2022 our 25th year online!

Welcome to the Piano World Piano Forums
Over 3 million posts about pianos, digital pianos, and all types of keyboard instruments.
Over 100,000 members from around the world.
Join the World's Largest Community of Piano Lovers (it's free)
It's Fun to Play the Piano ... Please Pass It On!

SEARCH
Piano Forums & Piano World
(ad)
Who's Online Now
59 members (Adam Reynolds, APianistHasNoName, Carey, brdwyguy, beeboss, Chris B, Cheeeeee, 9 invisible), 1,669 guests, and 246 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Hop To
Page 2 of 4 1 2 3 4
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 535
A
500 Post Club Member
Offline
500 Post Club Member
A
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 535
It should go without saying that one needs to mature to progress beyond the child prodigy stage. The whole "no one will know or even care if you're alive" is unnecessarily condescending, in my eyes at least.

Last edited by adamp88; 06/12/14 11:18 AM.

Adam Schulte-Bukowinski, RPT
Piano Technician, University of Nebraska-Lincoln
ASB Piano Service
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 863
L
500 Post Club Member
Offline
500 Post Club Member
L
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 863
Originally Posted by ABC Vermonter
Hi Pogorelich,

Thanks for your feedback on this issue.

Hi Louis Podesta,

Thank you for your perspectives.

The following youtube video is an example of the first school of teaching that I mentioned in my earlier post:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U9CekPZP2Tk

I hope that I now made my dilemma clearer.


Thank you for sharing the John Browning Master Class video. I have his recording of the Prokofiev 3rd Piano Concerto.

However, once again, here is an example of a concert pianist who does not have a clue as to what should constitute a proper octave/chord technique.

My coach, Thomas Mark, teaches a separate seminar in octave technique that is entirely based on a natural arm weight principle. That means that if you want to ruin your hands and wrists, do it the way John Browning does.

However (and I do not hustle students for Thomas Mark), if you can make it to the beautiful city of Portlandia this summer, then you can take a lesson on this very subject. www.pianomap.com

With all do respect to my fellow posters, it will solve your "dilemma" in short order. As I said before, with my spindly fingers and small hand, there is no way I could play this piece with out a normal body weight use of the hand and wrist.




Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 1,126
M
1000 Post Club Member
Offline
1000 Post Club Member
M
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 1,126
Originally Posted by Louis Podesta
Originally Posted by ABC Vermonter
Hi Pogorelich,

Thanks for your feedback on this issue.

Hi Louis Podesta,

Thank you for your perspectives.

The following youtube video is an example of the first school of teaching that I mentioned in my earlier post:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U9CekPZP2Tk

I hope that I now made my dilemma clearer.


Thank you for sharing the John Browning Master Class video. I have his recording of the Prokofiev 3rd Piano Concerto.

However, once again, here is an example of a concert pianist who does not have a clue as to what should constitute a proper octave/chord technique.

My coach, Thomas Mark, teaches a separate seminar in octave technique that is entirely based on a natural arm weight principle. That means that if you want to ruin your hands and wrists, do it the way John Browning does.

However (and I do not hustle students for Thomas Mark), if you can make it to the beautiful city of Portlandia this summer, then you can take a lesson on this very subject. www.pianomap.com

With all do respect to my fellow posters, it will solve your "dilemma" in short order. As I said before, with my spindly fingers and small hand, there is no way I could play this piece with out a normal body weight use of the hand and wrist.




As another person with spindly hands and fingers, +1.

Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 6,562
6000 Post Club Member
Offline
6000 Post Club Member
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 6,562
Originally Posted by adamp88
Originally Posted by Louis Podesta

Finally, at the age of 16, you will have the whole world telling you how great you are by being able to play this piece at your age. However, one day you will not be sixteen anymore, and if you haven't matured musically, like thousands of prodigies before you, no one will know or even care you are alive.


What is with you and the unnecessarily harsh replies? I'm pretty sure his family and friends will still know and care if he is alive. Fame isn't everything.
He's choice of wording is obnoxious, to say the least, but what he says holds water I'm afraid...

