Welcome to the Piano World Piano Forums
Over 2 million posts about pianos, digital pianos, and all types of keyboard instruments
Join the World's Largest Community of Piano Lovers (it's free)
It's Fun to Play the Piano ... Please Pass It On!

SEARCH
the Forums & Piano World

This custom search works much better than the built in one and allows searching older posts.
(ad) End Stage Fright
End Stage Fright
(ad) Pianoteq
Latest Pianoteq add-on instrument: U4 upright piano
(ad) Pearl River
Pearl River Pianos
(ad) P B Guide
Acoustic & Digital Piano Guide
PianoSupplies.com (150)
Piano Accessories Music Related Gifts Piano Tuning Equipment Piano Moving Equipment
We now offer Gift Certificates in our online store!
(ad) Estonia Piano
Estonia Piano
Quick Links to Useful Stuff
Our Classified Ads
Find Piano Professionals-

*Piano Dealers - Piano Stores
*Piano Tuners
*Piano Teachers
*Piano Movers
*Piano Restorations
*Piano Manufacturers
*Organs

Quick Links:
*Advertise On Piano World
*Free Piano Newsletter
*Online Piano Recitals
*Piano Recitals Index
*Piano Accessories
* Buying a Piano
*Buying A Acoustic Piano
*Buying a Digital Piano
*Pianos for Sale
*Sell Your Piano
*How Old is My Piano?
*Piano Books
*Piano Art, Pictures, & Posters
*Directory/Site Map
*Contest
*Links
*Virtual Piano
*Music Word Search
*Piano Screen Saver
*Piano Videos
*Virtual Piano Chords
Page 1 of 2 1 2 >
Topic Options
#633069 - 03/03/03 02:20 PM tuning devices
ejks Offline
Full Member

Registered: 02/05/03
Posts: 175
Loc: Land of Lincoln
Are any of the "devices" sold by Schaff beneficial for setting the temperament? I mean are they worth it to pay the price? And, would a "novice" benefit from using them? As "devices" I have in mind the more sophisticated ones beyond the strobetuner such as the laptop advertised for about $750.00?? Do these really do a good job for stretching the octaves and alternate types of tunings etc.??

I asked an earlier question about Aubrey Willis and got absolutely NO replies. Apparently Aubrey is dead and that's the end of that. Since then I found out that David Pennington from the Willis school joined the Randy Potter school.
_________________________
People will tell you they know what they like but what they really mean is they like what they know.

Top
(ad 568) Win a Year Journal Subscription
Win a year subscription to the PTG Journal
#633070 - 03/03/03 10:20 PM Re: tuning devices
SamLewisPiano.com Offline
500 Post Club Member

Registered: 08/19/01
Posts: 635
Loc: WHITE BLUFF (Nashville area) T...
Ejks- all of the major tuning computers were tested against one another some time back, and all were found to do a good job. I prefer the VeriTuner, which also has the ability to store any given tuning, and then recalculate the curve the next time you tune that piano, based on new information that it gathers during each tuning. The curve gets better as time goes on.
_________________________
Since 1975; Full-time piano tuner/tech in Nashville;
Lacquer and polyester specialist.

www.SamLewisPiano.com

Top
#633071 - 03/04/03 12:24 AM Re: tuning devices
KlavierBauer Offline
3000 Post Club Member

Registered: 11/06/02
Posts: 3773
Loc: Boulder, Colorado
ejks:

I used a SAT II for some time, then a SAT III, and now I use the Pocket RCT. I learned to tune aurally first of course. ;\)

I run the Pocket RCT on a compaq handheld, but will soon be switching over to my new Toshiba E-740. The software itself does a wonderful job tuning, as do the other big players in the market. The benefit I have found to the Pocket RCT, is the overall functionality of the Pocket PC platform for handhelds. There is so much I can do from my handheld (including posting here when a wireless network is available) \:\)

But I think you'd be ok using most of them, it will become a question of preference as you begin to figure out what you want a machine/software package to do.

Just as a side note: I would prefer something operating on the Pocket PC to a laptop, simply because of size limitations with certain pianos. Battery life, and startup time are also factors with the laptop. My handheld's processor operates at 400 MgHz, so there's not much it can't do. You can also get a PocketPC for a lot less money than a laptop -- comparing top of the line to top of the line anyway. ($350-600 vs. $2500 - $3000)

Hope that helps

KlavierBauer
_________________________
Outlive Yourself - Become an Organ Donor

Top
#633072 - 03/04/03 11:59 AM Re: tuning devices
Rick Clark Offline
1000 Post Club Member

Registered: 01/04/03
Posts: 1810
Loc: North County San Diego CA
There are some great electronic devices out there, but the biggest mistake you could make is to start depending on them before you have a good grasp on how to tune a piano well by ear. I know a lot of good tuners who can do it by ear or use a device, but I haven't met any good ones who can't do it by ear and only use a device.

They are good if they are a tool, bad if they are a crutch. The difference is the skill of the user.

Regards,

Rick Clark
_________________________
Rick Clark

Piano tuner-technician

Top
#633073 - 03/04/03 12:58 PM Re: tuning devices
ejks Offline
Full Member

Registered: 02/05/03
Posts: 175
Loc: Land of Lincoln
Guys,
Thanks for the comebacks. I teach school, play in a church, teach lessons in a store and am considering starting up again. I understand the difference between tool and crutch and I appreciate very much the technicians that tune by ear. I would like to learn someday. Thanks again for your responses.
ej
_________________________
People will tell you they know what they like but what they really mean is they like what they know.

