Welcome to the Piano World Piano Forums
Over 2 million posts about pianos, digital pianos, and all types of keyboard instruments
Join the World's Largest Community of Piano Lovers (it's free)
It's Fun to Play the Piano ... Please Pass It On!

SEARCH
the Forums & Piano World

This custom search works much better than the built in one and allows searching older posts.
(ad 125) Sweetwater - Digital Keyboards & Other Gear
Digital Pianos at Sweetwater
(ad) Pearl River
Pearl River Pianos
(ad) Pianoteq
Latest Pianoteq add-on instrument: U4 upright piano
(ad) P B Guide
Acoustic & Digital Piano Guide
PianoSupplies.com (150)
Piano Accessories Music Related Gifts Piano Tuning Equipment Piano Moving Equipment
We now offer Gift Certificates in our online store!
(ad) Estonia Piano
Estonia Piano
Quick Links to Useful Stuff
Our Classified Ads
Find Piano Professionals-

*Piano Dealers - Piano Stores
*Piano Tuners
*Piano Teachers
*Piano Movers
*Piano Restorations
*Piano Manufacturers
*Organs

Quick Links:
*Advertise On Piano World
*Free Piano Newsletter
*Online Piano Recitals
*Piano Recitals Index
*Piano Accessories
* Buying a Piano
*Buying A Acoustic Piano
*Buying a Digital Piano
*Pianos for Sale
*Sell Your Piano
*How Old is My Piano?
*Piano Books
*Piano Art, Pictures, & Posters
*Directory/Site Map
*Contest
*Links
*Virtual Piano
*Music Word Search
*Piano Screen Saver
*Piano Videos
*Virtual Piano Chords
Page 1 of 2 1 2 >
Topic Options
#2316959 - 08/18/14 01:59 PM Grand Pianos w/Ribs on Top of Soundboard, instead of back
freelife Offline
Full Member

Registered: 12/30/09
Posts: 28
Loc: CA
I'm rebuilding a Julius Bauer grand that has an odd characteristic I've seen only a few times in 40 years of rebuilding: The ribs are glued to the top of the soundboard, instead of the normal glued-to-the-underside configuration. I wondered if anyone knew some history about which piano makers first invented/used this top-rib configuration, and what they thought was the advantage gained. Obviously, any advantage must have been insignificant, as no modern pianos continued the practice, and at first glance, it seems to be counterproductive to the concept of holding the soundboard in its upwards crowned shape. Anybody know the history & purpose of this top-rib experiment?
_________________________
http://earthsongpiano.com

Top
(ad PTG 568) Grand Action Regulation in 37 Steps
Grand Action Regulation in 37 Steps
#2316994 - 08/18/14 03:40 PM Re: Grand Pianos w/Ribs on Top of Soundboard, instead of back [Re: freelife]
Eric Gloo Offline
1000 Post Club Member

Registered: 05/28/01
Posts: 1244
Loc: Richfield Springs, New York
The only one like it that I've encountered was an A.B. Chase grand.
_________________________
Eric Gloo
Piano Technician
Certified Dampp-Chaser Installer
Richfield Springs, New York

Top
#2316997 - 08/18/14 04:01 PM Re: Grand Pianos w/Ribs on Top of Soundboard, instead of back [Re: freelife]
A443 Offline
1000 Post Club Member

Registered: 04/28/12
Posts: 1287
Loc: Manywheres
I would really love to see some pictures. Is that possible?
_________________________
Klavierbaukünstler des Erwachens
...expecter of the best, 'gunslinger' to the rest!
Email: klavierbaukuenstler@gmail.com

Top
#2317069 - 08/18/14 07:28 PM Re: Grand Pianos w/Ribs on Top of Soundboard, instead of back [Re: freelife]
pyropaul Offline
Full Member

Registered: 11/16/10
Posts: 185
Loc: Montreal
I have a 1887 Steinway A that has ribs on the top - I presume these were added at some point when it was restored.

I'll see if I can dig out some photos tomorrow.

[edit] There are also ribs on the underside

Paul.


Edited by pyropaul (08/18/14 07:29 PM)

Top
#2317076 - 08/18/14 07:49 PM Re: Grand Pianos w/Ribs on Top of Soundboard, instead of back [Re: freelife]
WilliamTruitt Online   content
Full Member

Registered: 07/12/14
Posts: 81
Loc: New Hampshire
The Julius Bauer has ribs on both the top and bottom of the soundboard. I rebuilt one about 15 years ago. Nice solid piano
_________________________
Will Truitt

Top
#2317079 - 08/18/14 07:58 PM Re: Grand Pianos w/Ribs on Top of Soundboard, instead of back [Re: freelife]
Gene Nelson Offline
1000 Post Club Member

Registered: 09/10/04
Posts: 1484
Loc: Old Hangtown California
Yeah, Julius Bauer - full perimeter plate and I believe the board and pin block comes out with the plate as one unit if I'm not mistaken???
Only ever seen a few of these.
_________________________
RPT
PTG Member

Top
#2317088 - 08/18/14 08:46 PM Re: Grand Pianos w/Ribs on Top of Soundboard, instead of back [Re: freelife]
Del Offline
5000 Post Club Member

Registered: 09/04/03
Posts: 5287
Loc: Olympia, Washington
Originally Posted By: freelife
I'm rebuilding a Julius Bauer grand that has an odd characteristic I've seen only a few times in 40 years of rebuilding: The ribs are glued to the top of the soundboard, instead of the normal glued-to-the-underside configuration. I wondered if anyone knew some history about which piano makers first invented/used this top-rib configuration, and what they thought was the advantage gained. Obviously, any advantage must have been insignificant, as no modern pianos continued the practice, and at first glance, it seems to be counterproductive to the concept of holding the soundboard in its upwards crowned shape. Anybody know the history & purpose of this top-rib experiment?

I don’t know the full history of the design. The earliest reference I’ve seen is an 1885 patent (US 320264 A) issued to John R. Lomas (with half being assigned to B. Shoninger). This patent very simply describes a soundboard assembly with superimposed ribs on both sides of the soundboard panel just as was later used by Bauer.

I’ve only seen this soundboard design used on Julius Bauer pianos. No modification of this patent was ever issued to [William M.] Bauer for the invention so I assume JB used it as described. It seems to be used in the 1914 patent (US 1171921 A) issued to Bauer for his string frame and adjustable bearing mechanism although Bauer makes no special claims for the soundboard in this patent. Both grand and vertical JB pianos used the feature.

I owned a 9’ JB grand with all of their bells and whistles for a while. Fascinating instrument. Heaviest 9’ piano I’ve ever seen—David Rubenstein’s 12’ piano is heavier but not by much.

The (claimed) advantages were crown stability and lighter weight. For a given amount of overall soundboard stiffness the combined weight of the two superimposed ribs could somewhat less than that of a traditional single ribs used in conventional soundboard design.

