Welcome to the Piano World Piano Forums
Over 2 million posts about pianos, digital pianos, and all types of keyboard instruments
Join the World's Largest Community of Piano Lovers (it's free)
It's Fun to Play the Piano ... Please Pass It On!

SEARCH
the Forums & Piano World

This custom search works much better than the built in one and allows searching older posts.
(ad 125) Sweetwater - Digital Keyboards & Other Gear
Digital Pianos at Sweetwater
(ad) Pianoteq
Latest Pianoteq add-on instrument: U4 upright piano
(ad) Pearl River
Pearl River Pianos
(ad) P B Guide
Acoustic & Digital Piano Guide
PianoSupplies.com (150)
Piano Accessories Music Related Gifts Piano Tuning Equipment Piano Moving Equipment
We now offer Gift Certificates in our online store!
(ad) Estonia Piano
Estonia Piano
Quick Links to Useful Stuff
Our Classified Ads
Find Piano Professionals-

*Piano Dealers - Piano Stores
*Piano Tuners
*Piano Teachers
*Piano Movers
*Piano Restorations
*Piano Manufacturers
*Organs

Quick Links:
*Advertise On Piano World
*Free Piano Newsletter
*Online Piano Recitals
*Piano Recitals Index
*Piano Accessories
* Buying a Piano
*Buying A Acoustic Piano
*Buying a Digital Piano
*Pianos for Sale
*Sell Your Piano
*How Old is My Piano?
*Piano Books
*Piano Art, Pictures, & Posters
*Directory/Site Map
*Contest
*Links
*Virtual Piano
*Music Word Search
*Piano Screen Saver
*Piano Videos
*Virtual Piano Chords
Topic Options
#896207 - 04/01/04 11:15 AM Now There's An Idea -- Let's *Smear* The Jurors!
Cindysphinx Offline


Registered: 02/14/03
Posts: 6416
Loc: Washington D.C. Metro
Hi, all,

The Martha Stewart defense team has sunk to an all-time low -- juror character assassination.

It seems that Martha is now saying she should get a brand spankin' new trial because one of the jurors wasn't entirely truthful on his jury selection form.

Let's see. Martha's lawyers say he failed to disclose he had been briefly jailed for throwing a statue at a girlfriend (charges dropped), had embezzled money from a Little League team (never reported to police) and had been sued three times (no details provided by the Stewart team). They used private investigators to dig up this handful of mud.

Based on this, the Stewart team skewered the juror, saying in court filings that he "is a man with a checkered history." They say that had they only known the true story of the juror's past, they would have struck him from the jury.

I hope the court sanctions the lawyers for filing such drivel. Fortunately, courts rarely order new trials for this sort of thing -- you probably couldn't win a new trial unless you found out something *serious,* like the juror lost his life savings when Imclone crashed and has been stalking Martha for months and sending her death threats.

I'm not impressed with Martha's lawyers or this sort of lawyering.

Cindy

*********************************

From the Washington Post
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A40648-2004Mar31.html

NEW YORK, March 31 -- Martha Stewart asked to have her felony convictions overturned and a new trial ordered, arguing that the most outspoken member of the jury that convicted her had concealed previous brushes with the court system, including an arrest on domestic assault charges.


Stewart's lawyers wrote in a motion filed Wednesday that Chappell Hartridge lied in his sworn court questionnaire, failing to disclose that he had been briefly jailed for assaulting a former girlfriend and had been sued at least three times. The lawyers also alleged that former youth baseball league officials said that Hartridge embezzled money from the Kingsbridge Little League in the Bronx.

After Stewart's March 5 conviction on charges of conspiracy, obstruction and lying about a personal stock sale, Hartridge, 47, became the public face of the jury, appearing on camera and speaking freely to the media about the verdict. He said then that he viewed the conviction as "victory for the little guy" who takes the losses in the stock market while well-connected insiders profit at his expense.