Top
#633074 - 03/04/03 01:51 PM Re: tuning devices
pianoseed Offline
500 Post Club Member

Registered: 06/13/01
Posts: 884
Loc: here
All of the electronic tuning devices mentioned by name do excellent tunings. I believe a student tuner can spend an unnecessary amount of time and energy mastering the skill of Aural Tuning. Yes, aural tuning is an admirable ability, but unnecessary to do an excellent tuning. Put your energy into good clean unisons and perhaps beatless octaves. The new equipment out there is excellent. You will find that as you tune electronically you get used to the sound of a piano in tune. It takes the guess work out of tuning. I know I will be lambasted by the "dinosaurs" in the profession because "It is the way I had to do it."
I taught math for 25 years. There is no way I would demand that students learn to us a slide rule now. Scientific caluclators made slide rules obselete, yet I spent weeks in High School learning to use a slide rule. I believe the same is true with Aural Tuning. It will go the way of the slide rule, but the "dinosaurs" will hold onto it until they all die.
_________________________
pianoseed

Top
#633075 - 03/04/03 02:50 PM Re: tuning devices
Matt16 Offline
Junior Member

Registered: 01/09/03
Posts: 7
Loc: Calgary Alberta
I have been tuning for ten years and have done both electronic and aural tuning, and have found that listening instead of watching a screen or flashy lights is far more acurate.

The last time I looked the only dinosaurs I saw were the ones using electronic tuners because they were to old to hear beats. ;\)

Top
#633076 - 03/04/03 04:37 PM Re: tuning devices
pianoseed Offline
500 Post Club Member

Registered: 06/13/01
Posts: 884
Loc: here
I never said to stop listening. Some of us are coordinated enough to listen as well as watch blinking lights.
_________________________
pianoseed

Top
#633077 - 03/05/03 08:46 AM Re: tuning devices
ejks Offline
Full Member

Registered: 02/05/03
Posts: 175
Loc: Land of Lincoln
I can see there are differences of opinion regarding use of these devices. \:\) I understand, because the 86 year old gentleman that takes care of my pianos tunes aurally exclusively. He also is a professional musician and I believe that fact enhances his skills/sensitivities as a technician but that's another subject. I would love to be able to tune a piano aurally without the use of these aids but what I'd like to try to determine is, while someone is learning the trade what role can and should these devices play?? I know there should be one on one help but that's not always possible. How can I beneficially and practically utilize a tuning device to assist me in learning the skill of setting the temperament, etc.?? WOULD ALL SEASONED VETERAN TECHNICIANS PLEASE REPLY?? It would be greatly appreciated. \:\) Thank you in advance!
_________________________
People will tell you they know what they like but what they really mean is they like what they know.

Top
#633078 - 03/05/03 09:45 AM Re: tuning devices
Bill Bremmer RPT Offline
3000 Post Club Member

Registered: 08/21/02
Posts: 3036
Loc: Madison, WI USA
" How can I beneficially and practically utilize a tuning device to assist me in learning the skill of setting the temperament, etc.?? WOULD ALL SEASONED VETERAN TECHNICIANS PLEASE REPLY??"

Now in my 34th year, I hope I qualify. One of the things I observed long ago is that for every strongly held opinion, there is bound to be another which contredicts it but is just as strongly held and it doesn't necessarily mean that one opinion is right and the other wrong.

To learn to tune at a very high level aurally can take a considerable amount of time. I would agree that learning to tune by ear first is *usually* the best and most recommended way but it is not for everyone. It is also true that many who start off with an ETD never do develop aural skills which can duplicate what they can do with an ETD but it is not universally so.

If you are serious about having both aural and electronically assisted skills, you simply need to work on them simultaneously. I have 3 apprentices, 2 of them are strictly aural but the 3rd, because of his unique circumstances is learning with the aid of an ETD.

The decision has to be your own. If you want to be able to qualify as an RPT, you have to have a minimum amount of aural skills. If there are other priorities in your life and business, then highly developed aural tuning skills may not be essential. The latter can be summarized as nothing more than the ability to perceive and control beats. You learn to listen in a way that goes quite a bit further than what a musician does to learn to play "in tune".

Don't let the dinosaurs beat you up.

Regards,
_________________________
Bill Bremmer RPT
Madison WI USA
www.billbremmer.com

Top
#633079 - 03/05/03 07:12 PM Re: tuning devices
Rick Clark Offline
1000 Post Club Member

Registered: 01/04/03
Posts: 1810
Loc: North County San Diego CA
Well, thammer, perhaps one day we shall meet and find out who is truly the dinosaur.

The analogy of slide rules and calculators is not valid re aural tuning vs electronic tuning for reasons you obviously don't understand.

If you are interested at all in educating yourself on what the ear/brain can know that devices don't, one aspect is covered in the January 1979 issue of Scientific American cover story "The Physics Of Piano Strings".

And a question you may want to ask yourself is: why do the companies making devices like the Sanderson Accu-Tuner sell tunings performed by good ear tuners and stored as SAT software files?

I will say again- I have heard tuners who are great ear tuners and are great with a device. But I have yet to hear a great tuner who skipped the process of learning to tune by ear and used only devices. As to the whys and wherfores it could be the subject of perhaps endless debate, but that is my observation and until I start finding exceptions, I'm sticking to it.