Essentially this systems acts like a three-ply laminate with the crown being formed during the press cycle. Compared to conventional soundboard systems the crown in these systems was absolutely stable. I monitored string bearing on my piano in Sacramento, California (hot and dry in the summer) and in Jonesboro, Arkansas (hot and humid in the summer and cold and humid in the winter). I don’t recall it ever changing. If it had it would have given me an excuse to play around with the crown-adjusting mechanism built into the piano.

ddf


Edited by Del (08/18/14 09:05 PM)
Edit Reason: Added content
_________________________
Delwin D Fandrich
Piano Research, Design & Manufacturing Consultant
ddfandrich@gmail.com
(To contact me privately please use this e-mail address.)

Stupidity is a rare condition, ignorance is a common choice. --Anon

Top
#2317095 - 08/18/14 09:09 PM Re: Grand Pianos w/Ribs on Top of Soundboard, instead of back [Re: Del]
freelife Offline
Full Member

Registered: 12/30/09
Posts: 28
Loc: CA
Originally Posted By: Del

The advantage was crown stability and lighter weight. The two superimposed ribs were both somewhat lighter than the traditional single ribs used in conventional soundboard design. Crown was absolutely stable.


Thanks Del, that's great info.Two other questions arise from your response:

- What made the Bauer grand the heaviest ever? More wood beams? Different plate design? In an old Bauer promotional catalogue, they bragged that its structure was so much more stable that they actually needed less beams and less square inches of plate w/more open spaces.You'd think it would end up being lighter.

- What, and where, is this crown-adjusting mechanism you speak of? Was it only on 7' or 9' models. The one I'm rebuilding is a 6 footer.

As for sandwiching the board between top & bottom ribs, my customer actually asked a smart question which was, wouldn't that be somewhat more restrictive to the free-floating vibrations of the soundboard, compared to boards with ribs on bottom only? Wouldn't it kind of clamp down and make for a thinner resonance?
_________________________
http://earthsongpiano.com

Top
#2317103 - 08/18/14 09:35 PM Re: Grand Pianos w/Ribs on Top of Soundboard, instead of back [Re: freelife]
Del Offline
5000 Post Club Member

Registered: 09/04/03
Posts: 5287
Loc: Olympia, Washington
Originally Posted By: freelife
— What made the Bauer grand the heaviest ever? More wood beams? Different plate design? In an old Bauer promotional catalogue, they bragged that its structure was so much more stable that they actually needed less beams and less square inches of plate w/more open spaces. You'd think it would end up being lighter.

My piano had no bellybracing at all. The weight was primarily in the string frame. It had the most complex and massive casting I’ve ever seen in a piano. Grand or vertical.


[quote}— What, and where, is this crown-adjusting mechanism you speak of? Was it only on 7' or 9' models. The one I'm rebuilding is a 6 footer. [/quote]
Look up the patent (just do a Google patent search). The patent drawings explain it better than I could.


Quote:
As for sandwiching the board between top & bottom ribs, my customer actually asked a smart question which was, wouldn't that be somewhat more restrictive to the free-floating vibrations of the soundboard, compared to boards with ribs on bottom only? Wouldn't it kind of clamp down and make for a thinner resonance?

Not really. It’s the overall stiffness of the system that we’re interested in. I made no effort to measure this in my piano but I did note that the ribs—combined—were about half that of a normal rib. I.e., each rib was probably one-fourth the height of a typical rib in a conventional soundboard system. My 9’ JB was a very nice sounding piano.

I’d leave the soundboard alone. Clean it up and, if the finish has deteriorated, you might consider refinishing it. But it’s highly unlikely that—unless the ribs are delaminating from the panel or something—it will need anything more than this.

I rebuilt my piano in the early 1980s and sold it shortly thereafter. Were I doing the job today I’d do more measuring and testing. It was one of the most interesting pianos I’ve ever owned.

ddf
_________________________
Delwin D Fandrich
Piano Research, Design & Manufacturing Consultant
ddfandrich@gmail.com
(To contact me privately please use this e-mail address.)

Stupidity is a rare condition, ignorance is a common choice. --Anon

Top
#2317180 - 08/19/14 04:59 AM Re: Grand Pianos w/Ribs on Top of Soundboard, instead of back [Re: A443]
Olek Online   content
7000 Post Club Member

Registered: 03/14/08
Posts: 7539
Loc: France
Originally Posted By: A443
I would really love to see some pictures. Is that possible?


Bis repetita, please!
_________________________
It is critical that you call your Senators and Representatives and ask them to cosponsor S. 2587 and H.R. 5052. Getting your legislators to cosponsor these bills


Top
#2317270 - 08/19/14 10:52 AM Re: Grand Pianos w/Ribs on Top of Soundboard, instead of back [Re: freelife]
freelife Offline
Full Member

Registered: 12/30/09
Posts: 28
Loc: CA
Again thanks for great info Del. Olek & A443 want photos. Don't know if you have any from your old 9' you can post. I'll post some of the 6-footer I'm rebuilding later this week, it's being moved into my shop on Friday.
_________________________
http://earthsongpiano.com

Top
#2317300 - 08/19/14 11:55 AM Re: Grand Pianos w/Ribs on Top of Soundboard, instead of back [Re: freelife]
Dale Fox Offline
1000 Post Club Member

Registered: 10/17/04
Posts: 1060
Loc: Nor California Sacramento area
Del,

I have an Upright (about 55") Bauer here in the Sacramento area built like this. Had to move it out from the wall an inch. Not easy. Haven't tuned it for years though.
_________________________
Dale Fox
Registered Piano Technician
Remanufacturing/Rebuilding

Top
#2317373 - 08/19/14 03:42 PM Re: Grand Pianos w/Ribs on Top of Soundboard, instead of back [Re: freelife]
pyropaul Offline
Full Member

Registered: 11/16/10
Posts: 185
Loc: Montreal
Here's the picture of my 1887 Steinway A - the small ribs can be seen near the case in the centre of the picture. The ribs under the soundboard appear to be of "normal" dimensions and shape.



Paul.

Top
#2318571 - 08/22/14 12:47 PM Re: Grand Pianos w/Ribs on Top of Soundboard, instead of back [Re: pyropaul]
freelife Offline
Full Member

Registered: 12/30/09
Posts: 28
Loc: CA
Hey Paul, not seeing any photo or attachment to your post?
_________________________
http://earthsongpiano.com

Top
#2318581 - 08/22/14 01:18 PM Re: Grand Pianos w/Ribs on Top of Soundboard, instead of back [Re: freelife]
UnrightTooner Online   content
4000 Post Club Member

Registered: 11/13/08
Posts: 4939
Loc: Bradford County, PA
(Hmmm, and if you took an old upright that had little crown and put some shaped ribs on the FRONT side, after increasing the crown by using wedges between the posts and the ribs on the BACK side...)

Just thinking out loud, no need for anyone to respond.
_________________________
Jeff Deutschle
Part-Time Tuner
Who taught the first chicken how to peck?

Top
#2318602 - 08/22/14 02:19 PM Re: Grand Pianos w/Ribs on Top of Soundboard, instead of back [Re: freelife]
pyropaul Offline
Full Member

Registered: 11/16/10
Posts: 185
Loc: Montreal
Hmm, it was there .... try this
Paul


Edited by pyropaul (08/22/14 02:45 PM)
Edit Reason: fix problems with permissions on image

Top
#2318617 - 08/22/14 02:54 PM Re: Grand Pianos w/Ribs on Top of Soundboard, instead of back [Re: freelife]
freelife Offline
Full Member

Registered: 12/30/09
Posts: 28
Loc: CA
That 1882 Julius Bauer with the top-mounted soundboard ribs arrived at my shop. Here's a first photo, prior to any disassembly.



