Welcome to the Piano World Piano Forums
Over 2 million posts about pianos, digital pianos, and all types of keyboard instruments
Join the World's Largest Community of Piano Lovers (it's free)
It's Fun to Play the Piano ... Please Pass It On!

SEARCH
the Forums & Piano World

This custom search works much better than the built in one and allows searching older posts.
(ad 125) Sweetwater - Digital Keyboards & Other Gear
Digital Pianos at Sweetwater
(ad) Pearl River
Pearl River Pianos
(ad) Pianoteq
Latest Pianoteq add-on instrument: U4 upright piano
(ad) P B Guide
Acoustic & Digital Piano Guide
PianoSupplies.com (150)
Piano Accessories Music Related Gifts Piano Tuning Equipment Piano Moving Equipment
We now offer Gift Certificates in our online store!
(ad) Estonia Piano
Estonia Piano
Quick Links to Useful Stuff
Our Classified Ads
Find Piano Professionals-

*Piano Dealers - Piano Stores
*Piano Tuners
*Piano Teachers
*Piano Movers
*Piano Restorations
*Piano Manufacturers
*Organs

Quick Links:
*Advertise On Piano World
*Free Piano Newsletter
*Online Piano Recitals
*Piano Recitals Index
*Piano Accessories
* Buying a Piano
*Buying A Acoustic Piano
*Buying a Digital Piano
*Pianos for Sale
*Sell Your Piano
*How Old is My Piano?
*Piano Books
*Piano Art, Pictures, & Posters
*Directory/Site Map
*Contest
*Links
*Virtual Piano
*Music Word Search
*Piano Screen Saver
*Piano Videos
*Virtual Piano Chords
Topic Options
#2119754 - 07/18/13 05:51 PM Is this a good way to rank the difficulty of a score?
ShiroKuro Online   content
3000 Post Club Member

Registered: 12/26/04
Posts: 3415
Loc: not in Japan anymore
A question (in PW's non-classical pianist corner forum) about whether a particular piece was "easy to play" or not got me thinking about how a score's difficulty is ranked. I sometimes think a piece sounds easier than it actually is, while another one will sound harder but be easier to play. I consider myself at an intermediate level, so I figure that if I can play something, then it's intermediate (or lower). But not only is that totally arbitrary, there is wide variation in difficulty across the various pieces I am currently working on and the pieces that are in my repertoire.

Sheetmusicplus.com lists guidelines for how it ranks scores

SMP Level Guidelines

so I decided to use that as a guideline and see how well I can systematically rank the difficulty of a particular piece.

But I wanted to ask here and see what the good folks in the teachers' forum think about how to rank a score's level. Is this SMP method a good one? How do you conclude whether a particular piece is an appropriate level for a particular student?

If you're interested, here's the thread from the non-classical pianist corner:
Where can I get music sheet for 'Summer?'
_________________________
Started piano June 1999. My recordings at Box.Net:
https://app.box.com/s/j4rgyhn72uvluemg1m6u




Top
(ad) My Music Staff
Check out the new way to manage your music studio
#2119777 - 07/18/13 06:36 PM Re: Is this a good way to rank the difficulty of a score? [Re: ShiroKuro]
ezpiano.org Offline
1000 Post Club Member

Registered: 05/10/11
Posts: 1002
Loc: Irvine, CA
Yes SMP is a good one, I like it.
_________________________
http://ezpiano.org
Piano lessons in Irvine, CA
Watch the introduction video on YouTube
@ http://bit.ly/Ready123

Top
#2119800 - 07/18/13 07:23 PM Re: Is this a good way to rank the difficulty of a score? [Re: ShiroKuro]
AZNpiano Offline
5000 Post Club Member

Registered: 08/07/07
Posts: 5422
Loc: Orange County, CA
The idea of ranking any piece by level is a problematic one. The most obvious problem is that, what's one person's "level 5" is another person's "level 6." It might serve a pedagogical purpose by giving students a general idea which books/pieces are of _similar_ level of difficulty. That's about it.