Regards,

Rick Clark
_________________________
Rick Clark

Piano tuner-technician

Top
#633080 - 03/05/03 11:41 PM Re: tuning devices
ChrisKeys Offline
1000 Post Club Member

Registered: 01/21/03
Posts: 1267
Loc: Dallas, TX
 Quote:
Originally posted by thammer:
All of the electronic tuning devices mentioned by name do excellent tunings. I believe a student tuner can spend an unnecessary amount of time and energy mastering the skill of Aural Tuning.[/b]
Sorry, but I really beg to differ with you. I'm just a pianist. I'm neither a tuner nor a tech. But the times someone has tuned my piano with a device rather than by ear, the result has always been inferior. One of my coworkers told me that a tuner showed up to tune her Yamaha G3 using only a tuning device. The result: a "correct" tuning that she hated. I gave her the name of my tech, who tunes only by ear. After my tech talked with her, he tuned her piano so well that she told me how amazed she was at the results.

When a friend asks me to recommend a tuner, I say: If you choose someone, and he shows up at your door with an electronic device, be polite and kindly show him the door. Then find someone who tunes by ear.

I will never let anyone tune my piano unless he does so by ear. Period.

-- Chris

Top
#633081 - 03/06/03 02:17 AM Re: tuning devices
KlavierBauer Offline
3000 Post Club Member

Registered: 11/06/02
Posts: 3773
Loc: Boulder, Colorado
I'd like to start by saying that I agree with Rick.

I am fairly confident in my tuning abilities, and I use an ETD. BUT (and it's a big butt ... err but) I first learned the fundamentals of aural tuning. If you don't understand tuning, and what's going on in the scaling of the piano, the ETD is of limited use. Virgil Smith once showed me that an ear can hear what a machine cannot. This amazed me at the time. No not everyone tunes good by ear, but the principles learned in that process are invaluable.

So after saying that, why do I swear by my ETD? Well, as I said I'm fairly confident in my tuning abilities, and my understanding of the process. I am also constantly checking what the machine is calling "right" by checking octaves, 4ths, and 5ths (these are quick checks to make while moving up the scale). I also like to check things more thoroughly when needed.

I have found that aural tuning can be extremely exhausting on the ears. In fact, I wear earplugs much of the time when tuning. Pounding the notes of a piano in close proximity can play with your equilibrium, and your general sense of well being. Tuning visually allows me to "save" my ear for the important parts. What I mean is, I can tune visually, seeing what the note's doing while I'm moving it, and check it afterward aurally.

Anyway, that's my opinion. But to say again: I think one really needs to understand tuning... which means aural tuning... before using an ETD. One can even use an ETD to help learn aural tuning. But as Rick said, the ETD should never be a crutch.

KlavierBauer
_________________________
Outlive Yourself - Become an Organ Donor

Top
#633082 - 03/06/03 07:50 AM Re: tuning devices
ejks Offline
Full Member

Registered: 02/05/03
Posts: 175
Loc: Land of Lincoln
KlavierBauer, thanks for your input too. I used to live in the Chicagoland area and heard of Virgil Smith many years ago. Do you know whether he is still working in the profession? He must be getting up there like the rest of us. \:\) Did/does Virgil use an ETD?
_________________________
People will tell you they know what they like but what they really mean is they like what they know.

Top
#633083 - 03/06/03 01:51 PM Re: tuning devices
SamLewisPiano.com Offline
500 Post Club Member

Registered: 08/19/01
Posts: 635
Loc: WHITE BLUFF (Nashville area) T...
There was a PTG sponsored event some time back, labelled a "Tune-Off". Tunings were done by ear only and ETD assisted, on the same piano, and on similar pianos. If memory serves, Virgil was a participant. The results, judged by PTG members and professional musicians was a dead heat. The differences were so minute that nobody could tell which pianos had been tuned which way. The moral of the story is that if the person knows what he/she is doing, a quality tuning will be accomplished using either method. To say that a person who shows up with an ETD is going to give you a bad job is arrogant and misinformed. This has been debated ad nauseum on the PTG website, and the one thing that everyone agrees on is: nobody will ever agree on this subject........Sam
_________________________
Since 1975; Full-time piano tuner/tech in Nashville;
Lacquer and polyester specialist.

www.SamLewisPiano.com

Top
#633084 - 03/06/03 02:11 PM Re: tuning devices
Rick Clark Offline
1000 Post Club Member

Registered: 01/04/03
Posts: 1810
Loc: North County San Diego CA
Sam,

What you say is true enough. But this is not an argument over whether ETDs are bad or good. The issue here is should a tuner learn ear tuning first (or perhaps concurrently with ETDs), or should he just skip "ear tuning" and go straight to ETDs.

Someone who does not understand the aural principles and goals is going to be hugely handicapped when attempting to tune using an ETD, and will consistently yield unacceptable tunings.

OTOH, someone who is a good ear tuner can use an ETD and achieve results which are just as good as a top-notch ear tuning, as you recounted.

That is what this thread is about.

Regards,

Rick Clark
_________________________
Rick Clark

Piano tuner-technician

Top
#633085 - 03/06/03 05:51 PM Re: tuning devices
SamLewisPiano.com Offline
500 Post Club Member

Registered: 08/19/01
Posts: 635
Loc: WHITE BLUFF (Nashville area) T...
Rick- point understood. My post was in answer to Chris W.s post earlier.........Sam
_________________________
Since 1975; Full-time piano tuner/tech in Nashville;
Lacquer and polyester specialist.

www.SamLewisPiano.com

Top
#633086 - 03/06/03 08:19 PM Re: tuning devices
Rick Clark Offline
1000 Post Club Member

Registered: 01/04/03
Posts: 1810
Loc: North County San Diego CA
Gotcha, Sam.