This is the case with all youngsters playing amazingly well: They grow up, and then the age factor... well... stops being a factor at all, in which case they will have to complete out right with any other pianist in the world (if we're talking about a career in piano performance, right?) So there's no way around to what Louis, so ugly, puts it.

Now, for everything else...

I think I tend to agree with Angelina, since I also found the playing to be somewhat (at least to my taste of performances (Richter *ahem* ) not as full bodied as I'd expect.

I'd definitely not go into such detail as Derulux did, probably because I don't know the piece that well, but also because I find that such detail should be put forward by the pianist himself, rather than taking such strict and precise advice from someone else (teacher, poster, forum member, etc).

But over all we ARE nit picking here, for good reason: You're on your way to doing great stuff, so we have to be harsh. All of us! In the meantime you can be relaxed in knowing that already you're doing something that 99% of the pianists couldn't do at the age of 16! Just don't rest on this fact...

Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 9,395
W
wr Offline
9000 Post Club Member
Offline
9000 Post Club Member
W
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 9,395
Originally Posted by Louis Podesta

Thank you for sharing the John Browning Master Class video. I have his recording of the Prokofiev 3rd Piano Concerto.

However, once again, here is an example of a concert pianist who does not have a clue as to what should constitute a proper octave/chord technique.



In that case, since Browning had a successful career, having "a clue as to what should constitute a proper octave/chord technique" would seem to demonstrate that whatever it is you think is a clue is irrelevant to actual concert pianists.




Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 263
A
Full Member
OP Offline
Full Member
A
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 263
I am not saying that I agree or disagree with John Browning’s concerto teaching; there are a lot of things that I do not know and I am still learning. But his teaching of playing a big Romantic concerto is not that unique and I have heard similar teaching quite a few times from different big-name teachers. I found another Youtube video in which John Browning talked about the underlying theory/reason:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RwXL1uQh40U

If you have heard his recording of Barber’s solo pieces, his solo playing is very sensitive with beautiful sound. Obviously, he is conscious about his way of concerto playing.

Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 863
L
500 Post Club Member
Offline
500 Post Club Member
L
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 863
Okay, it is show and tell time. First, it is Earl Wild's recording, who by his own admission heard Rachmaninoff perform over a hundred times, and was a personal friend.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gvoFncOsKjk

Secondly, the master himself, is performing. Neither one of these men who had some the greatest concerto techniques ever known, in regards music of the Romantic Period, ever played with a John Browning technique, never!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pBx-tr1FDvY

Come to think of it, if you can't make it to Portlandia to have Thomas Mark teach you octave technique, then maybe you can travel to New York to take a lesson under the Taubman specialist Robert Durso. He can explain to in intricate detail the bio-mechanics of what me and Pogo are talking about.



Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 5,446
D
5000 Post Club Member
Offline
5000 Post Club Member
D
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 5,446
Originally Posted by Louis Podesta
Secondly, the master himself, is performing. Neither one of these men who had some the greatest concerto techniques ever known, in regards music of the Romantic Period, ever played with a John Browning technique, never!

Since Rachmaninoff died when Browning was 10 years old (assuming I have the right Browning), I suppose this would be akin to saying neither of them played with a Thomas Mark technique, either. wink


Every day we are afforded a new chance. The problem with life is not that you run out of chances. In the end, what you run out of are days.
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 863
L
500 Post Club Member
Offline
500 Post Club Member
L
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 863
Originally Posted by Derulux
Originally Posted by Louis Podesta
Secondly, the master himself, is performing. Neither one of these men who had some the greatest concerto techniques ever known, in regards music of the Romantic Period, ever played with a John Browning technique, never!

