's like relationships. Yeah, orgasms are awesome, but you can't make love to someone who you have no relationship with!"
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 4,291
4000 Post Club Member
|
4000 Post Club Member
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 4,291 |
Major scales are marked by a certain sound, and a certain sequence of whole and half steps between the notes.
Let's start with sound. The C major scale starts on C and includes all the white notes on the piano. Play an octave of the C major scale, up and down from C to C, with just one hand. You don't need to use any particular fingering; you can use just one finger if you like, or anything, for this listening practice. Listen to the sound. Listen in particular to the sound of the last three notes: A B C. Listen to them descending also: C B A.
Now try a scale starting on G. First play just white notes, one octave, up and down, with just one hand. Listen to the sound. Can you hear that it sounds wrong at the top? (If you can't hear it, just trust that some people can hear this, and carry on with the following steps.). Now play a scale starting on G, with all white keys except for one exception: instead of F natural play F sharp. Can you hear that this sounds the same as C major now, just higher (or lower, if you started on a lower G)? Play the last three notes, up and down: E F# G, G F# E. Can you hear that this is the same sound -- the same miniature tune -- as the last three notes in the C major scale: A B C, C B A? Compare to the sound of the G scale version with F natural: E F G, G F E. Can you hear that this sounds different?
If you can hear the versions that sound different and the versions that sound the same, then you have discovered aurally that a G major scale has F#, not F natural. I should mention here that all major scales sound the same, except they start on different pitches. This is the aural definition of being the same kind of scale: they sound the same except for starting on different pitches.
OK, that's the aural side. But we sort of had to do trial and error to figure out that it should be F# instead of F natural. In my next post I'll give a method involving checking the distance between notes to find a major scale immediately without having to do aural trial and error. (If you're strong in aural skills, the aural method may get you a lot farther than it can get me, but knowing about the distances between notes will come in handy in lots of places, not just major scales, so it's worth learning.)
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 4,291
4000 Post Club Member
|
4000 Post Club Member
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 4,291 |
That was cross posted: I see that casinitaly has already given the method I had in mind, of whole steps and half steps. In contrast to casinitaly, I find whole step and half step easier to work with than tone and semitone, so for me the major scale interval pattern is WWHWWWH. Shey, I see that you're in England: do you use tone/semitone or whole step/half step?
As you're working out examples of scales using the tone/semitone interval pattern, listen also to the results. Does it sound right? It's useful to be able to recognize the sound of a major scale.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 418
Full Member
|
OP
Full Member
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 418 |
casinitaly, thank you, I have a feeling I did learn that. The tone semi tone thing. I need to check my old books, things getting a little clearer. I can hear the difference when sharps need to be added to a scale, just totally forgot about the tone part. Thanks for prompt reply. So excited at getting it all together and re learning.
Adult returner Practising Mindfulness Piano
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 418
Full Member
|
OP
Full Member
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 418 |
PianoStudent88, yes I use tone and semi tone, only just remembered with casinitaly's help. Thanks for the detailed post, very helpful, I seem to need a lot of nudging to bring my old learning back. I do have good aural skill, and can hear the difference in the f and f sharp and know when things sound wrong when playing scales. I need to study the interval patterns, listen to major scales to recognise the right sound. I thank you again for your prompt reply and already my confidence is returning. Being able to ask questions which are just eluding me without feeling stupid is wonderful.
Sweet06, I appreciate the welcome back
Last edited by Shey; 07/16/13 02:29 PM.
Adult returner Practising Mindfulness Piano
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 18,356
Yikes! 10000 Post Club Member
|
Yikes! 10000 Post Club Member
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 18,356 |
Hi Shey, Good to hear from you again. I hope you are able to find a teacher who is a good fit for you. I think that's critical for adult beginners.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 5,894
5000 Post Club Member
|
5000 Post Club Member
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 5,894 |
I've been away from piano for about 6 years! I was an older late starter and was determined to play piano. I had two years of wwekly lessons with a teacher, but felt I wasn't learning enough, using children's books. Everyone thinks they are not learning enough. Maybe the choice of music could have been a little more adult oriented but you were doing the right thing with weekly lessons. I am now using the Alfred's All in One, self teaching until I find the right teacher for me I hope you find that "right teacher" soon. Generally speaking, getting help from a teacher is your quickest path to becoming a skilled player. Don't let promises of "quick" methods sway you. This forum is full of examples of players spending years on quick methods and ending up making very little progress or quitting in frustration.
