|
Welcome to the Piano World Piano Forums Over 3 million posts about pianos, digital pianos, and all types of keyboard instruments. Over 100,000 members from around the world.
Join the World's Largest Community of Piano Lovers
(it's free)
It's Fun to Play the Piano ... Please Pass It On!
|
|
68 members (Anglagard44, brdwyguy, amc252, Bellyman, accordeur, Aliasjunto, benkeys, abcowboyqh, 15 invisible),
2,258
guests, and
363
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 6,567
6000 Post Club Member
|
OP
6000 Post Club Member
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 6,567 |
A recent paper by Kees evoked my curiosity to ask these questions:
At which clock position do you prefer to tune a grand piano and why?
Is there a standard (best) position universally accepted, or does is change from tuner to tuner?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 3,489
3000 Post Club Member
|
3000 Post Club Member
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 3,489 |
Please buy Daniel Levitan's The Craft of Piano Tuning, available at Amazon.
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 6,567
6000 Post Club Member
|
OP
6000 Post Club Member
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 6,567 |
Please buy Daniel Levitan's The Craft of Piano Tuning, available at Amazon. But he is not using a standard tuning lever.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 3,489
3000 Post Club Member
|
3000 Post Club Member
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 3,489 |
Please buy Daniel Levitan's The Craft of Piano Tuning, available at Amazon. But he is not using a standard tuning lever. The book is called The Craft of Piano Tuning, not The Craft of Piano Tuning with a Non-Standard Tuning Lever; I assure you, he covers the use of standard tuning levers in detail. I know this because I not only own the book, but have read it a few times, and I use the Levitan "Classic" tuning lever, which is his conventional tuning lever, as opposed to the C shaped Levitan "Professional" lever. We're not here to baby sit. You have to put forth some initiative if you want to learn this stuff.
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 6,567
6000 Post Club Member
|
OP
6000 Post Club Member
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 6,567 |
We're not here to baby sit. You have to put forth some initiative if you want to learn this stuff. I have the Reblitz and he advices to use the five o'clock position for the grand. Which seemed awkward to me. Do you use a five o'clock position?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 4,331
4000 Post Club Member
|
4000 Post Club Member
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 4,331 |
Hakki
There are many posts in the archive about this. If you search through rxd's posts for the last two or three years you will find some of them. I cannot remember what words he used but "flagpoling" or "flag poling" may have been one of them, or two if you want to be pedantic.
Ian Russell Schiedmayer & Soehne, 1925 Model 14, 140cm Ibach, 1905 F-IV, 235cm
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 6,567
6000 Post Club Member
|
OP
6000 Post Club Member
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 6,567 |
Hakki
There are many posts in the archive about this. I you search through rxd's posts for the last two or three years you will find some of them. I cannot remember what words he used but "flagpoling" or "flag poling" may have been one of them, or two if you want to be pedantic. Thanks Ian, I am somewhat against that flag poling movement of the lever. And when I see a tuner use it I am worried. If not used properly it might loosen the pin in the long term.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 4,331
4000 Post Club Member
|
4000 Post Club Member
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 4,331 |
Also, I notice Isaac has given detailed answer in the Tuning Stability thread.
Ian Russell Schiedmayer & Soehne, 1925 Model 14, 140cm Ibach, 1905 F-IV, 235cm
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 6,567
6000 Post Club Member
|
OP
6000 Post Club Member
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 6,567 |
Also, I notice Isaac has given detailed answer in the Tuning Stability thread. Yes, I have noticed that. He also demonstrates it on his YouTube site. But I am yet to see a tuner using the 5-6 o'clock positions. Hence my sort of a poll thread here.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 2,571
2000 Post Club Member
|
2000 Post Club Member
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 2,571 |
Thanks, Hakki, for reminding me of some very dear friends from 40 years ago when I was an RTT.
Those old enough to remember what an RTT was will also remember that it became fashionable to use a longer tip on a grand and tune from the 5-6-7 o'clock position. I experimented myself somewhat but found it was way past my bedtime.
I did know some tuners who got solid results doing that. I don't know of anybody still tuning that way but those longer tips are available.
I have spoken of the lever being in line with the string on threads where beginners are makIng enquiries. I use this a lot in certain areas of certain pianos. In other areas of other pianos, i change the angle but never further round than 2-2.30 from the line of the string. My thumb is always partway down the shaft of the lever for more precise control.
If something feels real weird, I might try 11am but almost never. I prefer 11pm while I'm asleep if it's that bad.
One of the next posts will most likely be a repetition of the above but In gobbledygook.
Amanda Reckonwith Concert & Recording tuner-tech, London, England. "in theory, practice and theory are the same thing. In practice, they're not." - Lawrence P. 'Yogi' Berra.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 3,087
3000 Post Club Member
|
3000 Post Club Member
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 3,087 |
Hakki, As you can tell from RXD's answer, there is no one angle that is right for all grands. Each piano can have differing amounts of friction and each string's pitch can respond differently to hammer technique due to different non speaking lengths. The goal is to have a concept that allows you to choose the appropriate angle and technique for that piano and pin you are tuning at any given moment. Read my posts in the Tuning Stabilty thread. I basically outline the complete methodology of how the pin/string system behaves. I will eventually create a step by step method that will allow you to determine, with the aid of an ETD, exactly which hammer angle/technique is optimum for a particular piano/pin combination, and post it on my website, http://howtotunepiaanos.com.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,677
2000 Post Club Member
|
2000 Post Club Member
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,677 |
... At which clock position do you prefer to tune a grand piano and why?