Edited by freelife (08/22/14 03:05 PM)
_________________________
http://earthsongpiano.com

Top
#2318698 - 08/22/14 07:01 PM Re: Grand Pianos w/Ribs on Top of Soundboard, instead of back [Re: freelife]
Del Offline
5000 Post Club Member

Registered: 09/04/03
Posts: 5287
Loc: Olympia, Washington
The thought that kept coming to me as I worked on my 9' JB went something along the lines of, "I'd sure like to have seen the look on the pattern maker's and foundrymen's faces when they first saw the design of that string frame." In mine, if memory serves, it was a two-part casting.

ddf
_________________________
Delwin D Fandrich
Piano Research, Design & Manufacturing Consultant
ddfandrich@gmail.com
(To contact me privately please use this e-mail address.)

Stupidity is a rare condition, ignorance is a common choice. --Anon

Top
#2318725 - 08/22/14 09:02 PM Re: Grand Pianos w/Ribs on Top of Soundboard, instead of back [Re: freelife]
SMHaley Offline
500 Post Club Member

Registered: 05/06/13
Posts: 614
Loc: Seattle
Is there any appreciable addition to resonance at any point of the scale with such an open casting as this? Or any color the top ribs contributes?
_________________________
AA Music Arts 2001, BM 2005
Pipe Organ Builder
Practitioner of piano technology
Church Music Professional
Curator of instruments - Chancel Arts
Baldwin F 1960 (146256)
Zuckermann Flemish Single

Top
#2318781 - 08/23/14 01:31 AM Re: Grand Pianos w/Ribs on Top of Soundboard, instead of back [Re: SMHaley]
Del Offline
5000 Post Club Member

Registered: 09/04/03
Posts: 5287
Loc: Olympia, Washington
Originally Posted By: SMHaley
Is there any appreciable addition to resonance at any point of the scale with such an open casting as this? Or any color the top ribs contributes?

Who knows? The JB pianos had so many unique features it would be impossible to sort out which tonal characteristic was attributable to which design or manufacturing feature.

What I do know is that a professional jazz pianist fell in love with the thing the first time she played it and couldn't rest until she had raised the money to buy it.

ddf
_________________________
Delwin D Fandrich
Piano Research, Design & Manufacturing Consultant
ddfandrich@gmail.com
(To contact me privately please use this e-mail address.)

Stupidity is a rare condition, ignorance is a common choice. --Anon

Top
#2318856 - 08/23/14 10:31 AM Re: Grand Pianos w/Ribs on Top of Soundboard, instead of back [Re: Del]
bkw58 Offline

Silver Supporter until December 19, 2014


Registered: 03/14/09
Posts: 1721
Loc: Conway, AR USA
Del, do you recall the purpose of the "rib-like" strip of spruce atop the SD10 soundboard? I have forgotten.
_________________________
Bob W.
Retired piano technician
Piano Technicæ Blog

Top
#2318908 - 08/23/14 01:13 PM Re: Grand Pianos w/Ribs on Top of Soundboard, instead of back [Re: bkw58]
Del Offline
5000 Post Club Member

Registered: 09/04/03
Posts: 5287
Loc: Olympia, Washington
Originally Posted By: bkw58
Del, do you recall the purpose of the "rib-like" strip of spruce atop the SD10 soundboard? I have forgotten.

It is not really a rib. It covers a joint in the soundboard. The SD-10 used a soundboard cutoff bar. To make gluing the edge of the soundboard to that cutoff bar easier and more reliable the board was cut so it could be clamped more securely to the bar. Then the remaining small triangle portion was glued in and the joint was covered by a thin maple wood strip.

Next time you're sitting in front of one of these pianos follow that strip to the front edge of the board and look down just below the damper guide rail. You'll see a slight gap in the edge of the board.

ddf
_________________________
Delwin D Fandrich
Piano Research, Design & Manufacturing Consultant
ddfandrich@gmail.com
(To contact me privately please use this e-mail address.)

Stupidity is a rare condition, ignorance is a common choice. --Anon

Top
#2318971 - 08/23/14 04:58 PM Re: Grand Pianos w/Ribs on Top of Soundboard, instead of back [Re: freelife]
bkw58 Offline

Silver Supporter until December 19, 2014


Registered: 03/14/09
Posts: 1721
Loc: Conway, AR USA
Wholly aesthetic, then. Thanks, Del.
_________________________
Bob W.
Retired piano technician
Piano Technicæ Blog

Top
#2322291 - 08/31/14 04:02 PM Re: Grand Pianos w/Ribs on Top of Soundboard, instead of back [Re: bkw58]
freelife Offline
Full Member

Registered: 12/30/09
Posts: 28
Loc: CA

As promised, here's another photo showing the top-ribs on the Bauer 6' grand, this time with all the wires & dampers removed for a better view:



This Bauer's design continues to present surprises. As you can see, the plate is a "full-perimeter" plate. The outer edge of the plate is not just a thin perimeter that sits on top of the soundboard dowels. The outer rim of the plate is a 6" deep "wall" of cast iron, bolted to the rim all around, as well as bolted down to the board.

I removed all the strings, dampers, and all the plate bolts visible from the top, to allow me to lift the plate up & off the board and out of the piano. But it wouldn't budge. Even lifting with my crane & hook, it just wanted to lift the whole cabinet up with it, as if it was stuck or there was one bolt I missed still holding it down. Turns out there were quite a few bolts still screwed in...under the soundboard.

That 6" vertical wall of iron that forms the outer rim of the plate, has "tabs" on the bottom, small extensions in the plate's casting for a dozen bolts to screw the plate to the cabinet perimeter just under the soundboard:



In 4 decades of rebuilding, never seen anything like it!
_________________________
http://earthsongpiano.com

Top
#2322303 - 08/31/14 04:25 PM Re: Grand Pianos w/Ribs on Top of Soundboard, instead of back [Re: freelife]
kennyz Offline
Junior Member

Registered: 10/27/13
Posts: 16
Loc: N.E Pennsylvania
What an awesome project! I can't wait to see some finished pics.....that plate must be massive....rather ingenious design.

Top
#2322343 - 08/31/14 06:03 PM Re: Grand Pianos w/Ribs on Top of Soundboard, instead of back [Re: freelife]
Del Offline
5000 Post Club Member

Registered: 09/04/03
Posts: 5287
Loc: Olympia, Washington
Several differences I see right off:

In my 9' JB there were relatively low laminated maple strips in the shape of the bridges glued to the soundboard with cutouts for the ribs. The actual bridges were [s][/s]mounted on dowels that were fitted into holes drilled into the top of this strip and the bottom of the bridges. In the treble the bridge was probably 50 to 60 mm tall By the time it got to the low tenor it was more like 140 or 150 mm. The bass was even taller.

The ribs underneath the soundboard panel were not quite as deep as those in your picture.