Just for educational purposes, I would refer any interested party reading this thread to the Scientific American article I referred to earlier. It should be quite interesting to any serious pianist (Chris W) or any tuner interested in what the ear/brain can do as opposed to having a machine count frequencies. It may or may not be an explanation for the anecdote reported by Chris, but it is certainly an explanation for a significant % of the complaints against electronically rendered tunings, which are often described to me by unhappy pianists as "dead" sounding.

Regards,

Rick Clark
_________________________
Rick Clark

Piano tuner-technician

Top
#633087 - 03/06/03 11:28 PM Re: tuning devices
ChrisKeys Offline
1000 Post Club Member

Registered: 01/21/03
Posts: 1267
Loc: Dallas, TX
 Quote:
To say that a person who shows up with an ETD is going to give you a bad job is arrogant and misinformed.[/QB]
To say I am misinformed is certainly a possibility. In my limited realm of personal experiences, though, tunings via electronic devices have always been inferior to tunings done by ear.

However, to call me arrogant is a misplaced insult. My statements are consistent with the experiences I've had with both styles of tuning because the "device" tuning was always inferior. I will not have anyone touch my piano who uses a device rather than his ear. YMMV.

-- Chris

Top
#633088 - 03/07/03 12:58 AM Re: tuning devices
pianoseed Offline
500 Post Club Member

Registered: 06/13/01
Posts: 884
Loc: here
I tuned for a lady who did not approve of my SAT. I gave her the name of an aural tuner whom she hired for her next tuning. She was completely satisfied with his tuning. What she did not know which I found out later was that he tuned her piano with an SAT and did not tell her.
The "Tune off" was between Virgil Smith and Jim Coleman. Jim use the SAT and Virgil tuned aurally. The first year Jim won by a slight majority. The next year Virgil won by a slight majority. Sorry to break the aural tuning bubble but a novice tuner will be ahead to go straight to the ETD and spend lots of time learning repair and regulation. Currently you have to do a partial aural tuning to be come certified as an RPT but those days are numbered.
The manual on the SAT tells jow to set a temperament using the SAT.
_________________________
pianoseed

Top
#633089 - 03/07/03 01:13 AM Re: tuning devices
KlavierBauer Offline
3000 Post Club Member

Registered: 11/06/02
Posts: 3773
Loc: Boulder, Colorado
The tune-off was Virgil Smith, and Jim Coleman Sr. (just to clarify).

Both are amazing technicians, and therein lies the heart of the matter. Certainly Jim Coleman Sr. wasn't using ETD's when he was a wee lad tuning pianos. He has used the ETD as it is designed to be, a tool. It is a tool in the arsenal of tuning, not the tuning itself. I don't argue that ETD's are great and wonderful, I use mine every day. But without my ear being able to check what's going on, how good would it be? Maybe great, maybe not, but I like redundancy. I like having a fail safe. Maybe it comes from climbing, never setup only one anchor point, when you can setup two.

Same applies here, why use only one tool for tuning, when you can use two? I think you save your ear in the longrun, and give your customers better work.

You are certainly right though, new technicians need to also spend adequate time learning the fundamentals of regulation and voicing as well.

KlavierBauer
_________________________
Outlive Yourself - Become an Organ Donor

Top
#633090 - 03/07/03 09:05 AM Re: tuning devices
ejks Offline
Full Member

Registered: 02/05/03
Posts: 175
Loc: Land of Lincoln
This is probably showing my ignorance here but I seem to pretty good at that. \:\) I've read about false beats and I think that is where a string has beats in it while speaking alone. I believe there are different reasons why they occur so when a technician comes across an instrument with false beats how does that play out with the ETD? Does the technician need to "compensate" somehow? Sure the pitch may be correct but doesn't that affect the reading on the ETD or does the ETD know when to compensate? I know there has got to be an easy answer. Thanks for all your input thus far.
_________________________
People will tell you they know what they like but what they really mean is they like what they know.

Top
#633091 - 03/07/03 11:56 AM Re: tuning devices
reblder Offline
1000 Post Club Member

Registered: 10/21/01
Posts: 1237
Loc: Sherman Oaks, Calif.
I must confess to being something of an obsessive fanatic when setting the temperament. As a result, it can even take me a bit longer when using the Verituner as opposed to an aural only approach there. This is because I'm constantly checking out the Verituner's accuracy through aural checks.

It's funny that in the first eleven yars of my tuning career I was "aurally fixated". Then when I acquired an SAT I, I became dependent on it and really felt at a loss on those several occasions I didn't have it(as when I had to send in for repairs). These days though I don't seem to have quite that dependency on the few occasions I've had to also send in the Verituner for fixing problems.

Mark Mandell@pianosource.com

Top
#633092 - 03/07/03 12:04 PM Re: tuning devices
Rick Clark Offline
1000 Post Club Member

Registered: 01/04/03
Posts: 1810
Loc: North County San Diego CA
ejks,

The ETDs don't listen to beats, so they are irrelevant to the machine. An aural tuner quickly realizes through process of elimination that a beat is false and simply ignores it.

FWIW, I find false beats less and less common (or more reparable) these days, because typical new inexpensive pianos are much better made. I find most of the intractable false beating problems are in U.S. made spinets, but thankfully I see less and less of those in the field each year.

