Welcome to the Piano World Piano Forums
Over 2 million posts about pianos, digital pianos, and all types of keyboard instruments
Join the World's Largest Community of Piano Lovers (it's free)
It's Fun to Play the Piano ... Please Pass It On!

SEARCH
the Forums & Piano World

This custom search works much better than the built in one and allows searching older posts.
(ad 125) Sweetwater - Digital Keyboards & Other Gear
Digital Pianos at Sweetwater
(ad) Pearl River
Pearl River Pianos
(ad) Pianoteq
Latest Pianoteq add-on instrument: U4 upright piano
(ad) P B Guide
Acoustic & Digital Piano Guide
PianoSupplies.com (150)
Piano Accessories Music Related Gifts Piano Tuning Equipment Piano Moving Equipment
We now offer Gift Certificates in our online store!
(ad) Estonia Piano
Estonia Piano
Quick Links to Useful Stuff
Our Classified Ads
Find Piano Professionals-

*Piano Dealers - Piano Stores
*Piano Tuners
*Piano Teachers
*Piano Movers
*Piano Restorations
*Piano Manufacturers
*Organs

Quick Links:
*Advertise On Piano World
*Free Piano Newsletter
*Online Piano Recitals
*Piano Recitals Index
*Piano Accessories
* Buying a Piano
*Buying A Acoustic Piano
*Buying a Digital Piano
*Pianos for Sale
*Sell Your Piano
*How Old is My Piano?
*Piano Books
*Piano Art, Pictures, & Posters
*Directory/Site Map
*Contest
*Links
*Virtual Piano
*Music Word Search
*Piano Screen Saver
*Piano Videos
*Virtual Piano Chords
Page 3 of 4 < 1 2 3 4 >
Topic Options
#418988 - 06/04/03 01:39 PM Re: Rachmaninoff not even in the top 50?!!!!!
CrashTest Offline
4000 Post Club Member

Registered: 06/23/01
Posts: 4110
chickgrand,

Are you sure you are talking about the J.S Bach, and not one of his sons!? To me, his music is the opposite of dated- for this very reason, composers of the past and present look to him for ideas. Can you follow the counterpoint in his works well? Many people who lack a developed sense of polyphony find his work boring, since a lot of the excitement is in seeing how all of the different voices develop and merge into the harmonious structure.

I agree with you on Debussy. I do think you should give Brahms another consideration, he has some great works, although he is of course, no Debussy. ;\)

Top
Ad 800 (Pearl River)
Pearl River World's Best Selling Piano
#418989 - 06/04/03 06:13 PM Re: Rachmaninoff not even in the top 50?!!!!!
kluurs Offline
3000 Post Club Member

Registered: 05/24/02
Posts: 3739
Loc: Chicago
If I were to suddenly have my own harem, would I spend my time ranking the young lovelies from one to 50 or just enjoy my good fortune? Better yet, let them compete for my attention. Ranking -- too much work...just enjoy...

K

Top
#418990 - 06/04/03 06:23 PM Re: Rachmaninoff not even in the top 50?!!!!!
The D's Pianist Offline
500 Post Club Member

Registered: 06/08/01
Posts: 624
Loc: Southwestern Oregon
 Quote:
If I were to suddenly have my own harem, would I spend my time ranking the young lovelies from one to 50 or just enjoy my good fortune? Better yet, let them compete for my attention. Ranking -- too much work...just enjoy... [/b]
ROFL!
\:D :p
_________________________
Musically,
Benjamin Francis
http://www.myspace.com/benjaminfrancis
(I just changed my sig., so no grief, yeah?)
----------
Sofia Gilmson regarding Bach:
"Bach didn't write the subject; he wrote the fugue."

Top
#418991 - 06/04/03 06:43 PM Re: Rachmaninoff not even in the top 50?!!!!!
RachFan Offline
1000 Post Club Member

Registered: 02/02/03
Posts: 1336
Loc: Maine, U.S.
Hi Kreisler:

Yes, from a musicological standpoint Gluck was important in his lifetime the same way Weber was before the latter was totally eclipsed by the better appreciated Romantic composers. But neither one withstood the test of time or universality. In perspective then, Gluck deserves to drop off of any "greats of all time" list in my opinion. I certainly would not object to his being an historical footnote though.

