|
Welcome to the Piano World Piano Forums Over 3 million posts about pianos, digital pianos, and all types of keyboard instruments. Over 100,000 members from around the world.
Join the World's Largest Community of Piano Lovers
(it's free)
It's Fun to Play the Piano ... Please Pass It On!
|
|
79 members (AaronSF, apianostudent, beeboss, brdwyguy, benkeys, Abdulrohmanoman, accordeur, 19 invisible),
2,241
guests, and
447
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 19,099
Yikes! 10000 Post Club Member
|
Yikes! 10000 Post Club Member
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 19,099 |
That's just an illusion, apparently... Not necessarily. The previous generation PHAIII action utilised by the FP-7F, RD-700NX, and V-Piano would appear to be the same. However the keyboard action utilised by the FP-80 and LX-15e may well be different. Cheers, James x
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 337
Full Member
|
Full Member
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 337 |
Excellent points.
I have recently begun using a pretty high end digital piano for night time practice, though, and for that (practicing when others are sleeping) it is indispensable. I use it in conjunction with a great virtual piano software package, and I am able to get a lot of great work done on it. In my experience it is more responsive than any upright I've ever played.
I'm lucky enough to also have a Steinway L, too though.
Last edited by Rachel J; 03/31/14 08:24 PM.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 3,756
3000 Post Club Member
|
3000 Post Club Member
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 3,756 |
That's just an illusion, apparently... Not necessarily. The previous generation PHAIII action utilised by the FP-7F, RD-700NX, and V-Piano would appear to be the same. However the keyboard action utilised by the FP-80 and LX-15e may well be different. Cheers, James x But that doesn't apply here. Enthusiast claims to have found the LX15 and the FP 80 actions quite different. However, both those pianos use what Essbrace has just said is the same action under a different name: PHA III Ivory Feel Keyboard with Escapement for the one and Ivory Feel-S Keyboard with Escapement for the other. Jay Roland has just said that Essbrace is right. So yes, any perceived difference between them is indeed an illusion, apparently. As I say, this one keeps running
Roland HP 302 / Samson Graphite 49 / Akai EWI
Reaper / Native Instruments K9 ult / ESQL MOR2 Symph Orchestra & Choirs / Lucato & Parravicini , trumpets & saxes / Garritan CFX lite / Production Voices C7 & Steinway D compact
Focusrite Saffire 24 / W7, i7 4770, 16GB / MXL V67g / Yamaha HS7s / HD598
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 803
500 Post Club Member
|
500 Post Club Member
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 803 |
The perceived differences in how the keyboard feels from instrument to instrument is not an illusion. People can't separate the mechanics of the action from the surrounding materials that support the action. If you mount an action to a pillow I'm sure it will feel different than the identical action mounted to a steel beam. Just because someone loves how the Roland action feels on the LX-15 doesn't mean that feel will translate to a 35lb stage piano made of entirely different supporting material. You have to test the action on the keyboard you intend to buy if you really want to know whether or not it will be to your liking. Even the simple addition of some felt makes the PHAIV feel different than the PHAIII. That's just an illusion, apparently... Not necessarily. The previous generation PHAIII action utilised by the FP-7F, RD-700NX, and V-Piano would appear to be the same. However the keyboard action utilised by the FP-80 and LX-15e may well be different. Cheers, James x But that doesn't apply here. Enthusiast claims to have found the LX15 and the FP 80 actions quite different. However, both those pianos use what Essbrace has just said is the same action under a different name: PHA III Ivory Feel Keyboard with Escapement for the one and Ivory Feel-S Keyboard with Escapement for the other. Jay Roland has just said that Essbrace is right. So yes, any perceived difference between them is indeed an illusion, apparently. As I say, this one keeps running
Shigeru Kawai SK5 Vintage Vibe 64 Roland LX-15e Roland Jupiter 80
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 3,756
3000 Post Club Member
|
3000 Post Club Member
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 3,756 |
Hideki Matsui said: The perceived differences in how the keyboard feels from instrument to instrument is not an illusion. People can't separate the mechanics of the action from the surrounding materials that support the action.
Well maybe, but I would describe that as more illusory than substantial, since what we're talking about here us the keyboard action - not all the surrounding paraphernalia which really will have a negligible influence on the action and the player's real engagement with the actual keys.