Regards,

Rick Clark
_________________________
Rick Clark

Piano tuner-technician

Top
#633093 - 03/07/03 03:31 PM Re: tuning devices
Chris W1 Offline
500 Post Club Member

Registered: 09/26/01
Posts: 915
Loc: Boston
Not to be confused with Chris W, I'm of almost the opposite persuasion. I won't make a techno anecdote about why I'd bet ETD tunings yield better results, on average, than do aural tunings. I would disagree that you can't tune with an ETD if you can't achieve an equal result without one. Maybe that's a different, higher standard, than merely having an understanding of aural tuning, or being able to hear beats in unisons, octaves, or perhaps fifths.

I would hate to have to grade myself with an ETD, as the PTG does, if I didn't have it along with me most of the way. I will say, however, that Rick, you are welcome to come by and judge my DIY efforts any time you are next in the Boston area.

Anyone know if Pocket PC's will run Tunelabs?

Cheers,
Chris W1
_________________________
Amateur At Large

Top
#633094 - 03/07/03 07:44 PM Re: tuning devices
TomtheTuner Offline
500 Post Club Member

Registered: 07/29/01
Posts: 806
Loc: Melbourne, Florida USA
What everybody has said has truth. Especially the one about the lady that believed she was getting an non-EDT tuning. I have been using a Sanderson Sigh-0tuner, then a SAT 1 and now a
SAT 3 for over 27 years. Probably 20k pianos. I also have passed the RPT test. The EDT is a good thing. Any tuner that disregards the effectiveness of a properly used EDT is living in another dimension. Any pianist that does the same is too stupid to learn anythin new , so why bother??? The fastest way to learn is to use anm EDT to confirm what your ear tell you. But knowledge is different from experience. Just get in there and DO IT!!! everything will sort itself out. trust me....
_________________________
Maker of the TCHAMMER
www.thomasccobble.com

BUSY IS BETTER THAN BORED

Top
#633095 - 03/07/03 09:36 PM Re: tuning devices
Rick Clark Offline
1000 Post Club Member

Registered: 01/04/03
Posts: 1810
Loc: North County San Diego CA
Will *anyone* here read that Scientific American article and turn this into an intelligent discussion, or are you all just going to chant your ETD mantras?

This is an opportunity to learn something about this subject, folks. If you consider yourselves professional you ought to avail yourselves of that opportunity.

Regards,

Rick Clark
_________________________
Rick Clark

Piano tuner-technician

Top
#633096 - 03/07/03 10:52 PM Re: tuning devices
pianoseed Offline
500 Post Club Member

Registered: 06/13/01
Posts: 884
Loc: here
Jim Coleman is an excellent aural tuner. However he has used ETD's since they were invented, from the Conn strobe to the SAT to the Cybertuner. He is not afraid of technology.
I heard of a story about adding machines introduced to Japanese workers to improve effeciency. The opposite result was achieved. The problem? The employees were adding the figures on their adding machines but they did not trust them. They were checking the figures on their abbaci.
As they say in pilot school, trust you guages. Spend the other time doing things that make a difference.
_________________________
pianoseed

Top
#633097 - 03/08/03 04:55 AM Re: tuning devices
KlavierBauer Offline
3000 Post Club Member

Registered: 11/06/02
Posts: 3773
Loc: Boulder, Colorado
Rick, I will gladly read the article you linked, as well as bump this article back up, so we can begin an intelligent discussion. \:\)

I hope I wasn't contributing to it's idiocy.

KlavierBauer
_________________________
Outlive Yourself - Become an Organ Donor

Top
#633098 - 03/08/03 08:34 AM Re: tuning devices
ejks Offline
Full Member

Registered: 02/05/03
Posts: 175
Loc: Land of Lincoln
In response to KlavierBauer,
You used the word "link" in reference to the article in the SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN, 1979?? Did I miss something? Is there a link so I can click it on or does it need to be dug out of the archives at the local library? Thanks.
ej
_________________________
People will tell you they know what they like but what they really mean is they like what they know.

Top
#633099 - 03/08/03 04:34 PM Re: tuning devices
reblder Offline
1000 Post Club Member

Registered: 10/21/01
Posts: 1237
Loc: Sherman Oaks, Calif.
 Quote:

Originally posted by Rick Clark:
Will *anyone* here read that Scientific American article and turn this into an intelligent discussion, or are you all just going to chant your ETD mantras?[/b]
OK, Rick, I happened to read that article after I bought that issue years ago. So are you referring to the small "detuning" policy for unisons that extends their sustaining time a little?

Mark@pianosource.com

Top
#633100 - 03/08/03 05:33 PM Re: tuning devices
Rick Clark Offline
1000 Post Club Member

Registered: 01/04/03
Posts: 1810
Loc: North County San Diego CA
Mark,

I wouldn't quite put it in those terms, but that is the article. It has to do with the reflection of the wave through the string and board, phase cancellation as a result of those reflections, and how good ear tuners naturally "fudge" the unisons a bit by ear to get a good, rounded, smoothly progressing, pianistic dynamics envelope on each note, whereas tuning unisons electronically to the same frequency results in a more abbreviated, "deader" type sound.

Since when I hear a consumer complaint about how an ETD tuning came out, the phrase "dead sounding" (or some variation) is usually attached, I tend to think that this effect is significant to the listener/pianist.

Mind you, this is only one issue regarding why an ETD tuner needs to have a "tuner's ear" to understand what does or does not constitute a good tuning.... but since it is so well documented, accessible, and clearly explained, I thought it would be a good place to start, for those of the ETD "no ear tuning ability necessary" persuasion.