Top
#418992 - 06/04/03 08:19 PM Re: Rachmaninoff not even in the top 50?!!!!!
Joe Townley Offline
Full Member

Registered: 08/01/02
Posts: 182
Loc: Glendale
KREISLER WRITES:

Shut up, loser. Everybody knows that a good watermelon beats even the best apple every day of the week.[/b]

I mean...it's like....it's like....comparing apples to oranges, you know?? hehehe...whoa!...hehehe...hehehe....whoa!

---------------------------------------------
A Dog-Feeder's Dirge:[/b] (sung to the tune of "The Girl That I Marry")
The Dane that I'm feeding, I hate to say
Is costing me seventeen bucks a day!
He eats a daily meal
Of T-bones and lambchops and shoulder of veal.

And when he is finishd, he has a bowl
Of Porterhouse Steak and File of Sole.
His great yearning, I am learning
Swallows up every penny I'm earning.
The Dane that I'm feeding
Is constantly bleeding
Me dry!
_________________________
http://www.JoeTownley.com

Top
#418993 - 06/04/03 08:20 PM Re: Rachmaninoff not even in the top 50?!!!!!
Joe Townley Offline
Full Member

Registered: 08/01/02
Posts: 182
Loc: Glendale
 Quote:
Originally posted by Joe Townley:
KREISLER WRITES:

Shut up, loser. Everybody knows that a good watermelon beats even the best apple every day of the week.[/b]

I mean...it's like....it's like....comparing apples to oranges, you know?? hehehe...whoa!...hehehe...hehehe....whoa!

---------------------------------------------
A Dog-Feeder's Dirge:[/b] (sung to the tune of "The Girl That I Marry")
The Dane that I'm feeding, I hate to say
Is costing me seventeen bucks a day!
He eats a daily meal
Of T-bones and lambchops and shoulder of veal.

And when he is finishd, he has a bowl
Of Porterhouse Steak and File of Sole.
His great yearning, I am learning
Swallows up every penny I'm earning.
The Dane that I'm feeding
Is constantly bleeding
Me dry![/b]
http://www.JoeTownley.com Lots of piano videos!
_________________________
http://www.JoeTownley.com

Top
#418994 - 06/04/03 08:22 PM Re: Rachmaninoff not even in the top 50?!!!!!
Joe Townley Offline
Full Member

Registered: 08/01/02
Posts: 182
Loc: Glendale
 Quote:
Originally posted by Joe Townley:
 Quote:
Originally posted by Joe Townley:
KREISLER WRITES:

Shut up, loser. Everybody knows that a good watermelon beats even the best apple every day of the week.[/b]

I mean...it's like....it's like....comparing apples to oranges, you know?? hehehe...whoa!...hehehe...hehehe....whoa!

---------------------------------------------
A Dog-Feeder's Dirge:[/b] (sung to the tune of "The Girl That I Marry")
The Dane that I'm feeding, I hate to say
Is costing me seventeen bucks a day!
He eats a daily meal
Of T-bones and lambchops and shoulder of veal.

And when he is finishd, he has a bowl
Of Porterhouse Steak and File of Sole.
His great yearning, I am learning
Swallows up every penny I'm earning.
The Dane that I'm feeding
Is constantly bleeding
Me dry![/b]
http://www.JoeTownley.com Lots of piano videos![/b]
_________________________
http://www.JoeTownley.com

Top
#418995 - 06/04/03 08:23 PM Re: Rachmaninoff not even in the top 50?!!!!!
Joe Townley Offline
Full Member

Registered: 08/01/02
Posts: 182
Loc: Glendale
KREISLER WRITES:

Shut up, loser. Everybody knows that a good watermelon beats even the best apple every day of the week.[/b]

I mean...it's like....it's like....comparing apples to oranges, you know?? hehehe...whoa!...hehehe...hehehe....whoa!

---------------------------------------------
A Dog-Feeder's Dirge:[/b] (sung to the tune of "The Girl That I Marry")
The Dane that I'm feeding, I hate to say
Is costing me seventeen bucks a day!
He eats a daily meal
Of T-bones and lambchops and shoulder of veal.