The most obvious error is to use the list of levels to show that, if I am level 5, I can play all pieces listed in level 5. That's just a common problem I see with students who take CM or any other leveled tests.

My advice is just to be cautious when approaching the idea of levels. It is one with many inherent problems and potential problems.
_________________________
Private Piano Teacher and MTAC Member

Top
#2119842 - 07/18/13 08:50 PM Re: Is this a good way to rank the difficulty of a score? [Re: ShiroKuro]
ShiroKuro Online   content
3000 Post Club Member

Registered: 12/26/04
Posts: 3415
Loc: not in Japan anymore
Quote:
The idea of ranking any piece by level is a problematic one. The most obvious problem is that, what's one person's "level 5" is another person's "level 6."


AZNpiano, I agree, especially since my initial, totally arbitrary response to the question "is it easy to play" was "well if I can play it, it is." Obviously that's not helpful at all. It seems like at least the SMP guidelines give some objective ways to assess the score, so based on those measures, this is not "one person's 5,"  it's "does it have only three-note chords or also four-note chords" which seems much more useful.

Quote:
My advice is just to be cautious when approaching the idea of levels. It is one with many inherent problems and potential problems.


So what would you suggest when someone asks if a piece is easy or not? At least the SMP levels make one way of evaluating a score very clear.
_________________________
Started piano June 1999. My recordings at Box.Net:
https://app.box.com/s/j4rgyhn72uvluemg1m6u




Top
#2119866 - 07/18/13 09:43 PM Re: Is this a good way to rank the difficulty of a score? [Re: ShiroKuro]
John v.d.Brook Online   content
7000 Post Club Member

Registered: 03/18/06
Posts: 7311
Loc: Olympia, Washington, USA
SMP's listing is good, but hardly the end all or be all. There are numerous problems with the literature they cite and respective levels of difficulty. For example, Schumann's Album for the Young spans a fairly wide range of difficulty, from SMP's level 3 to their level 8. Another discrepancy is the Brahms Op 79, in which n.1 is a level more difficult than n.2, and neither are at the most difficult level of music, as SMPs listing would suggest.

For classical literature, take a look at Henle's scaling. Many piano teaching organizations have listings, such as Piano Guild and RCM. Both have strengths and weaknesses.

Originally Posted By: SK
How do you conclude whether a particular piece is an appropriate level for a particular student?

Frankly, experience is probably the best guide!
_________________________
"Those who dare to teach must never cease to learn." -- Richard Henry Dann
Full-time Private Piano Teacher offering Piano Lessons in Olympia, WA. www.mypianoteacher.com
Certified by the American College of Musicians; member NGPT, MTNA, WSMTA, OMTA

Top
#2119904 - 07/18/13 10:56 PM Re: Is this a good way to rank the difficulty of a score? [Re: ShiroKuro]
Bobpickle Offline

Gold Supporter until July 10  2014


Registered: 05/24/12
Posts: 1383
Loc: Cameron Park, California
I personally like John's rule of thumb:
Originally Posted By: John v.d.Brook
As a general rule of thumb, if my students cannot sight-read through a piece at 1/2 to 2/3rds tempo, then I don't assign it, because they are not prepared technically to tackle the piece.



Though for horrible sightreaders like myself, it would change my approach significantly, so your mileage may vary. However, with this in mind (that I need to improve on this area of my musicianship), I may actually consider changing my approach to put a greater emphasis on sightreading and its correlation to music with which to work.

Top
#2119930 - 07/18/13 11:40 PM Re: Is this a good way to rank the difficulty of a score? [Re: John v.d.Brook]
AZNpiano Offline
5000 Post Club Member

Registered: 08/07/07
Posts: 5422
Loc: Orange County, CA
Originally Posted By: John v.d.Brook
Another discrepancy is the Brahms Op 79, in which n.1 is a level more difficult than n.2, and neither are at the most difficult level of music, as SMPs listing would suggest.

