2022 our 25th year online!

Welcome to the Piano World Piano Forums
Over 3 million posts about pianos, digital pianos, and all types of keyboard instruments.
Over 100,000 members from around the world.
Join the World's Largest Community of Piano Lovers (it's free)
It's Fun to Play the Piano ... Please Pass It On!

SEARCH
Piano Forums & Piano World
(ad)
Who's Online Now
57 members (1200s, 36251, benkeys, 20/20 Vision, anotherscott, bcalvanese, 1957, beeboss, 7sheji, 11 invisible), 1,602 guests, and 336 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Hop To
#2439829 07/08/15 09:23 PM
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 746
G
500 Post Club Member
OP Offline
500 Post Club Member
G
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 746
Is the Roland piano samples for their lx and hp series based on a steinway concert grand? Or, with their modeling, is it their own created sound? Also, if steinway was used, was it a new york or hamburg steinway?

Also, does anyone know if the hp pianos are assembled in oregon or in asia? Thx

Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 3,756
T
3000 Post Club Member
Offline
3000 Post Club Member
T
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 3,756
There are elements of modelling in producing the Roland SN piano sounds, but it is based on Steinway samples which are then processed - don't know from which city the sampled piano came from, I'm afraid. Maybe Jay knows.

Roland products are made in Japan or outsourced to locations on SE Asia. The HP range of pianos is made in Indonesia I think.


Roland HP 302 / Samson Graphite 49 / Akai EWI

Reaper / Native Instruments K9 ult / ESQL MOR2 Symph Orchestra & Choirs / Lucato & Parravicini , trumpets & saxes / Garritan CFX lite / Production Voices C7 & Steinway D compact

Focusrite Saffire 24 / W7, i7 4770, 16GB / MXL V67g / Yamaha HS7s / HD598
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 3,494
P
3000 Post Club Member
Offline
3000 Post Club Member
P
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 3,494
As for the V-Piano (which I own and play) the modeling is supposedly based upon "Steinway D" for Vintage I presets and "Bosendorfer" for Vintage II presets:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7Ewq6NgYpxA

Vintage II = "Bosendorfer" (?)

Even though this has been claimed by Scott Tibbs above there is no way that the Vintage II presets sound anywhere close to a Bosendorfer Imperial grand.

And, Vintage I is modeled after Steinway D?

Modeling has a long way to go!

Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 4,565
E
4000 Post Club Member
Offline
4000 Post Club Member
E
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 4,565
I agree that Roland traditionally sampled Steinway. I've very recently been told that Roland representatives in the UK state that Roland uses a composite of four different pianos in their sampled pianos. That has certainly been mentioned by others over more recent years so I think there could well be reason to believe it's true.

Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 746
G
500 Post Club Member
OP Offline
500 Post Club Member
G
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 746
Originally Posted by EssBrace
I agree that Roland traditionally sampled Steinway. I've very recently been told that Roland representatives in the UK state that Roland uses a composite of four different pianos in their sampled pianos. That has certainly been mentioned by others over more recent years so I think there could well be reason to believe it's true.


Do you have any idea what the 4 pianos are?

Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 4,565
E
4000 Post Club Member
Offline
4000 Post Club Member
E
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 4,565
No, sorry. If the four piano theory is true then I have no doubt Steinway would be one of them. I do think the four piano theory might have some credibility because the more recent Roland sounds have got a somewhat generic vibe to them. I could persuade myself this was because they are a sonic amalgam of more than one source piano.

When they launched Supernatural I was (and am) convinced that the initial Supernatural sounds were based on what Roland previously called 'Superior Grand' from the RD-700SX. That was a four layer sample without the later modelled trickery. Additional sonic flavours were definitely added when SN came on stream but (in my opinion) it was definitely based around the underlying Superior Grand sound.

Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 1,243
1000 Post Club Member
Offline
1000 Post Club Member
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 1,243
Jay doesn't know....and if he did, he couldn't tell you anyways.

Sorry folks.