"Hartridge is a man with a checkered history, who deliberately concealed his prior experiences with the legal system so that he could empower the 'little man' and profit from the process. He appears to have committed perjury to gain access to a case in which he would judge whether other defendants made intentional false statements," Stewart's attorney Robert G. Morvillo wrote in the motion asking for a new trial.

He urged U.S. District Judge Miriam Goldman Cedarbaum to overturn the verdict or, at a minimum, to order an evidentiary hearing into the allegations.

A spokesman for the U.S. attorney's office in Manhattan, which prosecuted Stewart, declined to comment on the motion.

A woman answering the phone at Hartridge's home said he was not there and then said Hartridge "has no criminal record" and "he was never convicted" of the assault charge. She would not give her name and declined to comment further.

Hartridge's many interviews apparently led almost directly to the motion for a new trial. According to the court filings, an officer of the Kingsbridge Little League contacted Morvillo's office with the allegations about the embezzlement just one day after the verdict. According to the filings, Little League officers told Morvillo's private investigator that while Hartridge, who then worked at Citibank, was the group's treasurer, he circumvented rules requiring two signatures on league checks and wrote checks to himself and to a finance company to cover his car payments. The Little League officers said they had not contacted law enforcement or taken other actions against Hartridge.

Stewart's legal team also tracked down Gail Outlaw, who said in a sworn affidavit that she lived with Hartridge for four months in 1997 and that he physically abused her. She said that she had him arrested after he threw a statue of an elephant at her but that she then dropped criminal charges.

Stewart's lawyers allege that Hartridge would have been struck from the jury if he had disclosed those issues to the court. As a result, his inclusion on the panel violated Stewart's constitutional right to an impartial and unbiased jury. Stewart and her former broker Peter E. Bacanovic were convicted after five weeks of testimony that focused on whether they lied to authorities about the true reason she sold 3,928 shares of ImClone Systems Inc. stock in December 2001 after being told that the company's founder was selling his shares. She is facing an estimated 10 to 16 months in prison under federal sentencing guidelines.

Former federal prosecutor Seth Farber, who is not connected to either side of the case, said judges rarely grant motions for a new trial based on a juror's failure to be entirely truthful during the selection process.

"Part of the reasons these things are such long shots is that the legal system tries to discourage the sort of rummaging through the lives of jurors for dirt that has obviously gone on here," Farber said. Still, he said, "there's no downside to them in doing it."
_________________________
Vote For Cindy!!

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/post...QvjrL_blog.html

Top
Piano & Music Accessories
#896208 - 04/01/04 11:22 AM Re: Now There's An Idea -- Let's *Smear* The Jurors!
Jack Frost Offline
4000 Post Club Member

Registered: 12/10/03
Posts: 4454
Loc: Maine
Really makes you want to step right up to the front of the jury pool and do your civic duty by sitting on a jury. Martha has always been a big bully and this is perfectly in character from what i have read.

Of course, that is all second hand.....

jf
_________________________
"Make the pie higher." GWB

Top
#896209 - 04/01/04 11:30 AM Re: Now There's An Idea -- Let's *Smear* The Jurors!
Improviso Offline
1000 Post Club Member

Registered: 03/19/04
Posts: 1484
I agree with you. Drivel.

But a serious question comes to mind.

The article says "Stewart's lawyers wrote in a motion filed Wednesday that Chappell Hartridge lied in his sworn court questionnaire, failing to disclose that he had been briefly jailed"

If the juror "failed to disclose", is that lying. Or did the defense team (or questionaire) simply not ask the right questions? Are we liars simply because we fail to disclose something that was not asked in the first place?
_________________________
www.coffee-room.com

Top
#896210 - 04/01/04 12:04 PM Re: Now There's An Idea -- Let's *Smear* The Jurors!
Jack Frost Offline
4000 Post Club Member

