|
Welcome to the Piano World Piano Forums Over 3 million posts about pianos, digital pianos, and all types of keyboard instruments. Over 100,000 members from around the world.
Join the World's Largest Community of Piano Lovers
(it's free)
It's Fun to Play the Piano ... Please Pass It On!
|
|
57 members (Bellyman, Adam Reynolds, Berto, benkeys, Brendan, AlkansBookcase, accordeur, apianostudent, anotherscott, 12 invisible),
1,912
guests, and
317
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 6,163
6000 Post Club Member
|
6000 Post Club Member
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 6,163 |
Originally posted by -Frycek: Clara memorized easily and quickly but not particularly accurately and often sounded more like she was presenting her own impression of a work rather than the work itself. Because of the liberties she was inclined to take, her early audiences sometimes thought she was trying to pass off others' compositions as her own improvisions. Based on this description, I'm surprised that her choice to play from memory was precedent-setting. And yet she is credited with changing the accepted standards of performance practice from that point onward. Or is that an anecdote, too? Or is that another Music 101 topic of which I'm ignorant? Steven
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 5,921
5000 Post Club Member
|
5000 Post Club Member
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 5,921 |
Originally posted by sotto voce: Originally posted by -Frycek: [b]Clara memorized easily and quickly but not particularly accurately and often sounded more like she was presenting her own impression of a work rather than the work itself. Because of the liberties she was inclined to take, her early audiences sometimes thought she was trying to pass off others' compositions as her own improvisions. Based on this description, I'm surprised that her choice to play from memory was precedent-setting. And yet she is credited with changing the accepted standards of performance practice from that point onward.
Or is that an anecdote, too?
Or is that another Music 101 topic of which I'm ignorant?
Steven [/b]I imagine she got better at it as she got older. She was just a kid then. There was a particular piece by Beethoven that several people commented on. It seemed a bit odd to them.
Slow down and do it right.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,546
3000 Post Club Member
|
3000 Post Club Member
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,546 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 6,163
6000 Post Club Member
|
6000 Post Club Member
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 6,163 |
Originally posted by sophial: sorry, deleted post Well, I had been meaning to say that I didn't know which composer was the antecedent of "his." Did Liszt sight-read Chopin's ladies, or his own ladies? Well, I had also been meaning to say that I don't even know that that means! And sophial, you were right in any case. Steven
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,546
3000 Post Club Member
|
3000 Post Club Member
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,546 |
ah, Steven, you caught it! . Thanks.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 96
Full Member
|
Full Member
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 96 |
Two stories presented here are told about many people.
1) I read it was Czerny who was asked by Beethoven, when he presented himself as a candidate for instruction, 10 years old, to play one of the P&F from the WTC. He then asked the boy to transpose the thing to a different key, which he did. This prompted Beethoven to announce that he would take him as a pupil.
2) When Brahms was touring with the violinist (I forget the name), he was supposed to play the Waldstein sonata, which is in C major. The piano in the hall was found to be a semitone flat, so Brahms shrugged and played the thing in C# major instead, from memory.
Finally, I think it was Vierne who used to improvise extremely difficult stuff for the crowds at Notre Dame every Sunday.
The upshot of all this is that transposition, even of very difficult works, was not only commonplace, but expected of professional musicians, just as improvisation was also expected. In our fetishizing of the score in the modern age, we've let those skills atrophy as we search instead for the perfect performance. I'd much rather hear one of our great pianists improvise on something than hear yet another rendition of, say, the Appassionata.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 19,862
Yikes! 10000 Post Club Member
|
Yikes! 10000 Post Club Member
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 19,862 |
pianists can do great things.
ta da!
For the life of me, i couldn't transpose a thing without great forthought, notes, and writing out the chords... but suddenly was able to transpose a choral piece, not simple one, into A flat.. it just fell together, the fingers found the notes. I am a lot more comfortable transposing now. i can't do it automatically, but i can do it.
accompanist/organist.. a non-MTNA teacher to a few
love and peace, Õun (apple in Estonian)
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 298
Full Member
|
Full Member
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 298 |
2) When Brahms was touring with the violinist (I forget the name), he was supposed to play the Waldstein sonata, which is in C major. The piano in the hall was found to be a semitone flat, so Brahms shrugged and played the thing in C# major instead, from memory.
I bet those octave glissandi were murder in C#!
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 26,906
Yikes! 10000 Post Club Member
|
Yikes! 10000 Post Club Member
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 26,906 |
Another thread rises from a four-year old grave!
BruceD - - - - - Estonia 190
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 96
Full Member
|
Full Member
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 96 |
Another thread rises from a four-year old grave! Who cares?
