2022 our 25th year online!

Welcome to the Piano World Piano Forums
Over 3 million posts about pianos, digital pianos, and all types of keyboard instruments.
Over 100,000 members from around the world.
Join the World's Largest Community of Piano Lovers (it's free)
It's Fun to Play the Piano ... Please Pass It On!

SEARCH
Piano Forums & Piano World
(ad)
Who's Online Now
24 members (drumour, Foxtrot3, johnesp, Hakki, crab89, EVC2017, clothearednincompo, APianistHasNoName, 7 invisible), 1,221 guests, and 293 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Hop To
Page 2 of 2 1 2
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 1,342
M
1000 Post Club Member
Offline
1000 Post Club Member
M
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 1,342
Fang, it sounds like you've been similarly enchanted by the Steinway sound! It's a blessing and a curse, but do be sure to keep your options open, just the same.

In August we took the Tsawasssen Ferry to Nanaimo and drove up to Comox to spend a couple days with some friends. It was our first time on the Island. We had a terrific time and can't wait to go back!


2012 NY Steinway Model B | Kawai MP11 | Nord Stage 3 Compact | Moog Matriarch | ASM Hydrasynth 49 | Sequential Circuits Prophet 10 Rev4 | Yamaha ModX 61
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 6,714
E
6000 Post Club Member
Offline
6000 Post Club Member
E
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 6,714
I second Larry Buck's suggestion to contact either (pianosupply) Jurgen Goering, or Rod Verhnjak for a professional opinion. If there were no front leads in the keys, (which is almost certain not to be the case), and the touchweight was as you described, it would be easy to make the touch lighter.

The most likely thing is the hammers are too heavy for the leverage.


In a seemingly infinite universe-infinite human creativity is-seemingly possible.
According to NASA, 93% of the earth like planets possible in the known universe have yet to be formed.
Contact: toneman1@me.com
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,456
2000 Post Club Member
Offline
2000 Post Club Member
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,456
Ed,
Thanks for correcting the names for me. I was at O'Hare waiting for my next flight to Tulsa and could remember either ...


"It is better to keep your mouth closed and let people think you are a fool than to open it and remove all doubt."
Mark Twain

E. J. Buck & Sons
Lowell MA 01852
978 458 8688
www.ejbuckpiano.com
http://www.facebook.com/EJBuckPerformances
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,393
1000 Post Club Member
Offline
1000 Post Club Member
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,393
Originally Posted by Fang
The only thing that keeps me thinking about the piano, is the sound. ... But this S&S produced most beautiful sound I ever heard closely :-)

Maybe I just need to be patient to wait for something pops up locally


One thing to keep in mind is that "this" piano, no matter which it is, will often not be your last. Many of us have moved up the ladder of pianos. Another option for you is to go for a good C3 - which, after all, is a great piano, just not a S&S. Then, in years to come, maybe your finances might be more able to do so - then your dream piano. I had a U3 equivalent (a UX) till I was 56, and since then have gone to a 6' grand for a few years, and now to my 7'4" grand - which, likely will be my last. Maybe.


Alan from Queensland, Australia (and Clara - my Grotrian Concert & Allen Organ (CF-17a)).
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 2,182
W
2000 Post Club Member
Offline
2000 Post Club Member
W
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 2,182
Originally Posted by Ed Foote

Quote
Steinway actions are historically heavy for the very reason Ted stated - greater dynamic control. 68 grams is quite normal for a Steinway.

Lighter keys will allow you to play faster, heavier keys offer greater expression.


Greetings,
NO. 68 grams is NOT quite normal for a Steinway grand piano. You should expect a range of 52-56 in the bass, 50-48 across the middle, and usually descending to around 45 near the top. These are average resistances, and will vary on any of the stock Steinway actions. I would be concerned asking a 9 year old to use a piano this heavy.

What is normal on a 1935 Steinway is that new parts are often installed that don't match the weight or geometry of the original. This is the normal result when using new factory parts on pre WWII actions. They are NOT the same as the old ones and the factory doesn't sell original weight hammers. I am not sure how regulation will change the down-weight of an action, either. It changes the control and ease, but not the weight.
Regards,


Sorry if I was misinformed.
Got it from this (ancient) thread:

https://www.pianoworld.com/forum/ubb...2/topic/015035/Number/2/site_id/1#import

Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 14
F
Fang Offline OP
Junior Member
OP Offline
Junior Member
F
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 14
got more information about the touch weight on this piano.

Currently, it is about 75 - 65, distributed in 2 sections. The technician said, still staying within Steinway guidelines, he can bring the weights down 10 - 15 grams, e.g. 65 to 60 or even 60 to 55, distributed evenly in 6 sections as new steinway does. Anything lighter than that, he needs go back to check the piano again.

I am thinking to make the trip again sometime to spend more time on the piano.


Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 14
F
Fang Offline OP
Junior Member
OP Offline
Junior Member
F
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 14
By reading all the posts I can find in the forum and some referenced link, I think for the future piano, a little bit heavier than standard key with good action will be the way to go for everyday practise, and also will benefit a lot to practise on different pianos whenever possible.