Does the piano have JB's "adjustable crown" feature?

ddf
_________________________
Delwin D Fandrich
Piano Research, Design & Manufacturing Consultant
ddfandrich@gmail.com
(To contact me privately please use this e-mail address.)

Stupidity is a rare condition, ignorance is a common choice. --Anon

Top
#2322376 - 08/31/14 07:40 PM Re: Grand Pianos w/Ribs on Top of Soundboard, instead of back [Re: freelife]
freelife Offline
Full Member

Registered: 12/30/09
Posts: 28
Loc: CA
Del, I've been unable to find any patents/diagrams in a Google search for "Julius Bauer" or "Bauer adjustable soundboard" or anything like that. The closest I've come is a patent by F. B. Long for an upright soundboard with adjuster on each corner: https://www.google.com/patents/US936789?...ved=0CDIQ6AEwAw

So if you can post the actual link to the patent diagrams you saw for J. Bauer, that would be great.

Meantime, I not seeing any extra adjustment devices on this Bauer. And yes, the bridges have notches cut to accommodate fitting over the ribs, but the bridges appear to be one piece, plus a cap. A bit of a pain actually, as my bass bridge has enough thin diagonal cracks running right through the bridge-pin lines, to make it borderline as to repairing the existing bridge cap or needing recapping. I've never done my own bridge recapping, always sent it out to Schaff's bridge-maker. But with the notch-outs across the bottom, I don't know if he can match this.
_________________________
http://earthsongpiano.com

Top
#2322482 - 09/01/14 02:18 AM Re: Grand Pianos w/Ribs on Top of Soundboard, instead of back [Re: freelife]
Del Offline
5000 Post Club Member

Registered: 09/04/03
Posts: 5287
Loc: Olympia, Washington
Originally Posted By: freelife
Del, I've been unable to find any patents/diagrams in a Google search for "Julius Bauer" or "Bauer adjustable soundboard" or anything like that. The closest I've come is a patent by F. B. Long for an upright soundboard with adjuster on each corner: https://www.google.com/patents/US936789?...ved=0CDIQ6AEwAw

So if you can post the actual link to the patent diagrams you saw for J. Bauer, that would be great.

The only patents I know of that were issued to Bauer listed "William M. Bauer" as the inventor. I'm not sure that particular feature was patented by Bauer, however. I thought I remembered it being described in one of his patents but I'd have to go back and read through them to be sure. When I have the time....

Edit: Yes, that was it. Search Google patents for US 1171921 A. <http://www.google.com/patents/US1171921>

ddf


Edited by Del (09/01/14 02:51 AM)
Edit Reason: Added content
_________________________
Delwin D Fandrich
Piano Research, Design & Manufacturing Consultant
ddfandrich@gmail.com
(To contact me privately please use this e-mail address.)

Stupidity is a rare condition, ignorance is a common choice. --Anon

Top
#2322488 - 09/01/14 02:46 AM Re: Grand Pianos w/Ribs on Top of Soundboard, instead of back [Re: freelife]
A443 Offline
1000 Post Club Member

Registered: 04/28/12
Posts: 1287
Loc: Manywheres
I just want to say that those pictures represent one of the most sexy piano designs I've seen in a very long time. There are sooooooooooooooo many things "right" with that design. Modern manufactures would be wise to take serious note!

Freelife, when you took the plate out, was it distorted at all from the internal tension like some pianos, or was it pretty much flat? From here, it appears the design is really well balanced: I imagine it was probably pretty straight/flat if it were to theoretically be laid flat on the floor?
_________________________
Klavierbaukünstler des Erwachens
...expecter of the best, 'gunslinger' to the rest!
Email: klavierbaukuenstler@gmail.com

Top
#2322768 - 09/01/14 05:39 PM Re: Grand Pianos w/Ribs on Top of Soundboard, instead of back [Re: freelife]
Olek Online   content
7000 Post Club Member

Registered: 03/14/08
Posts: 7539
Loc: France
That looks like an interesting design.

What theoretical books say is that the ribbing is intended to install stress within the panel. (stress under the panel, between ribs and the underside of it, and stress on the outside, due to crowned shape.


this is somehow destructive to the panel itself with decades most probably

As we cannot know how where glued those ones it is very difficult to imagine.

Thanks for sharing that.
_________________________
It is critical that you call your Senators and Representatives and ask them to cosponsor S. 2587 and H.R. 5052. Getting your legislators to cosponsor these bills


Top
#2322798 - 09/01/14 06:44 PM Re: Grand Pianos w/Ribs on Top of Soundboard, instead of back [Re: freelife]
acortot Offline
Full Member

Registered: 06/28/07
Posts: 477
Loc: Italy
It was something that was already invented in the early 1800's and used in some french pianos.

http://www.palacepianos.com/en/uploads/pianos/1288966680_jean-henri-pape-grand-4188-4.jpg is one example

I think the idea being that it would resist the down bearing of the strings better.

but it's ugly-looking
_________________________
rhythm must be inborn - Alfred Cortot

An Article on the unusual makeup of original Pleyel hammers, during Chopin's lifetime:

http://acortot.blogspot.it/2012/07/pleyel-hammers-in-chopin-era-i-martelli.html

Max DiMario

Top
#2322814 - 09/01/14 07:26 PM Re: Grand Pianos w/Ribs on Top of Soundboard, instead of back [Re: acortot]
ChickGrand Offline
3000 Post Club Member

Registered: 05/02/03
Posts: 3210
Loc: Midwest U.S.
The concept of the set screw to adjust crown seems okay, but looking at the patent drawings, I wonder about the execution. I'd love to see the actual product.



It looks to me that turning the set screw (16) would necessarily cause the screw (13) that fixes the soundboard (10) to outer strip (12) to tilt away from the setscrew as the outer strip moves inwards to increase crown. Either the screw will bend or it will unseat at the head slightly in the inset (into cast iron!). I'm guessing bend. If the screw were flat-head, with washers, and that hole slotted slightly to allow the inward movement caused by that set screw, no problem. I realize the amount of movement would be very slight to yield the crown, but that movement has to be accommodated somewhere and an inset screw of that type would seem to only allow the movement to occur with bending of the screw or tilting it out of the inset on one side at the head.

Also, what about the stresses on glue joints where (10), (11), and (12) meet, and what about compression deformation of 11 where it meets the flange when the induced tilt (if it can't slide as in a slotted screw hole) of (10), since one would assume this flange-to-strip joint by necessity is initially tight and without a gap.

To me, it seems a good idea not so neatly executed (at least in the patent drawings). I'd be interested in seeing if the final product accommodated movement better than the drawings do.

Top
#2322819 - 09/01/14 07:53 PM Re: Grand Pianos w/Ribs on Top of Soundboard, instead of back [Re: freelife]
Olek Online   content
7000 Post Club Member

Registered: 03/14/08
Posts: 7539
Loc: France
I think you did not get the location of the pushing bolt, which force the soundboard up without much problems with the screws, even if they warped a little that is not much a concern, but they probably do not suffer.