And when he is finishd, he has a bowl
Of Porterhouse Steak and File of Sole.
His great yearning, I am learning
Swallows up every penny I'm earning.
The Dane that I'm feeding
Is constantly bleeding
Me dry![/qb][/QUOTE] http://www.JoeTownley.com Lots of piano videos![/qb][/QUOTE][/QB][/QUOTE]
_________________________
http://www.JoeTownley.com

Top
#418996 - 06/04/03 08:27 PM Re: Rachmaninoff not even in the top 50?!!!!!
Joe Townley Offline
Full Member

Registered: 08/01/02
Posts: 182
Loc: Glendale
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Joe Townley:
[QB]KREISLER WRITES:

Shut up, loser. Everybody knows that a good watermelon beats even the best apple every day of the week.[/b]

I mean...it's like....it's like....comparing apples to oranges, you know?? hehehe...whoa!...hehehe...hehehe....whoa!

---------------------------------------------
A Dog-Feeder's Dirge:[/b] (sung to the tune of "The Girl That I Marry")
The Dane that I'm feeding, I hate to say
Is costing me seventeen bucks a day!
He eats a daily meal
Of T-bones and lambchops and shoulder of veal.

And when he is finishd, he has a bowl
Of Porterhouse Steak and File of Sole.
His great yearning, I am learning
Swallows up every penny I'm earning.
The Dane that I'm feeding
Is constantly bleeding
Me dry!

http://www.JoeTownley.com Lots of piano videos!
_________________________
http://www.JoeTownley.com

Top
#418997 - 06/04/03 09:37 PM Re: Rachmaninoff not even in the top 50?!!!!!
Bernard Offline
3000 Post Club Member

Registered: 07/06/01
Posts: 3857
Loc: North Groton, NH
mkesfahani,
 Quote:
The fact that Berlioz ... on there baffles me.
You blaspheme! Berlioz's "Nuit d'été" is one of my favorite set of songs.

I still think trying to rank composers is as silly as trying to rank artists from Rembrant, Da Vinci, Michaelangelo on up to Kandinsky, Worhol, and Pollock.

Phlebas,
 Quote:
... it's more like sirloin vs. vichyssoise...
Nice.
_________________________
"Hunger for growth will come to you in the form of a problem." -- unknown

Top
#418998 - 06/04/03 09:54 PM Re: Rachmaninoff not even in the top 50?!!!!!
Krazypaul Offline
Full Member

Registered: 05/31/03
Posts: 133
I think Beethoven deserves some kind of leverage in the ranking because of how he could composed music with his growing deafness. or if it was considered or this is considered to be superfluous..then nvm.

Top
#418999 - 06/04/03 10:03 PM Re: Rachmaninoff not even in the top 50?!!!!!
ChickGrand Offline
3000 Post Club Member

Registered: 05/02/03
Posts: 3231
Loc: Midwest U.S.
___________
Jazzd said:

So is there really nothing of Bach's that you consider "good"? You would say all his music fails technically and aesthetically?

It is difficult enough to imagine anyone thinking this of Brahms with anything approaching good reason, let alone Bach. Your friend should be congratulated - you are definitely missing out...
______________

CrashTest said:

Are you sure you are talking about the J.S Bach, and not one of his sons!? To me, his music is the opposite of dated- for this very reason, composers of the past and present look to him for ideas. Can you follow the counterpoint in his works well? Many people who lack a developed sense of polyphony find his work boring, since a lot of the excitement is in seeing how all of the different voices develop and merge into the harmonious structure.

___________

Yup, I'm talking about that J. S. Bach. I understand counterpoint and polyphony and his approach to voices. It's specifically that what he did with them is NOT exciting. It's very nearly mathematical and predictable. While I do recognize Bach's significant contributions to composition and form that followed, I have never felt in the least moved by any of his work. He all but bores me to tears. He strikes more as a theorist and less an artist in his composition. As to Brahms, my word would be "mediocre" if I remain polite. All that said, whether I'm moved by one and not by another is a matter of taste. I'm not arguing technical merit, just artistry. Ability to compose/play within a form doesn't show me much. Doing something I wouldn't expect and making it sound good does.

