|
Welcome to the Piano World Piano Forums Over 3 million posts about pianos, digital pianos, and all types of keyboard instruments. Over 100,000 members from around the world.
Join the World's Largest Community of Piano Lovers
(it's free)
It's Fun to Play the Piano ... Please Pass It On!
|
|
72 members (accordeur, BWV846, Animisha, benkeys, Anglagard44, brdwyguy, 16 invisible),
2,323
guests, and
438
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 746
500 Post Club Member
|
OP
500 Post Club Member
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 746 |
I mistakenly tuned one of the unison strings to what I think was a fourth below pitch (the fifth dropped an octave) yesterday, and immediately knew that my next thought was a bad idea, so I did not do it--tuning one unison string on each note in the very uppermost octave to the fifth of the pitch but dropped an octave. The thought was that because of sympathetic resonance, these upper notes might add a different kind of resonance to other notes.
I do see the obvious problem--many chords and notes would sound off, and I didn't want to try it, regardless, because I didn't want to detune and then restretch the strings. But it made me wonder--have there been experiments with tuning unison strings to something other than unisons?
Last edited by Jake Jackson; 05/12/13 11:13 PM.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 2,671
2000 Post Club Member
|
2000 Post Club Member
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 2,671 |
I've always wanted to experiment with tuning one string from each unison an octave down, sort of a 12-string guitar tuning. I bet it would sound really cool once the piano stabilized and stayed put. Granted, there'd be the obvious side effects of strings being way below their tension (buzzes, probably, etc), but I still think it would be a neat thing to try.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 2,925
2000 Post Club Member
|
2000 Post Club Member
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 2,925 |
I already tried doing that. It is too confusing harmonically and, probably from the reduced tension, the piano sounds dull. It quickly became apparent that if you want an octave or a fifth above or below, just play it in the register where and when it will work musically.
I did this to the entire upper treble and a half of the lower treble at the request of a composition student hoping for a unique sound. So I don't know how the sympathetic ring of the upper treble would respond with only the top octave prepared.
"Imagine it in all its primatic colorings, its counterpart in our souls - our souls that are great pianos whose strings, of honey and of steel, the divisions of the rainbow set twanging, loosing on the air great novels of adventure!" - William Carlos Williams
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 746
500 Post Club Member
|
OP
500 Post Club Member
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 746 |
Well, my thought was just to tune the uppermost octave this way, so that the sympathetic resonance would produce the changed sound, and ideally there would not be a loss of force.
Another idea that comes to mind is creating a drone string--tuning one string on all of the uppermost octave's strings to the same pitch. It would of course limit what could be played. On the other hand, you could make the left-most string the drone string, and then use the soft pedal to remove the drone sound.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 6,714
6000 Post Club Member
|
6000 Post Club Member
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 6,714 |
If you have ever strung a piano-you will have heard what you are proposing sounds like. A string pitched many notes below it's intended frequency sounds very false and dead.
In a seemingly infinite universe-infinite human creativity is-seemingly possible. According to NASA, 93% of the earth like planets possible in the known universe have yet to be formed. Contact: toneman1@me.com
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 2,667
2000 Post Club Member
|
2000 Post Club Member
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 2,667 |
Just out of curiosity:
Would such a string, with reduced tension on the one side, not slip around the hitch-pin in due course? How much differential can the hitch-pin loop handle without slippage?
Autodidact interested in piano technology. 1970 44" Ibach, daily music maker. 1977 "Ortega" 8' + 8' harpsichord (Rainer Schütze, Heidelberg)
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 4,263
4000 Post Club Member
|
4000 Post Club Member
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 4,263 |
I've always wanted to experiment with tuning one string from each unison an octave down, sort of a 12-string guitar tuning. I bet it would sound really cool once the piano stabilized and stayed put. Well, my thought was just to tune the uppermost octave this way, so that the sympathetic resonance would produce the changed sound, and ideally there would not be a loss of force. The Blüthner Aliquot grand does this to a certain extent. From G47 to C# 65 the fourth string is tuned one octave higher than the corresponding unison. From there to the top of the register the fourth is tuned to the same frequency. Bluthner Aliquot This creates another tone body when the instrument is played, kind of similar in a way to what is being referred to here. I would think by attempting this on regular unisons will release too much tension from the bridgework and sounding board resulting in poor tonal qualities.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 746
500 Post Club Member
|
OP
500 Post Club Member
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 746 |
Remember that my original post was about tuning only one string per note in the upper octave to another pitch, so the effect would be on the sympathetic resonance. The tension is high enough at the top, even if one of the unison strings is lowered in pitch, to prevent a loss of force.
But the second idea, the separate drone string thought, yes, would create a problem with tension. The drone string would have to be pitched fairly high in the bass, I suppose. And there's the little problem of only being able to play in one or two modes unless the soft pedal was used often...
Last edited by Jake Jackson; 05/13/13 02:30 PM.
|
|
|
|
Piano
by Gino2 - 04/17/24 02:34 PM
|
Piano
by Gino2 - 04/17/24 02:23 PM
|
|
|
|
Forums43
Topics223,405
Posts3,349,434
Members111,637
|
Most Online15,252 Mar 21st, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|