Is there a standard (best) position universally accepted, or does is change from tuner to tuner? I use whatever position is comfortable and allows me to get the job done. The "best" position ends up being the one that the tuner is comfortable using. The ugly truth is that you can bend, or "flagpole", a tuning pin from any position if your technique is faulty. Those of us in the business make a living by being able to tune accurately and quickly so that we can make it through the day's schedule. Rehashing tuning hammer position is splitting hairs on non-essentials. If you are trying to learn to tune, more power to you. Read. If you are trying to evaluate individual tuners, don't. Wait until you've tuned a thousand pianos or more before you embark on that dubious venture.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 9,230
9000 Post Club Member
|
9000 Post Club Member
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 9,230 |
Thanks, Hakki, for reminding me of some very dear friends from 40 years ago when I was an RTT.
Those old enough to remember what an RTT was will also remember that it became fashionable to use a longer tip on a grand and tune from the 5-6-7 o'clock position. I experimented myself somewhat but found it was way past my bedtime.
I did know some tuners who got solid results doing that. I don't know of anybody still tuning that way but those longer tips are available.
I have spoken of the lever being in line with the string on threads where beginners are makIng enquiries. I use this a lot in certain areas of certain pianos. In other areas of other pianos, i change the angle but never further round than 2-2.30 from the line of the string. My thumb is always partway down the shaft of the lever for more precise control.
If something feels real weird, I might try 11am but almost never. I prefer 11pm while I'm asleep if it's that bad.
One of the next posts will most likely be a repetition of the above but In gobbledygook. The use of those extra tall tips give the tuner a powerful sensation, the impression he master better the bending that he creates more , inevitably. I work to have bending minimal generally, but tested those long tips, the effort on the pin is strong , really not what I like with standard orientations, I can understand it have been in the trend to use it at 17:00 or 18:00 as the mass of the lever may help to lighten the string force on the pin. As the ankle cannot be put in a firm static posture (no fulcrum) I question the precision. But C shaped lever use the same orientation basically and seem to help some tuners ergonomically. The wrist and arm of a trained tuner is as precise as the one of professional tennis men, lot of controlled power. That is always a long road to get there, better start when young. About the angles, pianos that have no pin bushing are easy to tune with the standard orientations near the line of the string. Pianos with bushing : the bottom of the pin will move differntly, also the pressure of the pin on the bushing refrain the tuner to feel as precisely what happens at the bottom. Then a 15:00 orientation free the upper part of the pin (at the expense of more bending and more twisting) That posture, on all pianos, allow to perceive the bottom of the pin more clearly. Yamaha first tuning lesson : lever at 14:30, you add pressure in direction of the rotating plane, very slowly,while playing the note repeatedly, until you feel a release of tension (very light) and generally hear a "tick".... You do not try to rotate the pin at all, the playing hand create the motion. Once understood those 2 things you can begin to work tuning.
Last edited by Olek; 11/10/13 11:16 AM.
Professional of the profession. Foo Foo specialist I wish to add some kind and sensitive phrase but nothing comes to mind.!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 3,713
3000 Post Club Member
|
3000 Post Club Member
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 3,713 |
or does is change from tuner to tuner? For upright (9-12) UP For grand (15-18) DOWN http://youtu.be/WZ2SxSG90U0
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 2,571
2000 Post Club Member
|
2000 Post Club Member
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 2,571 |
Yes. But remember, Kazakhstan is about 15 hours ahead of most of us.
Amanda Reckonwith Concert & Recording tuner-tech, London, England. "in theory, practice and theory are the same thing. In practice, they're not." - Lawrence P. 'Yogi' Berra.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 3,489
3000 Post Club Member
|
3000 Post Club Member
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 3,489 |
We're not here to baby sit. You have to put forth some initiative if you want to learn this stuff. I have the Reblitz and he advices to use the five o'clock position for the grand. Which seemed awkward to me. Do you use a five o'clock position? The Reblitz book is ancient, and no longer the best source of information, by any means. I typically use 2-3 o'clock for most of the piano. 12 o'clock in the high treble.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 2,562
2000 Post Club Member
|
2000 Post Club Member
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 2,562 |
If something feels real weird, I might try 11am but almost never. I prefer 11pm while I'm asleep if it's that bad.
Okay, this made me laugh. Some here are horrified by what I do, but, since I'm left-handed, I do things largely backward from what the righties here do. YMWDV
Last edited by OperaTenor; 11/10/13 05:25 PM.
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 6,567
6000 Post Club Member
|
OP
6000 Post Club Member
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 6,567 |
I typically use 2-3 o'clock for most of the piano. 12 o'clock in the high treble. Thanks b986 !!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 4,331
4000 Post Club Member
|
4000 Post Club Member
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 4,331 |
The Reblitz book is ancient, and no longer the best source of information, by any means. I typically use 2-3 o'clock for most of the piano. 12 o'clock in the high treble. As I read it, Reblitz describes what Isaac demonstrated in his video, but he seems to tell the time differently. Perhaps he was using a digital watch.
Ian Russell Schiedmayer & Soehne, 1925 Model 14, 140cm Ibach, 1905 F-IV, 235cm
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 3,489
3000 Post Club Member
|
3000 Post Club Member
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 3,489 |
The Reblitz book is ancient, and no longer the best source of information, by any means. I typically use 2-3 o'clock for most of the piano. 12 o'clock in the high treble. As I read it, Reblitz describes what Isaac demonstrated in his video, but he seems to tell the time differently. Perhaps he was using a digital watch. I couldn't tell you... didn't watch the video. But yeah. While Reblitz was once the best one-stop shop for info on piano technology, it is no longer the case, IMO. I don't own the book, and never plan to. The only reason I've even read through it is because much of the PTG written exam is based off its contents. Indeed, there are much better sources of information available, now.
|
|
|
Forums43
Topics223,403
Posts3,349,419
Members111,636
|
Most Online15,252 Mar 21st, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|