(Judging composers is about as meaningful as judging figure skating or ice dance at the Olympics.)

Top
#419000 - 06/04/03 10:05 PM Re: Rachmaninoff not even in the top 50?!!!!!
ChickGrand Offline
3000 Post Club Member

Registered: 05/02/03
Posts: 3231
Loc: Midwest U.S.
P.S. Erik Satie would get in somewhere in MY top 50.

Top
#419001 - 06/04/03 10:25 PM Re: Rachmaninoff not even in the top 50?!!!!!
Kreisler Offline



Registered: 11/27/02
Posts: 13792
Loc: Iowa City, IA
Well, people from Norman are weird, so you're allowed. ;\)
_________________________
"If we continually try to force a child to do what he is afraid to do, he will become more timid, and will use his brains and energy, not to explore the unknown, but to find ways to avoid the pressures we put on him." (John Holt)

www.pianoped.com
www.youtube.com/user/UIPianoPed

Top
#419002 - 06/04/03 11:03 PM Re: Rachmaninoff not even in the top 50?!!!!!
ChickGrand Offline
3000 Post Club Member

Registered: 05/02/03
Posts: 3231
Loc: Midwest U.S.
Kreisler said:

Well, people from Norman are weird, so you're allowed.

________

No disagreement there. Just curious how you have come to know that though.

Top
#419003 - 06/04/03 11:06 PM Re: Rachmaninoff not even in the top 50?!!!!!
CrashTest Offline
4000 Post Club Member

Registered: 06/23/01
Posts: 4110
chickgrand,

The common misconception about Bach is that he is pedantic, predictable, and without true emotion- but this is a horrible view. Have you studied his works extensively, or were you put off just because of the recordings you heard? Listen to the Brandenburg concerti, the keyboard concerti, English suites, partitas, how can they be boring?! (He wrote more than just the well-tempered clavier!)

Bach is not so strict in form that he is predictable. His fugues are not even "textbook" fugues. I understand your idea on technical skill and artisty, but I seriously think that your are viewing Bach through the wrong "looking glass".

I would hate to read what you think of Mozart!

(What do you think of Mozart?) ;\)

Top
#419004 - 06/04/03 11:52 PM Re: Rachmaninoff not even in the top 50?!!!!!
ChickGrand Offline
3000 Post Club Member

Registered: 05/02/03
Posts: 3231
Loc: Midwest U.S.
CrashTest wrote:

(What do you think of Mozart?)

I try not to.

Top
#419005 - 06/05/03 12:01 AM Re: Rachmaninoff not even in the top 50?!!!!!
CrashTest Offline
4000 Post Club Member

Registered: 06/23/01
Posts: 4110
!

Top
#419006 - 06/05/03 12:02 AM Re: Rachmaninoff not even in the top 50?!!!!!
Bernard Offline
3000 Post Club Member

Registered: 07/06/01
Posts: 3857
Loc: North Groton, NH
It's my very un-scientific opinion that children who are exposed to Bach's music when they are very young and young will develop a strong joie de vivre. At least--I wouldn't be surprised if they found that out through some study or other. Especially some of the chorals from the cantatas.

You should see what my birds do when I put one on--they gather on a perch, sit contentedly and have every appearance of listening and enjoying the gorgeous sound of Bach. (They do this with other classical music too.) I'm convinced it's a pleasurable sensory experience for them.
_________________________
"Hunger for growth will come to you in the form of a problem." -- unknown

Top
#419007 - 06/05/03 01:36 AM Re: Rachmaninoff not even in the top 50?!!!!!
StanSteel Offline
500 Post Club Member

Registered: 04/17/02
Posts: 646
Loc: Los Angeles
 Quote:
Originally posted by Joe Townley:
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Joe Townley:
[QB]KREISLER WRITES:

Shut up, loser. Everybody knows that a good watermelon beats even the best apple every day of the week.[/b]

I mean...it's like....it's like....comparing apples to oranges, you know?? hehehe...whoa!...hehehe...hehehe....whoa!

