This custom search works much better than the built in one and allows searching older posts.
|
|
69880 Members
40 Forums
143483 Topics
2075748 Posts
Max Online: 15252 @ 03/21/10 11:39 PM
|
|
|
#680222 - 04/24/03 08:48 AM
Re: PA vs. amplifier
|
1000 Post Club Member
Registered: 11/06/01
Posts: 1820
Loc: NJ
|
I guess it depends what you mean by PA system. An amplifier is really not just an amplifier, but also a preamp and a speaker all built into one piece of gear. A PA system generally consists of those same components in separate pieces. An amplifier can have multiple channels (inputs) but usually not more than 6 or 8. A PA system's "preamp" comes in the form of a mixing board and usually has at least that many channels and can have 60 channels (or more). Technically it's possible to plug a microphone into an amplifier, but they're not generally designed for anything other than instruments. PA systems have multiple microphone preamps and are designed for any instrument. Typically PA systems are more expensive and have a greater potential for high quality sound. PA systems can also range in size from a small integrated system to the PA system at a concert arena. A PA system can range in price from a few hundred dollars to several hundred thousand dollars. But this is a very generic answer as PA systems can be good, bad, and everywhere in between (just like amplifiers). Amplifiers are usually a bit more portable and top out financially at around $1500. But you can get a decent one for a few hundred dollars.
Can you give us an idea of what you've looked at specifically?
_________________________
PianoWorld disclaimer: musician, producer, arranger, author, clinician, consultant, PS2 aficionado, secret agent...
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#680224 - 04/25/03 11:28 AM
Re: PA vs. amplifier
|
1000 Post Club Member
Registered: 11/06/01
Posts: 1820
Loc: NJ
|
Roland and Motion Sound make great amps. I'm not as thrilled with Behringer -- certainly a different level of quality/performance. I'd suspect that if your budget is "light" that you'll do better with an amp. Do you mind sharing what your budget is?
_________________________
PianoWorld disclaimer: musician, producer, arranger, author, clinician, consultant, PS2 aficionado, secret agent...
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#680226 - 04/25/03 05:47 PM
Re: PA vs. amplifier
|
1000 Post Club Member
Registered: 11/06/01
Posts: 1820
Loc: NJ
|
In that price range, you'll definitely be better off with an amplifier. I highly recommend the Roland KC300 if you think you might need a bit more volume than your living room requires. If not, the KC100 or even the KC60 will do nicely. As I said in an earlier post, Motion Sound makes great products as well.
_________________________
PianoWorld disclaimer: musician, producer, arranger, author, clinician, consultant, PS2 aficionado, secret agent...
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#680227 - 04/26/03 07:34 PM
Re: PA vs. amplifier
|
Full Member
Registered: 04/26/03
Posts: 82
Loc: Zug, Switzerland
|
IMO the tube channel of the Motion Sound KT 80 is an advantage.
To reach a similar goal I use a tube DAC/preamp for connecting a cd player and a digital piano with my active studio monitors (MEG RL 906). The result is an almost realistic combination of the warm tube sound with the analytic studio sound.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#680228 - 05/06/03 07:55 PM
Re: PA vs. amplifier
|
Full Member
Registered: 05/05/03
Posts: 23
Loc: Michigan, USA
|
If you haven't already made your purchase... I think you would do well to look for a used/demo Mackie powered PA speaker, or even a JBL EON. These are incredibly loud, super clean/accurate, and much more versatile than a keyboard amp in the long view, as they are also perfectly suited to stage monitor or mains usage. If you need to warm up the sound for your keys, do as another here has mentioned, and throw a cheap tube-preamp in front.
-Lorenzo
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#680229 - 05/06/03 10:17 PM
Re: PA vs. amplifier
|
1000 Post Club Member
Registered: 11/06/01
Posts: 1820
Loc: NJ
|
I think you would do well to look for a used/demo Mackie powered PA speaker, or even a JBL EON. These are incredibly loud, super clean/accurate, and much more versatile than a keyboard amp in the long view, as they are also perfectly suited to stage monitor or mains usage. Actually, the Roland KC 300 keyboard amp is considerably more versatile than either the Mackie or the JBL. Don't get me wrong, the Mackie and the JBL are both fine products (I have several EON's). But neither are multichannel devices. The Roland KC 300 can accomodate 4 stereo keyboard inputs (or 8 mono), has a stereo link for adding another amp, and has a stand mount built in for mounting on ultimate support speaker stands. It also has a monitor input (which remains separate from the keyboard inputs) which allows it to be used as a stage monitor for vocals, guitars, etc. Both the Mackie and the JBL sound great, but are really intended for PA use.
_________________________
PianoWorld disclaimer: musician, producer, arranger, author, clinician, consultant, PS2 aficionado, secret agent...
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#680230 - 05/07/03 12:46 AM
Re: PA vs. amplifier
|
Full Member
Registered: 05/05/03
Posts: 23
Loc: Michigan, USA
|
Sounds like a great amp, Steve.
I guess it's all about emphasis. I don't think I like having a mixer built in to a speaker I'd like to use as mains on a small PA... but I guess you're still right - over all, a full-blown keyboard amp is probably more versatile.
-Lorenzo
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#680231 - 05/07/03 10:36 AM
Re: PA vs. amplifier
|
1000 Post Club Member
Registered: 11/06/01
Posts: 1820
Loc: NJ
|
I'm with you Lorenzo. But remember, the budget in question is in the $400-500 range.
_________________________
PianoWorld disclaimer: musician, producer, arranger, author, clinician, consultant, PS2 aficionado, secret agent...
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|