But the soundboard is somehow floating, with that system, hence may be the double ribbing
_________________________
It is critical that you call your Senators and Representatives and ask them to cosponsor S. 2587 and H.R. 5052. Getting your legislators to cosponsor these bills


Top
#2322855 - 09/01/14 09:00 PM Re: Grand Pianos w/Ribs on Top of Soundboard, instead of back [Re: Olek]
ChickGrand Offline
3000 Post Club Member

Registered: 05/02/03
Posts: 3210
Loc: Midwest U.S.
Originally Posted By: Olek
I think you did not get the location of the pushing bolt, which force the soundboard up without much problems with the screws, even if they warped a little that is not much a concern, but they probably do not suffer...


It would be rather hard to not get the location of the pushing bolt, since it's numbered and referenced in the patent.

It's that warp in the screws I'd prefer to avoid, even if, to you, it's not much a concern. My point is that slots and flathead bolts would prevent that warping. However minor, it's simply unnecessary.

Consider that an adjustment might be made that warps those screws (and compresses that wood strip). Then that just perhaps the additional crown turns out to have negative affect and the tech wants to back off the adjustment--will those warped screws prevent movement back to the original position? Will that compressed upper strip contacting the flange conform to that flange, after it's been compressed out of its original shape?

I simply think that with better execution of the same idea you gain an advantage without inducing problems from a poor execution. That's my only point. The basic idea seems quite good but if I were going to incorporate such a feature, I'd rather it be better-engineered.

Top
#2322883 - 09/01/14 10:43 PM Re: Grand Pianos w/Ribs on Top of Soundboard, instead of back [Re: ChickGrand]
Del Offline
5000 Post Club Member

Registered: 09/04/03
Posts: 5287
Loc: Olympia, Washington
Originally Posted By: ChickGrand
The concept of the set screw to adjust crown seems okay, but looking at the patent drawings, I wonder about the execution. I'd love to see the actual product.



It looks to me that turning the set screw (16) would necessarily cause the screw (13) that fixes the soundboard (10) to outer strip (12) to tilt away from the setscrew as the outer strip moves inwards to increase crown. Either the screw will bend or it will unseat at the head slightly in the inset (into cast iron!). I'm guessing bend. If the screw were flat-head, with washers, and that hole slotted slightly to allow the inward movement caused by that set screw, no problem. I realize the amount of movement would be very slight to yield the crown, but that movement has to be accommodated somewhere and an inset screw of that type would seem to only allow the movement to occur with bending of the screw or tilting it out of the inset on one side at the head.

Also, what about the stresses on glue joints where (10), (11), and (12) meet, and what about compression deformation of 11 where it meets the flange when the induced tilt (if it can't slide as in a slotted screw hole) of (10), since one would assume this flange-to-strip joint by necessity is initially tight and without a gap.

To me, it seems a good idea not so neatly executed (at least in the patent drawings). I'd be interested in seeing if the final product accommodated movement better than the drawings do.

If you were to remove the soundboard assembly—I did not—you would find that it behaves very much like a three-ply laminated (and rib-less) panel. The crown was forced into assembly in the press when the ribs were glued on. It is really quite a good idea, I think.

This could also be done with a three-ply wood veneer soundboard assembly but, to my knowledge, it has never been done. At least not commercially. I have tried to generate interest in the idea but, so far, without success.

In the 9’ JB that I had the inner rim was attached to the string frame much like it is shown in the patent drawing. The only difference I can see right off is that the underside of the string frame where the inner rim was seated was relatively narrow and appeared to be slightly curved. I did not remove the soundboard assembly so I don’t know this for sure but it wouldn’t be the first time an inventor left a few important details out of his application. I assumed this was to enable the top of the soundboard liner to rotate slightly when (if) the adjustment bolts were turned. In my piano I doubt they had been touched since the piano was originally built.

I played around with them some once I had the strings off of the string frame. They were adjusted to just contact the inner rim and, as far as I could tell, were doing nothing to add crown to the soundboard. When I backed the adjustment bolt—applying more force against the inner rim—out they did, indeed, force additional crown into the system. I didn’t go too far with this. I was only interested in finding out if they would do anything at all. Since there was already more than adequate crown in the system I ended up returning them to roughly the original settings.

(All of this is from memory. I sold the piano sometime in the mid-1980s so please forgive me if some details are a bit fuzzy.)
ddf
_________________________
Delwin D Fandrich
Piano Research, Design & Manufacturing Consultant
ddfandrich@gmail.com
(To contact me privately please use this e-mail address.)

Stupidity is a rare condition, ignorance is a common choice. --Anon

Top
#2322886 - 09/01/14 11:03 PM Re: Grand Pianos w/Ribs on Top of Soundboard, instead of back [Re: Del]
ChickGrand Offline
3000 Post Club Member

Registered: 05/02/03
Posts: 3210
Loc: Midwest U.S.
Originally Posted By: Del
If you were to remove the soundboard assembly—I did not—you would find that it behaves very much like a three-ply laminated (and rib-less) panel. The crown was forced into assembly in the press when the ribs were glued on. It is really quite a good idea, I think....


I like the idea of such a panel and realize it'd act like a three-ply laminated panel, with crown glued in. Probably would work well enough to make all but unnecessary that crown adjustment mechanism that I think might have been engineered a little better. With that panel, I doubt the shortcomings of the crowning adjustment system ever became an issue.

Top
#2322894 - 09/01/14 11:48 PM Re: Grand Pianos w/Ribs on Top of Soundboard, instead of back [Re: ChickGrand]
Del Offline
5000 Post Club Member

Registered: 09/04/03
Posts: 5287
Loc: Olympia, Washington
Originally Posted By: ChickGrand
Originally Posted By: Del
If you were to remove the soundboard assembly—I did not—you would find that it behaves very much like a three-ply laminated (and rib-less) panel. The crown was forced into assembly in the press when the ribs were glued on. It is really quite a good idea, I think....


I like the idea of such a panel and realize it'd act like a three-ply laminated panel, with crown glued in. Probably would work well enough to make all but unnecessary that crown adjustment mechanism that I think might have been engineered a little better. With that panel, I doubt the shortcomings of the crowning adjustment system ever became an issue.

That was pretty much my thinking. The crown adjustment feature wouldn't work on a soundboard system that was less stiff and it wasn't necessary on a soundboard system that was this stiff.

ddf
_________________________
Delwin D Fandrich
Piano Research, Design & Manufacturing Consultant
ddfandrich@gmail.com
(To contact me privately please use this e-mail address.)

Stupidity is a rare condition, ignorance is a common choice. --Anon

Top
#2322935 - 09/02/14 03:19 AM Re: Grand Pianos w/Ribs on Top of Soundboard, instead of back [Re: ChickGrand]
Olek Online   content
7000 Post Club Member

Registered: 03/14/08
Posts: 7539
Loc: France
Originally Posted By: ChickGrand
Originally Posted By: Olek
I think you did not get the location of the pushing bolt, which force the soundboard up without much problems with the screws, even if they warped a little that is not much a concern, but they probably do not suffer...


It would be rather hard to not get the location of the pushing bolt, since it's numbered and referenced in the patent.

It's that warp in the screws I'd prefer to avoid, even if, to you, it's not much a concern. My point is that slots and flathead bolts would prevent that warping. However minor, it's simply unnecessary.