---------------------------------------------
A Dog-Feeder's Dirge:[/b] (sung to the tune of "The Girl That I Marry")
The Dane that I'm feeding, I hate to say
Is costing me seventeen bucks a day!
He eats a daily meal
Of T-bones and lambchops and shoulder of veal.

And when he is finishd, he has a bowl
Of Porterhouse Steak and File of Sole.
His great yearning, I am learning
Swallows up every penny I'm earning.
The Dane that I'm feeding
Is constantly bleeding
Me dry!

http://www.JoeTownley.com Lots of piano videos![/b]
Shut up, Mona Lisa \:D
_________________________
"War does not determine who is right; only who is left."

Top
#419008 - 06/05/03 03:55 AM Re: Rachmaninoff not even in the top 50?!!!!!
David_J Offline
Full Member

Registered: 12/07/02
Posts: 175
Loc: Australia
Anyone who doesn't like Mozart should flush their head down some toilet... (Please take my advice in good faith).

I like Bach's Italian Concerto... how come I don't hear of it much here? I think it's underrated... the third movement is quite enjoyable. \:\)

Regarding the list, switch Mozart and Bach, delete Beethoven (not too serious...) and I'm happy.

Top
#419009 - 06/05/03 05:04 AM Re: Rachmaninoff not even in the top 50?!!!!!
Annihil8or Offline
Full Member

Registered: 12/13/02
Posts: 273
Loc: England
The only reason I can think of that people cannot find anything in Bach, Brahms, Beethoven, Mozart etc. is that they just don't know how to listen to that kind of music. They can't form a musical conception of the works, they are too stuck on how "similar" the material sound, rather than what it actually "means". It's like saying you can't find any sense in what French people say because you don't like the sound of their language.

Bernard: My dog comes and sits next to the piano whenever I play Chopin.

Top
#419010 - 06/05/03 10:11 AM Re: Rachmaninoff not even in the top 50?!!!!!
Phlebas Offline


Registered: 01/02/03
Posts: 4654
Loc: New York City
chickgrand,

You said: 'As to Brahms, my word would be "mediocre" if I remain polite. '
If you don't mind my saying so, you are responding more to your own personal taste rather than an informed opinion on a the "greatness" of these composers.

It's fine not to like Bach, Mozart, Brahms - or, for that matter, any of the other composers whose music is generally considered by the rest of the classical music listening/performing community as pinnacles of artistic achievement, and whose works have survived for centuries and will endure until the last stone of our civilization is destroyed (I guess you know how highly I regard these composers by now).

However, this thread is about determining the "greatest" composers, historically - if that is at all possible - and you often have to put aside your personal preferences to form and argue objective, informed opinions. For, example, I don't really like Schoenberg, but he should be on this list. Also, I would rather read a novel by Mickey Spillane than one by Marcel Proust. That doesn't mean I think Proust was inferior, or a "mediocre" writer.

Top
#419011 - 06/05/03 11:52 AM Re: Rachmaninoff not even in the top 50?!!!!!
ChickGrand Offline
3000 Post Club Member

Registered: 05/02/03
Posts: 3231
Loc: Midwest U.S.
Phlebas said:

If you don't mind my saying so, you are responding more to your own personal taste rather than an informed opinion on a the "greatness" of these composers.
_________

I think I said this about taste myself. It is precisely a matter of taste. I'm not even arguing that Bach, Brahms and Mozart wouldn't be on my list of 50. They just wouldn't be much beyond my middle. One must consider the whole body of a person's work to determine the value of their contribution to their field. Lots of small incremental innovations add up. But that doesn't make any one effort a work of genius. But then neither does one major innovation in a flash of genius elevate one's body of work above that of the other who's plugged away with hundreds of solid, but incremental, efforts. There are composers who've produced only a few wonderful pieces. I wouldn't necessarily put them on a list of only 50, even if I liked all of their small body of work.

I just happen to not like the aesthetic, the style of Bach, Mozart or Brahms. That's why I give them their due for technical merit (particularly Bach there). I just don't find myself wanting to listen to their body of work. An occassional piece, yes, an evening's program, certainly not.

