Piano World Home Page Forums Our Most Popular Forums Pianist Corner concerto movements that stand alone?

There is not enough information in your post to give a reasonable answer. What are the time limitations? What is your technical ability? Can you give us a repertoire list? Have you played any concertos before? You want me to throw suggestions out there? I could literally say ANYTHING at this point. Bach, Beethoven, Brahms, Chopin, Rachmaninov, Liszt, Medtner, Scriabin, Grieg, Tchaikovsky, Prokofiev, etc, etc, etc.

Sorry, I should've included more.

Time restriction, I don't know for sure, but I imagine around 10 maybe 12 minutes would be max. I haven't played a concerto before, and technically I've played Beethoven 10 no 3 and 27 no 1, Chopin 10 no 4, 25 no 1 & 2 and am working on 25 no 5. I also just finished Rachmaninoff 32 no 10. [that's all rep from this last year.] I have a good grasp on voicing and phrasing and have a very easing time memorizing music and understanding what a composer was thinking and how he was moving through a piece. I also have good octave, chord, and scale technique. My arpeggios are not my strongest suit, but I've been working them a lot lately and I'm getting significantly smoother and faster

Poly: The post you seem to have deleted was pretty clever.

Besides the etudes, I've only played the nocturne in Fm, opus 55 no 1 and the Am waltz whose opus number is escaping me.

....do you guys have any experience with the Warsaw Concerto? I LOVE it and it would fit the requirements, but I don't really know anyone who's played it or knows it to well.

Maybe because there isn't one?

(It's a posthumous work.)

Actually, it was 34 no 2. The very first classical piece I ever learned. . (Before that I was all improv and rock band stuff) (well except for playing fur Elise when I was six or something.)

Just a general thing, which most people probably don't agree with because this hardly ever gets done:

I think LAST movements make the best "stand alones." (Because, of course, they have a real ending.)

I've always only heard FIRST movements done as stand-alones. There's been only one near-exception, when a friend played the 2nd and 3rd movements of Mozart's F major Concerto (K. 459) for a competition. (It worked great, and she won.)

So, if it were me, I'd pick a last movement, and I think the last movements of just about any great or well-known concerto would work well. (Right at this moment, I'd probably pick Mozart's D minor.) But the first movements of just about any great or well-known concerto work well enough, that's what people usually do, and it's what you'll probably want to do. Sure, listen to the Beethoven concerti, and I'd say you'd be fine picking any one of them that really grabs you. From what you say about your repertoire, I think you'd be best off staying within numbers 1-3.

You might look at the short concert pieces by Mendelssohn and Schumann. The Serenade and Allegro Giojoso by Mendelssohn is worth looking at, as it is not played too often and has a lot of fireworks without being terribly difficult.

The Warsaw Concerto, being a little snippet for a movie, makes me wish that it had been a more complete piece. SheetMusicPlus lists it as being an advanced piece.

I think that the first movement of many a standard piano concerto would function just as well as a stand-alone piece as would the last movement. In some cases, I think that the first movement would be an even better choice than the last.

It seems you might not realize that you're agreeing much more than disagreeing!