Jay


Industry Consultant
Joined: Oct 2015
Posts: 29
B
Full Member
Offline
Full Member
B
Joined: Oct 2015
Posts: 29
Then...when a piano sounds is product of modelling, that sound is based on a real piano?? I mean, v-piano modelling is based in a steinway?? Its the same case with pianoteq bluthner??

Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 8,134
C
8000 Post Club Member
Offline
8000 Post Club Member
C
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 8,134
Originally Posted by Beereshit
Then...when a piano sounds is product of modelling, that sound is based on a real piano?? I mean, v-piano modelling is based in a steinway?? Its the same case with pianoteq bluthner??


There's a "white paper" on the Pianoteq website, that describes how their modelling works. It's worth reading.

To try to answer the question:

You have to be very careful to define what "based on a Bluthner" means.

You can "tweak" the parameters of the Pianoteq sound engine (which is not "based on" any particular piano) to give you a sound which is designed to match the sound of a Bluthner -- variation of tonal balance with loudness, variation of loudness across the range of pitch, decay time, string and damper resonance, etc.

In order to do that, you'd take measurements of how a real Bluthner sounds, so you knew what you were aiming for.

That "matching" takes place within the limits of the Pianoteq sound engine. It won't _exactly_ match a Bluthner, on any note.

You could say that collection of parameters was "based on" a Bluthner (and that's what Pianoteq means when it calls one of its modelled pianos "Bluthner"). But it's a very different "based on" than:

. . . The sound of "Vintage D" samples is based on recordings that we
. . . made of Steinway Model XXX, serial number YYYYY.

It's something like the difference between a photograph, and a painted portrait.



. Charles
---------------------------
PX-350 / Roland Gaia / Pianoteq
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 10,512
Yikes! 10000 Post Club Member
Offline
Yikes! 10000 Post Club Member
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 10,512
Originally Posted by Charles Cohen
Originally Posted by Beereshit
Then...when a piano sounds is product of modelling, that sound is based on a real piano?? I mean, v-piano modelling is based in a steinway?? Its the same case with pianoteq bluthner??


There's a "white paper" on the Pianoteq website, that describes how their modelling works. It's worth reading.

To try to answer the question:

You have to be very careful to define what "based on a Bluthner" means.

You can "tweak" the parameters of the Pianoteq sound engine (which is not "based on" any particular piano) to give you a sound which is designed to match the sound of a Bluthner -- variation of tonal balance with loudness, variation of loudness across the range of pitch, decay time, string and damper resonance, etc.

In order to do that, you'd take measurements of how a real Bluthner sounds, so you knew what you were aiming for.

That "matching" takes place within the limits of the Pianoteq sound engine. It won't _exactly_ match a Bluthner, on any note.

You could say that collection of parameters was "based on" a Bluthner (and that's what Pianoteq means when it calls one of its modelled pianos "Bluthner"). But it's a very different "based on" than:

. . . The sound of "Vintage D" samples is based on recordings that we
. . . made of Steinway Model XXX, serial number YYYYY.

It's something like the difference between a photograph, and a painted portrait.



Thats interesting, never knew that. So sampling from a real piano v modelling from scratch?

And I was just gonna say my lowly Roland sounds like Pianoteq D4 (New York "grand") and Piano 2 according to Roland data, is from a Hamburg grand. . .hmmmm, dunno about thart.

Sounds like something we could all do to make a basic digital sound awesome. . .maybe some of us already have, with new sound systems, etc


"I am not a man. I am a free number"

"[Linked Image]"
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 23
F
Full Member
Offline
Full Member
F
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 23
the secret sauce stays secret.

Joined: Nov 2014
Posts: 771
M
500 Post Club Member
Offline
500 Post Club Member
M
Joined: Nov 2014
Posts: 771
Is it really relevant?
I'd say the best judge is to play it and see if you like how it sounds and responds.