Judging composers is really like judging any other "art" (my figure skating reference). Technical merit alone can get you a bronze or silver. Some additional artistry is usually required to get on the higher podium with a gold. And that mark for artistry is always in the subjective eyes or ears of the judge.

Bach, Brahms, and Mozart just don't suit my taste or convey any emotion I can relate to. (In the case of Bach, I come nearer appreciating his work on harpsichord rather than piano. And wonder if I'd like his work better on a properly, historically-tempered piano.)

I plan to force myself to wade through my vast shelf of vinyl and CD's. One's aesthetic sense gets redefined with experience. But I'm doubtful that I'll come away from the experience with any new-found admiration for the aesthetics of those three. One can acquire a "taste" for something. In my case, Satie was a little inaccessible emotionally at first, but I've learned to love a fair bit of his rather enigmatic work.

I grew up in a house filled with music. I have a huge collection that includes these three. (No collection or education would be complete without it.) But the fact that previously listening to extensive volumes of their work has not inspired me to either want to listen to it again, nor to want to play it, is a likely indicator that I will probably find that yes, I still really don't like it. (I have MADE myself listen to their stuff on occassion, with a critical ear.)

I consider myself to be very open-minded in all things, but quite simply, there's too much great music out there to waste time immersing oneself in something that simply does not appeal to one's own taste. If it doesn't move me, I have no cause to listen or to play it myself. I expect to be moved emotionally and intellectually challenged by music.

(Would you prefer I learn to love and wear out all that Mozart, Bach, and Brahms vinyl you could someday buy in its current pristine condition at my eventual post-mortem estate sale?) ;\)

Top
#419012 - 06/05/03 12:15 PM Re: Rachmaninoff not even in the top 50?!!!!!
ChickGrand Offline
3000 Post Club Member

Registered: 05/02/03
Posts: 3231
Loc: Midwest U.S.
No Delibes in that 50?

(Have to get that in before a block-long mob of Mozart, Bach and Brahms afficianados with pitchforks arrive and burn me in the windmill.)

Actually, I wouldn't ever presume to be so well acquainted with enough of the life-time body of work of all of the major and minor composers to even begin ranking and culling to 50.

As Liszt said, "Music is enough for a lifetime. But a lifetime is not enough for music."

Top
#419013 - 06/05/03 12:23 PM Re: Rachmaninoff not even in the top 50?!!!!!
Matt G. Offline
3000 Post Club Member

Registered: 06/22/01
Posts: 3789
Loc: Plainfield, IL
I am just going to weigh in with two observations. First is that the list is comprised of composers in all musical genres, not just piano music. Perhaps the author felt that Rach's contributions were too piano-centric. Second is that I'm glad the author chose to include Smetana and Janacek. They both wrote some wonderful piano music, much of which is quite technically demanding. They seldom receive their due respect. (Yikes! Post #1000? Someone shut me up!)
_________________________
Sacred cows make the best hamburger. - Clemens

Top
#419014 - 06/05/03 01:38 PM Re: Rachmaninoff not even in the top 50?!!!!!
Praetorian_AD Offline
500 Post Club Member

Registered: 12/24/01
Posts: 717
Loc: England
 Quote:
Originally posted by chickgrand:

Actually, I wouldn't ever presume to be so well acquainted with enough of the life-time body of work of all of the major and minor composers to even begin ranking and culling to 50.

As Liszt said, "Music is enough for a lifetime. But a lifetime is not enough for music."[/b]
Rachmaninoff said that, actually. (Pianomuse? \:\) )

Top
#419015 - 06/05/03 02:17 PM Re: Rachmaninoff not even in the top 50?!!!!!
Diarmuid2 Offline
500 Post Club Member

Registered: 07/24/02
Posts: 871
Loc: London
 Quote:
Originally posted by benedict:
Mozart cannot be less than very close to Bach.
Listen the the Magic Flute of the 23rd piano concerto or the concerto for clarinette or the quintette with clarinette[/b]. Or Don Giovanni.
[/b]
Hey, I did a live recording of the clarinet quintet for someone recently. For anyone who doubts benedict's wisdom:

http://www.diarmuid.plus.com/Mozclip.mp3

Top
#419016 - 06/05/03 03:04 PM Re: Rachmaninoff not even in the top 50?!!!!!
nickyg Offline
Full Member