Consider that an adjustment might be made that warps those screws (and compresses that wood strip). Then that just perhaps the additional crown turns out to have negative affect and the tech wants to back off the adjustment--will those warped screws prevent movement back to the original position? Will that compressed upper strip contacting the flange conform to that flange, after it's been compressed out of its original shape?

I simply think that with better execution of the same idea you gain an advantage without inducing problems from a poor execution. That's my only point. The basic idea seems quite good but if I were going to incorporate such a feature, I'd rather it be better-engineered.



The distance the bolt need to make to gain crown in the panel is incredibly small.
It was computed on this forum a few years ago. Showing how stiff the belt and plate assembly must be to avoid loosing crown. And why the glue may not give any deformation, in ribs and around the perimeter.

It work both sides.
_________________________
It is critical that you call your Senators and Representatives and ask them to cosponsor S. 2587 and H.R. 5052. Getting your legislators to cosponsor these bills


Top
#2322936 - 09/02/14 03:20 AM Re: Grand Pianos w/Ribs on Top of Soundboard, instead of back [Re: freelife]
Olek Online   content
7000 Post Club Member

Registered: 03/14/08
Posts: 7539
Loc: France
Why would not work with a lighter soundboard, Del? You mean it would only deform on its edges?
_________________________
It is critical that you call your Senators and Representatives and ask them to cosponsor S. 2587 and H.R. 5052. Getting your legislators to cosponsor these bills


Top
#2322937 - 09/02/14 03:24 AM Re: Grand Pianos w/Ribs on Top of Soundboard, instead of back [Re: acortot]
Olek Online   content
7000 Post Club Member

Registered: 03/14/08
Posts: 7539
Loc: France
Originally Posted By: acortot
It was something that was already invented in the early 1800's and used in some french pianos.

http://www.palacepianos.com/en/uploads/pianos/1288966680_jean-henri-pape-grand-4188-4.jpg is one example

I think the idea being that it would resist the down bearing of the strings better.

but it's ugly-looking


Panels where almost as guitars on those pianos. Hence ribbing in all directions. I think 4 - 5 mm thickness on the 1840 pianino
_________________________
It is critical that you call your Senators and Representatives and ask them to cosponsor S. 2587 and H.R. 5052. Getting your legislators to cosponsor these bills


Top
#2323025 - 09/02/14 08:30 AM Re: Grand Pianos w/Ribs on Top of Soundboard, instead of back [Re: Olek]
ChickGrand Offline
3000 Post Club Member

Registered: 05/02/03
Posts: 3210
Loc: Midwest U.S.
[quote=Olek]The distance the bolt need to make to gain crown in the panel is incredibly small...[/quote]

I am aware of that. It's precisely this reason I think such a system, if it's going to work properly as intended, ought allow for *precision* movement, and precise locking and unlocking of the position, and not anything that introduces potential slop as with bent screws or screws unseated from their recess. Precision would be easy enough to incorporate in the design.

I'm also interested in why Del said it would not work as well with other boards. I think the basic idea is good and think good provisioning for some stiffness in the edges of the board and careful placement of pressure-receiving points would allow it work on other more lightly-ribbed board, since the required movement *is* so small.

Del, is it that you think a lighter board would simply compress under the additional downbearing as additional crown is induced?

Top
#2323026 - 09/02/14 08:33 AM Re: Grand Pianos w/Ribs on Top of Soundboard, instead of back [Re: ChickGrand]
ChickGrand Offline
3000 Post Club Member

Registered: 05/02/03
Posts: 3210
Loc: Midwest U.S.
I would fix that quote format issue above, except the system says "maximum time to edit has expired". (Two minutes??!!)

Top
#2323394 - 09/02/14 10:26 PM Re: Grand Pianos w/Ribs on Top of Soundboard, instead of back [Re: Olek]
Del Offline
5000 Post Club Member

Registered: 09/04/03
Posts: 5287
Loc: Olympia, Washington
Originally Posted By: Olek
Why would not work with a lighter soundboard, Del? You mean it would only deform on its edges?

I didn't say "lighter" I said "less stiff". As in, more flexible. The adjustment feature depends on the parameter of the soundboard assembly being stiff enough to support crown in the middle -- along the bridge line. A more flexible system would simply bend.

It would be possible, of course, to build a soundboard assembly with equal stiffness and less mass.

ddf
_________________________
Delwin D Fandrich
Piano Research, Design & Manufacturing Consultant
ddfandrich@gmail.com
(To contact me privately please use this e-mail address.)

Stupidity is a rare condition, ignorance is a common choice. --Anon

Top
#2323398 - 09/02/14 10:35 PM Re: Grand Pianos w/Ribs on Top of Soundboard, instead of back [Re: ChickGrand]
Del Offline
5000 Post Club Member

Registered: 09/04/03
Posts: 5287
Loc: Olympia, Washington
Originally Posted By: ChickGrand
I'm also interested in why Del said it would not work as well with other boards. I think the basic idea is good and think good provisioning for some stiffness in the edges of the board and careful placement of pressure-receiving points would allow it work on other more lightly-ribbed board, since the required movement *is* so small.

Del, is it that you think a lighter board would simply compress under the additional downbearing as additional crown is induced?

I didn't say "lighter", I said "less stiff". There is a difference.

A conventional soundboard system is relatively flexible around its parameter. A mechanism such as this would simply bend the assembly and accomplish nothing.

The same problem exists with the notion of beveling the inner rim and belly rail to "form crown" or "support crown." The parameter of the assembly is so flexible that all that is accomplished is to introduce a warp in the assembly at the edge of the board just in from the inner rim.

ddf


Edited by Del (09/02/14 10:36 PM)
_________________________
Delwin D Fandrich
Piano Research, Design & Manufacturing Consultant
ddfandrich@gmail.com
(To contact me privately please use this e-mail address.)

Stupidity is a rare condition, ignorance is a common choice. --Anon

Top
#2323485 - 09/03/14 03:20 AM Re: Grand Pianos w/Ribs on Top of Soundboard, instead of back [Re: Del]
ChickGrand Offline
3000 Post Club Member

Registered: 05/02/03
Posts: 3210
Loc: Midwest U.S.
Originally Posted By: Del

I didn't say "lighter", I said "less stiff". There is a difference.


I realized you'd said "less stiff" rather than "lighter" right after I hit "submit". (That's when I discovered the edit function wasn't working this morning.)

Originally Posted By: Del
A conventional soundboard system is relatively flexible around its parameter. A mechanism such as this would simply bend the assembly and accomplish nothing.

The same problem exists with the notion of beveling the inner rim and belly rail to "form crown" or "support crown." The parameter of the assembly is so flexible that all that is accomplished is to introduce a warp in the assembly at the edge of the board just in from the inner rim.

ddf


So you think it's essentially the same result discussed around and around at PTG's forum of what happens to a board with "compression crown"? I suppose my own mind wants to imagine that if a board were *just* stiff enough, Bauer's idea might work, but that just goes to the point you made earlier about if a board *is* stiff enough (and properly crowned by ribbing [or even lamination] in the first place, it's not going to need "adjustment".