Also, I have been called a "dinosaur", and I assume that means "old, set in my ways, unable to change, and not keeping up with current knowledge". I wish to call out the opposition as to the extent of their knowledge and experience on this subject and see what they really know about it and whether they can successfully argue their position without resorting to ad hominem comments.

Regards,

Rick Clark
_________________________
Rick Clark

Piano tuner-technician

Top
#633101 - 03/08/03 07:28 PM Re: tuning devices
KlavierBauer Offline
3000 Post Club Member

Registered: 11/06/02
Posts: 3773
Loc: Boulder, Colorado
Rick, I have never experimented with what you are talking about but it makes sense. I have always tuned unisons by ear, and I thought everyone else did as well. I think I can get a unison in tune better/faster with my ear vs. a machine. I tune middle strings with the ETD, and unisons by ear.

Anyway, it would be interesting to setup a situation where you could tune a section of unisons with an ETD, and then the same section by ear on another piano, and see how close the ETD is. I would think that because of inharmonicity, the place where a unison will sound best is not necessarily where the machine wants it to be mathematically. This is basically what you were pointing to in your earler post yes?

KlavierBauer
_________________________
Outlive Yourself - Become an Organ Donor

Top
#633102 - 03/08/03 09:55 PM Re: tuning devices
SamLewisPiano.com Offline
500 Post Club Member

Registered: 08/19/01
Posts: 635
Loc: WHITE BLUFF (Nashville area) T...
 Quote:
Originally posted by KlavierBauer:
Rick, I have never experimented with what you are talking about but it makes sense. I have always tuned unisons by ear, and I thought everyone else did as well. I think I can get a unison in tune better/faster with my ear vs. a machine. I tune middle strings with the ETD, and unisons by ear.[/b]
KB and Rick- this also opened my eyes up. I assumed that in this discussion ETD tuning meant tuning one unison string by ETD and the rest to that string by ear. Does anyone out there really tune all 3 strings by ETD? Just for the record, from Day One 28 years ago, I have always tuned one string by ETD, and the rest of that unison by ear. I call that an ETD tuning. Have we been talking about different things here? Note to KB- any reason that you tune the middle string first? I have heard of it being done in all possible orders; just curious why you prefer middle string........Sam
_________________________
Since 1975; Full-time piano tuner/tech in Nashville;
Lacquer and polyester specialist.

www.SamLewisPiano.com

Top
#633103 - 03/08/03 10:47 PM Re: tuning devices
Rick Clark Offline
1000 Post Club Member

Registered: 01/04/03
Posts: 1810
Loc: North County San Diego CA
Klavierbauer, no that's not what I meant, and I don't think it's what I said. It's not an inharmonicity issue, it's a wave phase cancellation issue that impacts the volume dynamics envelope of the note. The result is the ear tuned unisons do not have each string to the exact same frequency like the ETDs, but it is more musical and more "correct" than tuning each string to the same frequency.

"me", yes that is the article.

Sam, the ETD tuners I have watched did not do the unisons by ear, but rather by ETD, each string isolated in turn. They referred to the machine on every string. I guess I thought *that* is the usual way.

Regards,

Rick Clark
_________________________
Rick Clark

Piano tuner-technician

Top
#633104 - 03/09/03 12:07 AM Re: tuning devices
SamLewisPiano.com Offline
500 Post Club Member

Registered: 08/19/01
Posts: 635
Loc: WHITE BLUFF (Nashville area) T...
Rick and all: well it took us a while to get to this point, by all of us assuming we knew what the other really meant. I would be interested in what others in this thread consider "ear" and "ETD" tuning. For me, "ear" is tuning without benefit of an ETD. My view of ETD tuning is using the ETD to tune no more than one string of any given unison. How about the rest of you ETDs on this thread- how do you do it? As much as I love my ETD, I cant imagine using it to tune 3 strings of a unison, for 1 reason: Speed ........Sam
_________________________
Since 1975; Full-time piano tuner/tech in Nashville;
Lacquer and polyester specialist.

www.SamLewisPiano.com

Top
#633105 - 03/09/03 02:49 AM Re: tuning devices
reblder Offline
1000 Post Club Member

Registered: 10/21/01
Posts: 1237
Loc: Sherman Oaks, Calif.
I guess I still retain something of a pro-aural or ear tuning bias here because I don't trust the ETA's(like my Verituner) to provide me with a satisfactory sounding unison if I tune all the strings this way. But on a few occasions I have used the ETA for the unison tuning to help with false beats, I actually wasn't displeased with the result, so go figure.

Mark@pianosource.com

Top
#633106 - 03/09/03 03:15 AM Re: tuning devices
KlavierBauer Offline
3000 Post Club Member

Registered: 11/06/02
Posts: 3773
Loc: Boulder, Colorado
Rick, sorry for miscommunicating. \:\)

My mind was going in two different directions. I was hypothesizing about inharmonicity, but referring to your comment about the same outcome (with different processes). I will try to find the article you mentioned so I can better understand what you're saying, although it makes sense. Not that it's the same thing, but we can see what different phasing in the sound envelope will do when a hammer doesn't hit all 3 strings squarely. I understand this is a different subject, but a similar principle I think. Two sign waves out of phase can do some funny things soundwise. Again, sorry for implying that you were talking about inharmonicity, I understand that you weren't. I sometimes have trouble communicating with this medium. \:\) I hope I didn't cause you to sigh and exclaim "He just doesn't get it!" *grin*

Sam: I tune the middle string first simply because I've always done it that way. I have a very efficient system of moving the mute when I tune that way, and can move from note to note very easily. I strip mute the piano with felt, tune middle strings, then pull the mute strip. Then with a rubber mute, I tune right, then left strings through the section. I tune one section at a time this way. Of course if the piano is severely out of tune, I will adjust methods accordingly. For example, setting the temperament section first, or pitch raising a section that is significantly flatter than the rest of the piano. But for the most part, I tune chromatically section by section.