Registered: 04/06/03
Posts: 36
Loc: Essex
Chickgrand, you say that you adore Beethoven yet cannot listen to Mozart. I maybe wrong here, but this suggests to me that you really haven't listened to that much Mozart, and you disliked what you heard. This i can sort of understand, in that I have listened to Stockhausen twice and I won't again if I have a choice. But that is slightly different. Some of Mozart's music I dislike. But some of his work is so stunningly moving that it make your stomach turn. And while you may feel that Mozarts sonatas lack the depth and brutality of Beethovens, dig a little deeper and you may be pleasantly surprised by what you find. It isn't all light and airy. He's considered great for a reason. Personally i think Mozart and Beethoven compliment each other wonderfully as examples of examplary classical music, at either sides of the spectrum. Give it a try.

As for Bach, I also find him slightly inaccesible, and would never rush to see a Bach program, but when you decide to listen without prejudice as I can occasionaly when the mood suits, I sometimes find the discords and the progressiveness of Bach fascinating and it is something that you may grow into, as I slowly am. It takes a while, but then you see what previously you couldn't, or didn't want too.
_________________________
"The difference between impossible and possible is practice" Horowitz

Top
#419017 - 06/05/03 03:48 PM Re: Rachmaninoff not even in the top 50?!!!!!
CrashTest Offline
4000 Post Club Member

Registered: 06/23/01
Posts: 4110
Listening to and playing the works of composers is really a vastly different thing. For those who do not associate with Bach or Mozart's music, have you learned any of their works? (Keyboard or otherwise) I find that when one becomes intimate with a piece, it opens up an entire level of appreciation that dwarfs any superficial "taste" or bias one may of had.

Top
Page 3 of 4 < 1 2 3 4 >

Moderator:  Brendan, Kreisler 
What's Hot!!
HOW TO POST PICTURES on the Piano Forums
-------------------
Sharing is Caring!
About the Buttons
-------------------
Forums Rules & Help
-------------------
ADVERTISE
on Piano World

The world's most popular piano web site.
-------------------
PIANO BOOKS
Interesting books about the piano, pianists, piano history, biographies, memoirs and more!
(ad) HAILUN Pianos
Hailun Pianos - Click for More
ad (Casio)
Celviano by Casio Rebate
Ad (Seiler/Knabe)
Seiler Pianos
Sheet Music
(PW is an affiliate)
Sheet Music Plus Featured Sale
(125ad) Dampp Chaser
Dampp Chaser Piano Life Saver
(ad) Lindeblad Piano
Lindeblad Piano Restoration
New Topics - Multiple Forums
Rare Time Signatures
by caters
09/30/14 02:59 PM
has anyone tried the Focal alpha 50s or 65s for monitoring?
by dire tonic
09/30/14 11:54 AM
2015 Concerto Competition "Theodor Leschetizky" NY
by Piano World
09/30/14 11:49 AM
Valletta International Piano Competition, Velletta, Malta
by Piano World
09/30/14 11:45 AM
Cleveland International Piano Competition
by Piano World
09/30/14 11:42 AM
Who's Online
156 registered (36251, A Guy, accordeur, 49 invisible), 1755 Guests and 13 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Stats
76379 Members
42 Forums
157892 Topics
2318889 Posts

Max Online: 15252 @ 03/21/10 11:39 PM
(ads by Google)

Visit our online store for gifts for music lovers

 
Help keep the forums up and running with a donation, any amount is appreciated!
Or by becoming a Subscribing member! Thank-you.
Donate   Subscribe
 
Our Piano Related Classified Ads
|
Dealers | Tuners | Lessons | Movers | Restorations | Pianos For Sale | Sell Your Piano |

Advertise on Piano World
| Subscribe | Piano World | PianoSupplies.com | Advertise on Piano World | Donate | Link to Us | Classifieds |
| |Contact | Privacy | Legal | About Us | Site Map | Free Newsletter | Press Room |


copyright 1997 - 2014 Piano World ® all rights reserved
No part of this site may be reproduced without prior written permission