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 2,194
2000 Post Club Member
|
2000 Post Club Member
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 2,194 |
Well, it's hard to continue a discussion when the OP and many other posters don't use this website anymore, at least one of the people in this conversation has been banned (and in several other accounts as well)....
Working on: Chopin - Nocturne op. 48 no.1 Debussy - Images Book II
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 4,352
4000 Post Club Member
|
4000 Post Club Member
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 4,352 |
pianists can do great things.
ta da!
For the life of me, i couldn't transpose a thing without great forthought, notes, and writing out the chords... but suddenly was able to transpose a choral piece, not simple one, into A flat.. it just fell together, the fingers found the notes. I am a lot more comfortable transposing now. i can't do it automatically, but i can do it. Sometimes its like riding a bike...if you think about it, it doesn't work, but just do it, and it works fine.
Blues and Boogie-Woogie piano teacher.
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 1,394
1000 Post Club Member
|
1000 Post Club Member
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 1,394 |
Another thread rises from a four-year old grave! and here I didn't even notice at any rate, it was a fun read
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 643
500 Post Club Member
|
500 Post Club Member
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 643 |
I have the famous DG cd of Emil Gilels playing the two Brahms piano concerti. The liner notes said Gilels knew #1 well, but apparently he sight-read the second in the recording session, one take. It is considered world-class I think. Apparently there are many professional pianists who can do things like this.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 4,169
4000 Post Club Member
|
4000 Post Club Member
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 4,169 |
I have the famous DG cd of Emil Gilels playing the two Brahms piano concerti. The liner notes said Gilels knew #1 well, but apparently he sight-read the second in the recording session, one take. It is considered world-class I think. Apparently there are many professional pianists who can do things like this. Sorry-- I don't believe it for a second. My disbelief inspired me to do some research. Do you mean this DG recording? It's apparently a remastering of a 1972 recording. But Gilels had already recorded the piece in 1958 with Reiner. Maybe he knew #1 well, and it had just been a while since he'd played #2, so he didn't have it in his fingertips as well. He did not sightread it for the recording session-- no way. -J
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 6,651
6000 Post Club Member
|
6000 Post Club Member
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 6,651 |
I have the famous DG cd of Emil Gilels playing the two Brahms piano concerti. The liner notes said Gilels knew #1 well, but apparently he sight-read the second in the recording session, one take. It is considered world-class I think. Apparently there are many professional pianists who can do things like this. Sorry-- I don't believe it for a second. My disbelief inspired me to do some research. Do you mean this DG recording? It's apparently a remastering of a 1972 recording. But Gilels had already recorded the piece in 1958 with Reiner. Maybe he knew #1 well, and it had just been a while since he'd played #2, so he didn't have it in his fingertips as well. He did not sightread it for the recording session-- no way. -J I've not ever heard that story, but I would have a very difficult time buying it as well.
"And if we look at the works of J.S. Bach — a benevolent god to which all musicians should offer a prayer to defend themselves against mediocrity... -Debussy
"It's ok if you disagree with me. I can't force you to be right."
♪ ≠$
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 892
500 Post Club Member
|
500 Post Club Member
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 892 |
Some people mean "reading" when they say/write "sight-reading".
John
Vasa inania multum strepunt.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 854
500 Post Club Member
|
500 Post Club Member
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 854 |
I'm very slow at reading music and with everything I do on the piano I rely very much on my memory, so when I read stories like this it seems like pure wizardry to me. Even if you can read music that fast, how do your hands "know" all the moves? How can you make quick, precise jumps etc. if you haven't gone through these moves before? I just don't get it... not that I don't believe any of it, but it's just mind boggling to me.
Last edited by babama; 07/18/12 06:28 AM.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 643
500 Post Club Member
|
500 Post Club Member
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 643 |
I have often heard that Liszt was the most technically-accomplished pianist of all time. What I have always wondered is, how can we know? Since recordings weren't around, we only have personal accounts from his contemporaries. In times to come, pianists from say about 1950 on can be compared at least on a fairly simple level by their recordings, but Mozart? Tausig? Beethoven? Chopin? I think the stories about the famous pianists and composers of the past are fascinating, but I guess we will never know. What kind of performer was Bach? Above I read that Bizet was quite accomplished. I didn't know that although I know he was a musical genius. There are so many famous pianists who either didn't record, or recorded when the process was in its infancy.
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 6,050
6000 Post Club Member
|
6000 Post Club Member
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 6,050 |
I have the famous DG cd of Emil Gilels playing the two Brahms piano concerti. The liner notes said Gilels knew #1 well, but apparently he sight-read the second in the recording session, one take. No.
|
|
|
Forums43
Topics223,392
Posts3,349,326
Members111,634
|
Most Online15,252 Mar 21st, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|