What about if the board were made of something other than spruce, like carbon fiber, that might not compress and might not be as susceptible to uncontrolled warp?

I suppose what I'm interested in here is the concept of such a fine adjustment of crown as Bauer might have intended. It'd be interesting to be able to hear, in a single piano, the effect on tone, with an ability to change that one variable while all others remain the same.

Top
#2323491 - 09/03/14 03:46 AM Re: Grand Pianos w/Ribs on Top of Soundboard, instead of back [Re: ChickGrand]
SMHaley Offline
500 Post Club Member

Registered: 05/06/13
Posts: 614
Loc: Seattle
While I know others are sort of playing around with the concept, I find the idea of carbon fiber boards most fascinating. I wonder if it can go further in to plate design and being used as a "string frame" as Del usually refers to it. A concert grand that doesn't weigh a half ton might be extremely feasible.
_________________________
AA Music Arts 2001, BM 2005
Pipe Organ Builder
Practitioner of piano technology
Church Music Professional
Curator of instruments - Chancel Arts
Baldwin F 1960 (146256)
Zuckermann Flemish Single

Top
#2323677 - 09/03/14 12:54 PM Re: Grand Pianos w/Ribs on Top of Soundboard, instead of back [Re: SMHaley]
Del Offline
5000 Post Club Member

Registered: 09/04/03
Posts: 5287
Loc: Olympia, Washington
Originally Posted By: SMHaley
While I know others are sort of playing around with the concept, I find the idea of carbon fiber boards most fascinating. I wonder if it can go further in to plate design and being used as a "string frame" as Del usually refers to it. A concert grand that doesn't weigh a half ton might be extremely feasible.

Richard Dain (Hurstwood Farm, England) has done just that. Google "Richard Dain." for all kinds of interesting places to go.

ddf
_________________________
Delwin D Fandrich
Piano Research, Design & Manufacturing Consultant
ddfandrich@gmail.com
(To contact me privately please use this e-mail address.)

Stupidity is a rare condition, ignorance is a common choice. --Anon

Top
#2324513 - 09/05/14 05:25 PM Re: Grand Pianos w/Ribs on Top of Soundboard, instead of back [Re: freelife]
chernobieff Offline
Full Member

Registered: 09/05/14
Posts: 39
Loc: Tennessee, USA
William Bauer was a very innovative piano thinker. His patents are available for reading online, which he makes his claims.
Also, I have some pics of the inside of the factory on my website that I got from a descedent of the finisher.
http://antiquepianoemporium.com/bauer-julius/
_________________________
Chris Chernobieff
www.chernobieff.com
www.antiquepianoemporium.com
chrisppff@gmail.com
"I inherited a painting and a violin which turned out to be a Rembrandt and a Stradivarius. Unfortunately, Rembrandt made lousy violins and Stradivarius was a terrible painter."

Top
#2324514 - 09/05/14 05:30 PM Re: Grand Pianos w/Ribs on Top of Soundboard, instead of back [Re: freelife]
A443 Offline
1000 Post Club Member

Registered: 04/28/12
Posts: 1287
Loc: Manywheres
Oh...[snap]...that was interesting: even the upright was an innovative and creative design! This guy was good, IMHO...he was really good.
_________________________
Klavierbaukünstler des Erwachens
...expecter of the best, 'gunslinger' to the rest!
Email: klavierbaukuenstler@gmail.com

Top
#2324519 - 09/05/14 05:41 PM Re: Grand Pianos w/Ribs on Top of Soundboard, instead of back [Re: freelife]
A443 Offline
1000 Post Club Member

Registered: 04/28/12
Posts: 1287
Loc: Manywheres
...so, I guess that is a double decker bridge?!? I'm really curious as to how that sounds!!! That looks like it might be functioning somewhat like a sound post in a violin...that is interesting, no? I don't really have a mental reference as to how to predict that kind of sound. Any ideas? If that indeed does work, then a double layered soundboard, using those kinds of wooden connections in holes through the top level of the soundboard, could be a possibility. Producing a high and a low functioning soundboard separately is much easier (i.e., what is good for the bass, is not for the treble).
_________________________
Klavierbaukünstler des Erwachens
...expecter of the best, 'gunslinger' to the rest!
Email: klavierbaukuenstler@gmail.com

Top
#2324544 - 09/05/14 07:49 PM Re: Grand Pianos w/Ribs on Top of Soundboard, instead of back [Re: A443]
Del Offline
5000 Post Club Member

Registered: 09/04/03
Posts: 5287
Loc: Olympia, Washington
Originally Posted By: A443
...so, I guess that is a double decker bridge?!? I'm really curious as to how that sounds!!! That looks like it might be functioning somewhat like a sound post in a violin...that is interesting, no? I don't really have a mental reference as to how to predict that kind of sound. Any ideas? If that indeed does work, then a double layered soundboard, using those kinds of wooden connections in holes through the top level of the soundboard, could be a possibility. Producing a high and a low functioning soundboard separately is much easier (i.e., what is good for the bass, is not for the treble).

Not everything was perfect in this design. That soundboard assembly is rather heavy and stiff as is the bridge assembly.

I don't have the scaling from my 9' JB in my computer (or, if it is, I can't find it) but as I recall the tensions were high even for a 9' piano. I lowered the tensions some to free up the system at the expense (probably) of some "power" but it improved the tone quality and the dynamic range. Since the piano was going into a private home the power loss -- if, indeed, there was one -- was of no consequence. The piano was still adequately loud for any mortal ears.

The two biggest problems with the overall design were cost and weight. This had to be one of the most expensive pianos in the world to build. And it weighed approximately twice as much as a more conventional grand of the same size.

ddf
_________________________
Delwin D Fandrich
Piano Research, Design & Manufacturing Consultant
ddfandrich@gmail.com
(To contact me privately please use this e-mail address.)

Stupidity is a rare condition, ignorance is a common choice. --Anon

Top
#2324918 - 09/07/14 01:25 AM Re: Grand Pianos w/Ribs on Top of Soundboard, instead of back [Re: Del]
Dale Fox Offline
1000 Post Club Member

Registered: 10/17/04
Posts: 1060
Loc: Nor California Sacramento area
Originally Posted By: Del


The two biggest problems with the overall design were cost and weight. This had to be one of the most expensive pianos in the world to build. And it weighed approximately twice as much as a more conventional grand of the same size.

ddf


I still have bad memories from putting that piano on its side in preparation for being picked up by the Baldwin truck. How did you talk me into that?
_________________________
Dale Fox
Registered Piano Technician
Remanufacturing/Rebuilding

Top
#2324944 - 09/07/14 05:24 AM Re: Grand Pianos w/Ribs on Top of Soundboard, instead of back [Re: freelife]
Olek Online   content
7000 Post Club Member

Registered: 03/14/08
Posts: 7539
Loc: France
Estonia where building very stiff grand concert pianos too.
Everything seemed to be enlarged , up to hammer shanks at 136mm length

Forget string plane height ! the action had to be surelevated on wooden blocks in order to use 60 mm bore on meium hammers !

