Actually, I was just going to go to bed, but I figured since you're such an easy victim to assail, since you lack any sort of mental acumen, I'll kick you while you're down, or beat a dead horse if that's easier for you to understand, since you're down for the count, bleeding profusely on the canvas of ignorance.

You claim I live in delusion and have "labeled" me a conspiracy theorist.

I challenge you to refute a SINGLE STATEMENT of mine. Allow me to post it to you again.

Strange it seems to me, as even the mainstream media has already long caught on to the FACTS of this war. Namely, that there are no weapons of mass destruction and that Bin Laden has no ties to Iraq or Hussein. So, Markpcs, enlighten me, or at least throw a few more vacuous labels at me for fun, why are we in Iraq Mark? Why are we killing hundreds of thousands of children and civilians, Mark? Why are thousands of AMERICAN SOLDIERS maimed and decollated, Mark? Why are thousand+ more dead, Mark? Can you answer me any of these questions? Have we a right to be there? Our pretense was weapons of mass destruction, Mark, you know the same ones that Israel, North Korea, China, India, and Pakistan have. But why are we attacking Iraq and not them, Mark? Does it have anything to do with the fact that none of the other aforementioned countries sit atop an oil field the size of Wisconsin? Or perhaps because Iraq, with its obsolete, demoralized, and easily bribed armed forces, is the easiest foe to move in on, trample, and vanquish for the sake of financial prosperity, riches, and middle east IMPERIALISM.

Are you a religious man, Mark? Mr. Bush claims to be. In fact he claims to be a devout Christian. Mark, now I gotta ask ya for a favor, buddy. You know my memory's been going lately and I just am wondering if you can help an old pal out. Can you help me find that passage in the Bible that tells us Christians to invade, pillage, pilfer, sack, kill, maraud, shock and awe, rape, humiliate, demoralize, a country for its oil. Oh, and if you can't find that one, can you please try to look for that one that allows us to pillage a country's resources and people even after our initial pretense of invasion has been debunked as a fraud, or at least a gross miscalculation? Thanks, buddy, I knew I could count on you. Let me know when you find them.

I do not need to justify anything to you.

You are against the war. Wow! What a revelation! War is bad! War is hell. People die! Horror!

I am all for preemptive attacks to secure this nation. I do not care what you think, feel or demand. As long as certain nations of the middle east or any nation or warlord, or leader of any kind continue to breed their people to hate and attack us we must be on the offensive. If that takes till the end of time, so be it.

It has nothing to do with imperialism.

Yeah. Ok. I see where you are now. You are obviously so biased in this matter that you fail to see the reality of what the proud men and women of our military are actually doing over there.

You admit your memory has been going so I would suggest you try to do something about that. Maybe you could try to read something other than the left wing propaganda to which you seem to be indulging.

Religion has nothing to do with this.

Actually, you asked 3 questions there.

Anyway, you really need to settle down about this. You scream about the threats that Osama made to bomb the U.S. should Bush get re-elected, when really it just shows how desperate he is to get him out of office. Could this be because he knows he will have a harder time with Bush than with Kerry? Who's to say he wouldn't attack even if Kerry was elected? Are you going to trust a terrorist? Are you a terrorist?

Well, I'll let you go to bed now. Don't forget your rubber sheets.

Mark, you are dealing with loonys!

I know David.

It's fun to see them get all worked up though!

Thank you RA! We will.

Going by your logic, anyone who supported the Allies in WW2 was supporting murder seeing how the millions of German civilians were killed.

Liberals like you always have to take everything to the extreme, which is where you lose all credibility.

Man RA--you gotta buy yourself a Bible and read it! People are getting slaughtered in it all over the place.

1) The term "murdering" implies intent. If you are implying that our troops are intentionally killing innocent Iraqis then your ignorance is only exceeded by your calumny.

2) What "councils" have admitted that bin Laden's ties to Saddam Hussein were "tenuous at best" and just what degree of non-tenuousness is required before we begin to worry about them. Listening to you one would have to conclude that you believe there was no conceivable chance that Saddam's WMD capabilities and financial resources would ever find themselves in the hands of Al Qaeda and yet there have been numerous documented encounters beteen the two. How many undocumented encounters might we suppose or even assume that there have been.

This is the second most ridiculous thread I've read, containing two of the rudest and narrow-minded people I've met in a while.

yahpaapapabo,

I bet you if someone had kidnapped you and your family, holding them hostage in your basement, and you watch as the attacker kills your brother because he spoke up....and you and your family are sitting there helpless in the basement, and I come in and kill the attacker, thus making you and your family free....afterwards you would get mad at me and call me a murderer?

THAT is why you are a moron.

THAT is why you are a moron.[/b]


I must disagree. That is *proof* he is a moron. *Why* he is a moron runs much, much deeper.

Most true and revealing statement in your post.

So. Where the hell are you from, anyway?

Where the hell are you from, anyway?[/b]

You do realize that you answered your own question within your question, don't you?......

"You", I am embarrassed to say, is probably a Canadian. Indeed, "you" made reference in the "Canadian Friend" thread to a poltical party which only Canadians, or people on the Canada Desk in the State Dept. would be aware. I very much doubt the latter.

Larry is the man.

:D

I'm confused - are you saying that the Bible says this is ok as long as it's not for oil; or are you saying the rules of engagement as defined in the bible are different if it's not for oil?

It's not for oil..... really

exactly apple.

The wackos have got this all wrong. They hate Bush and that's all they know so they will try to get anyone to listen to their lies and call those who do not listen stupid. Something RA is very good at by the way.

All the national political ads skipped Kansas except for on election eve we were treated to a spooky (complete with ghost music) analysis of the Bush / Saudi relationship.. It put our resident dems to shame it was so leftbank.

Too bad it's not for oil. I WANT MY CHEAP GAS!!!

penny
(kidding, of course -- written for those of you without a sense of humor)

apple , you are so right. In fact when I was talking about the election to people at school and I said I wanted Bush to win they always used that "War for oil" complaint against him, saying that he is evil etc. :rolleyes:

I'm staying out of this thread, but I must say that if the pot calling the kettle black. Or, in this case, the black pot calling the blue kettle black.

Posted by JBryan:
Jeesh, are you still parroting that thoroughly debunked nonsense perpetrated by none other than Dick Cheney?

You guys(and maybe gals too)just can't seem to let go of this, can you?

Actually, no. I was using the good old common sense that the Lord provided me and seems to have, somehow, withheld from you.

Aw the heck with it. I'll just let the next 4 years speak for themselves.

AKindWord

The lord, whoever she is, seems to have missed JBryan when she was handing out the common
sense

Not, "point proven again"?

Perhaps the next four years will pull the wind out of your reductio.