Joined: Nov 2014
Posts: 959
MRC Online Content
500 Post Club Member
Online Content
500 Post Club Member
Joined: Nov 2014
Posts: 959
Originally Posted by Fang
got more information about the touch weight on this piano.

Currently, it is about 75 - 65, distributed in 2 sections.


What about the friction? If the difference between down weight and up weight is normal (around 30g according to the Pianofinders article), then the friction is normal. If the difference is too great, it means that there is too much friction: a serious problem that a tech should evaluate.


Steinway A grand (1919), Yamaha P2 upright (1983), Kawai ES-100 (2019)
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 6,272
J
Unobtanium Subscriber
6000 Post Club Member
Offline
Unobtanium Subscriber
6000 Post Club Member
J
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 6,272
Originally Posted by Fang
By reading all the posts I can find in the forum and some referenced link, I think for the future piano, a little bit heavier than standard key with good action will be the way to go for everyday practise, and also will benefit a lot to practise on different pianos whenever possible.


If you go with the lightened but still heavy (65 - 55) Steinway, it's absolutely critical that they get regular practice time on other lighter actions.



-- J.S.

[Linked Image] [Linked Image]

Knabe Grand # 10927
Yamaha CP33
Kawai FS690
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 997
500 Post Club Member
Offline
500 Post Club Member
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 997
Fang, looks like you had already made your mind up before posting. I've been there and sometimes the excitement has clouded my judgement. There has been some solid advice from qualified restorers on this site that you really should take to heart. If it was me I would get the piano to where it should be (at year of manufacture) and be done with it. Could be as little as re-hanging the hammers with the proper felt and weight for that period ( see Ronsen Hammers)- Would also take another tech or restorer for a second opinion.







Joined: May 2001
Posts: 36,799
Yikes! 10000 Post Club Member
Offline
Yikes! 10000 Post Club Member
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 36,799
Very young kids will not normally get or want to get extra practice time on lighter actions outside their home environment. In most cases, you'd be lucky if they do 1/2 hour/day of practicing at home Even if they did get outside practice, probably 95% of their practice would be at home. Nor will they be performing regularly if at all.

IMO the touch should be appropriate for their home practicing and this should be the case before purchase. It is NOT a good idea to practice on pianos where the action is inappropriately heavy or inappropriately light. And for young students it might discourage them to discontinue lessons very quickly. If the touch is lightened somewhat before purchase but is still outside a reasonable range, that should not be good enough.

It's fine for the OP to love the sound or even make sound more important that touch, but if the piano plays like a truck what good is the great sound? Similarly, if the touch of a piano is great but the sound stinks why would one even consider such a piano?

Last edited by pianoloverus; 03/03/15 06:46 PM.
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 36,799
Yikes! 10000 Post Club Member
Offline
Yikes! 10000 Post Club Member
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 36,799
Originally Posted by Fang
By reading all the posts I can find in the forum and some referenced link, I think for the future piano, a little bit heavier than standard key with good action will be the way to go for everyday practise, and also will benefit a lot to practise on different pianos whenever possible.
The piano you're considering doesn't seem to be "a little bit heavier than standard". It's completely wrong to think practicing on a piano with what seems to be an outrageously heavy action is a good idea for any reason. It certainly will not make playing other pianos easier. Unless your young children are performing regularly, why would ease of playing on other pianos even be a consideration? How on earth do you expect your young children to get practice for any significant amount of time on other pianos?

If the technician says he can lower the touch weight a lot, he should be willing to do that before you purchase the piano with no commitment on your part to buy the piano. After that you an a good tech can try and judge if the piano is playable. If he says the piano is already "perfectly regulated" and it has the touch weight you mentioned, I would walk away in an instant.

Last edited by pianoloverus; 03/03/15 06:43 PM.
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 14
F
Fang Offline OP
Junior Member
OP Offline
Junior Member
F
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 14
Originally Posted by Miguel Rey
Fang, looks like you had already made your mind up before posting. I've been there and sometimes the excitement has clouded my judgement. There has been some solid advice from qualified restorers on this site that you really should take to heart. If it was me I would get the piano to where it should be (at year of manufacture) and be done with it. Could be as little as re-hanging the hammers with the proper felt and weight for that period ( see Ronsen Hammers)- Would also take another tech or restorer for a second opinion.


I think you are right. I am lean to buy this piano at the beginning, reliable history, beautiful sound, price is still reachable. The technician sounds very reliable, 40+ years experience, tuner for UBC, won competition, trained at Steinway back to 30 years ago.

And I don't have many chances to look around.

But as everyone suggested, I will not make decision right way. I will look around a little bit more. This is all learning experience.

Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 1,825
K
1000 Post Club Member
Offline
1000 Post Club Member
K
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 1,825
$69 dollars for the car and driver from Nanaimo to Tswassen. Yikes. Another $35 or so if all the kids go. Double yikes! That's one way only. The same again to return. Triple yikes!