If you want specific sounds you can always get software sampled instruments (for a price, of course), but unlike some others that say "we have the sound of this or that instrument", Roland just says we have the Roland Supernatural sound.
Saying that you have the sound of this or that instrument might make users feel good at the idea that they're getting close to a very expensive piano with a nice name (good publicity), but the reality is that standalone digital pianos fail to feel or sound like their acoustic counterparts at this time. And personally, I came to the conclusion that I prefer the partially or fully modeled sounds. They feel better to play and react better in my opinion. It's the closest feeling to playing an acoustic (depending on the acoustic maybe even better).

That's why my suggestion is disregard the name of the source instrument, heck, even disregard the name of the DP manufacturer (if you can be that objective) and just play them and see which you like the most in a variety of scenarios (various repertoire and settings, and preferably on the same pair of good quality headphones, to eliminate speakers and room acoustics).

Last edited by mcoll; 05/04/16 01:06 PM.
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 17,273
B
Yikes! 10000 Post Club Member
Offline
Yikes! 10000 Post Club Member
B
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 17,273
Originally Posted by mcoll
Is it really relevant?
I'd say the best judge is to play it and see if you like how it sounds and responds.

Saying that you have the sound of this or that instrument might make users feel good at the idea that they're getting close to a very expensive piano with a nice name (good publicity), but the reality is that standalone digital pianos fail to feel or sound like their acoustic counterparts at this time. And personally, I came to the conclusion that I prefer the partially or fully modeled sounds. They feel better to play and react better in my opinion. It's the closest feeling to playing an acoustic (depending on the acoustic maybe even better).

That's why my suggestion is disregard the name of the source instrument, heck, even disregard the name of the DP manufacturer (if you can be that objective) and just play them and see which you like the most in a variety of scenarios (various repertoire and settings, and preferably on the same pair of good quality headphones, to eliminate speakers and room acoustics).

thumb

There was a recent thread in Piano Forum where a poster put on the same excerpt of a Chopin piece, played by the same pianist (Cyprien Katsaris) on four different pianos.

https://www.pianoworld.com/forum/ubb...ure_Piano_Tones_by_Make.html#Post2534815

Nobody got the four pianos right....(and people in that forum are experts in acoustic piano sound).

The moral of the story is - if you like the sound and you like the way the piano responds to your playing, it's the right piano for you, regardless of the brand or model.


If music be the food of love, play on!
Joined: Nov 2014
Posts: 771
M
500 Post Club Member
Offline
500 Post Club Member
M
Joined: Nov 2014
Posts: 771
Thanks for pointing out that thread, bennevis. I would have certainly missed it, I don't frequent other sections of the forum at this point.
Read through it, played the guessing game, guessed wrong. It was lots of fun though. The only conclusion I could draw is that all pianos sounded beautiful, and it was even hard to say which one I like best.

Originally Posted by bennevis

The moral of the story is - if you like the sound and you like the way the piano responds to your playing, it's the right piano for you, regardless of the brand or model.


You put it best.

Last edited by mcoll; 05/04/16 06:31 PM.

Link Copied to Clipboard
What's Hot!!
Piano World Has Been Sold!
--------------------
Forums RULES, Terms of Service & HELP
(updated 06/06/2022)
---------------------
Posting Pictures on the Forums
(ad)
(ad)
New Topics - Multiple Forums
Country style lessons
by Stephen_James - 04/16/24 06:04 AM
How Much to Sell For?
by TexasMom1 - 04/15/24 10:23 PM
Song lyrics have become simpler and more repetitive
by FrankCox - 04/15/24 07:42 PM
New bass strings sound tubby
by Emery Wang - 04/15/24 06:54 PM
Forum Statistics
Forums43
Topics223,385
Posts3,349,194
Members111,631
Most Online15,252
Mar 21st, 2010

Our Piano Related Classified Ads
| Dealers | Tuners | Lessons | Movers | Restorations |

Advertise on Piano World
| Piano World | PianoSupplies.com | Advertise on Piano World |
| |Contact | Privacy | Legal | About Us | Site Map


Copyright © VerticalScope Inc. All Rights Reserved.
No part of this site may be reproduced without prior written permission
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5
When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission, which supports our community.