Registered: 12/10/03
Posts: 4454
Loc: Maine
 Quote:
Originally posted by Improviso:
If the juror "failed to disclose", is that lying. Or did the defense team (or questionaire) simply not ask the right questions? Are we liars simply because we fail to disclose something that was not asked in the first place? [/b]
In a legal sense, absoutely not. There are certainly any number of circumstances where there is an affirmative moral obligation to disclose...but there is only one judge who hears those cases.

jf
_________________________
"Make the pie higher." GWB

Top
#896211 - 04/01/04 12:24 PM Re: Now There's An Idea -- Let's *Smear* The Jurors!
Phlebas Offline


Registered: 01/02/03
Posts: 4654
Loc: New York City
Prime example of a defense team who blew it by making, not one, but several mistakes, and backpedalling like crazy.

(Typical lawyers. -- just kidding)

Top
#896212 - 04/01/04 01:41 PM Re: Now There's An Idea -- Let's *Smear* The Jurors!
kathyk Offline
6000 Post Club Member

Registered: 08/19/03
Posts: 6971
Loc: Maine
Smear has worked so well for the W and Co., why shouldn't Martha & Co. follow suit? Wonderful tool of the rich and powerful.

Top
#896213 - 04/01/04 02:07 PM Re: Now There's An Idea -- Let's *Smear* The Jurors!
Anonymous
Unregistered


or the liberal elite

Top
#896214 - 04/01/04 02:08 PM Re: Now There's An Idea -- Let's *Smear* The Jurors!
Improviso Offline
1000 Post Club Member

Registered: 03/19/04
Posts: 1484
 Quote:
Originally posted by kathyk:
Smear has worked so well for the W and Co., why shouldn't Martha & Co. follow suit? Wonderful tool of the rich and powerful. [/b]
Beep.
Beep.
Beep.



"Tonque in cheek" detector alert!
_________________________
www.coffee-room.com

Top

What's Hot!!
European Piano Party 2014, Picts & Stories! (Piano Party in Portugal)
-------------------
75,000 Members and Growing!
-------------------
HOW TO POST PICTURES on the Piano Forums
-------------------
Sharing is Caring!
About the Buttons
-------------------
Forums Rules & Help
-------------------
ADVERTISE
on Piano World

The world's most popular piano web site.
Ad (Seiler/Knabe)
Seiler Pianos
(ad) Purely Piano Practice Software
Purely Piano Practice Software
(ad) Piano Guide Lessons
Piano Guide Lessons
(ad) HAILUN Pianos
Hailun Pianos - Click for More
Sheet Music
(PW is an affiliate)
Sheet Music Plus Featured Sale
(125ad) Dampp Chaser
Dampp Chaser Piano Life Saver
(ad) Lindeblad Piano
Lindeblad Piano Restoration
Who's Online
121 registered (ando, accordeur, Atrys, AmateurBob, 38 invisible), 1601 Guests and 20 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Stats
75369 Members
42 Forums
155827 Topics
2288218 Posts

Max Online: 15252 @ 03/21/10 11:39 PM
New Topics - Multiple Forums
New to the digital piano world! Can anyone help?
by blackwhitekeys
Today at 06:26 AM
Yamaha Swap For Roland ???
by musicmad
Today at 05:57 AM
midi over the internet
by chopin_r_us
Today at 04:56 AM
Theoretical tuning sequence
by DoelKees
Today at 01:01 AM
It's will never emit sounds again
by Maximillyan
Yesterday at 11:24 PM
(ads by Google)

Visit our online store for gifts for music lovers

 
Our Piano Related Classified Ads
| Dealers | Tuners | Lessons | Movers | Restorations | Pianos For Sale | Sell Your Piano |

Advertise on Piano World
| Subscribe | Piano World | PianoSupplies.com | Advertise on Piano World | Donate | Link to Us | Classifieds |
| |Contact | Privacy | Legal | About Us | Site Map | Free Newsletter | Press Room |


copyright 1997 - 2014 Piano World ® all rights reserved
No part of this site may be reproduced without prior written permission