Seattle, Vancouver and Victoria was my honeymoon 30 years ago at the end of August.

Speaking of Seattle, are they ever gonna git that diggin' machine thing out of the ground or finish that tunnel?

Kurt


**********************************************************************************************************
Co-owner (by marriage) and part time customer service rep at an electronic musical equipment repair shop.
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 1,069
B
1000 Post Club Member
Offline
1000 Post Club Member
B
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 1,069
Originally Posted by Fang
My 9 year old told me it is really hard for her to bring the sound out. My 6 year old can’t finish his piece on it...


Downweight too high and it won't be fun for your kids. Did you ask the tech how much will he charge to give a more decent "balance" to the action? Ask before a bad surprise.

Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,393
1000 Post Club Member
Offline
1000 Post Club Member
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,393
Originally Posted by Bosendorff
Originally Posted by Fang
My 9 year old told me it is really hard for her to bring the sound out. My 6 year old can’t finish his piece on it...


Downweight too high and it won't be fun for your kids. Did you ask the tech how much will he charge to give a more decent "balance" to the action? Ask before a bad surprise.


You may be able to get just a few notes adjusted to see what difference it would make. A few years ago, I played a piano which liked, but I didn't like the action weight - their technician said he'd adjust an octave of notes to be lighter so I could see what was possible. Amazing difference. I didn't end up buying the piano, but I did play it a little while later when back in the same showroom, and I noticed that he'd adjusted the entire piano the same way.

My Grotrian has a heavier weight action than my previous YAMAHA Upright (I gave to my daughter 5 yrs ago). I was there yesterday, and played it. I noticed the lightness immediately, and, for some reason found it harder to control after a piano with heavier action.


Alan from Queensland, Australia (and Clara - my Grotrian Concert & Allen Organ (CF-17a)).
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 6,272
J
Unobtanium Subscriber
6000 Post Club Member
Offline
Unobtanium Subscriber
6000 Post Club Member
J
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 6,272
Originally Posted by backto_study_piano
...., and, for some reason found it harder to control after a piano with heavier action.


Exactly. I had the same thing happen after a week out of town playing a different piano.



-- J.S.

[Linked Image] [Linked Image]

Knabe Grand # 10927
Yamaha CP33
Kawai FS690
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 2,845
E
2000 Post Club Member
Offline
2000 Post Club Member
E
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 2,845
Greetings,
In my experience, pianos that players find difficult to control are just as likely to be very bright. This Steinway is being compared to a lot of Asian uprights, it seems, and they are often very bright. I have often voiced an overly bright piano down to produce a malleable tone, i.e., one that is mellow at pp and brassy at FFF, and the customers' initial impression was that I had made the piano "heavier". This was a change of impression that had nothing to do with the weight, which was unchanged, but rather, originated from the customer's impression of the response. By the same token, hardening hammers, while not changing weight, always makes the piano feel "lighter".

It would be instructive to know what the strike-weight on a few of the Steinway's hammers might be, as it is common for replacement hammers to be a 1 or 1.5 grams heavier than what was on there to start. This translates into 5-7 grams additional down weight. (There is also the question of down weight being taken with or without dampers engaged, which makes a fundamental difference in the resulting "weight". )

I have, in the last year, found two Steinways that had had the hammers and shanks replaced with pre-hung factory parts. Neither of them had had the hammers shaped and were both around 60 grams at middle C. Played like mud. After carving about a gram and a half off the hammers on the way to getting them shaped, they were both brighter because of the lighter hammer and lighter because of the reduction in weight. Customer, (well-known professional), was very pleased and records on both of them.

When the factory sends out a set of hammers, they are NOT ready to use. Many techs simply install the parts and pass it off as genuine because they don't understand that by the time you have a factory set of hammers properly shaped, there will be piles of felt on the bench and floor.
Regards,

Page 2 of 2 1 2

Moderated by  Gombessa, Piano World, platuser 

Link Copied to Clipboard
What's Hot!!
Piano World Has Been Sold!
--------------------
Forums RULES, Terms of Service & HELP
(updated 06/06/2022)
---------------------
Posting Pictures on the Forums
(ad)
(ad)
New Topics - Multiple Forums
How Much to Sell For?
by TexasMom1 - 04/15/24 10:23 PM
Song lyrics have become simpler and more repetitive
by FrankCox - 04/15/24 07:42 PM
New bass strings sound tubby
by Emery Wang - 04/15/24 06:54 PM
Pianodisc PDS-128+ calibration
by Dalem01 - 04/15/24 04:50 PM
Forum Statistics
Forums43
Topics223,384
Posts3,349,178
Members111,631
Most Online15,252
Mar 21st, 2010

Our Piano Related Classified Ads
| Dealers | Tuners | Lessons | Movers | Restorations |

Advertise on Piano World
| Piano World | PianoSupplies.com | Advertise on Piano World |
| |Contact | Privacy | Legal | About Us | Site Map


Copyright © VerticalScope Inc. All Rights Reserved.
No part of this site may be reproduced without prior written permission
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5
When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission, which supports our community.