Don
Kawai MP7SE, On Stage KS7350 keyboard stand, KRK Classic 5 powered monitors, SennHeiser HD 559 Headphones
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 1,394
1000 Post Club Member
|
1000 Post Club Member
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 1,394 |
I had two years of wwekly lessons with a teacher, but felt I wasn't learning enough, using children's books. I don't know what happened, I just stopped! Are you sure you weren't learning enough specifically because of children's books? Their only difference to adult books is the pacing; adult books are paced faster and arguably more difficult to traverse alone while because children's books are slower, they have a lesser tendency to leave holes of any kind. Obviously one use of a teacher is to fill any gaps left by the method books, if you use or follow one at all. I ask the question because the lack of progress (be it perceived or real) very well may be attributed to a lack of an efficient practice routine and not the music you were using - the former allows for learning of the latter. Whether or not a teacher can help provide such a routine is an important question to ask/consider in selecting one to study under. I am trying not to regret where I would be if I had carried on, and am in a positive mood. This is good. Don't regret the past, learn from it.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 418
Full Member
|
OP
Full Member
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 418 |
I have just been practising some chords and revising note values, I feel I am remembering all sorts of bits of theory. Bob, yes I am wary of the "learn piano in two months" ideas, and would never go down that route, I want to have the proper grounding and training to be able to play piano well. I think I felt let down by my original teacher, playing only bits of children's music, although now I know I learnt a lot, and am not sure how to find someone who suits my needs just now, so I am practising in short spurts, and really enjoying myself. Setting small goals for each day and yet pushing myself to make progress. Can anyone please recommend a tutor book for scale practice that explains in detail the relationship to major, minor and key signatures, I'm now thinking this might be relevant to the circle of 5ths, of which I know nothing about! Thanks again for your replies and welcome posts.
Last edited by Shey; 07/16/13 05:46 PM.
Adult returner Practising Mindfulness Piano
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2013
Posts: 413
Full Member
|
Full Member
Joined: Jun 2013
Posts: 413 |
i don't really understand the circle of fifths, i'm looking forward to a good response to that. my current understanding (please don't take this as the "answer", its not, but it could be haha!) is that with your 1 and 5 you create a 5th assuming standard hand positiions so theres different combinations you can hit and just go up and down the keyboard. im sure im terribly wrong, it seems any explanation i see on the net is just a big picture with notes and stuff in a circle.
"Doesn't practicing on the piano suck?!?!" "The joy is in the practicing. It's like relationships. Yeah, orgasms are awesome, but you can't make love to someone who you have no relationship with!"
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 9,328
9000 Post Club Member
|
9000 Post Club Member
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 9,328 |
i don't really understand the circle of fifths, i'm looking forward to a good response to that. my current understanding (please don't take this as the "answer", its not, but it could be haha!) is that with your 1 and 5 you create a 5th assuming standard hand positiions so theres different combinations you can hit and just go up and down the keyboard. im sure im terribly wrong, it seems any explanation i see on the net is just a big picture with notes and stuff in a circle. What is it you don't understand about the diagram? I can't make head or tail of your post, by the way.
Regards,
Polyphonist
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,625
1000 Post Club Member
|
1000 Post Club Member
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,625 |
Sweet06, The Circle of Fifths, helps to explain the relationships between Key Signatures.
For example, if you have already learned the formula for constructing a major scale, as has been posted above, (T,T,S,T,T,T,S) and play the C major scale, you will see that it contains no sharps or flats.
Now play the 5th note of the C scale (G), and construct a G major scale, using the formula. You will see that it contains one sharp (F#)which is the key signature of G major.
Next, play the 5th note of the G major scale (D) and construct the D major scale. It will contain 2 sharps, (F# and C#) This is the key signature of D major.