These differences, if they exist at all in a substantial sense, would be extremely marginal, surely.
Roland HP 302 / Samson Graphite 49 / Akai EWI
Reaper / Native Instruments K9 ult / ESQL MOR2 Symph Orchestra & Choirs / Lucato & Parravicini , trumpets & saxes / Garritan CFX lite / Production Voices C7 & Steinway D compact
Focusrite Saffire 24 / W7, i7 4770, 16GB / MXL V67g / Yamaha HS7s / HD598
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 276
Full Member
|
Full Member
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 276 |
That's just an illusion, apparently... Not necessarily. The previous generation PHAIII action utilised by the FP-7F, RD-700NX, and V-Piano would appear to be the same. However the keyboard action utilised by the FP-80 and LX-15e may well be different. Cheers, James x But that doesn't apply here. Enthusiast claims to have found the LX15 and the FP 80 actions quite different. Yes that's right it was the LX15 with PHAIII action. I checked and it was on clearance sale presumably because the newer LX15e needed to put on display. I didn't play the FP-80 for long but I could feel a very noticeable difference. If anyone else has tried these two models back to back I'd be interested to hear opinions. I didn't really notice that sort of difference between the CA95, CS10 and MP11 in that shop.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 19,099
Yikes! 10000 Post Club Member
|
Yikes! 10000 Post Club Member
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 19,099 |
May I ask which shop you visited, Enthusiast?
Cheers, James x
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 803
500 Post Club Member
|
500 Post Club Member
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 803 |
Hideki Matsui said: The perceived differences in how the keyboard feels from instrument to instrument is not an illusion. People can't separate the mechanics of the action from the surrounding materials that support the action.
Well maybe, but I would describe that as more illusory than substantial, since what we're talking about here us the keyboard action - not all the surrounding paraphernalia which really will have a negligible influence on the action and the player's real engagement with the actual keys.
These differences, if they exist at all in a substantial sense, would be extremely marginal, surely. So the felt added to the PHAIV on the LX-15e has made a negligible difference when compared to the PHAIII on the LX-15? I think you would have to have hammer hands to not feel the difference. People are going to have varying levels of sensitivity to subtle differences. While you might find differences negligible, that same difference might feel significant to someone else. I don't think chalking it up to illusion is the answer nor do I think EssBrace or Jay Roland suggested as much. Without making any assumptions about your skill level, I will also note that someone like Martha Argerich will most likely be more sensitive to subtle differences than a beginner with little control over dynamics.
Last edited by Hideki Matsui; 03/31/14 10:02 PM.
Shigeru Kawai SK5 Vintage Vibe 64 Roland LX-15e Roland Jupiter 80
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 1,243
1000 Post Club Member
|
1000 Post Club Member
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 1,243 |
That's just an illusion, apparently... Not necessarily. The previous generation PHAIII action utilised by the FP-7F, RD-700NX, and V-Piano would appear to be the same. However the keyboard action utilised by the FP-80 and LX-15e may well be different. Cheers, James x For clarification. The FP-80 uses PHA-3 (Ivory Feel S version) and the LX-15e employs the newer PHA-4 Concert. These two variants will feel markedly different to anyone familiar with a quality digital piano action. Jay
Industry Consultant
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 19,099
Yikes! 10000 Post Club Member
|
Yikes! 10000 Post Club Member
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 19,099 |
Thank you Jay! The FP-80 uses PHA-3 (Ivory Feel S version) May I ask if this is different to the FP-7F's keyboard action? ...the LX-15e employs the newer PHA-4 Concert. May I ask how this is different to the (original, i.e. without the 'e') LX-15's keyboard action? Cheers, James x
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 3,756
3000 Post Club Member
|
3000 Post Club Member
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 3,756 |
So the felt added to the PHAIV on the LX-15e has made a negligible difference when compared to the PHAIII on the LX-15? I think you would have to have hammer hands to not feel the difference.