KlavierBauer
_________________________
Outlive Yourself - Become an Organ Donor

Top
#633107 - 03/09/03 03:53 AM Re: tuning devices
pianoseed Offline
500 Post Club Member

Registered: 06/13/01
Posts: 884
Loc: here
I use the SAT to tune a single string and then tune the unison by ear excetp for octave 7 which I tune string by string and then check them by ear and by plucking each string. On very difficult pianos with lots of false beats I sometimes tune octaves 6 and 7 string by string with the SAT.
_________________________
pianoseed

Top
#633108 - 03/12/03 02:11 PM Re: tuning devices
pianoseed Offline
500 Post Club Member

Registered: 06/13/01
Posts: 884
Loc: here
I would like to apologize for calling the pro-aural anti-etd tuners dinosaurs. From now on I will refer you as "John Henry's." :p
_________________________
pianoseed

Top
#633109 - 03/12/03 02:39 PM Re: tuning devices
ejks Offline
Full Member

Registered: 02/05/03
Posts: 175
Loc: Land of Lincoln
Thanks again to all who contributed. \:\) I have been considering taking the technology course from the school out in Oregon and this information is helpful. If anyone has any thoughts on that matter I'd love to hear those too. One just has to wade through the opinions but that's what this whole process is about. Thanks again.

Also to Thammer, thanks for the apology. I take that to mean you'll use proper names from now on. Lord only knows how many x's I've changed feet in my mouth! \:D
_________________________
People will tell you they know what they like but what they really mean is they like what they know.

Top
#633110 - 03/12/03 07:24 PM Re: tuning devices
Rick Clark Offline
1000 Post Club Member

Registered: 01/04/03
Posts: 1810
Loc: North County San Diego CA
thammer,

Does that mean you read the Scientifc American article?

But no one in this thread was ever "anti-ETD". It has just been said that aural tuning skills are important even if you use an ETD, and the ETD is just a tool in the arsenal.

I'm not sure about that "John Henry" reference, though- don't you think that is more appropriate for the restringers? Wham!

Regards,

Rick Clark
_________________________
Rick Clark

Piano tuner-technician

Top
#633111 - 03/13/03 01:04 AM Re: tuning devices
pianoseed Offline
500 Post Club Member

Registered: 06/13/01
Posts: 884
Loc: here
Remember John Henry died with a hammer in his hand vowing not to let the steam drill beat him. Aural tuners vow not to let etd's beat them, to no avail. \:\(
_________________________
pianoseed

Top
#633112 - 03/13/03 01:09 PM Re: tuning devices
Rick Clark Offline
1000 Post Club Member

Registered: 01/04/03
Posts: 1810
Loc: North County San Diego CA
I see. So you are still attempting to ridicule some of the finest tuners in the world.

Regards,

Rick Clark
_________________________
Rick Clark

Piano tuner-technician

Top
#633113 - 03/13/03 01:46 PM Re: tuning devices
Chris W1 Offline
500 Post Club Member

Registered: 09/26/01
Posts: 915
Loc: Boston
 Quote:
But no one in this thread was ever "anti-ETD". It has just been said that aural tuning skills are important even if you use an ETD, and the ETD is just a tool in the arsenal.
Yes, but perhaps it is more specifically coming down to what extent someone needs to be familiar with the aural method before a high measure of success can be achieved with an ETD. In past ETD threads, here and on the PTG site I believe, the majority of ETD users have always done unisons aurally after the first string and time was the reason. Also, in a past PTG thread I remember reading a poll on how many tuners deliberately tune unisons imperfect. The response was again a majority stating their aim was pure beatlessness and, if they could get there, perfection. I haven't read the Sci Am link, but intend to when I can get the time.

If, Rick, you are suggesting some lack of phase that comes from a *very* slow beat as the goal, my question would be don't you also notice a reduction in sustain once the notes begin to be tuned in this manner? I try and keep in mind that sounds in opposite phase cancel one another. That's how noice cancelation devises work. As such, I am not convinced that anything other than pure unisons are the what to strive for.

Sorry for not reading the article. Our S&S B arrived home this morning and I am here at work itching to go home and tune the 7 month old strings. I brought them up from a half step flat on Sunday at the incredibly dry environs of the refinisher. Now, its at home in 50%RH with 4 go-bars I cobbed together and placed between the floor and the ribs. I am hopeful that what was very little crown will be prevented from possibly going negative. Laugh, if you want to.

Chris W1
_________________________
Amateur At Large

Top
#633114 - 03/15/03 02:08 AM Re: tuning devices
pianoseed Offline
500 Post Club Member

Registered: 06/13/01
Posts: 884
Loc: here
Rick, Get a sense of humor! \:D
_________________________
pianoseed

Top
#633115 - 05/11/03 09:28 AM Re: tuning devices
Ralph Offline
1000 Post Club Member

Registered: 12/09/01
Posts: 1293
Loc: Delaware (slower/lower)
Sorry to bring this up again, but I need a little advise. I have a Peterson strobe tuner which I bought used several years ago. I would like to get a new tuner and am thinking about the Sat III or the Verituner. Could I get some opinions about these two or if there are any other recommendations? Thanks.
_________________________
Do or do not. There is no try.