That's why lists like the SMP criteria are totally inadequate for labeling difficult advanced music. There are pieces that are 11 (Chopin Op. 25 etudes) and some are close to 15 (Alkan or Ligeti etudes). They might as well say "beyond 10" for stuff that really has no need to be categorized.

And where do you draw the line?? Chopin Scherzo No. 2? Liszt Grande Etudes? Brahms Op. 79 No. 1 is indeed more difficult than No. 2, and I would say No. 2 is a "10" and No. 1 is "beyond 10."
_________________________
Private Piano Teacher and MTAC Member

Top
#2120038 - 07/19/13 07:13 AM Re: Is this a good way to rank the difficulty of a score? [Re: AZNpiano]
jdw Offline
500 Post Club Member

Registered: 03/04/11
Posts: 945
Loc: Philadelphia, PA
I notice that SMP ranks the Bach 2-part Inventions as more difficult than the 3-part, which seems odd.
_________________________
1989 Baldwin R
Currently working on:
Grieg, Papillon
Mozart, K 330
Brahms, Op. 118 no. 2

Top
#2120095 - 07/19/13 10:17 AM Re: Is this a good way to rank the difficulty of a score? [Re: jdw]
John v.d.Brook Online   content
7000 Post Club Member

Registered: 03/18/06
Posts: 7311
Loc: Olympia, Washington, USA
Pedagogically, Bach ordered them as follows: 2 Pt, French Suites, 3 Pt.

Bach introduces 3 voices in the French Suites, with some being relatively easy for the student to perform, and others, quite difficult. Dividing a voice between two hands, keeping them balanced and in proportion to the other two voices, is quite demanding for pianists.
_________________________
"Those who dare to teach must never cease to learn." -- Richard Henry Dann
Full-time Private Piano Teacher offering Piano Lessons in Olympia, WA. www.mypianoteacher.com
Certified by the American College of Musicians; member NGPT, MTNA, WSMTA, OMTA

Top

Moderator:  Ken Knapp 
What's Hot!!
Our latest Issue is available now...
Piano News - Interesting & Fun Piano Related Newsletter! (free)
-------------------
HOW TO POST PICTURES on the Piano Forums
-------------------
Sharing is Caring!
About the Buttons
-------------------
Forums Rules & Help
-------------------
ADVERTISE
on Piano World

The world's most popular piano web site.
(ad) HAILUN Pianos
Hailun Pianos - Click for More
Ad (Seiler/Knabe)
Seiler Pianos
Sheet Music
(PW is an affiliate)
Sheet Music Plus Featured Sale
(125ad) Dampp Chaser
Dampp Chaser Piano Life Saver
(ad) Lindeblad Piano
Lindeblad Piano Restoration
Who's Online
144 registered (aesop, accordeur, A Guy, 42 invisible), 1663 Guests and 17 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Stats
75579 Members
42 Forums
156267 Topics
2294952 Posts

Max Online: 15252 @ 03/21/10 11:39 PM
New Topics - Multiple Forums
M-Audio Oxygen 88 vs. StudioLogic Numa Compact
by snapdragon
07/29/14 07:02 PM
Sheet Music Retainers
by MargaretUK
07/29/14 05:20 PM
piano contest
by wkurashima
07/29/14 04:47 PM
piano contest Clavinova
by wkurashima
07/29/14 04:39 PM
Proper chunking method
by Edtek
07/29/14 03:10 PM
(ads by Google)

Visit our online store for gifts for music lovers

 
Our Piano Related Classified Ads
| Dealers | Tuners | Lessons | Movers | Restorations | Pianos For Sale | Sell Your Piano |

Advertise on Piano World
| Subscribe | Piano World | PianoSupplies.com | Advertise on Piano World | Donate | Link to Us | Classifieds |
| |Contact | Privacy | Legal | About Us | Site Map | Free Newsletter | Press Room |


copyright 1997 - 2014 Piano World ® all rights reserved
No part of this site may be reproduced without prior written permission