Since Rachmaninoff died when Browning was 10 years old (assuming I have the right Browning), I suppose this would be akin to saying neither of them played with a Thomas Mark technique, either. wink

From Thomas Mark's Octave Playing Tips Handout:

1) Perfectly Free Fall
2) Don't "set" the hand
3) The piano opens the hand
4) Fingers, hand, and forearm move together
5) No collapse whatever of the forearm arch
6) Wrist is higher in relation to hand than in single note
playing
7) Fingering is 1 and 5, and 1 occasionally 1 and 4
8) Movement to the next octave is a rebound and not a lifting
9) Activity comes in leaving the key bed and not in the descent
10) Release must go all the way to the key bed on every octave
11) Minimize in and out movement
12) Minimize up and down movement
13) No fixed point to move from except the piano bench

There is obviously much more, but this will give you a general idea of his philosophy of octave, and also chord playing. If you desire the entire package, you can visit him for a lesson regarding this and any other technique, or you can book him into your city/town for a seminar on general technique and also octave technique.

I traveled five hours by plane (each way) on two occasions, and I will remember those lessons for the rest of my life. He is that good. Also, he teaches by remote through video lessons after the initial session.

Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 452
F
Full Member
Offline
Full Member
F
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 452
I can't help but wonder how on earth can people believe that there is only one truth, one correct 'technique'.

Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 863
L
500 Post Club Member
Offline
500 Post Club Member
L
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 863
Originally Posted by Francisco Scalco
I can't help but wonder how on earth can people believe that there is only one truth, one correct 'technique'.


Thank you so much for broaching the subject, in that I have been soundly ridiculed for stating that I am a classical pianist/philosopher. The Royal Institute of Philosophy at Cambridge considers me to be one, but then again, they are not as sharp as my fellow contributors on Piano World - but I digress.

Dr. Thomas Mark used to be a philosophy professor at Columbia University, of which you may have heard. He is considered to be an authority on the writings of Spinoza.

He adheres to the piano pedagogical philosophy that one size does not always fit all. He has actually published a journal article on that very subject, which can be accessed through his website www.pianomap.com.

The first thing that he tells you in a coaching session is exactly that. There are some Taubman priniciples that apply overall, and then there are few things Ms. Golandsky left/leaves out in regards the relationship of the whole body to the playing of the piano. ("What Every Pianist Needs To Know About The Body," by Thomas Mark)

He stresses that your goal is to position your finger/fingers over the right note/notes by first positioning your whole body to be in balance. Then you move your entire arm (articulating from the sternovanicular joint) so you can rotate, shape, or do anything else required of a particular passage.

With the octaves and chords it is the same, very well thought out, logic.

However, sticking your finger in a meat slicer is not a different point of view. It is a potentially fatal very bad idea. Accordingly, playing octaves and chords like John Browning will screw up your hands forever.

You have no idea what physical therapy he had to undergo to play like this, which is a subject that never gets talked about regarding the world's great pianists. E.G. does Lang Lang mash his left hand when he plays a chord, and what is the subsequent result to his ulnar nerve?

The bio-mechanics of playing the piano has been around since Tobias Matthay. I suggest that you have your library send you his voluminous writings on this matter.

Nowhere does he even remotely suggest that anyone play an octave or chord like John Browning.

Thanks once again for your input.

Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 452
F
Full Member
Offline
Full Member
F
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 452
Originally Posted by Louis Podesta
Originally Posted by Francisco Scalco
I can't help but wonder how on earth can people believe that there is only one truth, one correct 'technique'.


Thank you so much for broaching the subject, in that I have been soundly ridiculed for stating that I am a classical pianist/philosopher. The Royal Institute of Philosophy at Cambridge considers me to be one, but then again, they are not as sharp as my fellow contributors on Piano World - but I digress.

Dr. Thomas Mark used to be a philosophy professor at Columbia University, of which you may have heard. He is considered to be an authority on the writings of Spinoza.

He adheres to the piano pedagogical philosophy that one size does not always fit all. He has actually published a journal article on that very subject, which can be accessed through his website www.pianomap.com.

The first thing that he tells you in a coaching session is exactly that. There are some Taubman priniciples that apply overall, and then there are few things Ms. Golandsky left/leaves out in regards the relationship of the whole body to the playing of the piano. ("What Every Pianist Needs To Know About The Body," by Thomas Mark)

He stresses that your goal is to position your finger/fingers over the right note/notes by first positioning your whole body to be in balance. Then you move your entire arm (articulating from the sternovanicular joint) so you can rotate, shape, or do anything else required of a particular passage.