Top
#633116 - 05/11/03 10:43 AM Re: tuning devices
TomtheTuner Offline
500 Post Club Member

Registered: 07/29/01
Posts: 806
Loc: Melbourne, Florida USA
Ralph, I don't know the Veri-Tuner at all BUT,,,, I DO know the SAT 3 and it is awesome!!!!

It is a very stable and dependable piece of technology. The Battery will last for a week, the thing can take rough handling,and it does NOT take up much space. It is worth every penny of its price. I really like the ways that you can tweek each piano to account for differences in inharmonicity. The only other alternative I can mention would be the RCT on the HAND-HELD Platform
_________________________
Maker of the TCHAMMER
www.thomasccobble.com

BUSY IS BETTER THAN BORED

Top
#633117 - 05/11/03 11:16 AM Re: tuning devices
Ralph Offline
1000 Post Club Member

Registered: 12/09/01
Posts: 1293
Loc: Delaware (slower/lower)
Thanks Thomas. I think the Sat III is probably the industry standard. The VeriTuner advertises the ability to "listen" to multiple partials. I don't know if this would help or just confuse things for me. I have seen the Sat III but never the Verituner. Unfortunatetly I haven't seen the RCT but have heard good things. The Sat III is probably the safe choice since this has been around for a while.
_________________________
Do or do not. There is no try.

Top
#633118 - 05/12/03 01:32 PM Re: tuning devices
Ralph Offline
1000 Post Club Member

Registered: 12/09/01
Posts: 1293
Loc: Delaware (slower/lower)
Does anyone know if any of these ETDs will listen to intervals and determine if there are an appropriate number of beats? It sure would help if it could determine if major and minor thirds, fourths and fifths and properly "out of tune".
_________________________
Do or do not. There is no try.

Top
#633119 - 05/12/03 01:52 PM Re: tuning devices
Chris W1 Offline
500 Post Club Member

Registered: 09/26/01
Posts: 915
Loc: Boston
Ralph,

Any ETD that has temperment settings should be steering you for the beat rates of your choice. TuneLabs defaults to equal temperment and, by so doing, should achieve the 3 beat/5 seconds fifths, etc. If you don't like that, the software comes with mean(?) tone and all that other stuff.

FYI, Robert Scott's TuneLabs also measures up to the 6th/7th partials and, I believe, will function on a pocket PC. Check out Bill Spurlocks new tuning pin mount for these devices:

http://www.spurlocktools.com/id63.htm

From the pic, it looks like it the RCT works on pocket PC's, as well.

Chris
_________________________
Amateur At Large

Top
#633120 - 05/12/03 03:11 PM Re: tuning devices
Ralph Offline
1000 Post Club Member

Registered: 12/09/01
Posts: 1293
Loc: Delaware (slower/lower)
That sounds great Chris. I'm going to give Tunelab a try. I believe they offer a free download. I just received my Steinway B back after a total rebuild. It took 14 months, but the results are marvelous. I can't keep my hands off the piano, but I like to keep it in tune (who doesn't). I don't mind taking a tuning hammer to it every week or so just for a few touch up areas. After a while, I've found one begins to know a specific piano and all the "trouble" areas. I knew where they were before the rebuild, but haven't found any since. Still, every piano has it's own personality and I think, in time, I'll be able to tune it better and more often than someone else. Thanks again.
_________________________
Do or do not. There is no try.

Top
Page 1 of 2 1 2 >

Moderator:  Piano World 
What's Hot!!
HOW TO POST PICTURES on the Piano Forums
-------------------
Sharing is Caring!
About the Buttons
-------------------
Forums Rules & Help
-------------------
ADVERTISE
on Piano World

The world's most popular piano web site.
-------------------
PIANO BOOKS
Interesting books about the piano, pianists, piano history, biographies, memoirs and more!
(125ad) Dampp Chaser
Dampp Chaser Piano Life Saver
Sheet Music
(PW is an affiliate)
Sheet Music Plus Featured Sale
Download & Print Sheet Music Instantly
sheet music search
sheet music search

sheet music search
(ad) HAILUN Pianos
Hailun Pianos - Click for More
(ad) Lindeblad Piano
Lindeblad Piano Restoration
Who's Online
165 registered (Atrys, Almaviva, accordeur, Anne'sson, anotherscott, 51 invisible), 1808 Guests and 54 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Stats
74206 Members
42 Forums
153499 Topics
2249386 Posts

Max Online: 15252 @ 03/21/10 11:39 PM
New Topics - Multiple Forums
Happy Birthday TwoSnowflakes
by gooddog
44 minutes 7 seconds ago
Troubleshooting the Gravity Drop/Weight Transfer etc.
by bledredwine
Today at 11:16 AM
Stories in SoundBook 2 Valerie Roth Roubos
by DameMyra
Today at 10:48 AM
Teaching memorization
by clarikeys
Today at 07:45 AM
Accepted Procedure for Having a Piano Tech look at a piano?
by Paul678
Today at 07:19 AM
(ads by Google)

Visit our online store for gifts for music lovers

 
Our Piano Related Classified Ads
| Dealers | Tuners | Lessons | Movers | Restorations | Pianos For Sale | Sell Your Piano |

Advertise on Piano World
| Subscribe | Piano World | PianoSupplies.com | Advertise on Piano World | Donate | Link to Us | Classifieds |
| |Contact | Privacy | Legal | About Us | Site Map | Free Newsletter | Press Room |


copyright 1997 - 2014 Piano World ® all rights reserved
No part of this site may be reproduced without prior written permission