I haven't actually commented on the PHAIV at all since I've never tried one. I am looking forward to doing so, though. People are going to have varying levels of sensitivity to subtle differences. While you might find differences negligible, that same difference might feel significant to someone else. I don't think chalking it up to illusion is the answer nor do I think EssBrace or Jay Roland suggested as much. I agree, the word 'illusion' is not a positive one. Essbrace used the words 'perceived differences'. Without making any assumptions about your skill level, I will also note that someone like Martha Argerich will most likely be more sensitive to subtle differences than a beginner with little control over dynamics. Evidently a competent pianist will have a much more developed sensitivity to the feel and response of the keys than a beginner. But I very much doubt that a great pianist would pay so much minute attention to these differences as we do. Regarding digital pianos, from the comments I've read and seen, professional performing pianists' criticisms are more concerned with the limits and gradation of expression that digital pianos are able to deliver. The differences between various makers, models and forms of acoustic pianos - even those of above reasonable level of quality - vary far more than the differences between those of the main DP manufactures. These differences are (in my opinion) relatively slight.
Roland HP 302 / Samson Graphite 49 / Akai EWI
Reaper / Native Instruments K9 ult / ESQL MOR2 Symph Orchestra & Choirs / Lucato & Parravicini , trumpets & saxes / Garritan CFX lite / Production Voices C7 & Steinway D compact
Focusrite Saffire 24 / W7, i7 4770, 16GB / MXL V67g / Yamaha HS7s / HD598
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 276
Full Member
|
Full Member
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 276 |
May I ask which shop you visited, Enthusiast?
Cheers, James x It was Rose Morris in London. I was also in Yamaha Music London (formerly Chappell of Bond Street) just before. Both have a treasure trove of DP's, Keyboards and workstations to try and don't seem to mind you spending ages there. In addition to those I mentioned I also had a go on the HP508, RD800, CP4, CVP609, Avantgrands and a silent piano. That was all after playing on a S6 Grand for an hour so good fun. There's also a shop specializing in Casio next door to Rose Morris and the Steinway Hall among others not far from there so the opportunities for trying both DPs and APs there are excellent. I really liked feel of the b3e SG2 silent piano. Seemed better than the NU1 Avantgrand.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 1,243
1000 Post Club Member
|
1000 Post Club Member
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 1,243 |
Thank you Jay! The FP-80 uses PHA-3 (Ivory Feel S version) May I ask if this is different to the FP-7F's keyboard action? ...the LX-15e employs the newer PHA-4 Concert. May I ask how this is different to the (original, i.e. without the 'e') LX-15's keyboard action? Cheers, James x There's no physical difference in the action between the FP-7F and FP-80. In the LX-15e, the PHA-4 Concert (and Premium) have decreased the mechanical thump that all digital actions make to Varying degrees. This was accomplished through a couple of design and material enhancements within the action. I personally find the initial throw of the keys to have a TINY bit more weight, and the point at which the keybed bottoms is softer than the PHA-3. I haven't actually measured the down weight to see what the difference is. Like I've said before, specs don't matter as much as sound and feel. All the new PHA-4 equipped pianos also employ a similar technology to the V-Piano, in that there is actually a separate processor scanning the keybed and offering 100 times the resolution that PHA-3 was able to.
Industry Consultant
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 613
500 Post Club Member
|
500 Post Club Member
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 613 |
This is a good reminder thread. I started out trying to find a digital that would emulate an acoustic very well. I was dissatisfied with most. I then started looking at acoustic pianos, and for $2000 could get 'garbage, for $3500 could get 'barely acceptable' and really needed to spend $5500 on a used upright to get half way to what I really wanted. At the same time I accepted that the digital will never be an acoustic, and finally started to overlook some of the differences.
I ended up with a Kawai MP10. So far, I really like the feel and sound. It is not the same as having an acoustic piano in the room, but it sounds good and feels good to play, and certainly is better than nothing.
Acoustic pianos are like furniture in some ways - they are big and heavy and you will end up looking at it every day. Because of that, it becomes a major decision to a lot of people. My house is small so I feel that I need to carefully consider what I get and where I put it.
That being said, I find that the digitals that try to replicate the action of an acoustic are more enjoyable to play. Each piano feels different, whether it's acoustic or digital.