Lot of sustain, assurely, but the treble sloped own progressively to a somewhat non manipulable tone with very limited ynamics and more foundamental than partials

One of those 80's grands where owned by a Gallish pianist I know ,and put at work by the Buethner restoration workshop in ENgland, he told me they suppressed one rib on 2 +- (they probably made a new soundboard, an correcte the 250 mm string height)


Edited by Olek (09/07/14 05:30 AM)
_________________________
It is critical that you call your Senators and Representatives and ask them to cosponsor S. 2587 and H.R. 5052. Getting your legislators to cosponsor these bills


Top
#2324997 - 09/07/14 10:22 AM Re: Grand Pianos w/Ribs on Top of Soundboard, instead of back [Re: Dale Fox]
Del Offline
5000 Post Club Member

Registered: 09/04/03
Posts: 5287
Loc: Olympia, Washington
Originally Posted By: Dale Fox
Originally Posted By: Del


The two biggest problems with the overall design were cost and weight. This had to be one of the most expensive pianos in the world to build. And it weighed approximately twice as much as a more conventional grand of the same size.

ddf


I still have bad memories from putting that piano on its side in preparation for being picked up by the Baldwin truck. How did you talk me into that?

You got even. During transit the piano tipped over and landed on top of my bicycle. Never saw a flatter bike....

ddf
_________________________
Delwin D Fandrich
Piano Research, Design & Manufacturing Consultant
ddfandrich@gmail.com
(To contact me privately please use this e-mail address.)

Stupidity is a rare condition, ignorance is a common choice. --Anon

Top
#2325016 - 09/07/14 12:05 PM Re: Grand Pianos w/Ribs on Top of Soundboard, instead of back [Re: freelife]
Dale Fox Offline
1000 Post Club Member

Registered: 10/17/04
Posts: 1060
Loc: Nor California Sacramento area
Ouch!
_________________________
Dale Fox
Registered Piano Technician
Remanufacturing/Rebuilding

Top
#2325065 - 09/07/14 02:48 PM Re: Grand Pianos w/Ribs on Top of Soundboard, instead of back [Re: freelife]
A443 Offline
1000 Post Club Member

Registered: 04/28/12
Posts: 1287
Loc: Manywheres
I thought a bit more about the pictures of the double-decker upright bridge. It is intriguing: it probably gives the piano more acoustical ambience (i.e., the opposite of a clear focused percussive attack sound). For a home piano, this could have been a step in the right tonal direction.

However, I am guessing that if bridge-tilt is a real thing, then this probably one of the worst examples of something like that. No?

BTW, I haven't observed bridge tilts in pianos, but I've also never gone looking for it either. Has anyone actually measured this? Is there a method?

I'm still trying to figure out what I think the ideal side bearings at the bridge should be (i.e., the angles and length between). Not enough, at it can create falseness, too much...maybe bridge tilting gets worst?!? Bridge-tilt happens predictably with the string instruments--it makes sense it would/could happen with the piano as well.
_________________________
Klavierbaukünstler des Erwachens
...expecter of the best, 'gunslinger' to the rest!
Email: klavierbaukuenstler@gmail.com

Top
#2325076 - 09/07/14 03:41 PM Re: Grand Pianos w/Ribs on Top of Soundboard, instead of back [Re: freelife]
Olek Online   content
7000 Post Club Member

Registered: 03/14/08
Posts: 7539
Loc: France
Simply use a small thin metal ruler and you will see the most evident occurrences, where the slant on bridge surface is not enough anymore, and most down bearing is on the back.

It may be visible by eye, sometime, but also when measuring A49, less than 438 mm can only be due to tilt.
P
The main reason to keep pianos at pitch is there.

When pitch raising pianos that where low for years, the tone degrades clearly generally.

(as it get better when tuning from 444 to 442 for instance.
_________________________
It is critical that you call your Senators and Representatives and ask them to cosponsor S. 2587 and H.R. 5052. Getting your legislators to cosponsor these bills


Top
#2325077 - 09/07/14 03:42 PM Re: Grand Pianos w/Ribs on Top of Soundboard, instead of back [Re: A443]
Del Offline
5000 Post Club Member

Registered: 09/04/03
Posts: 5287
Loc: Olympia, Washington
Originally Posted By: A443
However, I am guessing that if bridge-tilt is a real thing, then this probably one of the worst examples of something like that. No?

BTW, I haven't observed bridge tilts in pianos, but I've also never gone looking for it either. Has anyone actually measured this? Is there a method?

That's what I thought, as well. But in my 9' JB there was little, if any, bridge tilt.

I tend to think most of what we call "bridge tilt" is the result of soundboard deformation related to changes in EMC.

ddf
_________________________
Delwin D Fandrich
Piano Research, Design & Manufacturing Consultant
ddfandrich@gmail.com
(To contact me privately please use this e-mail address.)

Stupidity is a rare condition, ignorance is a common choice. --Anon

Top
Page 1 of 2 1 2 >

Moderator:  Piano World 
What's Hot!!
HOW TO POST PICTURES on the Piano Forums
-------------------
Sharing is Caring!
About the Buttons
-------------------
Forums Rules & Help
-------------------
ADVERTISE
on Piano World

The world's most popular piano web site.
-------------------
PIANO BOOKS
Interesting books about the piano, pianists, piano history, biographies, memoirs and more!
(ad) HAILUN Pianos
Hailun Pianos - Click for More
ad (Casio)
Celviano by Casio Rebate
Ad (Seiler/Knabe)
Seiler Pianos
Sheet Music
(PW is an affiliate)
Sheet Music Plus Featured Sale
(125ad) Dampp Chaser
Dampp Chaser Piano Life Saver
(ad) Lindeblad Piano
Lindeblad Piano Restoration
New Topics - Multiple Forums
Official: Fryderyk Chopin died of TB!
by bennevis
09/17/14 12:06 PM
Teacher wants me to play a "loud" piece too. (suggestions?)
by Tides
09/17/14 11:47 AM
Playing for ~9 months.. Where to go next?
by alexbergauer
09/17/14 11:39 AM
Aluminum plating on Steinways?
by chasingrainbows
09/17/14 11:32 AM
Associate Diploma repertoire
by lacrymosa85
09/17/14 07:55 AM
Who's Online
133 registered (ajames, ando, alexbergauer, aesop, 255, 42 invisible), 1421 Guests and 15 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Stats
76230 Members
42 Forums
157578 Topics
2314633 Posts

Max Online: 15252 @ 03/21/10 11:39 PM
(ads by Google)

Visit our online store for gifts for music lovers

 
Help keep the forums up and running with a donation, any amount is appreciated!
Or by becoming a Subscribing member! Thank-you.
Donate   Subscribe
 
Our Piano Related Classified Ads
|
Dealers | Tuners | Lessons | Movers | Restorations | Pianos For Sale | Sell Your Piano |

Advertise on Piano World
| Subscribe | Piano World | PianoSupplies.com | Advertise on Piano World | Donate | Link to Us | Classifieds |
| |Contact | Privacy | Legal | About Us | Site Map | Free Newsletter | Press Room |


copyright 1997 - 2014 Piano World ® all rights reserved
No part of this site may be reproduced without prior written permission