With the octaves and chords it is the same, very well thought out, logic.

However, sticking your finger in a meat slicer is not a different point of view. It is a potentially fatal very bad idea. Accordingly, playing octaves and chords like John Browning will screw up your hands forever.

You have no idea what physical therapy he had to undergo to play like this, which is a subject that never gets talked about regarding the world's great pianists. E.G. does Lang Lang mash his left hand when he plays a chord, and what is the subsequent result to his ulnar nerve?

The bio-mechanics of playing the piano has been around since Tobias Matthay. I suggest that you have your library send you his voluminous writings on this matter.

Nowhere does he even remotely suggest that anyone play an octave or chord like John Browning.

Thanks once again for your input.

Lol I didn't address anyone specifically in my post, but if the shoe fits so be it

Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 6,562
6000 Post Club Member
Offline
6000 Post Club Member
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 6,562
Originally Posted by Louis Podesta
Originally Posted by Francisco Scalco
I can't help but wonder how on earth can people believe that there is only one truth, one correct 'technique'.


Thank you so much for broaching the subject, in that I have been soundly ridiculed for stating that I am a classical pianist/philosopher. The Royal Institute of Philosophy at Cambridge considers me to be one, but then again, they are not as sharp as my fellow contributors on Piano World - but I digress.
We've been through this before, but what on earth are you doing here?

We certainly do NOT need your kind of education (at least I don't), and apparently you seem to be throwing gems to the swine, so...

Don't bother.

Doesn't bloody Cambridge have a forum to go to, instead PW? grin

Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 5,446
D
5000 Post Club Member
Offline
5000 Post Club Member
D
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 5,446
Originally Posted by Nikolas
Originally Posted by Louis Podesta
Originally Posted by Francisco Scalco
I can't help but wonder how on earth can people believe that there is only one truth, one correct 'technique'.


Thank you so much for broaching the subject, in that I have been soundly ridiculed for stating that I am a classical pianist/philosopher. The Royal Institute of Philosophy at Cambridge considers me to be one, but then again, they are not as sharp as my fellow contributors on Piano World - but I digress.
We've been through this before, but what on earth are you doing here?

We certainly do NOT need your kind of education (at least I don't), and apparently you seem to be throwing gems to the swine, so...

Don't bother.

Doesn't bloody Cambridge have a forum to go to, instead PW? grin

I'm all for the sharing of ideas, but I do draw issue with a flawed/limited perspective of an approach with which one has no working knowledge, and then speaking as if from authority. Podesta's claims on the limitations of the Taubman approach are consistently misinformed, so much so that it often makes me wonder how ill-informed other comments might be.


Every day we are afforded a new chance. The problem with life is not that you run out of chances. In the end, what you run out of are days.
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 6,562
6000 Post Club Member
Offline
6000 Post Club Member
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 6,562
It's not the matter of sharing ideas. I hope everyone here knows how open minded I am.

It's the way that Louis posts. With such an authoritative force that makes no sense. Making everyone else feel like a complete fool. I'm not happy with that. Not at all!

Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 2,352
2000 Post Club Member
Offline
2000 Post Club Member
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 2,352
Originally Posted by Louis Podesta
In order to play with full arm weight and upper body weight, you need to sit higher in order to maximize the natural gravity of your body. As it is now, you are poking at chords and octaves, and if you keep it up you will have carpel tunnel syndrome by your early 20's.

Hi Louis, I agree with the part about not poking at the keys except for some detache type effects and in other miscellaneous instances, not for health reasons though but for piano tone and range of tonal palette reasons. The advice that he sit higher though is not necessarily correct. A simple perusal of photos of great pianists - including Josef Hofmann who delivered a mighty yet beautiful fff in those live recordings from Casimir Hall - shows that maybe sitting a little lower and further back is what is needed. There is a photo somewhere of Josef with his son Anton (presumably named after Josef's teacher Anton Rubinstein) at the keys, and one might be inclined to think he has Anton in an optimal configuration relative to the keyboard. The tone is in its majority from weight and the back muscles, not weight and the triceps which in my belief tends to produce a rather strident result especially in the ff+ range.