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 276
Full Member
|
Full Member
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 276 |
Thank you Jay! The FP-80 uses PHA-3 (Ivory Feel S version) May I ask if this is different to the FP-7F's keyboard action? ...the LX-15e employs the newer PHA-4 Concert. May I ask how this is different to the (original, i.e. without the 'e') LX-15's keyboard action? Cheers, James x All the new PHA-4 equipped pianos also employ a similar technology to the V-Piano, in that there is actually a separate processor scanning the keybed and offering 100 times the resolution that PHA-3 was able to. What does that mean exactly? What effect does it have?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 1,243
1000 Post Club Member
|
1000 Post Club Member
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 1,243 |
All the new PHA-4 equipped pianos also employ a similar technology to the V-Piano, in that there is actually a separate processor scanning the keybed and offering 100 times the resolution that PHA-3 was able to.
What does that mean exactly? What effect does it have? Basically what that means is that the separate keybed processor is able to take care of reading the actual keystrokes and feeds the sound engine the most accurate possible data so expression and dynamics is always exactly what the player wants. Anything that eases load on the sound engine so it can just make the sound is a good thing, and I'm glad that this has been included in the new series. These pianos have to do a lot of instantaneous calculations to create the sound that they do, so taking some of that load off of the sound engine was a smart design decision. Especially with the updated SuperNatural engine doing even more than the previous one did in terms of nuance and resonance. Anything with a PHA-4 action will employ this processor and will allow for greater sensing of the inputs of the player. In practical application, I've found that I've been able to really dig the tone out of the piano and found it really responds incredibly well to all my playing inputs. I've spent a LOT of time the last couple of days on the RD800 and HP508. I'm preparing to do a clinic event in Southern Alberta this weekend. Every time I sit down, I enjoy them more and more. I'm hoping my boss will allow me to use the HP508 at home. If not, there's a beauty DP-90Se-PW (Polished white) that I may ask for as well if it is still around when I get back from Alberta.
Last edited by Jay Roland; 04/01/14 08:13 PM.
Industry Consultant
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 19,099
Yikes! 10000 Post Club Member
|
Yikes! 10000 Post Club Member
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 19,099 |
Thank you for your explanations Jay.
Cheers, James x
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 19,099
Yikes! 10000 Post Club Member
|
Yikes! 10000 Post Club Member
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 19,099 |
It was Rose Morris in London. I was also in Yamaha Music London (formerly Chappell of Bond Street) just before. Both have a treasure trove of DP's, Keyboards and workstations to try and don't seem to mind you spending ages there. In addition to those I mentioned I also had a go on the HP508, RD800, CP4, CVP609, Avantgrands and a silent piano. That was all after playing on a S6 Grand for an hour so good fun. There's also a shop specializing in Casio next door to Rose Morris and the Steinway Hall among others not far from there so the opportunities for trying both DPs and APs there are excellent. Wow, you're lucky to have access to such a great selection of instruments!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 1
Junior Member
|
Junior Member
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 1 |
I bought my LX15 on mid July 2013 and am very upset to find out that the newer LX15e has a better and less noisy keyboard. After a month or two playing with that at night, my wife and son complained the thump noise was too loud and wake them up...since that I seldom touch my piano as I couldn't only find time to play at night. My $6K was a big waste.
Wish I knew the LX15e would come in Jan2104, I would have had waited for just few more month for a quieter keyboard...
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 17,391
Yikes! 10000 Post Club Member
|
Yikes! 10000 Post Club Member
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 17,391 |
I bought my LX15 on mid July 2013 and am very upset to find out that the newer LX15e has a better and less noisy keyboard. After a month or two playing with that at night, my wife and son complained the thump noise was too loud and wake them up...since that I seldom touch my piano as I couldn't only find time to play at night. My $6K was a big waste.
Wish I knew the LX15e would come in Jan2104, I would have had waited for just few more month for a quieter keyboard...
I would try to do some sound-dampening treatments to your room. There are relatively cheap ways of helping to reduce this to those in the next room. There will always be the next best thing right around the corner, and not much you can do about that. But other than that, do you like your LX15? If so, try to make it work, if not, cut your losses and sell it while it's still under warranty and can get a decent price and look at other instruments you can buy instead.
private piano/voice teacher FT
|
|
|
|
|
|
Piano
by Gino2 - 04/17/24 02:34 PM
|
Piano
by Gino2 - 04/17/24 02:23 PM
|
|
Forums43
Topics223,405
Posts3,349,434
Members111,637
|
Most Online15,252 Mar 21st, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|