Carry on in this manner, until you have found all of the sharp key signatures.
By moving in the opposite direction, e.g. play 5 notes down the keyboard from C, and you will hit F. Constructing an F major scale, you will find it contains one flat (Bb)
Playing 5 notes downwards from F, brings you to Bb. The Bb scale will contain 2 flats (Bb and Eb) and so on.
There is more to the Circle of Fifths than I have outlined so far, for example, working out key signatures for the relative minor keys, but it should get you started in understanding how it works.
Good luck.
Rob
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 9,328
9000 Post Club Member
|
9000 Post Club Member
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 9,328 |
Carry on in this manner, until you have found all of the sharp key signatures.
By moving in the opposite direction, e.g. play 5 notes down the keyboard from C, and you will hit F. This is the part of your explanation that I object to. The reason it's called the circle of fifths is because it is a cycle of keys which never ends. Don't think about it in terms of sharp keys, then flat keys. After you get to the bottom of the circle from the sharp side, continue back around with decreasing numbers of flats until reaching C again, and so on. Or you could go backwards, which would look like this: C - F - Bb - Eb - Ab - Db - Gb/F# - B - E - A - D - G - C, etc.
Regards,
Polyphonist
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 774
500 Post Club Member
|
500 Post Club Member
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 774 |
i don't really understand the circle of fifths, i'm looking forward to a good response to that Sweet06 I hope this won't confuse you further: If you start at C(no sharps)and count up a perfect 5th you'll end up at G which has one sharp (the F). Count up another perfect 5th and you'll be at D which has two sharps(F and C). Count again up a perfect 5th and your at A which has three sharps (F,C and G) etc, etc. As you can see you will add a sharp each time you go to the next perfect fifth. Look at the following link to this web page and see if you understand what I am saying. HTH Circle of Fifths
Last edited by Ragdoll; 07/16/13 09:08 PM.
Ragdoll At first, she only flew when she thought no one was watching.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 9,328
9000 Post Club Member
|
9000 Post Club Member
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 9,328 |
i don't really understand the circle of fifths, i'm looking forward to a good response to that Sweet06 I hope this won't confuse you further: If you start at C(no sharps/flats)and count up a perfect 5th you'll end up at G which has one sharp (the F). Count up another perfect 5th and you'll be at D which has two sharps(F and C). Count I have a feeling this explanation is incomplete.
Regards,
Polyphonist
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 774
500 Post Club Member
|
500 Post Club Member
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 774 |
Just couldn't resist while I edited huh?
Ragdoll At first, she only flew when she thought no one was watching.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,625
1000 Post Club Member
|
1000 Post Club Member
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,625 |
This is the part of your explanation that I object to. The reason it's called the circle of fifths is because it is a cycle of keys which never ends. Don't think about it in terms of sharp keys, then flat keys. After you get to the bottom of the circle from the sharp side, continue back around with decreasing numbers of flats until reaching C again, and so on. Or you could go backwards, which would look like this: C - F - Bb - Eb - Ab - Db - Gb/F# - B - E - A - D - G - C, etc.
You are of course, correct I was merely trying to simplify the explanation, by starting with one sharp, and then one flat, key signature.
Rob
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 9,328
9000 Post Club Member
|
9000 Post Club Member
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 9,328 |
This is the part of your explanation that I object to. The reason it's called the circle of fifths is because it is a cycle of keys which never ends. Don't think about it in terms of sharp keys, then flat keys. After you get to the bottom of the circle from the sharp side, continue back around with decreasing numbers of flats until reaching C again, and so on. Or you could go backwards, which would look like this: C - F - Bb - Eb - Ab - Db - Gb/F# - B - E - A - D - G - C, etc.
You are of course, correct I was merely trying to simplify the explanation, by starting with one sharp, and then one flat, key signature. Yes, but I think it went a little too far beyond simplification - you were missing one of the crucial concepts.
Regards,
Polyphonist
|
|
|
Forums43
Topics223,384
Posts3,349,173
Members111,631
|
Most Online15,252 Mar 21st, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|