I hope that no one here feels I am being dogmatic. I've seen a video of Joaquin Achucarro sitting so high and close to the keys that it looks almost like he is standing, and his tone isn't impaired. But he has decades and decades of concertizing behind him, and he didn't start off sitting that way. For a teenager whose tone might seem a bit hard maybe it is best to experiment first with sitting lower down and further back which in and of itself may reduce any tendency to poke at the keys.

Some of the hardness might be due to how the Steinway's hammers are voiced - it is a bit difficult to get a beautiful tone if the hammers are voiced for more attack than tone in the sound.

p.s. - I don't think a pianist can realistically be expected to consciously follow a ten step process in playing octaves as you seem to suggest in another post with this thread. Somehow, with some basic musical and other guidance with supervision, it all has to come together naturally.

Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 2,352
2000 Post Club Member
Offline
2000 Post Club Member
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 2,352
Originally Posted by Louis Podesta
Thank you for sharing the John Browning Master Class video. I have his recording of the Prokofiev 3rd Piano Concerto.

However, once again, here is an example of a concert pianist who does not have a clue as to what should constitute a proper octave/chord technique.

My coach, Thomas Mark, teaches a separate seminar in octave technique that is entirely based on a natural arm weight principle. That means that if you want to ruin your hands and wrists, do it the way John Browning does.

According the wikipedia article John Browning gave over 100 concerts a season. The article doesn't mention any issues with his hands. This is something which you, Louis, as a self-claimed empiricist, might want to take notice of.

Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 5,446
D
5000 Post Club Member
Offline
5000 Post Club Member
D
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 5,446
Originally Posted by Nikolas
It's not the matter of sharing ideas. I hope everyone here knows how open minded I am.

No worries, I'm completely on your side. grin


Every day we are afforded a new chance. The problem with life is not that you run out of chances. In the end, what you run out of are days.
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 863
L
500 Post Club Member
Offline
500 Post Club Member
L
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 863
Originally Posted by Michael Sayers
Originally Posted by Louis Podesta
In order to play with full arm weight and upper body weight, you need to sit higher in order to maximize the natural gravity of your body. As it is now, you are poking at chords and octaves, and if you keep it up you will have carpel tunnel syndrome by your early 20's.

Hi Louis, I agree with the part about not poking at the keys except for some detache type effects and in other miscellaneous instances, not for health reasons though but for piano tone and range of tonal palette reasons. The advice that he sit higher though is not necessarily correct. A simple perusal of photos of great pianists - including Josef Hofmann who delivered a mighty yet beautiful fff in those live recordings from Casimir Hall - shows that maybe sitting a little lower and further back is what is needed. There is a photo somewhere of Josef with his son Anton (presumably named after Josef's teacher Anton Rubinstein) at the keys, and one might be inclined to think he has Anton in an optimal configuration relative to the keyboard. The tone is in its majority from weight and the back muscles, not weight and the triceps which in my belief tends to produce a rather strident result especially in the ff+ range.

I hope that no one here feels I am being dogmatic. I've seen a video of Joaquin Achucarro sitting so high and close to the keys that it looks almost like he is standing, and his tone isn't impaired. But he has decades and decades of concertizing behind him, and he didn't start off sitting that way. For a teenager whose tone might seem a bit hard maybe it is best to experiment first with sitting lower down and further back which in and of itself may reduce any tendency to poke at the keys.

Some of the hardness might be due to how the Steinway's hammers are voiced - it is a bit difficult to get a beautiful tone if the hammers are voiced for more attack than tone in the sound.

p.s. - I don't think a pianist can realistically be expected to consciously follow a ten step process in playing octaves as you seem to suggest in another post with this thread. Somehow, with some basic musical and other guidance with supervision, it all has to come together naturally.


If you have read some of my other posts on this thread, you would know that I do not, nor does Thomas Mark, ascribe to any "ten steps" or one size fits all logic.

Accordingly, Thomas sits very high, and as my video illustrates, I do not. Additionally, since that recording, I sit even lower.

I have always sat very far back because of my long legs. And, I also lean forward.

In terms of John Browning playing a hundred performances a season, you need to know the big secret. That secret is that most, if not all, concert pianists have three hours of recital up and also two piano concertos (maybe three, if there are two Mozart selections).

So,it is no problem for someone like John Browning to program pieces around his particular technique. The point being, including Lang Lang (who mashes his left hand), it is a very bad idea to follow in the footsteps of "big name teachers" or concert pianists, who have been less than genuous regarding the actual facts of their own particular technique.

Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 2,352
2000 Post Club Member
Offline
2000 Post Club Member
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 2,352
Originally Posted by Louis Podesta
If you have read some of my other posts on this thread, you would know that I do not, nor does Thomas Mark, ascribe to any "ten steps" or one size fits all logic.

Accordingly, Thomas sits very high, and as my video illustrates, I do not. Additionally, since that recording, I sit even lower.

I have always sat very far back because of my long legs. And, I also lean forward.

In terms of John Browning playing a hundred performances a season, you need to know the big secret. That secret is that most, if not all, concert pianists have three hours of recital up and also two piano concertos (maybe three, if there are two Mozart selections).

So,it is no problem for someone like John Browning to program pieces around his particular technique. The point being, including Lang Lang (who mashes his left hand), it is a very bad idea to follow in the footsteps of "big name teachers" or concert pianists, who have been less than genuous regarding the actual facts of their own particular technique.

Probably many of us can remember at some point idolizing this or that pianist, emulating the pianist, and then out growing the model or finding that it doesn't fit right. If John Browning's or Lang Lang's recordings and performances are what works for someone, and he finds these to be really great and amazing, and it results in taking up piano lessons with many hours dedication at the piano, I don't see any fault with it. Admittedly - and this is the bottom line - what John Browning did and what Lang Lang is doing work for them, and it works for others as well. These are the empirical facts to which I endeavor to draw your attention even though I am not sure how much it relates to the original poster's story.

It is philosophically important to see the whole in life, which is why and for which reason I hope you know that unlike other posters here I don't have any personal umbrage against you Louis. I really do believe that everything happens for a reason and that we are subject to teleological forces in the universe which operate outside of our conscious level. We only observe the thin slice of whatever we are conscious of moment to moment for why we do any thing and there very well may be a reason or reasons why you are posting as such on this thread and which will unfold later in time.

If Thomas Mark is what works for you and others then congratulations on finding what is needed.

p.s. - I posted an mp3 of a romantic style piano work at the Composers Lounge - the "Södermalm Fantasy Ballade" as played by Tim Adrianson. I was specifically hoping to get your candid and honest response as it is scored somewhat for romantic piano techniques including even varying degrees of note and chord rubato - in other words, my personal romantic interpretation was notated into the score rather than being left out. One friend told me it sounds like "very bad Nyiregyhazi mixed with some very bad Liszt" and I didn't mind, so any comment you have, even quite negative, would be of interest.

Page 2 of 4 1 2 3 4

Link Copied to Clipboard
What's Hot!!
Piano World Has Been Sold!
--------------------
Forums RULES, Terms of Service & HELP
(updated 06/06/2022)
---------------------
Posting Pictures on the Forums
(ad)
(ad)
New Topics - Multiple Forums
Recommended Songs for Beginners
by FreddyM - 04/16/24 03:20 PM
New DP for a 10 year old
by peelaaa - 04/16/24 02:47 PM
Estonia 1990
by Iberia - 04/16/24 11:01 AM
Very Cheap Piano?
by Tweedpipe - 04/16/24 10:13 AM
Practical Meaning of SMP
by rneedle - 04/16/24 09:57 AM
Forum Statistics
Forums43
Topics223,392
Posts3,349,302
Members111,634
Most Online15,252
Mar 21st, 2010

Our Piano Related Classified Ads
| Dealers | Tuners | Lessons | Movers | Restorations |

Advertise on Piano World
| Piano World | PianoSupplies.com | Advertise on Piano World |
| |Contact | Privacy | Legal | About Us | Site Map


Copyright © VerticalScope Inc. All Rights Reserved.
No part of this site may be reproduced without prior written permission
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5
When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission, which supports our community.